{"id":280285,"date":"2022-12-23T12:00:37","date_gmt":"2022-12-23T06:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=280285"},"modified":"2023-01-06T17:29:11","modified_gmt":"2023-01-06T11:59:11","slug":"rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/","title":{"rendered":"Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal<\/b> | Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J.<\/b> and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member) held that Regulation 26(2) of the CIRP Regulations, 2016 being directory cannot override the power of the CoC which can take the final decision accepting or rejecting the resolution plan.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, a Resolution Plan was submitted by the Resolution Applicants (respondent 5 & 6), which was rejected by the CoC. Later, the Adjudicating Authority directed the initiation of liquidation proceedings of the asset of the Corporate Debtor under S. 33<\/a> of the IBC, 2016<\/a>. During the pendency of liquidation application, the applicants acquired 100% voting share in the CoC via assignment deed. The appellant filed an appeal to set aside the order initiating Liquidation and send the case back to CoC so that they can review the prior Resolution Plan.<\/p>\n

The respondents contended that no express power is provided to this Tribunal under IBC to set aside the order of liquidation. The appellant contended that with the change of circumstances, the Tribunal can still pass an order of turning the clock back even after the CoC has become funcutous officio<\/i>. The appellant also contended that since there is no express provision in IBC to set aside the Liquidation Order, R. 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 may be invoked.<\/p>\n

The issue in hand is whether the NCLAT can still turn the clock back, even after the members of CoC passed a resolution to liquidate the Corporate Debtor and allowed the Application under S. 33<\/a> IBC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Discussing the judgments relied by the parties, Sharad Sangi<\/i> v. Vandana Garg, CA (AT) (Ins.)<\/i> No. 461 of 2018 and State of Maharashtra<\/i> v. Videocon Industries Ltd.<\/i>, 2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 6<\/a>, the Tribunal opined that the ratio of precedents mentioned is not applicable since there is a change in the voting share.<\/p>\n

Dismissing the contention to rely on Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, the Tribunal stated that the Supreme Court has repeatedly held in several cases that the IBC, 2016<\/a> is comprehensive on its own and since there is no provision to deal with such a situation as we have one in hand, we do not find it to be a fit case to apply Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules 2016 which operate in altogether different sphere.<\/i><\/p>\n

The Tribunal held that appeal is devoid of merits and therefore is dismissed without any order cost.<\/p>\n

[Shailaja Vaibhav Patil v. Harshad S. Deshpande, 2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 1615<\/a>, decided on 05-12-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Mr. Varun Singh, Counsel for the Appellant;<\/p>\n

Mr. Rohit Rathi, Counsel for the Respondent No. 1;<\/p>\n

Mr. Rahul Totala and Mr. Rajat Malu, Counsel for the Respondent No. 3.<\/p>\n\n

*Ritu Singh, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[44108,29690,30182,22014,53806,12521,30228],"class_list":["post-280285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-corporate-insolvency","tag-liquidation","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-nclat-rules-2016","tag-nclt","tag-resolution-plan"],"yoast_head":"\nRule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member) held that Regulation 26(2)\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member) held that Regulation 26(2)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-23T06:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-06T11:59:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/\",\"name\":\"Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-23T06:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-06T11:59:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member) held that Regulation 26(2)\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"NCLAT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT | SCC Times","description":"Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member) held that Regulation 26(2)","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT","og_description":"Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member) held that Regulation 26(2)","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-23T06:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-06T11:59:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/","name":"Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","datePublished":"2022-12-23T06:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-06T11:59:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member) held that Regulation 26(2)","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"NCLAT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":312265,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/26\/nclat-affirms-committee-of-creditors-authority-to-opt-for-liquidation-under-section-332-of-the-ibc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":280285,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT affirms Committee of Creditors\u2019 authority to opt for liquidation under Section 33(2) of the IBC; sets aside show cause notice","author":"Ritu","date":"January 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that the CoC had the jurisdiction to decide on liquidation as per Section 33(2) and its explanation, even before completing all steps for resolution.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307307,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/16\/financial-debt-claims-under-section-58-of-ibc-cannot-be-entertained-after-cocs-approval-of-resolution-plan-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":280285,"position":1},"title":"Financial Debt claim under Section 5(8) of IBC cannot be entertained after CoC\u2019s approval of Resolution Plan: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT reiterated the importance of adhering to timelines in the Insolvency resolution process and the unacceptability of claims filed after the approval of the Resolution Plan by the CoC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274550,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/27\/nclat-rejection-of-resolution-plan-by-the-nclt-due-to-non-serious-casual-and-non-diligent-conduct-of-resolution-appellant-is-good-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":280285,"position":2},"title":"NCLAT | Rejection of Resolution Plan by the NCLT due to Non-Serious, Casual and Non-Diligent Conduct of Resolution Appellant is Good in Law","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The CIRP is a time bound process where timeline has been prescribed for each step. The CIRP cannot be allowed to continue for indefinite period.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224562,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/nclat-nclts-order-directing-liquidation-of-corporate-debtor-upheld-where-resolution-applicant-was-a-related-party-and-thus-not-eligible-under-s-29-a-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":280285,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | NCLT’s order directing liquidation of corporate debtor upheld where resolution applicant was a ‘related party’ and thus not eligible under S. 29-A IBC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench of Justice Venugopal M., Member (Judicial) and Balvider Singh and Ashok Kumar Mishra, Members (Technical) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal. Chandigarh, whereby the resolution plan submitted by the appellant was rejected and liquidation of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307140,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/15\/nclat-determines-how-to-distribute-corporate-debtors-assets-to-secured-creditors-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":280285,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Admitted Claim versus Security Interest\u2019; NCLAT determines how to distribute Corporate Debtor\u2019s assets to Secured Creditors","author":"Ritu","date":"November 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT reiterated that Commercial wisdom of the CoC is crucial in determining the viability and feasibility of a resolution plan.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/27\/no-demonstrated-legal-infirmity-or-non-compliance-with-section-302-of-the-ibc-found-nclat-upholds-resolution-plan-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":280285,"position":5},"title":"\u2018No demonstrated legal infirmity or non-compliance with Section 30(2) of the IBC found\u2019; NCLAT upholds Resolution Plan approval","author":"Ritu","date":"January 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that the commercial wisdom of the CoC was considered paramount, and no interference was justified.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=280285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280285\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=280285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=280285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=280285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}