{"id":282971,"date":"2023-02-02T17:00:37","date_gmt":"2023-02-02T11:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=282971"},"modified":"2023-02-02T16:41:18","modified_gmt":"2023-02-02T11:11:18","slug":"tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY (ATE)<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance; Appellate Tribunal for Electricity sets aside the order<\/p>\n<p>A division bench of Ramesh Ranganathan (Chairperson) and Sandesh Kumar Sharma (Technical Member) set aside the order passed by Secretary, Bureau of Energy Efficiency (&#8216;Bureau&#8217;) and held that since the first test report was deficient, inconsistent with the set standards and conducted without proper notice, it did not stand legal scrutiny, thus, directed to treat the second test report as the first test report with certain directions. Depending upon the result of further investigation, the Tribunal granted the Bureau the permission to act against Whirlpool of India Limited (&#8216;appellant&#8217;) in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/16\/whirlpool-india-limited-appeal-against-order-of-bureau-of-energy-efficiency-regarding-5-star-rating-on-refrigerator-models-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (CAT)<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">[DSSSB] CAT, Delhi directs State to constitute an expert body to examine the Answer Key for question paper for the post of Librarian<\/p>\n<p>In an original application filed by the applicant seeking to quash the answer key for Questions No. 103, 124, 129, 139, 141, 147, 153, 154, 156, 161, 164, 182 &amp; 197 for Question Paper for Post of Librarian used by Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) as incorrect and consequent result and appointments based on such impugned question paper as incorrect and the answer Key and to further direct the State to constitute an Independent Expert Body to examine the Answer Key and submit a report as to whether the impugned Answer Key used by DSSSB for all impugned questions is incorrect or not, Ashish Kalia, J., (Member) and Chhabilendra Roul, A., (Member) directed the State to constitute an expert body to examine the Answer Key for Question Paper for the post of Librarian and submit the copy of the report to the applicant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/central-administrative-tribunal-cat-delhi-directs-government-of-delhi-gnctd-constitution-expert-body-examine-question-paper-answer-key-librarian-legalnews-legalresearch\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (CERC)<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">CERC| Imposition of Safeguard Duty on import is a &#8216;Change in Law&#8217; event in Power Purchase Agreement<\/p>\n<p>In a combined petition seeking declaration of imposition of safeguard duty on import of solar panels\/modules as a &#8216;Change in Law&#8217; event under the Power Purchase Agreement (&#8216;PPA&#8217;), the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (&#8216;CERC&#8217;) accepted the claim. The CERC Coram consisting of I.S. Jha, Arun Goyal and P.K. Singh granted relief over imposition of safeguard duty on the import of solar panels\/modules holding the same as a &#8216;Change in Law&#8217; event. The Commission also relieved the petitioners with respect to carrying cost during the specified period.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/25\/cerc-imposition-of-safeguard-duty-on-import-a-change-in-law-event-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">CUSTOMS EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CESTAT)<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8216;Commissioner ought to have followed Supreme Court&#8217;s Ranbaxy Laboratories verdict&#8217;; CESTAT grants interest on delayed sanction of Refund claim under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules<\/p>\n<p>In a service tax appeal filed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) Raigad (&#8216;The Commissioner&#8217;), which rejected the appeal filed by the appellant which had stated that the appellant shall not be eligible for interest on delay in sanction of refund, filed under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the bench of Ajay Sharma (Judicial Member), while allowing the appeal filed by the appellant held that refund under Rule 5 also being a refund under section 11B would squarely fall within the ambit of Section 11BB and interest is payable in case of delay in sanctioning the refund under Rule 5.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/03\/refund-under-rule-5-refund-under-section-11b-within-ambit-section-bb-interest-payable-delay-sanctioning-refund-under-rule-5-legal-new-legal-research-updates-cestat-cenvat-credit-rules\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Service tax not payable for &#8216;deemed sales&#8217;; CESTAT sets aside the order passed by the Commissioner LTU, Delhi<\/p>\n<p>The division bench of Dilip Gupta, (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical member) sets aside the order passed by the Commissioner LTU (Audit), New Delhi which confirmed the demand of service tax with interest and penalty for the reason that the appellant had received &#8216;supply of tangible goods for use&#8217; (&#8216;STGU&#8217;) service from foreign suppliers, for which service tax was to be paid by the appellant under reverse charge mechanism and held that service tax can&#8217;t be levied in transactions where the &#8216;right to use&#8217; had been transferred along with the &#8216;possession and effective control&#8217; of the