{"id":283631,"date":"2023-02-10T17:00:24","date_gmt":"2023-02-10T11:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=283631"},"modified":"2023-02-17T10:58:10","modified_gmt":"2023-02-17T05:28:10","slug":"burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"When evidence unambiguously proves the guilt, absence of motive cannot weaken the conclusions: Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Supreme Court of India:<\/b> In a criminal appeal challenging the High Court&#8217;s confirmation of the Trial Court&#8217;s conviction and sentencing, the division bench of <b>Dinesh Maheshwari*<\/b> and Sudhanshu Dhulia, JJ. dismissed the same, and held that the prosecution&#8217;s case is amply established by cogent and convincing chain of circumstances pointing only towards the appellant&#8217;s guilt, who caused the death of victim children, his sons, by strangulation and also caused the evidence of offence to disappear by throwing the dead bodies into the canal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial Court had passed a judgment of conviction and order of sentence against the appellant, holding him guilty of offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\">302<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\">201<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> for strangulating his sons aged 6 and 9 years, throwing their bodies into the canal and projecting the same as accidental drowning. Trial Court&#8217;s decision was confirmed by the High Court during appeal. Challenging the concurrent findings of Trial Court and High Court before the Supreme Court through the present appeal, the appellant pointed towards the unsupported story of strained relationship with wife, lack of motive to kill own sons and omission to examine appellant&#8217;s mental capacity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <i>Pappu<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, for determining the matters to be examined in a Special Leave under Article 136 of Constitution of India wherein, it was held that only findings calling for interference may be reappreciated to prevent grave or serious miscarriage of justice. The principles related to circumstantial evidence, burden of explanation, hostile witnesses and motive were discussed in accordance with the facts of the present matter through <i>Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra<\/i>, for establishment of facts through circumstantial evidence including false defense.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While taking note of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516684\">106<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>, the Court referred to <i>Trimukh Maroti Kirkan<\/i> v. <i>State of Maharashtra<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Yz6i6QpT\">(2006) 10 SCC 681<\/a>, <i>Sudru<\/i> v. <i>State of Chhattisgarh<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4AqzSn7x\">(2019) 8 SCC 333<\/a> and <i>Sabitri Samantaray<\/i> v. <i>State of Odisha<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/178BhQLd\">2022 SCC OnLine SC 673<\/a> for principle to be followed in case of false explanation by the accused and his burden of proof. The Court also referred to <i>Anwar Ali<\/i> v. <i>State of H.P.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/oS0ele7w\">(2020) 10 SCC 166<\/a> for principles enunciated regarding relevancy of motive.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench found no substance in the appellant&#8217;s contentions against the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and High Court. Based on evidence on record and surrounding factors, the Court was satisfied with the establishment of a chain of circumstances under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516684\">106<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\">Evidence Act<\/a> operating heavily against the appellant. The Court held that the motive not being proved cannot displace or weaken the conclusions naturally flowing from the evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the law mandates the Courts to presume absence of circumstances for bringing the case within any of the General Exceptions in IPC, and that nothing in the present case shows the appellant being medically treated as a person of unsound mind.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court reiterated that &#8220;the burden of proving the existence of circumstances, so as to bring the case within the purview of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561905\">84<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> lies on the accused in terms of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516683\">105<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\">Evidence Act<\/a>; and if the accused is charged of murder, the burden to prove that as a result of unsoundness of mind, the incapability of knowing the consequences of his acts ,are on the defense, as duly exemplified by illustration (a) to the said Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516683\">105<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\">Evidence Act<\/a>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court viewed that the appellant was neither suffering from any medically determined mental illness nor could be said to be a person under a legal disability of unsound mind. Hence, neither Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561905\">84<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> applies to the present case nor Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519607\">329<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">CrPC<\/a> would come to the rescue of the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench concluded that there was no infirmity in the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and High Court. It refused to give benefit of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561905\">84<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> or Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519607\">329<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> or interfere in the present matter and therefore dismissed the present appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Prem Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/TMI5ym2H\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 2<\/a> , decided on 2-01-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by: Justice Dinesh Maheshwari<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For Appellant: Advocate on Record Nidhi, Advocate Shikil Shiv Suri, Advocate Madhu Suri, Advocate Jyoti Suri, Advocate Mahima Aggarwal, Advocate Komal Gupta, Advocate Nikita Thapar, Advocate Vinishma Kaul, Advocate Shilpa Saini;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For Respondent: Advocate on Record Shubhranshu Padhi, Advocate Vishal Banshal, Advocate Rajeshwari Shankar, Advocate Niroop Sukirthy, Advocate Mohd Ovais, Advocate Ashish Yadav, Advocate Rakshit Jain, Advocate on Record Munawwar Naseem, Advocate Dhaval Nanavati, Advocate Ruchi Khurana, Advocate Sanjna Dua, Advocate on Record Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate Rahul Chitnis.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>The Supreme Court refused to grant the benefit of General Exception of unsoundness of mind under IPC in favour of the appellant, since he failed to discharge his burden of proof.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":283659,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[3468,31096,54817,55130,5363,34169,30821],"class_list":["post-283631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-conviction","tag-criminal-appeal","tag-murder-case","tag-person-of-unsound-mind","tag-supreme-court","tag-supreme-court-of-india","tag-unsoundness-of-mind"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>When evidence unambiguously proves the guilt, absence of motive cannot weaken the conclusions: Supreme Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a criminal appeal challenging the High Court&#039;s confirmation of the Trial Court&#039;s conviction and sentencing, the division bench\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When evidence unambiguously proves the guilt, absence of motive cannot weaken the conclusions: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a criminal appeal challenging the High Court&#039;s confirmation of the Trial Court&#039;s conviction and sentencing, the division bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-02-10T11:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-02-17T05:28:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-356.