{"id":282122,"date":"2023-01-21T10:00:32","date_gmt":"2023-01-21T04:30:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=282122"},"modified":"2023-01-21T10:10:53","modified_gmt":"2023-01-21T04:40:53","slug":"if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/","title":{"rendered":"Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court<\/span>: While deciding the petition, the bench of Amit Rawal, J., held that principle of promissory estoppel arises while extending the promise of subsidy and the benefit cannot be taken away after expiry of number of years, if steps have been taken by other party considering the factor of subsidy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the Government of Kerala passed an order, under which few benefits like concession in electricity charges were to be given to industrial units like Five Star Hotels. The petitioner established a Five Star Hotel and claimed tariff concession for the electricity for 5 years i.e., 2013-2018 based on government&#39;s order. Later, the Government of Kerala, passed another order to withdraw the electricity subsidy w.e.f. 2015. The petitioner, aggrieved by this order filed a petition before this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The issue in the present case is whether the impugned order passed by the Government shall be construed prospectively or retrospectively.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the benefit cannot be taken away after expiry of number of years, if steps have been taken by the party, considering the factor of subsidy. The principle of promissory estoppel applies to it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further said that there is no bar for the Government to stop the concession or benefit of subsidy prospectively for the units which have already raised to construction with a project considering the factor of subsidy. The intention of the Government was to attract the persons like that of the petitioner and give the financial benefits. In case such subsidy is not paid to such persons, the affected parties would be liable to pay the charges along with interest for no rhyme and reasons.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <i>Kusumam Hotels Pvt. Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>KSEB,<\/i> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAwMDQwMzkxJiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZmYWxzZSYmJiYmKDIwMDgpIDEzIFNDQyAyMTMmJiYmJlBocmFzZSYmJiYmRmluZEJ5Q2l0YXRpb24mJiYmJmZhbHNl\">(2008) 13 SCC 213<\/a> in which it was held that administrative orders ordinarily are to be considered prospective in nature unless retrospective operation is expressly stated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the impugned order did not reveal any retroactive operation and it was neither published in any gazette nor uploaded on the website.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, the Court quashed the impugned order and issued writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to disburse the electric tariff concession to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Vasu Coco Resorts Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala, WP(C) No. 16882 OF 2019, decided on 10-01-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Counsel for Petitioner: &#8211; Advocate P. B. Sahasranaman, Advocate T. S. Harikumar<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Counsel for Respondent:- Advocate Justin Jacob, Advocate G. Keerthivas<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Kerala High Court observed that concession or benefit of subsidy can be withdrawn prospectively and not retrospectively, by the Government.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":278757,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30594,2523,32386,29991,54609],"class_list":["post-282122","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-electricity","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-promissory-estoppel","tag-subsidy","tag-tariff-concession"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While deciding the petition, the bench of Amit Rawal, J., held that principle of promissory estoppel arises while extending the promise\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While deciding the petition, the bench of Amit Rawal, J., held that principle of promissory estoppel arises while extending the promise\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-21T04:30:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-21T04:40:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/\",\"name\":\"Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-21T04:30:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-21T04:40:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"While deciding the petition, the bench of Amit Rawal, J., held that principle of promissory estoppel arises while extending the promise\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"Kerala High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively | SCC Times","description":"While deciding the petition, the bench of Amit Rawal, J., held that principle of promissory estoppel arises while extending the promise","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively","og_description":"While deciding the petition, the bench of Amit Rawal, J., held that principle of promissory estoppel arises while extending the promise","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-21T04:30:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-21T04:40:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/","name":"Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-21T04:30:32+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-21T04:40:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"While deciding the petition, the bench of Amit Rawal, J., held that principle of promissory estoppel arises while extending the promise","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"Kerala High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/if-a-party-has-taken-steps-considering-the-factor-of-subsidy-the-government-cannot-withdraw-subsidy-retrospectively\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kerala High Court | If a party has taken steps considering the factor of subsidy, the Government cannot withdraw it retrospectively"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":302538,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/27\/no-abolute-bar-writ-jurisdiction-hig-court-promissory-estoppel-disputes-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":282122,"position":0},"title":"No absolute bar on writ jurisdiction of High Courts in promissory estoppel disputes between State and its instrumentalities: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The case revolved around a special package sanctioned by the Govt. of India for the revival of infrastructural projects which were affected severely due to rise of militancy in Jammu and Kashmir in the 1990s.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":47631,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/19\/buildings-constructed-from-the-year-1990-1993-entitled-to-tax-exemption-as-per-s-3a-of-the-kerala-buildings-act-1993\/","url_meta":{"origin":282122,"position":1},"title":"Buildings constructed from the year 1990-1993 entitled to tax exemption as per S. 3A of the Kerala Buildings Act, 1993","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding on the issue that whether the State Government may deny the tax exemption which was promised earlier, the bench comprising of Dr. A.K Sikri and R. F. Nariman, JJ., was of the view that the non-exercise of the power to give exemption in certain taxes is in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240032,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/02\/legitimate-expectations-evolution-and-application-of-the-doctrine-in-india-and-how-is-it-different-from-promissory-estoppel-as-explained-by-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":282122,"position":2},"title":"Legitimate expectations: Evolution and application of the doctrine in India and how is it different from promissory estoppel as explained by Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where the Jharkhand Government had failed to give effect to the Industrial Policy and subsequent Notification that promised 50% rebate to Industrial Units on electricity duty, the Dr. DY Chandrachud* and Indu Malhotra, JJ took the opportunity to explain the evolution and application of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197273,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/20\/cross-subsidies-in-electricity-sector\/","url_meta":{"origin":282122,"position":3},"title":"Cross-subsidies in Electricity Sector","author":"Saba","date":"June 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Electricity is a development indicator and critical for India\u2019s economic growth. The electricity is shared responsibility between the central and state governments, with states having considerable freedom to set electricity prices, the average subsidy level and the beneficiaries of the cross-subsidisation. Cross-subsidy surcharges and non-price regulatory measures are key tools\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/GNLU-Pic.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/GNLU-Pic.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/GNLU-Pic.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/GNLU-Pic.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/GNLU-Pic.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280709,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/30\/madras-high-court-government-order-warranting-adhaar-authentication-from-persons-availing-benefits-under-social-welfare-schemes-paid-out-of-the-consolidated-fund-of-india-or-st\/","url_meta":{"origin":282122,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court| Government order warranting Aadhaar authentication from persons availing benefits under social welfare schemes paid out of the Consolidated Fund of India or State is not illegal","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court dismissed Public Interest Litigation challenging the Government order warranting Adhaar authentication services in the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., from persons availing electricity subsidy in Tamil Nadu.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":284543,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/21\/difference-between-promissory-estoppel-and-legitimate-explanation-explainer\/","url_meta":{"origin":282122,"position":5},"title":"Difference between Promissory Estoppel and Legitimate Expectation: Explainer","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Arpit Sarangi\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-463.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-463.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-463.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-463.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282122"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282122\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}