{"id":281182,"date":"2023-01-06T18:00:05","date_gmt":"2023-01-06T12:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=281182"},"modified":"2023-01-18T14:56:40","modified_gmt":"2023-01-18T09:26:40","slug":"legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal:<\/b> While deciding the appeal, the bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Ms. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), held that once the resolution Plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and the successful resolution applicant, unless there is any material irregularity or is against the provisions of Section 30(2)<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a>, the Adjudicating Authority cannot interfere in its limited jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

Background<\/b><\/p>\n

In the case at hand the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) approved the resolution plan and the application for approval of the resolution plan under Section 31<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (“Code, 2016”) was filed before the Adjudicating Authority. Later, the Adjudicating Authority directed the Resolution Professional (“RP”) to consider the new resolution plan of M\/s. Hindustan Coils Limited (“HCL”), which is challenged by the appellant in this appeal. Further, CoC filed an application to withdraw their approval after more than two years of its approval.<\/p>\n

Issue:<\/b><\/p>\n

Whether the CoC after approving the resolution plan can seek direction to consider the new resolution plan of a third party who was not a part of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) and seek to withdraw their approval after more than two years of the approval of the first resolution plan?<\/p>\n

Law, Analysis and Decision<\/b><\/p>\n

The Tribunal placed reliance on ‘Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd.’<\/i>, in which it was held that strict timelines must be adhered to and that the Adjudicating Authority lacks the authority to allow the withdrawal\/modification of the resolution plan by the successful resolution applicant (“SRA”), as this would defeat the very objective of the statute.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal stated that the effect of the CoC seeking withdrawal of an already approved resolution plan would have identical repercussions with respect to timelines as the same would have the effect of restarting the CIRP from the valuation stage when all the statutory timelines have long since been exhausted. The principle with respect to ‘timelines’ is applicable to the facts of this case.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal further stated that at the cost of repetition, it is crystal clear that any modification or a withdrawal after approval by the CoC and submission to the Adjudicating Authority, ‘irrespective of the content’<\/i> of the terms envisaged by the resolution plan, would only lead to further delay and defeat the very scope and objective of the Code. The existing framework does not provide any scope for effecting any further modifications or withdrawals of the CoC approved resolution plan by the SRA or the Creditors. The Adjudicating Authority can interfere only if the resolution plan is against the provisions of the Code, 2016<\/a>. Once the resolution plan is submitted to the Adjudicating Authority, it is binding and irrevocable as between the CoC and the SRA in terms of the provisions of the Code, 2016<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal held that the contention of the respondent that the Code, 2016<\/a> provides for ‘Maximisation of the Value of Assets’ and therefore a higher value offered is to be considered, is untenable, as the maximum timeline permissible for completion of the said process has lapsed.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal further reiterated that the ‘Maximisation of Value of Assets’ ought to be ‘within the specified timelines and if it is not a timebound process, the entire scope and objective of the Code, 2016<\/a> would fail merely because there is another higher offer made by a third party<\/p>\n

Thus, the Tribunal held that once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the CoC and the SRA, unless there is any material irregularity or is against the provisions of Section 30(2) of the Code the Adjudicating Authority cannot, in its limited jurisdiction, interfere.<\/p>\n

[Kalinga Allied Industries India Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors, 2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 1618<\/a>, decided on 19-12-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Advocates for Appellants: Advocate Abhijeet Sinha, Advocate Rakesh Wadhwa;<\/p>\n

