{"id":282720,"date":"2023-01-30T16:00:41","date_gmt":"2023-01-30T10:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=282720"},"modified":"2023-02-03T11:58:32","modified_gmt":"2023-02-03T06:28:32","slug":"set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court<\/span>: The division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Vibhu Bakhru*<\/span> and Amit Mahajan, J.J., while dealing with the civil writ petition, set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Delhi (Goods and Service Tax) (&#8216;Commissioner&#39;) as well as the Appellate Authority, whereby his goods were detained under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002534707\">129(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\">Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017<\/a> (&#8216;GST Act&#39;) during transportation. An order raising demand of tax and penalty was also imposed on the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Petitioner&#39;s truck was intercepted by the GST Authorities in October 2020 which was detained on the ground that the documents found were defective. Subsequently, the petitioner was served with a show cause notice under Section 129(3) of the GST Act and order of demand of tax and penalty raising a demand of \u00e2\u201a\u00b92,78,129\/- which was paid by the petitioner since he required the goods urgently. The Appellate Authority found the order passed by the Commissioner to be legally justified which required no interference.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that an E-Way bill was generated for transporting the goods which duly recorded the movement of goods in question and also clearly mentioned the GSTIN.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondents denying the contention of the petitioners stated that the goods were not accompanied by an E-Way bill but with an invoice in the name of <i>S.K. Integrated Consultants<\/i> to whom the goods were sold. It was further contended that the demand of tax and penalty was a consent order and therefore, the GST Officer concerned was not required to give a detailed reason.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court not being in consonance with the respondent stated that the order of demand and penalty was not a consent order and the petitioner had paid the tax and penalty for release of the goods, therefore, the said payment could not be termed as voluntary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court was of the view that neither the notice served upon the petitioner mentioned any specific defect found by the authorities nor the order of tax and demand specify any reason why the documents accompanying the goods were found to be defective.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that that Appellate Authority in its order had stated that the Commissioner&#39;s order which had formed the basis for penalising the petitioner did not disclose the discrepancy between the E-Way Bills and the goods. Further, the respondents, only in their counter affidavit stated the fact that the goods were not accompanied by an E-Way bill, which found no mention in order of the demand.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court while setting aside the order of the Commissioner as well as the Appellate Authority, held that neither the show cause notice nor the order of demand clearly set out the reason for imposing the tax liability and penalty. Accordingly, directed to issue a fresh show cause notice to pass appropriate order after affording a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner of being heard.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Ram Prakash Chauhan v Commissioner of Delhi (Goods and Service Tax), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/774QwcYQ\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 285<\/a>, decided on 19-01-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner<\/span>&#8211; Advocate Smriti Sinha, Advocate Satyam Thareja, Advocate Vasundhara Nagarath and Advocate Shriyanshi Pathak<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent<\/span>&#8211; Additional Standing Counsel Satyakam<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Order by Justice Vibhu Bakhru<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Simran Singh, Editorial Assistant has put together this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>The Court was of the view that neither the notice served upon the petitioner mentioned any specific defect found by the authorities nor the order of tax and demand specify any reason why the documents accompanying the goods were found to be defective.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279267,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,54794,29442,43994,54795],"class_list":["post-282720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-demand-of-tax-and-penalty","tag-e-way-bill","tag-gst-act","tag-gstin-number"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The division bench, while dealing with the civil writ petition, set aside the order passed by Commissioner of Delhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The division bench, while dealing with the civil writ petition, set aside the order passed by Commissioner of Delhi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-30T10:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-02-03T06:28:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/\",\"name\":\"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-30T10:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-02-03T06:28:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The division bench, while dealing with the civil writ petition, set aside the order passed by Commissioner of Delhi\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner | SCC Times","description":"The division bench, while dealing with the civil writ petition, set aside the order passed by Commissioner of Delhi","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner","og_description":"The division bench, while dealing with the civil writ petition, set aside the order passed by Commissioner of Delhi","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-30T10:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-02-03T06:28:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","name":"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-30T10:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2023-02-03T06:28:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The division bench, while dealing with the civil writ petition, set aside the order passed by Commissioner of Delhi","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","width":391,"height":311,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":335349,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/allahabad-hc-penalty-goods-in-transit-gst-registration-suspension\/","url_meta":{"origin":282720,"position":0},"title":"Penalty can&#8217;t be imposed on goods in transit with valid tax invoice and e-way bill, even after suspension of GST registration: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court directed the authorities to carry out the exercise in terms of Section 129 (1)(a) of the CGST Act within a period of two weeks from the date of this order.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/commissioner-empowered-to-call-any-person-to-furnish-any-information-under-delhi-gst-act-2017-vide-delhi-gst-amendment-act-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":282720,"position":1},"title":"Commissioner empowered to call for furnishing any information under Delhi GST Act, 2017 vide Delhi GST (Amendment) Act, 2021","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs has passed the Delhi Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2021 to amend the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 on August 9, 2021. \u00a0 The key amendments are: Section 7(1)(aa), inserted, Scope of supply : The tax shall also be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":142731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/15\/impact-implications-of-gst-on-legal-practitioners-clarification-sought-from-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":282720,"position":2},"title":"Impact &#038; implications of GST on Legal Practitioners: Clarification sought from Government","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 15, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Taking note of the fact that the legal practitioners are under a genuine doubt whether they require to get themselves registered under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (CGST Act), the Delhi Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (DGST Act) and the Integrated Goods and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297798,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/27\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-order-for-violating-the-principles-of-natural-justice-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":282720,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Telephonic conversations for brief period cannot be construed as hearing\u2019; Delhi High Court sets aside order passed in violation of S. 75 of CGST Act","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe opportunity of hearing, which the Officer is statutorily required to give to the person against whom an adverse decision is contemplated, is not an empty formality, and is a well-recognised principle of audi alteram partem, which has rightly been incorporated in Section 75(3) and 75(4) of the CGST Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327542,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/bank-cannot-be-charged-for-filing-return-in-another-states-gst-portal-due-to-technical-glitch-telhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":282720,"position":4},"title":"Bank cannot be charged with demand, interest, penalty for filing return in another State\u2019s GST portal due to technical glitch: Telangana High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The foundation of show cause notice itself was bad in law and the assumption that return could not have been filed in the GST portal of Telangana did not flow from Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telangana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/","url_meta":{"origin":282720,"position":5},"title":"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy&#8217; and \u2018non-speaking&#8217;, Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST","author":"Editor","date":"December 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"It suffered from non-application of mind and was in violation of mandatory requirement of section 75 (6) of the CGST Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282720\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}