{"id":279915,"date":"2022-12-19T10:00:46","date_gmt":"2022-12-19T04:30:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=279915"},"modified":"2022-12-22T14:46:14","modified_gmt":"2022-12-22T09:16:14","slug":"characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/","title":{"rendered":"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy’ and \u2018non-speaking’, Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n

Rajasthan High Court<\/span>: While dealing with the connected civil writ petitions challenging the interest and penalty imposed by the Joint Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax (\u2018GST’) on account of delayed payment of tax, the division bench of Sandeep Mehta and Kuldeep Mathur, JJ., set aside the order of the Officer due to violation of mandatory requirement of Section 75(6)<\/a> of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017<\/a> (\u2018CGST Act’).<\/p>\n

The petitioner challenged the final assessment order on ground on non-adherence to the principles of natural justice as the orders, pursuant to the show cause notice, were passed without providing opportunity of hearing and without adverting to the petitioner’s assertions made in the reply. It was further contended that non-speaking order was passed, thus, the order was liable to be set aside. The petitioner prayed for one opportunity to advance oral submissions qua<\/i> the show cause notice and the Joint Commissioner be directed to pass a fresh reasoned order.<\/p>\n

The respondent contended that the notice for personal hearing was duly dispatched and delivered to the petitioner’s representative who had appeared before the Officer in May 2022 to submit the reply qua<\/i> the show cause notice. It was further contended that the May 2022 order sheet too recorded the intimation to remain present for personal hearing, therefore, no separate notice was required to be issued anyway.<\/p>\n

Since no one appeared for the personal hearing, the order was passed ex-parte.<\/i> The respondent further submitted that the petitioner had delayed in depositing the tax amount and the notice was a direct legal consequence of that. Therefore, the demand for interest and penalty was justifiable.<\/p>\n

The Court concluded that the Officer did not consider the reply filed by the petitioner, while passing the order characterizing it as sketchy and non-speaking on the face of it. The Court while setting aside the order, asserted that it suffered from non-application of mind and was in violation of mandatory requirement of section 75 (6)<\/a> of the CGST Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was accordingly directed to appear before the Joint Commissioner on a set date, providing an opportunity of being heard, consequent to which fresh order to be passed assigning proper reasons.<\/p>\n

The Court had previously issued a show cause notice to the Joint Commissioner and had directed him to remain present in Court with the original dispatch register which was ultimately discharged.<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

[Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. Union of India, 2022 SCC OnLine Raj 2478<\/a>, decided on 15-12-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the petitioner- Advocate Bharat Raichandani;<\/p>\n

