{"id":280485,"date":"2022-12-27T17:00:17","date_gmt":"2022-12-27T11:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=280485"},"modified":"2022-12-30T16:45:06","modified_gmt":"2022-12-30T11:15:06","slug":"executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

Delhi High Court:<\/b> In a case where an application was filed by one of the beneficiaries of the Will under probate, under Section 247<\/a> of the Succession Act, 1925<\/a> seeking appointment of Administrator of the Estate and assets of the testator, a Single Judge Bench of Chandra Dhari Singh, J. dismissed the application and held that an executor appointed in probate proceedings would not be readily removed unless gross misconduct, gross mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate was demonstrated. Further, the Court held that there should be clear evidence that the executor’s continued presence was detrimental to the property and would frustrate the will for which he was charged by law.<\/p>\n

Background<\/b><\/p>\n

The present application had been filed by Respondent 4, who was one of the beneficiaries of the Will under probate, under Section 247<\/a> of the Succession Act, 1925<\/a> (Act) seeking appointment of Administrator of the Estate and Assets of the Testator and for issuance of temporary injunction restraining the petitioner, Respondents 2 and 3 (testator’s wife and son respectively) from alienating or creating third-party rights qua the estate and assets of the testator in the Will.<\/p>\n

The testator was married to Respondent 2 and out of the marriage two children (Respondents 3 and 4) were born. A Will was executed by the testator in 2017 and Respondent 3 and 4 (the testator’s son and daughter respectively) were the only two beneficiaries under the Will. The testator left for heavenly abode in 2021 and after the testator’s death and upon coming to the know about the existence of the alleged Will, his daughter objected to the genuineness of the said Will and sought details of any transactions which had been undertaken under the said Will. Further, his daughter requested the Executors to refrain from accepting any change in the ownership of the assets and properties without a valid probate of the Will. In 2022, the probate petition was filed by the executors for probate of the Will and in the same petition, Respondent 4 filed an application for status quo on the Estate and the assets of the testator and directions for freezing of voting rights in respect of shareholding of the testator in various corporate entities, but the application was dismissed.<\/p>\n

Submissions on behalf of the Applicant\/Respondent 4<\/b><\/p>\n

Counsel for Respondent 4 submitted that the instant Will had been executed under duress, coercion and undue influence and the testator was in a feeble state of mind and his physical condition was severely impacted at the time of the execution of the Will. It was submitted that the executors, in connivance with the testator’s wife and son had parted with the ownership and possession of many assets of the testator even though Respondent 4 had taken a strong objection to the genuineness of the Will. Counsel also submitted that the executors had failed to take into consideration Section 337 of the Act as the Executor was not empowered to pay or deliver any legacy until the expiration of one year from the death of the testator. Even otherwise, the interest of justice requires that until and unless the alleged Will was proved and probate as prayed was granted, the entire estate of the testator should be preserved. Therefore, it was submitted that it was a fit case, wherein this Court should invoke its powers under Section 247 of the Act and appoint an Administrator of the Estate and Assets of the testator.<\/p>\n

Submissions on behalf of the Executor\/Petitioner 2<\/b><\/p>\n

Counsel for the Executor submitted that he had taken every effort to stand by the wishes of the testator and Petitioner 2 who was the first cousin of both Respondents 3 and 4 (the testator’s children), was a resident of Mumbai and the bulk of the estate of the testator was situated in New Delhi and Petitioner 2 was completely removed from the daily life of Respondents 2 and 3, therefore, it was not possible that Petitioner 2 was acting in connivance with Respondents 2 and 3. It was submitted that there was no requirement in law or otherwise for the respondents to be aware of the Will upon its execution and the executor’s responsibility commenced only on the death of the testator.<\/p>\n

