{"id":281970,"date":"2023-01-19T16:00:20","date_gmt":"2023-01-19T10:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=281970"},"modified":"2023-01-23T19:16:12","modified_gmt":"2023-01-23T13:46:12","slug":"power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Power to recall orders not to be exercised when ground for vacating the judgment was available but not availed; Delhi High Court dismisses application for recall of order"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court<\/span>: In a case wherein an application was filed under Section 151<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code<\/a> to seek relief of \u201crecalling the old order and then deciding the petition on merits\u201d, a Single Judge Bench of Chandra Dhari Singh, J. dismissed the application as no ground was made for recall of earlier Order and held that the settled things could not be permitted to be unsettled at the behest of a person who had not been careful enough with regard to his rights and claims.<\/p>\n

The present application was filed by the petitioner under Section 151<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> to seek the following relief:<\/p>\n

\u201cRecall order dated 26-9-2022 passed by the Court and the present petition be decided on merits again.\u201d<\/p>\n

The petitioner submitted that on 26-9-2022, the present case was listed and when the case was called out, the present counsel was arguing before another Bench and was therefore, unable to appear before the Court and hence, this Court dismissed the petition in Daya Engg. Works (Sleeper) Ltd.<\/i> v. Union of India<\/i>, O.M.P. (T) (COMM) 1 of 2020.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the main petition was filed under Section 14<\/a> r\/w Section 15<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> to seek termination of the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator and appointment of substitute Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties. The Court further noted that the said Order had been passed on merits.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on Budhia Swain<\/i> v. Gopinath Deb<\/i>, (1999) 4 SCC 396<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that \u201cthe Courts had inherent power to recall and set aside an order:<\/i><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Obtained by fraud practiced upon the court;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    When the court is misled by a party;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    When the court itself commits a mistake, which prejudices a party\u201d<\/span>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The Court also relied on A.R. Antulay<\/i> v. R.S. Nayak<\/i>, (1988) 2 SCC 602<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that \u201cthe power to recall a judgment will not be exercised when the ground for reopening the proceedings or vacating the judgment was available to be pleaded in the original action but was not done or where a proper remedy in some other proceeding such as by way of appeal or revision was available but was not availed. The right to seek vacation of a judgment may be lost by waiver, estoppel, or acquiescence\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

    The Court noted that \u201cthe scope of Section 151<\/a> of Civil Procedure Code<\/a> was limited and the inherent powers enshrined therein could be exercised only where no remedy had been provided for in any other provision of law. The exceptions carved out where recall of order could be permitted, as outlined in the afore-mentioned judgments, had not been satisfied by the petitioner\u201d<\/span>.<\/p>\n

    The Court further held that the settled things could not be permitted to be unsettled at the behest of a person who had not been careful enough with regard to his rights and claims, therefore, the Court dismissed the application as no case was made to entertain the present application.<\/p>\n

    [Daya Engg. Works (Sleeper) Ltd. v. Union of India, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 178<\/a>, Order dated 17-1-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    Judgment by: Justice Chandra Dhari Singh<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    For the Petitioner: Advocate Anant Agarwal<\/p>\n