Advocate Rajdeep Singh Chouhan;<\/p>\n

For the Respondent- Additional Advocate General Sandeep Shah;<\/p>\n

Advocate Abhimanhyu Singh;<\/p>\n

Advocate Sunil Bhandari;<\/p>\n

Advocate Charu Mathur.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It suffered from non-application of mind and was in violation of mandatory requirement of section 75 (6) of the CGST Act. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":278826,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[29698,45773,2805,29540,2509,18281,2621],"class_list":["post-279915","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cgst","tag-joint-commissioner","tag-natural_justice","tag-non-speaking-order","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-show-cause-notice","tag-Tax"],"yoast_head":"\nCharacterising it as \u2018sketchy' and \u2018non-speaking', Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While dealing with the connected civil writ petitions challenging the interest and penalty imposed by the Joint Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy' and \u2018non-speaking', Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While dealing with the connected civil writ petitions challenging the interest and penalty imposed by the Joint Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-19T04:30:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-22T09:16:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/\",\"name\":\"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy' and \u2018non-speaking', Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-19T04:30:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-22T09:16:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"While dealing with the connected civil writ petitions challenging the interest and penalty imposed by the Joint Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy’ and \u2018non-speaking’, Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy' and \u2018non-speaking', Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST | SCC Times","description":"While dealing with the connected civil writ petitions challenging the interest and penalty imposed by the Joint Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy' and \u2018non-speaking', Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST","og_description":"While dealing with the connected civil writ petitions challenging the interest and penalty imposed by the Joint Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-19T04:30:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-22T09:16:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/","name":"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy' and \u2018non-speaking', Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg","datePublished":"2022-12-19T04:30:46+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-22T09:16:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"While dealing with the connected civil writ petitions challenging the interest and penalty imposed by the Joint Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy’ and \u2018non-speaking’, Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":284850,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/14\/know-thy-newly-appointed-supreme-court-judge-justice-sandeep-mehta\/","url_meta":{"origin":279915,"position":0},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judge – Justice Sandeep Mehta","author":"Editor","date":"November 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Dr. Justice D.Y Chandrachud, CJI, administered oath to Justice Sandeep Mehta on 9-11-2023.","rel":"","context":"In "Know thy Judge"","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sandeep Mehta","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Sandeep-Mehta.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Sandeep-Mehta.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Sandeep-Mehta.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Sandeep-Mehta.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/19\/madras-high-court-proper-reasons-to-be-given-for-rejecting-gst-registration-applications-just-writing-rejected-would-not-suffice\/","url_meta":{"origin":279915,"position":1},"title":"Madras High Court| Proper reasons to be given for rejecting GST Registration Applications; Just writing ‘rejected’ would not suffice","author":"Editor","date":"July 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madras High Court: Anita Sumanth, J. set aside the impugned order which rejected a registration application filed under Section 22 read with Section 25 of Central Goods and Service Tax (\u2018CGST Act') and Rule 8 of CGST Rules, without assigning proper reasons and adhering to proper procedure. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282720,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/set-aside-order-passed-by-commissioner-gst-and-appellate-authority-whereby-his-goods-were-during-transportation-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":279915,"position":2},"title":"Reasonable opportunity of being heard must be granted; Delhi High Court sets aside non-speaking order of the Delhi GST Commissioner","author":"Editor","date":"January 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court was of the view that neither the notice served upon the petitioner mentioned any specific defect found by the authorities nor the order of tax and demand specify any reason why the documents accompanying the goods were found to be defective.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":284893,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/23\/madras-high-court-examines-the-scope-and-ambit-of-s-174-of-cgst-act-in-context-of-notifications-issued-under-the-repealed-tax-regime-dismisses-petition-filed-by-ar-rahman\/","url_meta":{"origin":279915,"position":3},"title":"Madras High Court examines the scope and ambit of S. 174 of CGST Act in context of Notifications issued under the repealed tax regime","author":"Editor","date":"February 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The practice and procedure, both pre and post GST are consistent and involve participation of the officer of the DGGI in issuance of show cause notices.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297798,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/27\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-order-for-violating-the-principles-of-natural-justice-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":279915,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Telephonic conversations for brief period cannot be construed as hearing\u2019; Delhi High Court sets aside order passed in violation of S. 75 of CGST Act","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe opportunity of hearing, which the Officer is statutorily required to give to the person against whom an adverse decision is contemplated, is not an empty formality, and is a well-recognised principle of audi alteram partem, which has rightly been incorporated in Section 75(3) and 75(4) of the CGST Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/07\/aar-whether-input-tax-credit-can-be-availed-on-distribution-of-promotional-product-done-for-marketing-and-brand-promotion-read-aar-ruling-in-the-matter-of-jockey-speedo\/","url_meta":{"origin":279915,"position":5},"title":"Kar AAR | Whether Input Tax Credit can be availed on distribution of promotional product done for marketing and brand promotion? Read AAR ruling in the matter of Jockey & Speedo","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Authority for Advance Ruling, GST:\u00a0A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Prasad M.P. (Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes) and MashhoodUr Rehman Farooqui (Joint Commissioner of Central Tax) addressed whether the input tax credit can be availed on the distribution of promotional products to distributors\/dealer's showrooms for the purpose of marketing the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Advance Rulings"","block_context":{"text":"Advance Rulings","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/aar\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AAR","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279915","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=279915"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279915\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=279915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=279915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=279915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}