{"id":283959,"date":"2023-02-15T16:00:34","date_gmt":"2023-02-15T10:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=283959"},"modified":"2023-02-20T15:31:32","modified_gmt":"2023-02-20T10:01:32","slug":"ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory’; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Jharkhand High Court:<\/b> In a Second Appeal against the reversal of Trial Court’s decision in a Title Suit for partition of share and separate possession, Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. set aside the reversal of Trial Court’s decree and restored the matter to be decided afresh. The Court held that the ingredients of Section 50<\/a> of the Evidence Act, 1872<\/a> have not been fulfilled for proving the relationship of a mother and son.<\/p>\n

Understanding the facts of the present matter, a Title suit was instituted for partition of half share of the plaintiff (hereinafter ‘X’) and separate possession. The Trial Court vide judgment dated 01.10.1985 dismissed the suit and held that ‘X’ is not the son of deceased- mother since natural corollary follows that deceased died issueless. The matter was appealed before the Additional District Judge wherein, the Trial Court’s decree was modified, and ‘X’’s suit was decreed in part which held that the ’X’ was entitled to a decree of partition to the extent of half share in the suit property except a small portion of the land. The decision of Additional District Judge has been appealed against in the present matter wherein, the following questions have been raised and dealt with one by one by the Court:<\/p>\n

Question 1 – Whether the evidence of PWs 2,4 and 5 was admissible under section 50<\/a> of the Evidence Act<\/a>?<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court regarded special means of knowledge as one of the ingredients for deciding the claim of Section 50<\/a> of the Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Reliance was placed upon Dalgobinda Paricha<\/i> v. Nimai Charan Misra<\/i>, 1959 Supp (2) SCR 814<\/a> wherein, the witness possessed some special knowledge of the conduct of parties for having attended a few ceremonies, and that is where Section 50<\/a> of the Evidence Act<\/a> comes into play, as held by the Supreme Court. Referring to DW 4, who admitted to not having attended deceased’s marriage and being unknown to the birth of X, completely bereft of any special knowledge, the Court held that the said evidence did not come within the purview of section 50<\/a> of the Evidence Act<\/a>. The Court pointed out that the dispute is arising from the relationship of mother and son, and the above scenario falls akin to the evidence of three other PW No. 2, 4 and 5. It was held that the evidence of witnesses were not admissible for not having fulfilled the ingredients of section 50 of the Evidence Act.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that “there is a great risk involved in solely relying on the evidence of witnesses given from pure memory because interested witnesses normally have the tendency to draw more from their imagination, or twist and turn the facts heard from their ancestors in order to help the parties for whom they are deposing.”<\/p>\n

Question 2 – Whether ‘X’ was the son of ‘A’?<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court referred to the principles required to be considered for close connection among the persons whose pedigree is sought to be deposed as per Section 50<\/a> of the Evidence Act<\/a> and noted that the nature and character of special knowledge must be one of the parameters to consider such witnesses, one being derived under all means of special knowledge purely from imagination and that witness’s evidence must be substantially corroborated. The Court observed that since time, memory and necessary ingredients are lacking in the present matter, the documentary evidence prima facie suggests that ‘X’ was not the son of deceased.<\/p>\n

The Court set aside the appellate Court’s order of reversal of Trial Court’s decision and restored the Title appeal for deciding the matter afresh in accordance with law.<\/p>\n

[Sarbeswar Mahto v. Jagu Mahto, 2023 SCC OnLine Jhar 116<\/a>, dated 3-01-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For Appellants: Senior Advocate R.N. Sahay, Advocate Yashvardhan, Advocate Ritesh Singh, Advocate Vishnu P. Pathak, Advocate Abhishek Piyush, Advocate Aditya Aman, Advocate Rishika Kaushik;<\/p>\n

For Respondents: Advocate S.K. Sharma and Advocate R.K. Mahtha.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

While dealing with an appeal in a Title suit for partition, Jharkhand High Court considered the admissibility of disputed relationship of a mother and son through witnesses lacking ‘special means of knowledge’ as required under Section 50<\/a> of the Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":278795,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6252,5791,30967,55236,25884],"class_list":["post-283959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-evidence-act","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-second-appeal","tag-section-50-of-evidence-act","tag-title-suit"],"yoast_head":"\n'Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory'; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a Second Appeal against the reversal of Trial Court's decision in a Title Suit for partition of share and separate possession\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"'Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory'; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a Second Appeal against the reversal of Trial Court's decision in a Title Suit for partition of share and separate possession\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-02-15T10:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-02-20T10:01:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"name\":\"'Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory'; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-15T10:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-02-20T10:01:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a Second Appeal against the reversal of Trial Court's decision in a Title Suit for partition of share and separate possession\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"Jharkhand High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"‘Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory’; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"'Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory'; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court | SCC Times","description":"In a Second Appeal against the reversal of Trial Court's decision in a Title Suit for partition of share and separate possession","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"'Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory'; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court","og_description":"In a Second Appeal against the reversal of Trial Court's decision in a Title Suit for partition of share and separate possession","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-02-15T10:30:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-02-20T10:01:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","name":"'Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory'; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg","datePublished":"2023-02-15T10:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2023-02-20T10:01:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a Second Appeal against the reversal of Trial Court's decision in a Title Suit for partition of share and separate possession","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"Jharkhand High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/ingredients-of-section-50-of-evidence-act-not-satisfied-jharkhand-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"‘Great risk involved in witnesses evidence based on pure memory’; Ingredients of Section 50 of Evidence Act not satisfied: Jharkhand High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":221606,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/chh-hc-affidavit-filed-under-or-18-r-4-cpc-is-not-evidence-within-s-3-of-evidence-act-unless-deponent-is-subjected-to-cross-examination\/","url_meta":{"origin":283959,"position":0},"title":"Chh HC | Affidavit filed under Or. 18 R. 4 CPC is not “evidence” within S. 3 of Evidence Act unless deponent is subjected to cross-examination","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Sanjay K. Agrawal, J., allowed a second appeal against the order of the trial court as well as the First Appellate Court whereby the suit brought by the plaintiffs (respondents herein) for declaration of title, permanent injunction, partition and possession of the suit property was decreed. It is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":246132,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/26\/immovable-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":283959,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Immovable property which is compulsorily registrable under S. 49 of Indian Registration Act, 1908 may be taken as evidence for the purpose of collateral transaction","author":"Editor","date":"March 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Hemant Chandangoudar, J. allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order. The facts of the case are such that the plaintiffs in the original suit filed an application for partition and separate possession of their legitimate share. The defendants therein sought to produce an unregistered partition deed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":246394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/02\/partition-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":283959,"position":2},"title":"Madras HC | Daughters filed partition suit while disowning their registered release deed. As per S. 92 of Evidence Act, burden to adduce evidence sufficient to exclude written evidence will be on the daughters? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G. Jayachandran, J., the instant suit was filed with regard to the relief of partition and permanent injunction from alienating or encumbering the suit property. Instant suit was filed for partition by daughters of Late Palanisamy Gounder against his sons was dismissed by the trial court while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":284131,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/jharkhand-high-court-acknowledges-custom-of-adoption-in-santhal-community-upheld-the-decision-of-trial-and-appellate-courts-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":283959,"position":3},"title":"Jharkhand High Court acknowledges customary provision for adoption of child in Santhal Community","author":"Editor","date":"February 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court refused to disturb the findings of Trial Court and Appellate Court in a title suit for succession by an adopted son, whose adoption was questioned on the ground of customary provisions of Santhals.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":286641,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/09\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-the-limited-scope-of-the-appellate-courts-in-remanding-back-the-matter-for-a-de-novo-trial\/","url_meta":{"origin":283959,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court emphasises on Appellate Courts\u2019 limited scope in remanding back the matter for a de novo trial","author":"Editor","date":"March 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The remand in the present case could only be correlated with Rule 23-A of Order XLI CPC and for its applicability, the necessary requirements were that \u201cthe decree is reversed in appeal and a re-trial is considered necessary\u201d, thus, the Supreme Court held that the remand in the present case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-683.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-683.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-683.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-683.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255954,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/22\/second-appeal-is-maintainable-if-only-the-case-involves-a-substantial-question-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":283959,"position":5},"title":"Sikk HC | Second appeal is maintainable if only the case involves a substantial question of law; Court dismisses appeal","author":"Editor","date":"October 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J., dismissed the second appeal explaining that the second appeal is maintainable before the High Court if the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law. Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin, (2012) 8 SCC 148,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=283959"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283959\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278795"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=283959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=283959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=283959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}