Advocates for Respondents: Advocate Mohit Nandani, Advocate Mukesh Kumar.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NCLAT while deciding the appeal held that the CoC after approving the resolution plan cannot seek direction from Adjudicating Authority to consider the new resolution plan of a third party who was not a part of the CIRP as it would fall outside the timeline and defeat the very scope and objective of the Code.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[33289,32458,31387,54284,22014,30228,54282,54283],"class_list":["post-281182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-adjudicating-authority","tag-committee-of-creditors","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016","tag-maximisation-of-value-of-assets","tag-nclat","tag-resolution-plan","tag-successful-resolution-applicant","tag-timelines"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While deciding the appeal, the bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Ms. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), held that once the resolution Plan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While deciding the appeal, the bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Ms. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), held that once the resolution Plan\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-06T12:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-18T09:26:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-06T12:30:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-18T09:26:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"While deciding the appeal, the bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Ms. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), held that once the resolution Plan\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"NCLAT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant | SCC Times","description":"While deciding the appeal, the bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Ms. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), held that once the resolution Plan","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant","og_description":"While deciding the appeal, the bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Ms. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), held that once the resolution Plan","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-06T12:30:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-18T09:26:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/","name":"NCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-06T12:30:05+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-18T09:26:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"While deciding the appeal, the bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Ms. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), held that once the resolution Plan","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"NCLAT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/legal-updates-legal-news-once-the-resolution-plan-is-submitted-for-approval-it-is-binding-between-committee-of-creditors-and-successful-resolution-applicant\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT | Once the resolution plan is submitted for approval, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors and successful resolution applicant"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":236860,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/nclat-will-ib-code-permit-a-successful-resolution-applicant-to-stage-a-u-turn-frustrating-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-tribunal-decodes\/","url_meta":{"origin":281182,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT | Will I&B Code permit a successful Resolution Applicant to stage a “U-turn” frustrating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process? Tribunal decodes","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0Full Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhat (ACJ) and Justice Anant Bijay Singh (Judicial Member) and Dr Ashok Kumar Mishra (Technical Member), while addressing the present application observed that, A Resolution Applicant whose Resolution Plan stands approved by Committee of Creditors cannot be permitted to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239378,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/whether-an-unsuccessful-resolution-applicant-whose-resolution-plan-gets-rejected-by-coc-has-locus-to-question-implementation-of-approved-resolution-plan-nclat-thoroughly-determines\/","url_meta":{"origin":281182,"position":1},"title":"Whether an ‘Unsuccessful Resolution Applicant’ whose Resolution Plan gets rejected by CoC has locus to question implementation of approved Resolution Plan? NCLAT thoroughly determines","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0The Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhat (Acting Chairperson) and Justice Anant Bijay Singh (Judicial Member), Dr Ashok Kumar Mishra (Technical Member), in the present appeal observed, \"Once the Appellant is out of the fray, it has neither locus to call in question any action\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/04\/whether-coc-after-approval-a-resolution-plan-can-seek-direction-to-consider-a-new-resolution-plan-of-a-third-party-who-was-not-a-part-of-the-cirp-proceedings-nclat-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":281182,"position":2},"title":"Whether CoC after approval a Resolution Plan can seek direction to consider a new Resolution Plan of a third party who was not a part of the CIRP Proceedings? NCLAT answers","author":"Editor","date":"January 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: A bench consisting of Anant Bijay Singh, J., and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member) held that once the Resolution Plan is submitted for approval before the Adjudicating Authority, it is binding between the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Successful Resolution Applicant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280176,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/legal-update-legal-news-adjudicating-authority-either-approve-or-reject-resolution-plan\/","url_meta":{"origin":281182,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | No provision for making any modification in the resolution plan; Adjudicating Authority can either approve or reject it","author":"Editor","date":"December 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal held that there is no provision in Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for alteration or modification in the resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":262199,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/22\/if-granting-exclusion-of-time-would-help-corporate-debtor-from-liquidation-should-nlcat-allow-such-exclusion\/","url_meta":{"origin":281182,"position":4},"title":"If granting exclusion of time would help Corporate Debtor from liquidation, should NCLAT allow such exclusion? Here\u2019s what NCLAT says","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice M. Venugopal (Judicial Member) and Dr Ashok Kumar Mishra (Technical Member) held that if granting exclusion of time helps the Corporate Debtor to revive, the basic objective of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code will eb achieved. An appeal was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274550,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/27\/nclat-rejection-of-resolution-plan-by-the-nclt-due-to-non-serious-casual-and-non-diligent-conduct-of-resolution-appellant-is-good-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":281182,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | Rejection of Resolution Plan by the NCLT due to Non-Serious, Casual and Non-Diligent Conduct of Resolution Appellant is Good in Law","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The CIRP is a time bound process where timeline has been prescribed for each step. The CIRP cannot be allowed to continue for indefinite period.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281182"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281182\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}