{"id":281452,"date":"2023-01-12T10:00:54","date_gmt":"2023-01-12T04:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=281452"},"modified":"2023-01-23T19:27:38","modified_gmt":"2023-01-23T13:57:38","slug":"uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"UPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in \u2018Oh My God’ project"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority<\/span>: Rajesh Kumar Tyagi (Secretary) upheld the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal (‘Tribunal') and accorded Saya Cementation Limited. (‘Saya Cementation') the status of promoter in accordance with Section 2(zk)<\/a> of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016<\/a> (‘RERA Act'), by approving the proposal to transfer the majority rights and liabilities of the project ‘OH MY GOD' to Saya Cementation jointly with the land-owning company Alisa Infratech Pvt. (‘Alisa Infratech').<\/p>\n

The project ‘OH MY GOD' being commercial project was registered with UP RERA(‘Authority') in the name of Baya Weaver Limited (‘Baya Weaver'). The promoter added land-owning company Alisa Infratech as a promoter by editing promoter details without obtaining the approval of the Authority. Subsequently, Alisa Infratech approached the Authority to transfer the project’s registration in the name of the land-owner company Alisa Infratech and to allow the change of name to SAYA STATUS on the grounds that Baya Weaver had defaulted on the timelines to complete the project and that Alisa Infratech had taken over all the assets and liabilities of the project including the 300 crores+ loan amount. Thereafter, Baya Weaver, approached the Authority for mutating the project in favour of land-owning company Alisa Infratech<\/p>\n

A public notice in four leading newspapers was published informing the allottees regarding the transfer of majority rights and liabilities in the project pursuant to which objections were filed by six of the allottees. The Authority directed Alisa Infratech to file an undertaking assuring the allottees of its intentions.<\/p>\n

In addition to this, a share purchase agreement was entered between Saya Cementation, Baya Weaver, and Alisa Infratech, whereby Saya Cementation purchased 100 per cent equity share capital of the companies and had issued no objection certificate to the effect that Saya Cementation had paid the whole of purchase consideration and the companies had handed over the possession of the site to entitle it to mortgage project. However, a dispute arose between the companies and Saya Cementation which led the parties to approach the Arbitration Tribunal.<\/p>\n

The Arbitration Tribunal in the case of Alisa Infratech v Saya Cementation had passed an order of injunction to the effect that the claimants i.e., Alisa Infratech should not create any hindrance to the respondents i.e., Saya Cementation for taking over the claimant companies and continuing with the project and shall give all necessary assistance to properly execute the project. It was an admitted position that the possession was given to the respondent by the claimant, however, not all documents were handed over to the respondent which did not give the respondents an effective control of the project resulting into delay and making the investment made by the buyers at risk. Saya cementation had taken over the liabilities of its subsidiary companies i.e., both Baya Weaver as well as the Alisa Infratech, however, created mortgage to discharge their liabilities.<\/p>\n

While navigating through section 2[zk] of RERA Act, the Authority held that Saya Cementation was entitled to be the promoter of the project as it had taken over all the rights and obligations in the project and was also in physical possession of the project for its development. As per section 11[4][g], it is the promoter who is responsible for payments of the outgoings, including mortgage loans and interest on a mortgage making it the duty and obligation of Saya Cementations, as per the relevant provisions of the RERA Act.<\/p>\n

The Authority after taking into account all the relevant material on record and exercising its power under Section 15 of RERA Act decided to approve the proposal to transfer the majority rights and liabilities in the project ‘OH MY GOD' to Saya Cementation Ltd. jointly with the land-owning company Alisa Infratech subject to certain terms and conditions.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the request of Saya Cementations to be the promoter of the project along with Alisa Infratech to comply with all the pending and forthcoming obligations jointly and severely under the rules and regulations of the RERA Act was accepted by the Authority.<\/p>\n