Submissions on behalf of the Respondents 2 and 3<\/b><\/p>\n

Counsel for Respondents 2 and 3 submitted that the appropriate and the legal course would have been to first move an application under Section 301 of the Act seeking removal of the executor, and then only an application could have been moved under Section 247 of the Act seeking appointment of an administrator pendente lite<\/i>. Therefore, the present application was non-maintainable.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court opined that “it is trite law that the testator’s wish regarding as to who will be the executor of his estate and carry out his Will must typically be respected, and an executor named by the testator should not be removed from his office unless, there is convincing proof that his continued appointment would be harmful to the estates of the deceased and frustrate the testator’s Will. The named executor cannot be removed for a few isolated minor mistakes. According to Section 211 of the Act, the executor of the testator’s will serve as the testator’s legal representative for all purposes and becomes the owner of the testator’s property as soon as the Testator passes away. It was a well-established legal principle that the executor may exercise his authority and carry out the conditions of the Will even if probate was not granted. In fact, one of the key differences between an executor and administrator was that the former may act even before obtaining probate, whilst the latter cannot act until he had been awarded letters of administration. The interest of an executor in the estate of the deceased vests in him immediately on the death of the testator”.<\/i><\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court held that an executor appointed in probate proceedings would not be readily removed unless gross misconduct, gross mismanagement, abuse, or misuse of probate was demonstrated. Further, the Court held that there should be clear evidence that the executor’s continued presence was detrimental to the property and would frustrate the will for which he was charged by law and the records of the Will to administer.<\/p>\n

The Court held that naming an administrator pendente lite<\/i> would not come up until the Executor was removed by the appropriate Court in accordance with Section 301 of the Act. Further, the Court noted that Section 332 of the Act had been complied with in the present case as there had been subsequent ratification of the transactions entered into by Respondent 3 by the executor. Moreover, the Court noted that the language used in Section 337 of the Act was that the executor was ‘not bound’ and the language was not that the executor was ‘barred’.<\/p>\n

The Court also held that the court of probate was a court of conscience and not a court of suspicion and the wishes of the testator could not be throttled merely because of certain aspersions were being casted on the authenticity of the Will without any basis. A registered document carries a rebuttable presumption in its favour and it is presumed to be genuine in terms of Section 114(e)<\/a> of the Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>. For this, the Court relied on Prem Singh<\/i> v. Birbal<\/i>, (2006) 5 SCC 353<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that “there was a presumption that a registered document is validly executed. A registered document, therefore, prima facie would be valid in law. The onus of proof, thus, would be on a person who leads evidence to rebut the presumption”<\/i>.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the present application was not only liable to be dismissed on merits but also on the grounds of maintainability as no preceding application under Section 301 of the Act had been filed by the Respondent 4.<\/p>\n

[Swapnil Gupta v. Govt. (NCT of Delhi), 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4580<\/a>, decided on 23-12-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner(s): Advocate Samrat Nigam;<\/p>\n

