{"id":284157,"date":"2023-02-16T17:00:10","date_gmt":"2023-02-16T11:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=284157"},"modified":"2023-07-10T15:34:04","modified_gmt":"2023-07-10T10:04:04","slug":"eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray| SC Constitution bench reserves order on question of reference of 5-judge bench \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict to a 7-judge bench"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/b> The Constitution bench of Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, CJ., and M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha JJ., orally observed that the two nemesis of the Shiv Sena Faction in Maharashtra staking claim to power have posed a tough constitutional question which has serious ramification for the polity, as it weighed the options of referring 5-judge bench 2016 decision of Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix<\/i> v. Deputy Speaker, Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly<\/i>, (2016) 8 SCC 1<\/a> (\u2018Nabam Rabia\u2019) to a larger 7-judge bench.<\/p>\n

The court while considering the plea posed by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appearing on behalf of Uddhav Thackeray faction seeking reference of the Nabam Rabia judgment reserved its order dated 16-02-2023.<\/p>\n

“Arguments addressed only on the question of Nabam Rebia being referred to a larger bench. Orders reserved,” the Court recorded after third<\/em> consecutive day of arguments.<\/p>\n

Posing strong objection to the plea, the rival faction led by the present Chief Minister Eknath Shinde submitted that such a reference was not necessary as it was purely \u2018academic\u2019 as 16 Member of Legislative Assemblies never got to vote as Uddhav Thackeray resigned a day before the proposed floor test that was ordered on June 30 by the then Governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari.<\/p>\n

Senior advocate Harish Salve appearing on behalf of Eknath Shinde stated that Anti-defection law was not a weapon for a leader who had lost faith of his members to hang on to power. He had also stated that the Nabam Rebia verdict did not apply in the present case.<\/p>\n

The bench observed that the Nabam Rebia judgment may require some \u2018tightening\u2019 as to when a Speaker will not be allowed to take a call on disqualification pleas.<\/p>\n

[Subhash Desai v. Governor of Maharashtra, Civil Writ Petition No. 493 of 2022, matter reserved on 16-02-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

To know more about the case ALSO READ\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

