{"id":28231,"date":"2015-12-04T11:31:59","date_gmt":"2015-12-04T06:01:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=28231"},"modified":"2015-12-14T16:33:44","modified_gmt":"2015-12-14T11:03:44","slug":"legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/","title":{"rendered":"Legislature cannot directly overrule a decision or make a direction as not binding on it, but has power to make the decision ineffective"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court<\/strong>: Declaring the Karnataka Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 and the Karnataka Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2012 discriminatory and violative of Constitutional Rights, the High Court held that if the law passed by a legislature is struck down by the Courts as being invalid for one or the other reason, it would be competent for the appropriate Legislature to cure the\u00a0 said infirmity and pass a validating law so as to make the provisions of the said earlier law effective from the date when it was passed. But the changed or altered conditions should be such that the previous decision would not have been rendered by the Court if those conditions had existed at the time of declaring the law as invalid.<\/p>\n

In Sri Sahasra Lingeshwara Temple v. State of Karnataka, <\/em>SCC OnLine Kar 525, the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 was declared discriminatory and violative of Article 14 and 26 by division bench of Karnataka High Court on the ground that though the Act was enacted to provide a uniform religious law and abolished five local religious Acts, the State chose to exclude a mutt or a temple attached thereto from the scope and application of the Act. Such mutts or temple attached thereto were used to be governed by the local Acts but the effect of the enactment was that such mutts were no longer subject to provisions of any law.\u00a0 Though a mutt may stand on a different footing in terms of religious practice and rituals, the basic object of religion and religious activities is carried on in Hindu mutts also. Thus, such exclusion resulted in violation of Article 14. A matter preferred against this decision is pending before the Supreme Court. However the State Government amended the impugned Act twice in 2011 and 2012.<\/p>\n

While allowing the writ petitions challenging the vires<\/em>of the amending Acts, the High Court held that the amended provisions of the Act were more or less same as the unamended provisions which were struck down by the division bench. The Legislature through the impugned amendments sought to reintroduce the offending provisions with mere cosmetic changes. Thus the amendments brought about were bad in law. [Shri Maha Ganapati Shankara v. State of Karnataka, decided on 17.11.2015]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: Declaring the Karnataka Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 and the Karnataka Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nLegislature cannot directly overrule a decision or make a direction as not binding on it, but has power to make the decision ineffective | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Legislature cannot directly overrule a decision or make a direction as not binding on it, but has power to make the decision ineffective\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: Declaring the Karnataka Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 and the Karnataka Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-12-04T06:01:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-14T11:03:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/\",\"name\":\"Legislature cannot directly overrule a decision or make a direction as not binding on it, but has power to make the decision ineffective | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-04T06:01:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-14T11:03:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Legislature cannot directly overrule a decision or make a direction as not binding on it, but has power to make the decision ineffective\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Legislature cannot directly overrule a decision or make a direction as not binding on it, but has power to make the decision ineffective | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Legislature cannot directly overrule a decision or make a direction as not binding on it, but has power to make the decision ineffective","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: Declaring the Karnataka Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 and the Karnataka Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-12-04T06:01:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-14T11:03:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/","name":"Legislature cannot directly overrule a decision or make a direction as not binding on it, but has power to make the decision ineffective | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-12-04T06:01:59+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-14T11:03:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/04\/legislature-cannot-directly-overrule-a-decision-or-make-a-direction-as-not-binding-on-it-but-has-power-to-make-the-decision-ineffective\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Legislature cannot directly overrule a decision or make a direction as not binding on it, but has power to make the decision ineffective"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/03\/utt-hc-power-conferred-on-the-supreme-court-under-article-142-to-do-complete-justice-not-available-to-high-courts-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":28231,"position":0},"title":"Utt HC | Power conferred on the Supreme Court, under Article 142 to do complete justice, not available to High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and N.S. Dhanik, J. entertained a PIL which sought mandamus to direct the respondents to constitute a Committee for management\/trust of the affairs of the \u2018Purnagiri Temple\u2019; to prepare a list of important temples in terms of the order passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/commissioner-under-hindu-religious-and-charitable-endowments-act-is-not-a-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":28231,"position":1},"title":"Commissioner under Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act is not a Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Ashok Bhushan and KM Joseph, JJ decided some important questions dealing with the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 and held that the Commissioner, while hearing the appeal under Section 69 of Act, 1959, is not a Court. It said, \u201cWhen an appeal is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273297,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/09\/gratuity-payment-for-private-school-teachers-supreme-court-upholds-constitutional-validity-payment-gratuity-amendment-act-2019-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":28231,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court holds private school teachers entitled to gratuity; upholds Constitutional validity of Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009","author":"Editor","date":"September 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the legislature acts within its power to usher in a valid law and rectify a legal error, even after a court ruling, the legislature exercises its constitutional power to enact the law and does not overrule an earlier court decision.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-holds-private-school-teachers-entitled-to-gratuity-upholds-Constitutional-validity-of-Payment-of-Gratuity-Amendment-Act-2009-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-holds-private-school-teachers-entitled-to-gratuity-upholds-Constitutional-validity-of-Payment-of-Gratuity-Amendment-Act-2009-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-holds-private-school-teachers-entitled-to-gratuity-upholds-Constitutional-validity-of-Payment-of-Gratuity-Amendment-Act-2009-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-holds-private-school-teachers-entitled-to-gratuity-upholds-Constitutional-validity-of-Payment-of-Gratuity-Amendment-Act-2009-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-holds-private-school-teachers-entitled-to-gratuity-upholds-Constitutional-validity-of-Payment-of-Gratuity-Amendment-Act-2009-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236494,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/30\/kar-hc-proposed-25-domicile-reservation-policy-for-admissions-by-karnataka-state-govt-to-nlsiu-struck-down\/","url_meta":{"origin":28231,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC | Proposed 25% domicile reservation policy for admissions by Karnataka State Govt to NLSIU, struck down","author":"Editor","date":"September 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench B.V. Nagarathna and Ravi V. Hosmani, JJ., while allowing the petition filed by an aspirant for a seat at NLSIU through the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT), strikes down the recent reservation policy proposed for the Karnataka students. In an unprecedented move, the State\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/03\/entry-25-of-schedule-vi-of-karnataka-sales-tax-act-1957-levying-tax-on-processing-and-supply-of-photographs-etc-held-constitutionally-valid\/","url_meta":{"origin":28231,"position":4},"title":"Entry 25 of Schedule VI of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 levying tax on processing and supply of photographs etc. held constitutionally valid","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 3, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a dispute regarding the constitutional validity of Entry 25 of Schedule VI of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 dealing with levy of tax on processing and supply of photographs, photo prints and photo negatives, the 3 Judge Bench of H.L. Dattu, C.J., Dr. A.K. Sikri and Arun\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301095,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/sc-lays-down-principles-for-exercise-of-legislative-power-of-abrogating-a-law-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":28231,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court lays down Principles for exercise of legislative power of abrogating a law declared invalid by Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the legislature merely seeks to validate the Acts, struck down or rendered inoperative by a Court, by a subsequent legislation without curing the defects in such legislation, the subsequent legislation would be ultra-vires\u201c.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"abrogation of law","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/abrogation-of-law.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/abrogation-of-law.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/abrogation-of-law.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/abrogation-of-law.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28231\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}