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"name\":\"When evidence unambiguously proves the guilt, absence of motive cannot weaken the conclusions: Supreme Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-356.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-10T11:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-02-17T05:28:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a criminal appeal challenging the High Court's confirmation of the Trial Court's conviction and sentencing, the division bench\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-356.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-356.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When evidence unambiguously proves the guilt, absence of motive cannot weaken the conclusions: Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When evidence unambiguously proves the guilt, absence of motive cannot weaken the conclusions: Supreme Court | SCC Times","description":"In a criminal appeal challenging the High Court's confirmation of the Trial Court's conviction and sentencing, the division bench","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When evidence unambiguously proves the guilt, absence of motive cannot weaken the conclusions: Supreme Court","og_description":"In a criminal appeal challenging the High Court's confirmation of the Trial Court's conviction and sentencing, the division bench","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-02-10T11:30:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-02-17T05:28:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-356.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","name":"When evidence unambiguously proves the guilt, absence of motive cannot weaken the conclusions: Supreme Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-356.jpg","datePublished":"2023-02-10T11:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2023-02-17T05:28:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a criminal appeal challenging the High Court's confirmation of the Trial Court's conviction and sentencing, the division bench","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-356.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-356.jpg","width":390,"height":310},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/burden-of-proof-under-section-84-ipc-lies-with-accused-supreme-court-dismisses-appeal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When evidence unambiguously proves the guilt, absence of motive cannot weaken the conclusions: Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-356.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282178,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/supreme-court-sets-aside-madras-high-courts-sentence-in-section-138-ni-act-modifies-decree\/","url_meta":{"origin":283631,"position":0},"title":"Section 138 NI Act| Supreme Court sets aside Madras High Court&#8217;s reversal of acquittal in a cheque bouncing case","author":"Editor","date":"January 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that the scope of interference in an appeal against acquittal is limited and that the Madras High Court \u2018could not have interfered with the finding of acquittal recorded by the learned Trial Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-164.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":295300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/23\/circumstantial-evidence-links-in-a-chain-must-be-complete-in-all-aspects-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":283631,"position":1},"title":"Chain of Circumstantial evidence must be complete in all aspects to indicate guilt of accused: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court was of the view that the High Court ought to have interfered with the conviction when it found one of the links in circumstantial evidence missing and not proved, respecting the settled law in this regard.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"circumstantial evidence links in a chain","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/circumstantial-evidence-links-in-a-chain.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/circumstantial-evidence-links-in-a-chain.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/circumstantial-evidence-links-in-a-chain.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/circumstantial-evidence-links-in-a-chain.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297192,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/19\/conviction-based-circumstantial-evidence-vouch-commitment-accused-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":283631,"position":2},"title":"\u201cTo clinch a conviction, circumstances ought to form a chain to indicate that the accused and no one else committed the crime\u201d: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The instant matter related to a person killed while he was travelling with his group on scooter, allegedly by constables patrolling the village, which was investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (\u2018CBI\u2019).","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"conviction based on circumstantial evidence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/conviction-based-on-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/conviction-based-on-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/conviction-based-on-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/conviction-based-on-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/supreme-court-remarks-judgment-by-chhattisgarh-high-court-as-sketchy-acquits-murder-convict-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":283631,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court finds Chhattisgarh High Court&#8217;s judgment \u2018Sketchy\u2019; Acquits murder convict in a 20-year-old case","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the cherished principles or golden threads of proof beyond reasonable doubt which runs through the web of our law should not be stretched morbidly which was done by the Courts below.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sketchy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/09\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts-as-prosecution-failed-to-prove-incriminating-circumstances-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":283631,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Prosecution utterly failed to prove incriminating circumstances beyond reasonable doubt\u2019; SC acquits three murder convicts","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court said that the evidence regarding the last seen theory was totally unreliable and the evidence regarding the Call Detail Records also did not inspire any confidence.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sc acquits murder convicts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sc-acquits-murder-convicts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205896,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/conviction-under-section-302-ipc-upheld-on-finding-incident-to-be-not-at-spur-of-moment\/","url_meta":{"origin":283631,"position":5},"title":"Conviction under Section 302 IPC upheld on finding incident to be not at spur of moment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and M.R. Shah, JJ. dismissed an appeal arising out of Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment, while altering the conviction and sentence awarded under Sections 304 Part II IPC to that of under Section 302 IPC. The factual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=283631"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283631\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/283659"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=283631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=283631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=283631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}