*Simran Singh, Editorial Assistant summated the data.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme court while considering the plea posed by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appearing on behalf of Uddhav Thackeray faction seeking reference of the Nabam Rabia judgment reserved its order dated 16-02-2023.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":284681,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,38282],"tags":[49897,49899,55287,50888,5363],"class_list":["post-284157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-decisions-of-the-constitution-benches-of-the-supreme-court","tag-deputy-speaker","tag-eknath-shinde","tag-nabam-rebia-case","tag-reference-to-larger-bench","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nEknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray| SC Constitution bench reserves order on question of reference of 5-judge bench \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict to a 7-judge bench | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Constitution bench of Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, CJ., and M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha JJ., orally observed\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray| SC Constitution bench reserves order on question of reference of 5-judge bench \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict to a 7-judge bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Constitution bench of Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, CJ., and M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha JJ., orally observed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-02-16T11:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-10T10:04:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-468.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"name\":\"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray| SC Constitution bench reserves order on question of reference of 5-judge bench \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict to a 7-judge bench | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-468.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-16T11:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-10T10:04:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The Constitution bench of Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, CJ., and M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha JJ., orally observed\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-468.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-468.png\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"Nabam Rebia\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray| SC Constitution bench reserves order on question of reference of 5-judge bench \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict to a 7-judge bench\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray| SC Constitution bench reserves order on question of reference of 5-judge bench \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict to a 7-judge bench | SCC Times","description":"The Constitution bench of Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, CJ., and M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha JJ., orally observed","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray| SC Constitution bench reserves order on question of reference of 5-judge bench \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict to a 7-judge bench","og_description":"The Constitution bench of Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, CJ., and M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha JJ., orally observed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-02-16T11:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-10T10:04:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-468.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","name":"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray| SC Constitution bench reserves order on question of reference of 5-judge bench \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict to a 7-judge bench | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-468.png","datePublished":"2023-02-16T11:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-10T10:04:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The Constitution bench of Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, CJ., and M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha JJ., orally observed","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-468.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-468.png","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"Nabam Rebia"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackrey-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-its-order-on-the-question-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-verdict-to-a-7-judge-bench-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray| SC Constitution bench reserves order on question of reference of 5-judge bench \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict to a 7-judge bench"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-468.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":284296,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/17\/sc-constitution-bench-protracted-to-decide-on-issue-of-reference-of-5-judge-bench-nabam-rebia-to-larger-bench-will-decide-along-with-merits-of-case-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":284157,"position":0},"title":"[Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray] SC Constitution bench defers to decide on the issue of reference of 5-judge bench decision of \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 to a larger bench","author":"Editor","date":"February 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court held that the issue of whether a reference to a bench of 7 judges should be made cannot be considered in the abstract, isolated and divorced from the facts of the case. The bench to decide the issue, along with the merits of the case on 21-02-2023.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Nabam Rebia","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-561.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":283915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/14\/uddhav-thackrey-faction-seeks-a-7-judge-bench-reference-to-reconsider-5-judge-bench-decision-in-nabam-rebia-matter-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":284157,"position":1},"title":"SC Constitution Bench| Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray: Uddhav Thackeray faction seeks a 7-judge bench reference to reconsider 5-judge \u2018Nabam Rebia\u2019 verdict","author":"Editor","date":"February 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal went on to argue that the \u2018rebel\u2019 MLA's action was a misuse of the Nabam Rebia principle as this could mean that the disqualification proceedings could be stalled by merely sending a notice seeking the Speaker's removal. He placed heavy reliance on Article 179 and 181\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-467.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":287077,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/16\/eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackeray-sc-constitution-bench-reserves-judgment-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":284157,"position":2},"title":"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray | Supreme Court Constitution bench reserves judgment","author":"Editor","date":"March 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court reserves judgement in the Maharashtra political crises after hearing rigorous, head-strong arguments from both the Shiv Sena factions for more than a month.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Eknath Shinde v Uddhav Thackeray","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-757.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-757.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-757.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-757.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291833,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/11\/maharashtra-political-crisis-supreme-court-verdict-governor-inviting-bjp-backed-shinde-govt-justified-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":284157,"position":3},"title":"Maharashtra Political Crisis: SC Constitution Bench holds Governor justified in inviting Eknath Shinde to form Government; 7-judges bench to reconsider Nabam Rebia judgment","author":"Editor","date":"May 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court refused to quash Udhav Thackeray's resignation as it was submitted voluntarily before the floor test.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"maharashtra political crisis","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/maharashtra-political-crisis.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/maharashtra-political-crisis.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/maharashtra-political-crisis.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/maharashtra-political-crisis.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285776,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/01\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-in-the-month-of-february-2023-was-dominated-by-the-maharashtra-political-battle-eknath-shinde-v-uddhav-thackeray-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":284157,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court Constitution Bench February 2023| Two verdicts delivered; Maharashtra\u2019s political battle dominates hearings","author":"Editor","date":"March 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Don\u2019t miss out on the Constitution bench verdicts delivered on conducting All India Bar Examination and the issue relating to ex-communication of a person from the Dawoodi Bohra community. Judgments Delivered","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court Constitution Bench","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-582.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-582.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-582.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-582.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284725,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/21\/battle-for-shiv-sena-party-issues-for-consideration-laid-down-before-the-supreme-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":284157,"position":5},"title":"Eknath Shinde versus Uddhav Thackeray| Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal lays down issues for consideration before the Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"On the question of reference, the coram on 17-02-2023 had stated that the matter could not be decided in isolation and divorced from the facts of the case and same needed to be decided along with the merits of the case.","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-488.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-488.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-488.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-488.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284157","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=284157"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284157\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/284681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=284157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=284157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=284157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}