{"id":281470,"date":"2023-01-11T18:00:33","date_gmt":"2023-01-11T12:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=281470"},"modified":"2023-01-11T17:54:13","modified_gmt":"2023-01-11T12:24:13","slug":"cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of ₹ 936 crore penalty"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi<\/span>: While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a penalty of ₹ 936.44 crore on the appellant, Google for abusing its dominant position through its Play Store policies, a bench consisting of Rakesh Kumar, J., and Dr. Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) refused to grant interim relief to the appellant regarding the status quo to remain till the appeal is finally heard.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, CCI vide order dated 20-10-2022, imposed a penalty of ₹ 936.44 crore on the appellant for abusing its dominant position through its Play Store policies. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the appellant filed an appeal before this Tribunal challenging the said order and prayed for interim relief to put a stay on CCI's order.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal observed that the CCI's order was passed on 20-10-2022 and the appeal was filed on 20-12-2022, i.e., on the last day of 60 days period allotted for filing of an appeal. The Tribunal opined that the appellant cannot be allowed to insist on interim relief when no urgency was shown in filing the appeal.<\/p>\n

Allowing the appeal, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit 10% of the penalty amount. The Tribunal held that<\/p>\n

“Since, urgency has been shown for passing interim order, keeping in view voluminous record and long impugned order, instead of passing any interim order, we are of the opinion that the appeal can be finally decided at the earliest. Accordingly, the appeal is directed to be listed in the month of April. Put up on 03.04.2023 for final hearing.”<\/p>\n

[Google LLC v. CCI, Competition Appeal (AT) No. 01 of 2023, decided on 04-01-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. Maninder Singh (Senior Advocates), Mr. Toshit Shandilya, Mr. Hemangini Dadwal, Mr. Ravisekhar Nair, Mr. Parthsarathi Jha, Mr. Mohith Gauri, Mr. Atish Ghoshal, Mr. Deepanshu Poddar, Mr. Aditya Dhupar, Ms. Ketki Agrawal, Mr. Param Tandon, Mr. Bhaavi Agrawal, Mr. Thomas Bohnett, Ms. Aditi Goapalakrishnan, Mr. Aman Sharma, Ms. Bani Brar, Ms. Sayobani Basu and Ms. Vanya Chhabra, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n

Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Counsel for the Respondent No. 1<\/p>\n

Mr. Jayant Mehta (Senior Advocates), Mr. Abir Roy, Mr. Soham Goswami, Mr. Vivek Pandey, Mr. Aman Shankar, Ms. Sukanya Viswanathan, Counsel for the Map My India<\/p>\n

Mr. Mukul Rohatgi and Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao (Senior Advocates), Mr. Naval Chopra, Mr. Ajit Warrier, Ms. Shally Bhasin, Mr. Yaman Verma, Mr. Ritwik Bhattacharya, Ms. Chandni Anand, Mr. Prateek Yadav and Ms. Parnita Kare, Counsel for the Oslabs Technology India (P) Ltd.<\/p>\n

Mr. Abir Roy, Counsel for the ADIF<\/p>\n\n

*Ritu Singh, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[5461,6661,2889,25414,30182,22014,2627,54381],"class_list":["post-281470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cci","tag-dominant-position","tag-google","tag-interim-relief","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-Penalty","tag-play-store-policies"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of ₹ 936 crore penalty | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a penalty of \u20b9 936.44 crore\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of ₹ 936 crore penalty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a penalty of \u20b9 936.44 crore\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-11T12:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of ₹ 936 crore penalty | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-11T12:30:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a penalty of \u20b9 936.44 crore\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"NCLAT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of ₹ 936 crore penalty\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of ₹ 936 crore penalty | SCC Times","description":"While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a penalty of \u20b9 936.44 crore","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of ₹ 936 crore penalty","og_description":"While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a penalty of \u20b9 936.44 crore","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-11T12:30:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/","name":"NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of ₹ 936 crore penalty | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-11T12:30:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a penalty of \u20b9 936.44 crore","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"NCLAT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of ₹ 936 crore penalty"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282480,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/26\/repudiated-appeal-of-google-llc-deposit-10-penalty-quantified-order-of-cci-for-abuse-of-dominance-in-relation-to-android-eco-system-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":281470,"position":0},"title":"‘Findings not contrary to the weight of record\u2019; Supreme Court affirms NCLAT’s order refusing to stay CCI\u2019s Rs 1,338 crore penalty on Google LLC for anti-competitive practices","author":"Editor","date":"January 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court had reservation to express its opinion on the merits of the case which would otherwise affect the proceedings pending before NCLAT and stated that the findings of the CCI at the interlocutory stage was neither without jurisdiction nor suffered from any error which would necessitate interference in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-202.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":288174,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/29\/penalty-on-google-nclat-sets-aside-certain-directions-by-cci-but-upholds-inr-1337-crore-penalty-on-google-for-abuse-of-dominant-position-in-android-mobile-device-ecosystem-legal-news-legal-researc-up\/","url_meta":{"origin":281470,"position":1},"title":"[Google-CCI Case] |NCLAT upholds Rs1,337 crore penalty on google for abuse of dominant position in Android Mobile Device Ecosystem","author":"Editor","date":"March 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Tribunal while upholding the impugned order passed by CCI dated 20-10-2022, set aside 4 key directions issued in paragraphs 617.3, 617.9, 617.10 and 617.7.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-685.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/","url_meta":{"origin":281470,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY (ATE) Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance; Appellate Tribunal for Electricity sets aside the order A division bench of Ramesh Ranganathan (Chairperson) and Sandesh Kumar Sharma (Technical Member) set aside the order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":335564,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/20\/competition-commission-india-imposes-penalty-213-14-crore-meta-abusing-dominant-position-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":281470,"position":3},"title":"CCI imposes a penalty of Rs. 213.14 crore on Meta for abusing its dominant position vide order dated 18-11-2024","author":"Editor","date":"November 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The penalty by CCI was imposed in relation to WhatsApp\u2019s 2021 Privacy Policy, which collected an expanded scope of data along with mandatory data.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Competition Commission of India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":116151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/25\/penalty-imposed-against-coal-india-ltd-its-subsidiaries-for-abusing-dominant-position\/","url_meta":{"origin":281470,"position":4},"title":"Penalty imposed against Coal India Ltd. & its subsidiaries for abusing dominant position","author":"Saba","date":"March 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India:The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has found Coal India Limited (CIL) and its subsidiaries to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Competition Act, 2002 for imposing unfair\/discriminatory conditions in Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs) with the power producers for supply of non-coking\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290137,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/cci-imposed-penalty-anti-competitive-behaviour-appal-nclat-reduce-penalty-mitigating-factors-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":281470,"position":5},"title":"Mitigating factors should be considered while imposing penalty for anti-competitive behavior: NCLAT imposes 1% penalty of the turnover on Geep Industries","author":"Ritu","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026penalty @1% of the turnover for each year of continuance of the cartel would be appropriate penalty in keeping with the extent and seriousness proportionality of the anti-competitive behavior of Geep Industries.\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281470"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281470\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}