{"id":286663,"date":"2023-03-10T09:00:53","date_gmt":"2023-03-10T03:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=286663"},"modified":"2023-03-22T17:53:15","modified_gmt":"2023-03-22T12:23:15","slug":"financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Advance paid for purchase of shares of Corporate Debtor does not fall under definition of Financial Debt: NCLT"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai:<\/b> Mr. Prabhat Kumar* (Technical Member) and Mr. Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) held that the amount of advance paid for purchase of shares of the Corporate Debtor does not fall under the definition of Financial Debt which is defined under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549784\">5(8)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">IBC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present matter, the Financial Creditor agreed to purchase 100% of share capital of the Corporate Debtor held by its Shareholders\/promoters for a consideration of Rs. 4,50,00,000\/- and paid an advance payment of Rs. 1,25,00,000 to the Corporate Debtor towards this transaction on 17-12-2014. On default of payment, the petitioner-Jushya Realty Private Limited, (the Financial Creditor) preferred a company petition under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">IBC<\/a> was preferred before the Adjudicating Authority seeking initiation of CIRP against the respondent\/Ninety Properties Private Limited, (the Corporate Debtor).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the respondent failed to provide any documents to the advisors for carrying out the due diligence as mutually agreed at the time of entering in the transaction. On the other hand, the respondent denied the existence of any transaction for sale of shares of Corporate Debtor and contended that the petitioner is not the Financial Creditor as per the Code.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Adjudicating Authority observed that from the perusal of Financial Statement of the Corporate Debtor for the year ended 31-03-2018, there is no dispute as to existence of the debt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Relying on the definition of Financial Debt under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549784\">5(8)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">IBC<\/a>, the Adjudicating Authority observed that the amount of advance paid for purchase of shares of the Corporate Debtor does not fall under the definition of Financial Debt as it was not disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money. The Adjudicating Authority further observed that such advance also does not fall within the inclusive definition part as contained in clause (a) to (i).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Adjudicating Authority opined that the petitioner is not a financial creditor in terms of S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549784\">5(7)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">IBC<\/a> as the amount in default is not a financial debt. Moreover, the present petition filed under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">IBC<\/a> is not maintainable because S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">IBC<\/a> only provides filing of an application by a Financial Creditor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner\/ Financial Creditor seeking the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Jushya Realty (P) Ltd. v. Ninety Properties (P) Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5rcz60r0\">2023 SCC OnLine NCLT 18<\/a>, decided on 03-02-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Mr. Prabhat Kumar (Technical Member)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Shyam Kapadia, Counsel for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Rohit Gupta, Counsel for the Respondent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>NCLT held that the amount of advance paid for purchase of shares of the Corporate Debtor does not fall under the definition of Financial Debt as it was not disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":286672,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[43781,30596,22814,25934,3539,12521],"class_list":["post-286663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cirp","tag-corporate-debtor","tag-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process","tag-financial-creditor","tag-National_Company_Law_Tribunal","tag-nclt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Advance paid for purchase of shares of Corporate Debtor does not fall under definition of Financial Debt: NCLT | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Mr. Prabhat Kumar* (Technical Member) and Mr. Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) held that amount of advance paid for purchase of shares\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Advance paid for purchase of shares of Corporate Debtor does not fall under definition of Financial Debt: NCLT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mr. Prabhat Kumar* (Technical Member) and Mr. Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) held that amount of advance paid for purchase of shares\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-10T03:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-03-22T12:23:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/\",\"name\":\"Advance paid for purchase of shares of Corporate Debtor does not fall under definition of Financial Debt: NCLT | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-10T03:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-22T12:23:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Mr. Prabhat Kumar* (Technical Member) and Mr. Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) held that amount of advance paid for purchase of shares\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"NCLT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Advance paid for purchase of shares of Corporate Debtor does not fall under definition of Financial Debt: NCLT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Advance paid for purchase of shares of Corporate Debtor does not fall under definition of Financial Debt: NCLT | SCC Times","description":"Mr. Prabhat Kumar* (Technical Member) and Mr. Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) held that amount of advance paid for purchase of shares","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Advance paid for purchase of shares of Corporate Debtor does not fall under definition of Financial Debt: NCLT","og_description":"Mr. Prabhat Kumar* (Technical Member) and Mr. Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) held that amount of advance paid for purchase of shares","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-03-10T03:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-03-22T12:23:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/","name":"Advance paid for purchase of shares of Corporate Debtor does not fall under definition of Financial Debt: NCLT | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png","datePublished":"2023-03-10T03:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-22T12:23:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Mr. Prabhat Kumar* (Technical Member) and Mr. Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) held that amount of advance paid for purchase of shares","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"NCLT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/financial-creditor-advance-payment-purchase-shares-corporate-debtor-not-financial-debt-section-57-nclt-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Advance paid for purchase of shares of Corporate Debtor does not fall under definition of Financial Debt: NCLT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":252205,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/03\/working-capital-and-financial-debt\/","url_meta":{"origin":286663,"position":0},"title":"NCLT Decodes | Whether working capital provided by an investor to run a restaurant would come under the ambit of Financial Debt?\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT): Coram of H.V. Subba Rao (Judicial Member) and Chandra Bhan Singh (Technical Member) held that \u2018Working Capital\u2019 provided by an investor cannot be considered as \u2018Financial Debt\u2019. Instant company petition was filed seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor alleging that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268652,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/18\/can-default-in-payment-of-instalments-under-the-settlement-agreement-be-defined-as-an-operational-debt-nclt-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":286663,"position":1},"title":"Can default in payment of instalments under the settlement agreement be defined as an operational debt? NCLT decides","author":"Editor","date":"June 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi: The bench of Abni Rajan Kumar Sinha, Judicial Member and Hemant Kumar Sarangi, Technical Member has held, that default made in payment of instalment amount as per the terms of the settlement agreement does not fall under the definition of operational debt. Facts of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Financial Creditor","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/","url_meta":{"origin":286663,"position":2},"title":"Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Rahul Poddar*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/17\/acknowledgment-of-debt\/","url_meta":{"origin":286663,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | &#8216;Balance and Security Confirmation Letter&#8217; is sufficient &#8216;acknowledgement of debt&#8217; so as to extend limitation period for initiating insolvency proceedings under S. 7 IBC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Division Bench of Justice Venugopal M. (Judicial Member) and V.P. Singh (Technical Member) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad (\"NCLT\"), whereby the NCLT had admitted an application filed by the Financial Creditor\u2212Punjab National Bank under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/27\/nclat-financial-debt-under-section-58-ibc-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":286663,"position":4},"title":"Transition between the parties should be direct to construe the debt as \u2018Financial Debt\u2019 under Section 5(8) of the IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"June 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Amount taken by the Directors of the Corporate Debtor in their personal capacity cannot be construed as \u2018Financial Debt\u2019 under S. 5(8) of the IBC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283118,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/04\/financial-creditor-application-section-7-ibc-nclt-cirp-corporate-debtor-consent-terms-breach-subsequent-application-allowed-appeal-nclat-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":286663,"position":5},"title":"Nature of Financial Debt does not change on account of breach of consent terms | NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While upholding the NCLT's order of admission of fresh application and initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, the Tribunal held that the nature of financial debt would not change on account of breach of the consent terms.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=286663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286663\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/286672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=286663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=286663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=286663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}