{"id":286941,"date":"2023-03-17T18:00:26","date_gmt":"2023-03-17T12:30:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=286941"},"modified":"2023-03-17T15:29:27","modified_gmt":"2023-03-17T09:59:27","slug":"invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Invocation of Urgency Clause in Land Acquisition \u2014 Hazy Contours of Judicial Review"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #903; float: left; font-family: Georgia; font-size: 75px; line-height: 60px; padding-top: 4px; padding-right: 8px; padding-left: 3px;\">I<\/span>n India, the State&#8217;s power of eminent domain finds expression in two statutory enactments &#8211; the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000027868\">Land Acquisition Act, 1894<\/a><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Land Acquisition Act, 1894.\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002763211\">Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013<\/a><a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\" title=\"2. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a> (hereinafter, the old Act and the new Act respectively). While the new Act differs substantially from the old one on some important markers, namely, factors considered for computing the quantum of compensation, consent from affected people in some cases, social impact assessment, clauses on resettlement and rehabilitation, return of unutilised land, special provision with regard to food security, etc., both legislations allow the State to invoke urgency clause to bypass some important procedural safeguards and fastrack the acquisition process.<a id=\"fnref3\" href=\"#fn3\" title=\"3. As per a comparison between the scheme of the old Act and the new Act.\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Essentially, acquiring land for a public purpose in lieu of compensation to the landholders (regardless of consent on their part) is a testament to the massive coercive power wielded by the modern State. One of the important checks on this power comes in the form of procedural safeguards that are to be followed by the executive i.e. conducting a thorough Social Impact Assessment Study<a id=\"fnref4\" href=\"#fn4\" title=\"4. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as per Ss. 4-8.\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a> of the proposed piece of land for acquisition, publication of notification in the Official Gazette and newspapers, allowing objections from interested persons within 30 days of such publication<a id=\"fnref5\" href=\"#fn5\" title=\"5. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. 15.\"><sup>5<\/sup><\/a>, allowing the opportunity of being heard to such objectors, submit a comprehensive report of all these proceedings along with personal recommendations and findings to the Government.<a id=\"fnref6\" href=\"#fn6\" title=\"6. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as per S. 15.\"><sup>6<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The urgency clause appears as an antidote to bypass this elaborate procedure.<a id=\"fnref7\" href=\"#fn7\" title=\"7. Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S. 17and Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. 40.\"><sup>7<\/sup><\/a> Enquiry into the question &#8211; whether this antidote has been correctly administered by the executive or not, constitutes the sum and substance of scope of judicial review in land acquisition matters. For abundant clarity, it must be kept in mind that judicial scrutiny into validity of invocation of urgency clause only decides whether the State had good enough reason to bypass the procedural safeguards as guaranteed in the Act and does not tantamount to a verdict on legality of acquisition itself. But these procedural safeguards are not mere formal processes that can be bypassed at will. They are in fact important rights of the landholder to object to the acquisition and\/or its various aspects, at the very threshold. In a way, these procedures embody the very principles of natural justice.<a id=\"fnref8\" href=\"#fn8\" title=\"8. Anand Singh v. State of U.P., (2010) 11 SCC 242.\"><sup>8<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Time and again, the Supreme Court has underlined the importance of pre-acquisition procedures as being substantive right<a id=\"fnref9\" href=\"#fn9\" title=\"9. Hamid Ali Khan v. State of U.P., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115, para 22.\"><sup>9<\/sup><\/a> vested in the landholders and the same cannot be violated in the absence of real urgency.<a id=\"fnref10\" href=\"#fn10\" title=\"10. Radhy Shyam v. State of U.P., (2011) 5 SCC 553.\"><sup>10<\/sup><\/a> Thus, wrongful invocation of urgency clause in matters where there is no urgency, only to expedite the process of acquisition has serious repercussions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <i>Hamid Ali Khan<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i><a id=\"fnref11\" href=\"#fn11\" title=\"11. 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115.\"><sup>11<\/sup><\/a>, the Supreme Court tried its best to tread upon a tightrope in culling out the settled principles that should guide the extent of judicial scrutiny into urgency, while tacitly accepting that the unique facts of each case play an extremely crucial role in the interpretation of urgency. In the instant case, the urgency clause was invoked for the construction of a residential colony by the name of Bulandshahr Khurja Development Authority in Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh for the public at large.<a id=\"fnref12\" href=\"#fn12\" title=\"12. Hamid Ali Khan v. State of U.P., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115, para 2.\"><sup>12<\/sup><\/a> Interestingly, this judgment discloses the discussion that had taken place between the executive authorities in order to establish the necessity and urgency of land acquisition and put it in the public domain for all to analyse.<a id=\"fnref13\" href=\"#fn13\" title=\"13. Hamid Ali Khan v. State of U.P., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115, paras 24-31.\"><sup>13<\/sup><\/a> To thwart any &#8220;possibility of delay&#8221;, the urgency clause was invoked. Recording the finding that purpose of the acquisition was not exclusively housing development, the facts were distinguished from other cases to hold that no real reason was made out for urgency.