{"id":279911,"date":"2022-12-20T09:00:47","date_gmt":"2022-12-20T03:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=279911"},"modified":"2022-12-19T10:43:45","modified_gmt":"2022-12-19T05:13:45","slug":"2022-scc-vol-10-part-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/","title":{"rendered":"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> — Or. 22 Rr. 3<\/a> and 4<\/a> — Abatement of appeal:<\/b> Appeal as a whole cannot be dismissed as abated for not bringing on record legal representatives of co-sharers\/co-owners who died during pendency of appeal. [DDA<\/i> v. Diwan Chand Anand<\/i>, (2022) 10 SCC 428<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> — Or. 9 R. 13<\/a> and S. 115<\/a> — Setting aside of ex parte decree:<\/b> Condonation of delay in filing of application for setting aside ex parte decree, whether warranted, determined. Proper forum for challenging refusal to set aside ex parte decree under Or. 9 R. 13<\/a>, ascertained. [Mohd. