{"id":283778,"date":"2023-02-13T10:00:47","date_gmt":"2023-02-13T04:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=283778"},"modified":"2023-02-13T09:57:33","modified_gmt":"2023-02-13T04:27:33","slug":"2023-scc-vol-2-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> — S. 11<\/a> — Res judicata — Applicability:<\/span> Findings on issue(s) which actually fell for consideration in the previous proceedings alone can operate as res judicata. [Anil Kumar Modi<\/i> v. Tarsem Kumar Gupta<\/i>, (2023) 2 SCC 201<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Constitution of India<\/a> — Pts. III and IV-A — Government\/Government-aided schools and educational institutions:<\/span> Matter of prohibition on wearing of hijab or headscarf by Muslim girl students in Government\/Government-aided schools and educational institutions, referred to larger Bench. [Aishat Shifa (Hijab Case-2 J.)<\/i> v. State of Karnataka<\/i>, (2023) 2 SCC 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> — S. 482<\/a> — Quashment of proceedings:<\/span> Principles summarized regarding when quashment of proceedings is warranted. [R. Nagender Yadav<\/i> v. State of Telangana<\/i>, (2023) 2 SCC 195<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923<\/a> — Ss. 3<\/a>, 4<\/a>, 10<\/a> and 30(1)<\/a> — Compensation — Computation:<\/span> for computation of compensation, it is necessary to estimate functional disability and not just physical disability. [Chandramma<\/i> v. NCC Ltd.<\/i>, (2023) 2 SCC 144<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Energy, Power and Electricity — Electricity — Tariff — Determination or Fixation\/Review\/Concession\/Exemption\/Incentive\/Rebate\/Subsidy\/Surcharge\/Slabrates\/Security deposit — Incentives for new industrial units from payment of enhanced power tariff for five years from commencement of commercial production:<\/span> In this case, there was claim for incentive from date of energisation on ground of parity with another industrial unit. High Court granted remedy when it was specifically brought to its knowledge that benefit so granted to another industrial unit was withdrawn. It was held that the said order was not sustainable. What does not emerge out of exemption notification cannot be granted. [Kerala SEB Ltd.<\/i> v. Rubfila International Ltd.<\/i>, (2023) 2 SCC 187<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Evidence Act, 1872<\/a> — Ss. 32(1)<\/a> and 157<\/a>:<\/span> In this case, Executive Magistrate recorded statement of injured prosecution witness assaulted by accused persons, in the form of dying declaration, however, aforesaid witness surviving such assault. In view of S. 157, so-called dying declaration can be treated as a former statement made by such witness and, therefore, same can be used for contradicting witness. [Ramcharan<\/i> v. State of M.P.<\/i>, (2023) 2 SCC 163<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> — Ss. 238-A<\/a> and 9<\/a> — Non-consideration of developed law on the applicability of S. 18 of the Limitation Act to IBC proceedings:<\/span> Effect of non-consideration of developed law on the applicability of S. 18 of the Limitation Act to IBC proceedings, explained. [SVG Fashions (P) Ltd.<\/i> v. Ritu Murli Manohar Goyal<\/i>, (2023) 2 SCC 205<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013<\/a> — S. 24(2)<\/a>:<\/span> Lapse of acquisition proceedings is not occasioned where acquisition proceedings were subject-matter of litigation and because of that authority could not take possession of lands in question. [LAO<\/i> v. Suresh B. Kapur<\/i>, (2023) 2 SCC 155<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002<\/a> — Ss. 17<\/a> and 18<\/a> r\/w Ss. 13(2)<\/a> and 13(4)<\/a>:<\/span> Invocation of writ jurisdiction, against the order of Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissing application of respondent borrower is not permissible. Proper remedy thereagainst is that of appeal provided under S. 18 of the 2002 Act. [Varimadugu Obi Reddy<\/i> v. B. Sreenivasulu<\/i>, (2023) 2 SCC 168<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 11 — Res judicata — Applicability: Findings on issue(s) which actually fell for consideration in the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":283780,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[8331,7601,3634,55145,55146,24144],"class_list":["post-283778","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-educational_institutions","tag-executive-magistrate","tag-government-aided-schools","tag-limitation-act"],"yoast_head":"\n2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability: Findings on issue(s) which actually fell for consideration\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability: Findings on issue(s) which actually fell for consideration\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-02-13T04:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\",\"name\":\"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-13T04:30:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability: Findings on issue(s) which actually fell for consideration\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1 | SCC Times","description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability: Findings on issue(s) which actually fell for consideration","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1","og_description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability: Findings on issue(s) which actually fell for consideration","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-02-13T04:30:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","name":"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg","datePublished":"2023-02-13T04:30:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability: Findings on issue(s) which actually fell for consideration","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":212750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/all-hc-order-dismissing-first-writ-petition-operates-as-res-judicata-second-petition-on-same-facts-not-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":283778,"position":0},"title":"All HC | Order dismissing first writ petition operates as res judicata; second petition on same facts not allowed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: This writ petition was filed before a Divison Bench of Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal and Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., for issuance of direction to respondent to consider the claim of petitioners for providing compensation in lieu of acquisition of plot situated in Village Pratap Patti District Varanasi\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276357,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/2022-scc-vol-9-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":283778,"position":1},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2","author":"Editor","date":"October 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 31(7) and Ss. 17, 21, 23(3), 24(1), 25, 26, 29 and 85(2)(a) \u2014 Party autonomy \u2014 Emphasis on, under the 1996 Act: The phrase \u201cunless otherwise agreed by the parties\u201d used in various sections, namely, 17, 21, 23(3), 24(1), 25, 26,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-188-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-188-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-188-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-188-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-188-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254708,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/25\/explained-res-judicata-question-of-fact-or-law-or-mixed-question-of-law-and-fact-can-it-be-decided-as-a-preliminary-issue\/","url_meta":{"origin":283778,"position":2},"title":"Explained| Res judicata: Question of fact or law or mixed question of law and fact? Can it be decided as a preliminary issue?","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an important ruling on Res Judicata, the 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Vikram Nath and Hima Kohli, JJ has held that the issues that arise in a subsequent suit may either be questions of fact or of law or mixed questions of law and fact. \"Issues\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331700,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":283778,"position":3},"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability between co-defendants \u2014 Conditions","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/12\/chhattisgarh-high-court-res-judicata-section11-code-of-civil-procedure-possession-landlord-tenant-directly-and-substantially-in-issue-heard-and-finally-decided-former-suit-subsequent-suit-title-a\/","url_meta":{"origin":283778,"position":4},"title":"Chhattisgarh High Court remands suit back to the Trial Court; Observes suit is not barred by Res Judicata and must be decided on merits","author":"Editor","date":"September 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: In an appeal against the decision of Trial Court of dismissing the suit mainly on the ground that the suit preferred by the appellant was barred under the provisions of Section 11 Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (CPC), Arvind Singh Chandel, J. has observed that the suit preferred\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330883,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/17\/2024-scc-vol-7-part-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":283778,"position":5},"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 7 Part 3","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 141 and 142 \u2014 What is binding \u2014 \u201cLaw declared by Supreme Court\u201d \u2014 Doctrine of merger","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2024 SCC Vol. 7 Part 3","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-7-Part-3.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-7-Part-3.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-7-Part-3.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-7-Part-3.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=283778"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283778\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/283780"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=283778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=283778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=283778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}