{"id":282208,"date":"2023-01-23T10:00:50","date_gmt":"2023-01-23T04:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=282208"},"modified":"2023-01-27T13:42:43","modified_gmt":"2023-01-27T08:12:43","slug":"court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/","title":{"rendered":"Kerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Kerala High Court<\/span>: While deciding the petition, the bench of C.S. Dias, J., held that the judgment and decree, rendered after a full-fledged trial is appealable under Section 96<\/a> of Civil Procedure Code<\/a> and without challenging the decree, application for refund of court fee is impermissible in law.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

In the present case, the plaintiff filed the suit against the respondents for a decree for damages, which was dismissed by the court. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for return of plaint, plaint documents, court fee and legal benefit fund stamps, which was also rejected by the court. Thus, the petitioner filed this petition.<\/p>\n

The counsel of the petitioner contended that although the court below had dismissed the suit on the finding that the suit is barred by law, the dismissal is rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11<\/a> of Civil Procedure Code<\/a> (“the Code”). Hence, the petitioner is entitled to a refund of the court fee under Section 70 of the Kerala Courts Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 (“the Act”).<\/p>\n

The Court said that if the suit does not appear to be barred from the statement in the plaint, then the court must proceed to the next stage as laid down under the Code and adjudicate the suit after a full-fledged trial. In the case at hand, the Court below framed issues, proceeded with the trial and after completion of the trial it concluded that the suit was barred by law.<\/p>\n

The Court placed reliance on Linsaraj<\/i> v. State of Kerala<\/i>, 2017 SCC OnLine Ker 23175<\/a> in which it was held that Section 70 of the Act comes into play only when there is no adjudicatory process.<\/p>\n

The Court said that judgment was rendered after a full-fledged trial and a complete adjudicatory process. Thus, the judgment falls squarely under Section 33 of the Code and was followed by a decree. A decree passed under Section 33 of the Code is appealable under Section 96 of the Code.<\/p>\n

The Court further said that without challenging the decree, the petitioner has filed an application with a seemingly innocuous prayer for the return of the plaint, the plaint documents, the court fee and legal benefit fund stamps. The said course is untenable and impermissible in law, mainly because the petitioner has consciously paid the balance court fee, participated in the trial and has suffered a decree.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Court dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n

[S. Surendran v. State of Kerala, 2023 SCC OnLine Ker 383<\/a>, decided on 12-01-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Counsel for Petitioner: – Advocate M. Sasindran<\/p>\n

Counsel for Respondent:- Advocate Salil Narayanan, Advocate V. Manu<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court observed that when the suit is dismissed on finding that it is barred by law, the court fees cannot be refunded.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":278757,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8331,31992,2713,12981,2523,27594,2532],"class_list":["post-282208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-court-fee","tag-decree","tag-judgment","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-plaint","tag-Refund"],"yoast_head":"\nKerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While deciding the petition, the bench of C.S. Dias, J., held that the judgment and decree, rendered after a full-fledged trial is appealable\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While deciding the petition, the bench of C.S. Dias, J., held that the judgment and decree, rendered after a full-fledged trial is appealable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-23T04:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-27T08:12:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/\",\"name\":\"Kerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-23T04:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-27T08:12:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"While deciding the petition, the bench of C.S. Dias, J., held that the judgment and decree, rendered after a full-fledged trial is appealable\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"Kerala High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits | SCC Times","description":"While deciding the petition, the bench of C.S. Dias, J., held that the judgment and decree, rendered after a full-fledged trial is appealable","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits","og_description":"While deciding the petition, the bench of C.S. Dias, J., held that the judgment and decree, rendered after a full-fledged trial is appealable","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-23T04:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-27T08:12:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/","name":"Kerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-23T04:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-27T08:12:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"While deciding the petition, the bench of C.S. Dias, J., held that the judgment and decree, rendered after a full-fledged trial is appealable","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"Kerala High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":241304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/ker-hc-proviso-to-or-vi-r-17-of-code-curtails-absolute-discretion-of-court-to-allow-amendment-at-any-stage-of-suit-it-has-to-be-shown-that-in-spite-of-due-diligence-such-amendment-could-not-have\/","url_meta":{"origin":282208,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Proviso to Or. VI R. 17 of Code curtails absolute discretion of Court to allow amendment at any stage of suit, it has to be shown that in spite of due diligence, such amendment could not have been sought earlier; legal position reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"December 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: R. Narayana Pisharadi, J., while allowing the instant petition, set aside the order of trial Court, thereby allowing the amendment of the plaint contrary to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure. In the present case, respondent instituted a suit before trial Court for obtaining a decree\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281625,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/14\/set-aside-order-of-trial-court-while-rejecting-husbands-plaint-for-declaration-of-divorce-decree-upon-pronouncement-triple-talaq-legal-news-legal-reseach-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":282208,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court's Triple Talaq judgment applies retrospectively; Andhra Pradesh High Court rejects husband's suit for decree of divorce","author":"Editor","date":"January 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBy the time the judgment is proposed to be rendered on such a plaint, the law available for the Court would be that there was no Triple Talaq. Therefore, the view of the trial Court that the ratio in Shayara Banu's case (supra) is not applicable retrospectively is incorrect.\u201d observed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-491.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":219284,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/09\/del-hc-trial-court-cannot-reconsider-issue-of-maintainability-of-suit-under-or-37-cpc-where-once-summons-have-been-issued-and-served-on-defendant\/","url_meta":{"origin":282208,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Trial court cannot reconsider issue of maintainability of suit under Or. 37 CPC where once summons have been issued and served on defendant","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby the suit filed by the petitioner under Order 37\u00a0(summary procedure)\u00a0of the Civil Procedure Code was directed to be treated as an ordinary suit. A suit under Order 37 was filed by the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/09\/ker-hc-or-41-r-5-power-of-execution-court-to-stay-the-execution-is-only-upto-to-the-stage-of-filing-appeal-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":282208,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | [Or. 41 R. 5] Power of execution court to stay the execution is only upto to the stage of filing appeal; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: B. Sudheendra Kumar, J., allowing the present petition observed, \u201cSince the appeal was already filed, the court below had no jurisdiction to stay the execution petition in the absence of any order from the appellate court.\u201d Petitioner is a decree-holder, who filed praying for issuing a direction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":287067,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/rejection-of-written-statement-by-commercial-court-just-kerala-hc-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":282208,"position":4},"title":"Kerala High Court upholds Commercial Court’s refusal to accept delayed written statement","author":"Ridhi","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Referring to the amended portion of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Supreme Court's interpretation, Kerala High Court found the Commercial Court's refusal for acceptance after delay in filing written statement beyond 120 days justified.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/06\/utt-hc-ex-parte-decree-set-aside-considering-sufficient-cause-under-or-9-r-13-of-the-code-of-civil-procedure-1908-court-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":282208,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Ex-parte decree set aside considering \u201csufficient cause\u201d under Or. 9 R. 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Court allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Alok Kumar Verma, JJ., allowed an appeal which was filed challenging an order passed by Judge, Family Court whereby, the application filed by the appellant, under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for setting aside\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282208\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}