[In the matter of project ‘Oh My God', 2022 SCC OnLine RERA (UP) 136<\/a>, decided on 08-12-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The request of Saya Cementations to be the promoter of the project along with Alisa Infratech to comply with all the pending and forthcoming obligations jointly and severely under the rules and regulations of the RERA Act was accepted by the Authority”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":281456,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[48887,11641,25924,54376,54375,49017,54374],"class_list":["post-281452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-arbitration-tribunal","tag-mortgage","tag-promoter","tag-subsidiaries","tag-transfer-of-rights-and-liabilities","tag-uprera","tag-uttar-pradesh-real-estate-regulatory-authority"],"yoast_head":"\nUPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in \u2018Oh My God' project | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajesh Kumar Tyagi (Secretary) upheld the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal (\u2018Tribunal') and accorded Saya Cementation Limited\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"UPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in \u2018Oh My God' project\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajesh Kumar Tyagi (Secretary) upheld the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal (\u2018Tribunal') and accorded Saya Cementation Limited\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-12T04:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-23T13:57:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-49.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"name\":\"UPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in \u2018Oh My God' project | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-49.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-12T04:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-23T13:57:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Rajesh Kumar Tyagi (Secretary) upheld the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal (\u2018Tribunal') and accorded Saya Cementation Limited\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-49.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-49.jpg\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"UPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in \u2018Oh My God’ project\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"UPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in \u2018Oh My God' project | SCC Times","description":"Rajesh Kumar Tyagi (Secretary) upheld the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal (\u2018Tribunal') and accorded Saya Cementation Limited","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"UPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in \u2018Oh My God' project","og_description":"Rajesh Kumar Tyagi (Secretary) upheld the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal (\u2018Tribunal') and accorded Saya Cementation Limited","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-12T04:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-23T13:57:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-49.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","name":"UPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in \u2018Oh My God' project | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-49.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-12T04:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-23T13:57:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Rajesh Kumar Tyagi (Secretary) upheld the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal (\u2018Tribunal') and accorded Saya Cementation Limited","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-49.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-49.jpg","width":391,"height":311},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/uprera-accorded-saya-cementation-status-promoter-accordance-with-section-2zk-rera-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPRERA interprets Section 2 (zk) of RERA Act; upholds Saya Cementation Ltd. as a Promoter in \u2018Oh My God’ project"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-49.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/","url_meta":{"origin":281452,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY (ATE) Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance; Appellate Tribunal for Electricity sets aside the order A division bench of Ramesh Ranganathan (Chairperson) and Sandesh Kumar Sharma (Technical Member) set aside the order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":356946,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/19\/sc-upholds-allahabad-hc-ruling-larsen-toubro-promoter-rera\/","url_meta":{"origin":281452,"position":1},"title":"Promoter Liability and Deemed Sanction under RERA | SC upholds Allahabad HC Ruling declaring L&T as sole promoter","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cInsofar as the interpretation of Section 2(zk) and Section 5(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. made by the High Court in the impugned Judgment is concerned; it is a matter on which we do not express any opinion, and it is left open in an appropriate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"L&T sole promoter under RERA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/LT-sole-promoter-under-RERA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/LT-sole-promoter-under-RERA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/LT-sole-promoter-under-RERA.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/LT-sole-promoter-under-RERA.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":171514,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/27\/petition-challenging-validity-maharera-order-defining-co-promoter-disposed-off-maharera-withdraws-impugned-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":281452,"position":2},"title":"Petition challenging validity of MahaRERA Order defining \u2018co-promoter\u2019 disposed off after MahaRERA withdraws impugned Order","author":"Saba","date":"November 27, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: While deciding the petition which challenged the validity of the Order passed by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority wherein it had defined the term \u2018co-promoter\u2019 as the same was not defined in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, the Division Bench of Naresh H.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/28\/application-of-real-estate-regulatory-authority-act-provisions-to-rehabilitated-allottees-of-flats\/","url_meta":{"origin":281452,"position":3},"title":"Application of Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act Provisions to Rehabilitated Allottees of Flats","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Parag A. Vyas\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Application of Real Estate Regulatory","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Application-of-Real-Estate-Regulatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Application-of-Real-Estate-Regulatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Application-of-Real-Estate-Regulatory.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Application-of-Real-Estate-Regulatory.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338197,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/31\/oreat-upholds-denial-welfare-society-claim-project-did-not-fall-under-rera-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":281452,"position":4},"title":"OREAT upholds denial of welfare society\u2019s complaint regarding builder\u2019s violation of RERA Act; Cites non-applicability of Act to projects completed before commencement","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"OREAT held that completion certificates issued by registered architects or engineers as permitted by BDA as per Section 20 of the ODA Act in respect of projects completed prior to the commencement of the RERA Act would not be invalid as that would render all the projects in Odisha, which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"OREAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/OREAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/OREAT.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/OREAT.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/OREAT.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":178034,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/25\/bombay-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-real-estate-regulation-development-act-2016\/","url_meta":{"origin":281452,"position":5},"title":"Bombay HC upholds constitutional validity of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016","author":"Saba","date":"December 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Following the orders of the Supreme Court to hear petitions challenging the constitutional validity of several provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act of 2016, a Division Bench comprising of Naresh Patil and Rajesh Ketkar, JJ. held the provisions to be constitutionally valid and legal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281452"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281452\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/281456"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}