machinery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/05\/service-tax-not-payable-for-deemed-sales-for-import-transactions-holds-cestat-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Cancelled Flat Bookings amount to non-performance of service; CESTAT directs Authorities to refund service tax to Builder<\/p>\n<p>While dealing with the issue whether service tax should be refunded back to Credence Property Developers Pvt. Ltd. (&#8216;appellant&#8217;) after the cancellation of two flats booked by the buyers, Ajay Sharma (Judicial Member) held that the Commissioner (Appeals-III), GST and Central Excise, Mumbai (&#8216;Adjudicating Authority&#8217;) was not justified in denying the refund and allowed the appeal preferred by the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/17\/service-tax-to-be-refunded-for-cancelled-flat-bookings-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (CIC)<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Information under section 2(f) refers to material already available with public authorities; CIC reiterates<\/p>\n<p>The complainant being dissatisfied with the information being provided by the Public Information Officer (&#8216;PIO&#8217;), filed a second appeal under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001541425\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760680\">Right to Information Act, 2005<\/a>  (&#8216;RTI Act&#8217;) on the grounds of disclosure of incorrect information before the Central Information Commission (&#8216;The Commission&#8217;) wherein the Information Commissioner, Heeralal Samariya held that&#8220; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8216;information&#8217; as defined in the section<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001541426\">2(f)<\/a>  of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760680\">RTI Act<\/a> , only refers to such material as is already available in the records of the public authority.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/05\/information-defined-section-2f-rti-act-refers-material-already-available-records-public-authority-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (NCLAT)<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NCLAT sets aside clean chit to DLF in allegations of abuse of dominant position case; CCI to hear matter afresh<\/p>\n<p>A bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar*, J., and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra (Technical Member) set aside the impugned order passed by Competition Commission of India (CCI) rejecting a complaint against DLF and its subsidiary for alleged abuse of the dominant position based on a second\/supplementary report from Director General (DG) and directed to examine the matter with fresh consideration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/04\/nclat-cci-competition-act-2002-competition-commission-india-dlf-trade-legal-research-news-updates-buyer-seller-dlf\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Whether CoC after approval a Resolution Plan can seek direction to consider a new Resolution Plan of a third party who was not a part of the CIRP Proceedings? NCLAT answers<\/p>\n<p>A bench consisting of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)<\/span> held that once the Resolution Plan is submitted for approval before the Adjudicating Authority, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), unless there is any material irregularity or the same is against S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549763\">30(2)<\/a>  of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> .<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/04\/whether-coc-after-approval-a-resolution-plan-can-seek-direction-to-consider-a-new-resolution-plan-of-a-third-party-who-was-not-a-part-of-the-cirp-proceedings-nclat-answers\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NCLAT | Date of default cannot be strictly construed as the date of Non-Performing Assets<\/p>\n<p>While deciding an application filed under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\">7<\/a>  of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> , a bench comprising of Anant Bijay Singh, J. and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member) held that the &#8216;date of default&#8217; cannot be strictly construed as the date of NPA and if the Corporate Debtor makes any acknowledgement of debt and default within the period of limitation, the said period of limitation shall be extended to a further period of three years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-nclat-corporate-debtor-debt-application-section7-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-rejected-limitation-barred-by-limitation\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant<\/p>\n<p>While deciding the appeal, the bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Ms. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), held that once the resolution Plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and the successful resolution applicant, unless there is any material irregularity or is against the provisions of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549763\">30(2)<\/a>  of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> , the Adjudicating Authority cannot interfere in its limited jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">No inconsistency between Section 33 IBC and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001517116\">11-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002913364\">Central Excise Act, 1944<\/a>; NCLAT partly allows appeal<\/p>\n<p>Partly allowing the appeal, a bench comprising of Ashok Bhushan*, J., Dr. Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) and Barun Mitra (Technical Member) held that there is no inconsistency between S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001517116\">11-B<\/a>  of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002913364\">Central Excise Act, 1944<\/a>  and S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549766\">33(5)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">IBC<\/a>  and the respondent is only entitled for the refund of the amount of Rs.25,46,588\/- and not of the amount of Rs.1,08,797\/-.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/07\/corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-corporate-debtor-liquidation-refund-allowed-appeal-partly-allowed-no-inconsistency-s-11b-of-the-central-excise-act-1944-s-335-ibc\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NCLAT sets aside Section 7 IBC application; lets Section 9 application run its due course<\/p>\n<p>By way of six connected appeals filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549797\">61<\/a>  of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a>  (&#8216;IBC&#8217;) against the order passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad bench (&#8216;NCLT&#8217;), which closed the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (&#8216;CIRP&#8217;) against the corporate debtor Sintex Plastics Technology Ltd. (&#8216;Sintex Plastics&#8217;), a division bench of Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) set aside the application of withdrawal of Section 9 and consequently let CIRP run its course under the provisions of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (&#8216;IBC&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/07\/nclat-sets-aside-application-of-withdrawal-of-section-9-of-ibc-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NCLAT cannot direct modifications of claims once the Resolution Plan is approved<\/p>\n<p>A bench consisting of Anant Bijay Singh, J. and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)<\/span> held that the Tribunal does not have residual equity-based jurisdiction to direct modifications of claims once the Resolution plan is approved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/09\/corporate-debtor-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-resolution-plan-coc-approved-nclt-allowed-appeal-nclat-commercial-wisdom-dismissed\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Adjudicating Authority is obligated to give direction for liquidation only when CoC&#8217;s decision is in accordance with IBC: NCLAT<\/p>\n<p>A bench consisting of Ashok Bhushan*, J. and Shreesha Merla (Technical Member) held that the obligation of the Adjudicating Authority to direct for liquidation shall rise only when decision of the CoC is in accordance with the IBC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/corporate-debtor-default-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-coc-liquidation-nclt-reconsider-liquidation-appeal-nclat-upheld\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of &#8377; 936 crore penalty<\/p>\n<p>While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India&#8217;s (CCI) order imposing a penalty of &#8377; 936.44 crore on the appellant, Google for abusing its dominant position through its Play Store policies, a bench consisting of Rakesh Kumar, J., and Dr. Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) refused to grant interim relief to the appellant regarding the status quo to remain till the appeal is finally heard.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Strong reason required to keep the application in abeyance; NCLAT dismisses appeal finding no error in Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order<\/p>\n<p>In an appeal filed by the appellant, an ex-Promoter of the Corporate Debtor challenging the order by the Adjudicating Authority, NCLT, a bench comprising of Ashok Bhushan*, J., and Barun Mitra (Technical Member) held that the Adjudicating Authority has not committed any error in rejecting the appellant&#8217;s application praying to keep the respondent&#8217;s application in abeyance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/corporate-debtor-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-resolution-professional-resolution-plan-coc-approved-settlement-plan-nclt-application-section-a-rejected-nclat-appeal-no-error-dismissed\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to &#8216;Interest other than interest on securities&#8217;: NCLAT observes<\/p>\n<p>Dismissing the appeal, the bench comprising of Ashok Bhushan*, J. and Barun Mitra (Technical Member) held that there is no error in the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority and materials on record fully proved the ingredients of financial debt, thus establishing that there was loan agreement between the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NCLAT| After closure of Challenge Process and consequent receipt of resolution plan, Adjudicating Authority cannot direct consideration of the revised plan submitted thereafter<\/p>\n<p>While deciding the appeal, Ashok Bhushan J., and Barun Mitra (Technical Member), held that the Adjudicating Authority cannot interfere with the decision of CoC to vote on the resolution plan as it is the wisdom of CoC to take a decision in this regard.