    For the Respondents: CGSC Bhagwan Swarup Shukla<\/p>\n

    Advocate Sarvan Kumar<\/p>\n

    \n

    *Simranjeet Kaur, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The Delhi High Court dismissed an application filed for “recall of earlier order” under Section 151 of CrPC and held that the settled things could not be permitted to be unsettled at the behest of a person who had not been careful enough with regard to his rights and claims.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279267,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3226,40741,17711,13031,30320,54566,43350],"class_list":["post-281970","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitration","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-arbitrator","tag-inherent-powers","tag-order","tag-power-to-recall","tag-recall"],"yoast_head":"\nPower to recall orders not to be exercised when ground for vacating the judgment was available but not availed; Delhi High Court dismisses application for recall of order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case wherein an application was filed under Section 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to seek relief of \u201crecalling the old order\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Power to recall orders not to be exercised when ground for vacating the judgment was available but not availed; Delhi High Court dismisses application for recall of order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case wherein an application was filed under Section 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to seek relief of \u201crecalling the old order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-19T10:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-23T13:46:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/\",\"name\":\"Power to recall orders not to be exercised when ground for vacating the judgment was available but not availed; Delhi High Court dismisses application for recall of order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-19T10:30:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-23T13:46:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case wherein an application was filed under Section 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to seek relief of \u201crecalling the old order\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Power to recall orders not to be exercised when ground for vacating the judgment was available but not availed; Delhi High Court dismisses application for recall of order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Power to recall orders not to be exercised when ground for vacating the judgment was available but not availed; Delhi High Court dismisses application for recall of order | SCC Times","description":"In a case wherein an application was filed under Section 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to seek relief of \u201crecalling the old order","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Power to recall orders not to be exercised when ground for vacating the judgment was available but not availed; Delhi High Court dismisses application for recall of order","og_description":"In a case wherein an application was filed under Section 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to seek relief of \u201crecalling the old order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-19T10:30:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-23T13:46:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/","name":"Power to recall orders not to be exercised when ground for vacating the judgment was available but not availed; Delhi High Court dismisses application for recall of order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-19T10:30:20+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-23T13:46:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case wherein an application was filed under Section 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to seek relief of \u201crecalling the old order","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","width":391,"height":311,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/power-to-recall-orders-not-exercised-when-ground-for-vacating-judgment-was-available-delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-for-recall-of-order-under-section-151-crpc-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Power to recall orders not to be exercised when ground for vacating the judgment was available but not availed; Delhi High Court dismisses application for recall of order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":329589,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/29\/section-311-crpc-based-on-affidavit-filed-after-her-initial-testimony-mp-hc-answers-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":281970,"position":0},"title":"Section 311 CrPC| Can Prosecutrix be recalled for further Cross-Examination based on affidavit filed after her initial testimony? MP High Court answers","author":"Ritu","date":"August 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 311 CrPC allows the court to recall a witness if it is essential for a just decision of the case, but such power must be exercised judiciously and with caution.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":158504,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/22\/power-to-recall-a-witness-cannot-be-invoked-to-fill-up-omission-in-the-evidence-already-led-by-witness\/","url_meta":{"origin":281970,"position":1},"title":"Power to recall a witness cannot be invoked to fill up omission in the evidence already led by witness","author":"Saba","date":"September 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: While deciding a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order passed by the learned Civil Judge whereby application filed under Section 151 CPC on behalf of the petitioners-defendants for leading additional evidence was dismissed, a Single Judge Bench of Sandeep Sharma,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/nclat-power-recall-its-judgement-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":281970,"position":2},"title":"Does NCLAT have power to review or recall its judgment? NCLAT 5-member bench answers","author":"Ritu","date":"June 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A 5-member bench overturned two judgments delivered by 3-judge bench which held that the NCLAT does not have the power to review or recall its own judgements.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/kerala-hc-rejects-actor-sunils-application-seeking-recall-of-witnesses-in-2017-actor-assault-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":281970,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Frivolous application filed for delaying disposal\u2019: Kerala HC rejects actor Sunil\u2019s plea to recall two expert witnesses for cross examination in 2017 actor assault case","author":"Editor","date":"December 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA prosecution witness, who was examined already, cannot be recalled by exercising the powers under Section 233 CrPC. However, such an exercise can be done under Section 311 CrPC at any stage, including that of Section 233, provided all the requirements and parameters of Section 311 are otherwise satisfied.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/04\/order-18-rule-17-cpc-not-intended-for-parties-to-recall-witness-for-re-examination-it-enables-court-to-recall-witness-to-clarify-issues\/","url_meta":{"origin":281970,"position":4},"title":"Order 18 Rule 17 CPC not intended for parties to recall witness for re-examination; it enables Court to recall witness to clarify issues \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and C. Hari Shankar, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-husband against the order of the family court whereby it granted a decree of divorce in favour of the respondent-wife. It was contended by appellant that he wasn\u2019t given\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":319682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/kanyadan-not-essential-for-solemnization-of-hindu-marriage-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":281970,"position":5},"title":"[S. 311 CrPC] Discrepancies in examination and cross examination no ground to recall witnesses: Allahabad HC","author":"Editor","date":"April 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cHindu Marriage Act, 1955 merely provides saptpadi as an essential ceremony of a Hindu marriage and it does not provide that the ceremony of kanyadan is essential for solemnization of a Hindu marriage\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281970","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281970"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281970\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281970"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281970"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281970"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}