Advocate Angad Mehta;<\/p>\n

For the Respondent(s): Senior Advocate Rajesh Yadav;<\/p>\n

Advocate Pavitra Kaur;<\/p>\n

Advocate Tanmaya Mehta;<\/p>\n

Advocate Rudrajit Ghosh;<\/p>\n

Advocate Ashu Goyal;<\/p>\n

Advocate Karan Nagrath;<\/p>\n

Advocate Ruchika Arora;<\/p>\n

Advocate Niharila Nagrath.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Delhi High Court held that naming of an administrator pendente lite would not come up unless and until the Executor was initially removed by the appropriate Court as per Section 301<\/a> of Succession Act, 1925<\/a>. Further, it was held that an executor appointed in probate proceedings would not be readily removed unless gross misconduct, gross mismanagement, abuse, or misuse of probate was demonstrated.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279267,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[53895,39340,6111,2881,35120,43469,53891,53893,53894,53896,30970,53892,46772,17331],"class_list":["post-280485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abuse-or-misuse","tag-administrator","tag-appointment","tag-Assets","tag-beneficiaries","tag-estate","tag-executor","tag-gross-misconduct","tag-gross-mismanagement","tag-indian-succession-act-1925","tag-pendente-lite","tag-probate-proceedings","tag-testator","tag-will"],"yoast_head":"\nExecutor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case where an application was filed by one of the beneficiaries of the Will under probate, under Section 247 of the Succession Act, 1925\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case where an application was filed by one of the beneficiaries of the Will under probate, under Section 247 of the Succession Act, 1925\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-27T11:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-30T11:15:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-27T11:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-30T11:15:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1364,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"abuse or misuse\",\"Administrator\",\"Appointment\",\"Assets\",\"Beneficiaries\",\"Estate\",\"Executor\",\"gross misconduct\",\"gross mismanagement\",\"Indian Succession Act 1925\",\"pendente lite\",\"probate proceedings\",\"Testator\",\"Will\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/\",\"name\":\"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-27T11:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-30T11:15:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case where an application was filed by one of the beneficiaries of the Will under probate, under Section 247 of the Succession Act, 1925\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/12\\\/27\\\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court | SCC Times","description":"In a case where an application was filed by one of the beneficiaries of the Will under probate, under Section 247 of the Succession Act, 1925","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court","og_description":"In a case where an application was filed by one of the beneficiaries of the Will under probate, under Section 247 of the Succession Act, 1925","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-27T11:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-30T11:15:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court","datePublished":"2022-12-27T11:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-30T11:15:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/"},"wordCount":1364,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","keywords":["abuse or misuse","Administrator","Appointment","Assets","Beneficiaries","Estate","Executor","gross misconduct","gross mismanagement","Indian Succession Act 1925","pendente lite","probate proceedings","Testator","Will"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/","name":"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","datePublished":"2022-12-27T11:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-30T11:15:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case where an application was filed by one of the beneficiaries of the Will under probate, under Section 247 of the Succession Act, 1925","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","width":391,"height":311,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/executor-appointed-in-probate-proceedings-cannot-be-removed-unless-gross-misconduct-or-mismanagement-abuse-or-misuse-of-probate-is-demonstrated-delhi-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Executor appointed in probate proceedings cannot be removed unless gross misconduct or mismanagement, abuse or misuse of probate is demonstrated: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":297317,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/20\/delhi-hc-grants-probate-in-favour-of-khetri-trust-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":280485,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Substratum of refusing probate cannot be the testimony of an unreliable witness\u2019; Delhi High Court grants probate in favour of Khetri Trust","author":"Editor","date":"July 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Will was executed by the testator, Late Raja Bahadur Sardar Singh of Khetri in the presence of two attesting witnesses, thus, complying with Section 63 of the Succession Act, 1925.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264123,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/will-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":280485,"position":1},"title":"Testamentary disposition of property is deviation from natural line of inheritance in lesser or greater degree: Can it result in complete disposition in favour of one heir or exclusion of any other heir? Jhar HC throws light","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Expressing that the due execution of a Will is to be proved as per the provisions of law as laid down in Evidence Act as well as that if Indian Succession Act, \u00a0Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J., remarked that, a probate court being a Court of conscience, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":360404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/17\/supreme-court-dismisses-rajasthan-khetri-estate-upholds-will-khetri-trust\/","url_meta":{"origin":280485,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court dismisses Rajasthan\u2019s claim over Khetri Estate; Affirms validity of Raja Sardar Singh Will and Probate in favour of Khetri Trust","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court held that a State has no locus standi to challenge a Will of a private citizen by claiming to be a person interested in the estate of the deceased due to the action taken under Escheats Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Khetri Estate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khetri-Estate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khetri-Estate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khetri-Estate.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Khetri-Estate.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/15\/succession-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":280485,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Under S. 263 of Succession Act, can a person approach High Court for grant of probate or letter of administration or revocation or annulment? HC addresses the issue","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., decides a matter revolving around the Will of a deceased person. Factual Background Instant suit was filed by two brothers\u2019 owners of the suit property. The brothers mentioned were brothers of Late Shanti Swaroop Gupta. Defendants submitted that the deceased left a Will in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/letters-of-administration-under-section-228-indian-succession-act-granted-on-a-will-proved-and-registered-in-high-court-of-justice-leeds-uk\/","url_meta":{"origin":280485,"position":4},"title":"Letters of Administration under Section 228 Indian Succession Act granted on a Will proved and registered in High Court of Justice, Leeds, UK","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 13, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Jayant Nath, J. allowed a petition filed under Section 228 read with Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking grant of Letters of Administration in respect of a Will. It was pleaded by the petitioner that the testator's (who died\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215649,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/13\/bom-hc-not-open-to-probate-court-to-exceed-its-jurisdiction-by-enquiring-into-issues-of-title-in-probate-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":280485,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | Not open to Probate Court to exceed its jurisdiction by enquiring into issues of title in probate proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Sandeep K. Shinde, J. examined the scope of jurisdiction to be exercised by the Probate Court, and allowed an appeal filed against the order of the Probate Court whereby the appellant's application under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for probate of will\u00a0of her deceased husband was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=280485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280485\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=280485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=280485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=280485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}