{"id":280170,"date":"2022-12-21T15:30:43","date_gmt":"2022-12-21T10:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=280170"},"modified":"2022-12-26T17:20:16","modified_gmt":"2022-12-26T11:50:16","slug":"review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

Delhi High Court:<\/b> In a case filed seeking recall of an order which held that since Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [‘CIRP'] proceedings had commenced, the moratorium would take into effect and consequently all proceedings against the corporate debtor would stand interdicted, Yashwant Varma, J., held that while exercising the power conferred by Section 11<\/a> Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a>, the Court does not cease to be a Court of Record and the review or reopening of proceedings sought is not with respect to any power exercised by the Court under Section 11 on merits but on account of the evident factual mistake in that order, hence is permissible.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the power which the High Court exercises as a nominee of the Chief Justice under Section 11 of the Act is no longer liable to be construed or viewed as merely an administrative power but judicial in character.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondents submitted that as the Court was exercising powers under Section 11<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a>, it would not be entitled to undertake what is and would be entitled to construe as a substantive review.<\/p>\n

Placing reliance on United India Insurance Company Limited<\/i> v. Antique Art Exports Private Ltd.<\/i>, (2019) 5 SCC 362<\/a>, the Court noted that it would be incorrect for the Court to hold that the power exercised under Section 11 of the Act is a mere administrative function rather it is purely judicial.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that it would be incorrect to hold or to sustain the submission that while exercising the power conferred by Section 11 of the Act, the Court ceases to be a Court of Record and the review or reopening of proceedings which is sought is not with respect to any power exercised by the Court under Section 11 on merits but on account of the evident factual mistake in that order.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court recalled the impugned order and held that it suffers from an evident factual error based on the incorrect statement made by counsel.<\/p>\n

[Always Remember Properties Private Limited v. Reliance Home Finance Limited, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4479<\/a>, decided on 07-12-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Mr. Gaurav Mishra, Mr. Daman Popli, Ms. Ria Chanda and Ms. Neetu Devrani, Advocates before Petitioner;<\/p>\n

Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya and Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Advocates for R-1.<\/p>\n\n

*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

While exercising the power conferred by Section 11 of the Act, the Court ceases to be a Court of Record and the review or reopening of proceedings which is sought is not with respect to any power exercised by the Court under Section 11 on merits but on account of the evident factual mistake in that order.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279267,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3226,10131,22814,31803,2543,22074,43350,2897,45421],"class_list":["post-280170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitration","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process","tag-court-of-record","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-moratorium","tag-recall","tag-Review","tag-section-11"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While exercising the power conferred by Section 11 of the Act, the Court ceases to be a Court of Record and the review or reopening of proceedings which is sought is not with respect to any power exercised by the Court under Section 11 on merits but on account of the evident factual mistake in that order.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-21T10:00:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-26T11:50:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-21T10:00:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-26T11:50:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act","og_description":"While exercising the power conferred by Section 11 of the Act, the Court ceases to be a Court of Record and the review or reopening of proceedings which is sought is not with respect to any power exercised by the Court under Section 11 on merits but on account of the evident factual mistake in that order.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-21T10:00:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-26T11:50:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/","name":"Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","datePublished":"2022-12-21T10:00:43+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-26T11:50:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","width":391,"height":311,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/review-permissible-against-order-dismissing-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-delhi-high-court-legal-news-research-awareness\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":280427,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/order-of-stay-moratorium-under-the-companies-act-2013-prohibits-the-initiation-of-any-proceedings-parties-cannot-be-referred-to-arbitration-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":280170,"position":0},"title":"Order of stay\/moratorium under the Companies Act, 2013 prohibits the initiation of any proceedings; Parties cannot be referred to Arbitration: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court ruled that the moratorium granted by the NCLAT, staying the institution of suits and proceedings against the Corporate Debtor, after the resolution process was initiated against it under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, was akin to an order of moratorium passed under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280511,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/01\/the-intersection-between-arbitration-and-insolvency-proceedings-an-indian-perspective\/","url_meta":{"origin":280170,"position":1},"title":"The Intersection between Arbitration and Insolvency Proceedings: An Indian Perspective","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Devna Arora* and Didon Misri**","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Indian Perspective","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-51.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280075,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/recovering-foreign-award-debts-in-insolvency-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":280170,"position":2},"title":"Recovering Foreign Award Debts in Insolvency Proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kartikey Mahajan, Siddhant Sharma and Jatan Rodrigues Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 87","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Insolvency Proceedings","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image108.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":301406,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/arbitrator-fees-treated-as-preferential-payments-cirp-pending-before-nclt-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":280170,"position":3},"title":"Arbitrator\u2019s fees to be treated as preferential payments even where CIRP proceedings are pending before NCLT: Madras High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court said that if the Arbitrators are not paid their fees \/ costs on account of the moratorium order, the object of arbitration will get defeated, as competent Arbitrators will hesitate to become Arbitrators in a dispute involving Companies facing financial crisis.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/nclat-application-s-9-ibc-for-implementation-of-arbitral-award-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":280170,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Arbitration Proceedings\u2019 and \u2018IBC Proceedings\u2019 cannot go on together; NCLAT upholds NCLT’s order rejecting Section 9 application","author":"Ritu","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that an application preferred under Section 9 of the IBC for implementation of an Arbitral Award is not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273376,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/10\/can-arbitration-proceedings-against-a-director-promoter-continue-even-after-moratorium-is-imposed-on-the-principal-debtor-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":280170,"position":5},"title":"Can Arbitration Proceedings Against a Director\/Promoter Continue Even after Moratorium is Imposed on the Principal Debtor Company","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Garima Sharma*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-438-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-438-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-438-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-438-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-438-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=280170"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280170\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=280170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=280170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=280170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}