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/24\/after-closure-of-challenge-process-and-consequent-receipt-of-resolution-plan-the-adjudicating-authority-cannotdirect-consideration-of-the-revised-plan-submitted-thereafter\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Successful Auction Purchaser can withdraw from e-Auction; NCLAT upheld refund of EMD and first instalment<\/p>\n<p>While partly allowing the appeal, a bench comprising of Ashok Bhushan*, J. and Barun Mitra (Technical Member) held that after attachment of the assets of the corporate debtor under PMLA Act, the Successful Auction Purchaser is not required to deposit the entire sale amount and the Adjudicating Authority can order for refund of EMD and first instalment but without interest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/25\/liquidation-e-auction-successful-auction-purchaser-due-amount-attachment-assets-corporate-debtor-nclt-allowed-withdraw-return-instalment-nclat-partly-allowed-appeal\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (NGT)<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Can lease be cancelled on the ground of ecological repercussion? NGT to determine the scope of its jurisdiction<\/p>\n<p>The bench of Dinesh Kumar Singh and Dr. Vijay Kulkarni, JJ has agreed to hear the matter relating to National Green Tribunal&#8217;s (NGT) jurisdiction to decide if the lease granted to salt industries can be cancelled on the ground of ecological repercussion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/01\/national-green-tribunal-ecological-lease-cancellation-environment-protection-clearance-jurisdiction-legal-news-updates-research\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NGT: Petrol Pump near Veeranam Lake doesn&#8217;t violate CPCB&#8217;s 50 Meter guideline<\/p>\n<p>The bench of Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J (Judicial Member) and Dr Satyagopal Korlapati (Expert Member), Southern Bench, has dismissed the application against the proposed petrol pump located within 50 meters from the Veeranam Lake citing compliance to the guidelines of CPCB.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/05\/national-green-tribunal-ecologically-important-veeranam-lake-petrol-pump-vapor-recovery-system-indian-oil-corporation\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NGT stays Notification of Ministry delegating the appraisal of Impact Assessment to Local Bodies<\/p>\n<p>The Bench of Adarsh Kumar Goel, Sudhir Agarwal, Arun Kumar Tyagi, JJ and Prof. A. Senthil Vel (Expert Member), Principal Bench, disposed of the application and sustained the stay on the notification modifying the EIA regime in respect of construction projects with built up area more than 20,000 sq. meters to 50, 000 sq. meters and industrial sheds, educational institutions, hospitals and hostels for educational institutions more than 20,000 sq. meters upto 1,50,000 sq. meters.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/07\/national-green-tribunal-notification-ministry-of-environment-forest-and-climate-change-built-up-area-industrial-sheds-educational-institutions-hospitals-hostels\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NGT constitutes High Level Committee to combat Pollution in River Yamuna<\/p>\n<p>The bench of Adarsh Kumar Goel, Sudhir Agarwal, Arun Kumar Tyagi, JJ. Prof. A. Senthil Vel and Dr. Afroz Admad has constituted High Level Committee headed by Lieutenant Governor, Delhi to combat unabated pollution in river Yamuna.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/13\/national-green-tribunal-yamuna-river-national-capital-of-delhi-water-pollution-high-level-committee-continous-failureofauthorities-supreme-court-lieutenant-governor\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION (NHRC)<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NHRC calls for action against dilapidated condition of a District Child Protection Office in Chennai<\/p>\n<p>In furtherance of a complaint registered with the National Human Rights Commission (&#8216;NHRC&#8217;) related to dilapidated condition of District Child Protection Office, Royapuram, NHRC called several authorities concerned to act within four weeks. The Commission also transferred the said complaint to the State Human Rights Commission Tamil Nadu (&#8216;SHRC&#8217;). The Authorities called for action in this matter include the District Magistrate, the Secretary for Tamil Nadu SHRC and the Chief Secretary under Government of Tamil Nadu.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/nhrc-calls-chennai-authorities-for-dilapidated-dcpo-building-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, rgb(121, 164, 210));\">UTTAR PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (UPRERA)<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">UPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in &#8216;Oh My God&#8217; project<\/p>\n<p>Rajesh Kumar Tyagi (Secretary) upheld the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal (&#8216;Tribunal&#8217;) and accorded Saya Cementation Limited. (&#8216;Saya Cementation&#8217;) the status of promoter in accordance with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001535550\">2(zk)<\/a>  of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002840159\">Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016<\/a>  (&#8216;RERA Act&#8217;), by approving the proposal to transfer the majority rights and liabilities of the project &#8216;OH MY GOD&#8217; to Saya Cementation jointly with the land-owning company Alisa Infratech Pvt. (&#8216;Alisa Infratech&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY (ATE) Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":282981,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45673,46957],"tags":[31438,54909,33575,32436,31959,6651,15801,6211,54912,54913,54910,22014,54911],"class_list":["post-282971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns-for-roundup","category-tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup","tag-appellate-tribunal-for-electricity","tag-ate","tag-cat","tag-cenvat-credit-rules","tag-cerc","tag-cestat","tag-change-in-law","tag-cic","tag-commissioner-of-central-tax","tag-deemed-sales","tag-legal-scrutiny","tag-nclat","tag-whirlpool-of-india-limited"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-02-02T11:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-02T11:30:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more | SCC Times","description":"Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more","og_description":"Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-02-02T11:30:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/","name":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png","datePublished":"2023-02-02T11:30:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png","width":391,"height":311},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":281743,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/16\/whirlpool-india-limited-appeal-against-order-of-bureau-of-energy-efficiency-regarding-5-star-rating-on-refrigerator-models-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":282971,"position":0},"title":"Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance; Appellate Tribunal for Electricity sets aside the order","author":"Editor","date":"January 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Tribunal stated that since the first test report was deficient, it did not stand legal scrutiny and was directed to treat the second test report as the first test report in continuation of their investigation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ATE","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-95.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":252103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/31\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-july-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":282971,"position":1},"title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | July 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Here\u2019s a run-through of all the significant decisions covered in the month of July, 2021 under the Section of Tribunals\/Commission\/Regulatory Bodies. Appellate Tribunal for Electricity \u00a0 Solar Project Whether there was bona fide delay in commissioning the solar power project? \u201c\u2026allowed an appeal which was filed against the Order of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/31\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-may-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":282971,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal Monthly Roundup May 2023 | Top Stories on Zee-Sony merger, compensation for rat bite in Cinema Hall, Go Air insolvency, and more","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Know about why NGT formed Joint Committee for environmental norms violations in constructions at CM Kejriwal\u2019s residence, relevancy of intent of Corporate Debtor, threshold limit under IBC Code, compensation in Ludhiana Gas Leak incident, etc.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunal monthly may 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/tribunal-monthly-may-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/tribunal-monthly-may-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/tribunal-monthly-may-2023.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/tribunal-monthly-may-2023.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/04\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-march-2023-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":282971,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | Top 13 Legal Stories covering Google-CCI case, FTS under India Netherlands DTAA, RCap Resolution, RBI Penalty on Amazon, SEBI Penalty on Arshad Warsi, and more from March 2023","author":"Ridhi","date":"April 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Find interesting rulings by NCLT, NCLAT, RBI, ITAT, SEBI, NCDRC covering legal stories on FTS under India Netherlands DTAA, reconsideration of approved resolution plan in insolvency proceedings, definition of financial debt, compensation against doctor\u2019s legal obligations, and much more.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Monthly Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-973.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-973.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-973.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-973.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298109,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-july-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":282971,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal Monthly Roundup July 2023 | Top Stories on Illegal Sand Mining on Yamuna Bank; Mumbai Floods 2005; Tata Power; and more","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies, Commissions this month","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunal monthly july 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258031,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-november-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":282971,"position":5},"title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | November 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Here\u2019s a run-through of all the significant decisions covered in the month of November 2021 under the Section of Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282971"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282971\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/282981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}