{"id":282241,"date":"2023-01-23T16:00:01","date_gmt":"2023-01-23T10:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=282241"},"modified":"2023-02-03T17:31:44","modified_gmt":"2023-02-03T12:01:44","slug":"corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to ‘Interest other than interest on securities’: NCLAT observes"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal<\/span>: Dismissing the appeal, the bench comprising of Ashok Bhushan*, J.<\/span> and Barun Mitra (Technical Member) held that there is no error in the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority and materials on record fully proved the ingredients of financial debt, thus establishing that there was loan agreement between the parties.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n

In the instant matter, an application under S. 7<\/a> IBC<\/a> was filed by the respondents, financial facility against the Corporate Debtor claiming the repayment of unpaid loan with interest. Vide order dated 12-07-2022, the Adjudicating Authority admitted the application after hearing the same. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, the appellant, suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor filed an appeal challenging the same.<\/p>\n

Contentions<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n

The appellant contended that there was no financial debt as no loan agreement is entered between the appellant and the respondents and deduction of TDS does not prove that Corporate Debtor owed any financial debt to the Respondents. The appellant further contended that the Adjudicating Authority did not consider that the respondents are not registered under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949<\/a> therefore does not have permission or license to advance any loan to the Corporate Debtor, before admitting the S. 7<\/a> IBC<\/a> application.<\/p>\n

The respondents contended that there are enough materials on record to prove the financial debt, moreover, the appellant himself replied to the demand notice admitting the grant of loan. The respondents further contended that depositing TDS clearly proved that loan was taken with interest.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n

Whether there are any other materials on record which may prove that there was any financial debt by the transaction between the parties?<\/p>\n

Observations<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n

The Tribunal observed that it is undisputed that there is no loan agreement between the parties and the Tribunal needs to look into other materials on record to prove the financial debt.<\/p>\n

After taking into account the reply to the demand notice by the Corporate Debtor, the Tribunal observed that it can be clearly concluded that the appellant admitted grant of loan, moreover, the claim of interest was not refuted.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal observed that deduction of TDS and deposit by the Corporate Debtor does not itself prove that there is any financial debt but deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A<\/a> of Income Tax Act<\/a> clearly proves that the deduction which was deposited was TDS relating to “Interest other than interest on securities”.<\/i><\/p>\n

Relying on S. 3(33)<\/a> IBC<\/a> and Arrow Engineering Ltd.<\/i> v. Golden Tobacco Ltd.<\/i>, 2021 SCC OnLine NCLAT 446<\/a>, the Tribunal observed that the Financial Debt can be proved from other documents as contemplated in Column 8 of Part-V of Form 1 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n

The Tribunal further observed that the respondents did not violate S. 22<\/a> of Banking Regulation Act, 1949<\/a> by advancing a loan to the Corporate Debtor as they are not carrying on any banking business.<\/p>\n

Decision<\/b><\/u><\/p>\n

In the light of facts of the case, arguments advanced, materials placed on record and authorities cited, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and held that the Adjudicating Authority has correctly held that the ingredients of financial debt were fully proved in the facts of the present case.<\/p>\n

[Pradeep Tayal v. Essbert Fashion (P) Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 43<\/a>, order dated 12-01-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Ashok Bhushan<\/span><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Nitesh Jain and Vatsal Chandra, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n

Abhishek Nahta (PCA), Raveena Panika and Rishabh Sachdeva, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n\n

*Ritu Singh, Editorial Assistant has put this report together<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the instant matter an appeal was preferred against the order of NCLT admitting S. 7 IBC application or repayment of financial debt. Upholding the order of the NCLT, the Tribunal held that even if there is no proof of loan agreement other materials on record can prove the financial debt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[30596,31422,30361,54645,30182,22014,12521],"class_list":["post-282241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-corporate-debtor","tag-financial-debt","tag-ibc","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-section-7","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-nclt"],"yoast_head":"\nDeduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to 'Interest other than interest on securities': NCLAT observes | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"there is no error in impugned order passed by Adjudicating Authority and materials on record fully proved the ingredients of financial debt\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to 'Interest other than interest on securities': NCLAT observes\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"there is no error in impugned order passed by Adjudicating Authority and materials on record fully proved the ingredients of financial debt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-23T10:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-02-03T12:01:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/\",\"name\":\"Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to 'Interest other than interest on securities': NCLAT observes | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-23T10:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-02-03T12:01:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"there is no error in impugned order passed by Adjudicating Authority and materials on record fully proved the ingredients of financial debt\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"NCLAT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to ‘Interest other than interest on securities’: NCLAT observes\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to 'Interest other than interest on securities': NCLAT observes | SCC Times","description":"there is no error in impugned order passed by Adjudicating Authority and materials on record fully proved the ingredients of financial debt","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to 'Interest other than interest on securities': NCLAT observes","og_description":"there is no error in impugned order passed by Adjudicating Authority and materials on record fully proved the ingredients of financial debt","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-23T10:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-02-03T12:01:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/","name":"Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to 'Interest other than interest on securities': NCLAT observes | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-23T10:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2023-02-03T12:01:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"there is no error in impugned order passed by Adjudicating Authority and materials on record fully proved the ingredients of financial debt","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"NCLAT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to ‘Interest other than interest on securities’: NCLAT observes"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":295496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/27\/nclat-financial-debt-under-section-58-ibc-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":282241,"position":0},"title":"Transition between the parties should be direct to construe the debt as \u2018Financial Debt\u2019 under Section 5(8) of the IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"June 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Amount taken by the Directors of the Corporate Debtor in their personal capacity cannot be construed as \u2018Financial Debt\u2019 under S. 5(8) of the IBC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304367,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":282241,"position":1},"title":"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application","author":"Ritu","date":"October 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLT\u2019s order did not contain specific findings regarding whether the entire loan amount had been paid and whether nothing remained due.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295726,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/01\/nclat-application-section-7-ibc-debt-default-not-examine-quatum-of-debt-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":282241,"position":2},"title":"While admitting application under Section 7 of the IBC, existence of Debt and Default needs to be examined not \u2018Quantum of Debt\u2019: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the instant case, the record establishes that there is a \u2018debt\u2019 and a \u2018default\u2019 and the Application is complete and the Adjudicating Authority has rightly admitted the Application under Section 7 of the Code.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/17\/acknowledgment-of-debt\/","url_meta":{"origin":282241,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | ‘Balance and Security Confirmation Letter’ is sufficient ‘acknowledgement of debt’ so as to extend limitation period for initiating insolvency proceedings under S. 7 IBC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Division Bench of Justice Venugopal M. (Judicial Member) and V.P. Singh (Technical Member) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad (\"NCLT\"), whereby the NCLT had admitted an application filed by the Financial Creditor\u2212Punjab National Bank under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283118,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/04\/financial-creditor-application-section-7-ibc-nclt-cirp-corporate-debtor-consent-terms-breach-subsequent-application-allowed-appeal-nclat-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":282241,"position":4},"title":"Nature of Financial Debt does not change on account of breach of consent terms | NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While upholding the NCLT's order of admission of fresh application and initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, the Tribunal held that the nature of financial debt would not change on account of breach of the consent terms.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":307307,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/16\/financial-debt-claims-under-section-58-of-ibc-cannot-be-entertained-after-cocs-approval-of-resolution-plan-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":282241,"position":5},"title":"Financial Debt claim under Section 5(8) of IBC cannot be entertained after CoC\u2019s approval of Resolution Plan: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT reiterated the importance of adhering to timelines in the Insolvency resolution process and the unacceptability of claims filed after the approval of the Resolution Plan by the CoC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282241\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}