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As enunciated in this very judgment, on one hand, the courts are required to have a &#8220;hands-off approach&#8221;<a id=\"fnref14\" href=\"#fn14\" title=\"14. Hamid Ali Khan v. State of U.P., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115.\"><sup>14<\/sup><\/a> in situations where the urgency clause is invoked provided there is any &#8220;relevant material on record howsoever meagre&#8221;<a id=\"fnref15\" href=\"#fn15\" title=\"15. Narayan Govind Gavate v. State of Maharashtra, (1977) 1 SCC 133.\"><sup>15<\/sup><\/a>; and on the other hand, the courts are also expected to check whether &#8220;the Government had applied its mind before forming a subjective opinion, free from extraneous considerations&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At this point, the question that begs consideration is &#8211; can the scope of judicial review then be precipitated in the form of a two-step procedure, where in the judiciary first checks the existence and relevancy of material-on-record with the executive and if satisfied on the first count, delves into finding out whether there was any real application of mind into that material?<a id=\"fnref16\" href=\"#fn16\" title=\"16. Anand Singh v. State of U.P., (2010) 11 SCC 242, para 37.\"><sup>16<\/sup><\/a> The former is an enquiry of a far more objective nature than the latter. And if the standard of judicial review is purported to be so strict, how do we reconcile it with a larger Bench decision putting forth an entirely different point of view?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The judgment in <i>Union of India<\/i> v. <i>Mohiuddin Masood<\/i><a id=\"fnref17\" href=\"#fn17\" title=\"17. (2020) 14 SCC 760.\"><sup>17<\/sup><\/a>, acquires particular relevance in this light; the same being an older 3-Judge Bench decision holding a greater binding value than <i>Hamid Ali Khan<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i><a id=\"fnref18\" href=\"#fn18\" title=\"18. 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115.\"><sup>18<\/sup><\/a> It is worth noting that the public purpose in this case, was the establishment of one Battalion Headquarter of Indo Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) at Kanpur Nagar and to this effect, urgency clause was sought to be invoked by the State for the acquisition of land. By and large, the case turns on whether there was any delay between the publication of preliminary notification<a id=\"fnref19\" href=\"#fn19\" title=\"19. Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S. 4.\"><sup>19<\/sup><\/a> and declaration of intended acquisition<a id=\"fnref20\" href=\"#fn20\" title=\"20. Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S. 6.\"><sup>20<\/sup><\/a> (three months) and &#8220;the chronological list of dates and events and the object and purpose for<span style=\"\"><\/span>which the land was sought to be acquired&#8221;<i>.<\/i> Essentially, questions like whether there existed any relevant material, what was that relevant material, and whether there was any application of mind on the part of the executive to interpret urgency from that relevant material, were never dealt with. It is almost as if the purpose itself (having to do with national security) was sufficient to establish urgency and once that decision attained finality, distinguishing the case on the basis of facts to bring it in consonance with conflicting judgments,<a id=\"fnref21\" href=\"#fn21\" title=\"21. Anand Singh v. State of U.P., (2010) 11 SCC 242.\"><sup>21<\/sup><\/a> remained only a formality. Curiously enough, no previous judgment was cited as a precedent in the instant case to supplicate their stance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In what can only qualify as obiter dicta, the Court goes on to observe that:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>5.3<\/i>. &#8230; As observed hereinabove, the total land acquired was 28.1398 hectares and other landowners have not questioned the acquisition. Therefore also, the High Court ought not to have set aside the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 respectively of the Act which were with respect to the acquisition of large chunk of land admeasuring 28.1398 hectares, which was not under challenge by the other landowners except Respondents 1 and 2 herein &#8211; original writ petitioners.<a id=\"fnref22\" href=\"#fn22\" title=\"22. Union of India v. Mohiuddin Masood, (2020) 14 SCC 760, 767.\"><sup>22<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Such callous observations of the Supreme Court grant considerable leeway to High Courts across the country to water down the scope of judicial review while deciding cases on similar facts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Having variable standards of judicial review, depending heavily on the facts of every case, leaves enough room for judicial discretion and allows for accommodating almost any viewpoint. &#8220;Distinguished on the basis of facts&#8221; seems to be the new weapon in the arsenal of the judiciary when it comes to the invocation of the urgency clause in land acquisition matters.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a not so distant future, it will be incumbent upon the Supreme Court to read these two judgments together and strive for some resolution either by limiting the scope of a two-step judicial review procedure, as envisaged in <i>Hamid Ali<\/i><a id=\"fnref23\" href=\"#fn23\" title=\"23. Hamid Ali Khan v. State of U.P., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115.\"><sup>23<\/sup><\/a>, to the peculiar facts of that case, or by carving out a separate standard of a lenient judicial review to interpret urgency clause invocation in those land acquisition matters where public purpose overlaps with national security issues. In the meantime, taking either of the two approaches will certainly add on to the complexity and already existing jurisprudence, but might take away some teeth from the third branch of governance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In view of the importance placed upon the substantive rights of the landholders by the Supreme Court itself, it is desirable to have a strict, consistent, two-step judicial review for all matters in which land is sought to be acquired urgently by the State, regardless of the public purpose or &#8220;peculiar facts&#8221; of the case. However, any such clear pronouncement from the Supreme Court is yet to come.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">* Currently working as RA to Justice Sunita Agarwal, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Graduate from National Law University, Delhi. Author can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:anamika.mishra3@gmail.com\">anamika.mishra3@gmail.com<\/a>.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/DGXMod68\">Land Acquisition Act, 1894<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Y53nZ49Z\">Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> As per a comparison between the scheme of the old Act and the new Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Y53nZ49Z\">Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as per Ss. 4-8<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn5\" href=\"#fnref5\">5.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/52C46ofD\">Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. 15<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn6\" href=\"#fnref6\">6.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/52C46ofD\">Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as per S. 15<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn7\" href=\"#fnref7\">7.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/n5R76HY9\">Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S. 17<\/a>and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/xM9dF6yC\">Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. 40<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn8\" href=\"#fnref8\">8.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/V0x54qi7\"><i>Anand Singh<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, (2010) 11 SCC 242<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn9\" href=\"#fnref9\">9.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Ew3QUfL\"><i>Hamid Ali Khan<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115, para 22<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn10\" href=\"#fnref10\">10.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/tmt9Lo3J\"><i>Radhy Shyam<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, (2011) 5 SCC 553<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn11\" href=\"#fnref11\">11.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Ew3QUfL\">2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn12\" href=\"#fnref12\">12.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Ew3QUfL\"><i>Hamid Ali Khan<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115, para 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn13\" href=\"#fnref13\">13.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Ew3QUfL\"><i>Hamid Ali Khan<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115, paras 24-31.<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn14\" href=\"#fnref14\">14.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Ew3QUfL\"><i>Hamid Ali Khan<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn15\" href=\"#fnref15\">15.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4ilj3t15\"><i>Narayan Govind Gavate<\/i> v. <i>State of Maharashtra<\/i>, (1977) 1 SCC 133<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn16\" href=\"#fnref16\">16.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/V0x54qi7\"><i>Anand Singh<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, (2010) 11 SCC 242, para 37<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn17\" href=\"#fnref17\">17.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/if5P7Jmr\">(2020) 14 SCC 760<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn18\" href=\"#fnref18\">18.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Ew3QUfL\">2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn19\" href=\"#fnref19\">19.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/di6rAM60\">Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S. 4<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn20\" href=\"#fnref20\">20.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/KLRRobTp\">Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S. 6<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn21\" href=\"#fnref21\">21.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/V0x54qi7\"><i>Anand Singh<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, (2010) 11 SCC 242<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn22\" href=\"#fnref22\">22.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/if5P7Jmr\"><i>Union of India<\/i> v. <i>Mohiuddin Masood<\/i>, (2020) 14 SCC 760, 767<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn23\" href=\"#fnref23\">23.<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Ew3QUfL\"><i>Hamid Ali Khan<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1115<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Anamika Mishra*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":287124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[2728,55972,2723,55975,55002,55973,55974,55971],"class_list":["post-286941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-compensation","tag-hands-off-approach","tag-Land_Acquisition","tag-markers","tag-namely","tag-peculiar-facts","tag-social-impact-assessment","tag-unutilised-land"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Invocation of Urgency Clause in Land Acquisition \u2014 Hazy Contours of Judicial Review | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In India, the State\u2019s power of eminent domain finds expression in two statutory enactments \u2013 the Land Acquisition Act, 1894\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Invocation of Urgency Clause in Land Acquisition \u2014 Hazy Contours of Judicial Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In India, the State\u2019s power of eminent domain finds expression in two statutory enactments \u2013 the Land Acquisition Act, 1894\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-17T12:30:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-772.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/\",\"name\":\"Invocation of Urgency Clause in Land Acquisition \u2014 Hazy Contours of Judicial Review | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-772.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-17T12:30:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In India, the State\u2019s power of eminent domain finds expression in two statutory enactments \u2013 the Land Acquisition Act, 1894\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-772.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-772.png\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Invocation of Urgency Clause in Land Acquisition \u2014 Hazy Contours of Judicial Review\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Invocation of Urgency Clause in Land Acquisition \u2014 Hazy Contours of Judicial Review | SCC Times","description":"In India, the State\u2019s power of eminent domain finds expression in two statutory enactments \u2013 the Land Acquisition Act, 1894","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Invocation of Urgency Clause in Land Acquisition \u2014 Hazy Contours of Judicial Review","og_description":"In India, the State\u2019s power of eminent domain finds expression in two statutory enactments \u2013 the Land Acquisition Act, 1894","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-03-17T12:30:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-772.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/","name":"Invocation of Urgency Clause in Land Acquisition \u2014 Hazy Contours of Judicial Review | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-772.png","datePublished":"2023-03-17T12:30:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In India, the State\u2019s power of eminent domain finds expression in two statutory enactments \u2013 the Land Acquisition Act, 1894","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-772.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-772.png","width":886,"height":590},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/invocation-of-urgency-clause-in-land-acquisition-hazy-contours-of-judicial-review\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Invocation of Urgency Clause in Land Acquisition \u2014 Hazy Contours of Judicial Review"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-772.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":321810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/10\/income-tax-on-compulsory-acquisition-under-the-nhai-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":286941,"position":0},"title":"Income Tax on Compulsory Acquisition Under the NHAI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Somesh Jain*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax on Compulsory Acquisition","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Income-Tax-on-Compulsory-Acquisition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Income-Tax-on-Compulsory-Acquisition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Income-Tax-on-Compulsory-Acquisition.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Income-Tax-on-Compulsory-Acquisition.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261766,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/15\/no-corporation-planning-authority-can-be-compelled-to-acquire-an-unusable-or-unsuitable-land-and-be-compelled-to-pay-compensation-to-land-owners-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":286941,"position":1},"title":"No Corporation\/Planning Authority can be compelled to acquire an unusable or unsuitable land and be compelled to pay compensation to landowners: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the Bombay High Court had directed Kolhapur Municipal Corporation to acquire an unusable land under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and compensate the landowners, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-82.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-82.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-82.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-82.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-82.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346334,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":286941,"position":2},"title":"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land\u2019s market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cLegislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"market value land acquisition","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271004,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/02\/ready-reckoner-price-cannot-be-basis-for-determining-for-compensation-of-land-acquisition-bsnl-bombay-high-court-supreme-court-india-legal-update-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":286941,"position":3},"title":"Ready Reckoner Price cannot be the basis for determining compensation for land acquisition: SC declares Bombay HC\u2019s decision per incuriam\u00a0\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"August 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While reversing the impugned decision of the Bombay High Court, M.R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., held that the prices mentioned in the Ready Reckoner cannot be the basis for determining compensation for the land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.\u00a0 By the instant appeal, Bharat Sanchar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":286941,"position":4},"title":"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 28, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Dismissing the present appeals filed on the issue of land acquisitions in several villages of Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar and Greater Noida, the 3 Judge Bench comprising of H.L.Dattu, C.J, A.K. Sikri and Arun Mishra, JJ., observed that the Allahabad High Court had studied the ground realities to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265647,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/land-owners-acquisition-compensation-supreme-court-legal-news-updates-research-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":286941,"position":5},"title":"Land owners cannot claim acquisition proceeding is lapsed u\/s. 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act where stay was obtained by them vide interim orders: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of M. R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., reversed the impugned judgment of Karnataka High Court holding that land owners who approach the acquisition proceedings and obtain interim orders in their favour cannot take benefit under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-135.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=286941"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286941\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/287124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=286941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=286941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=286941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}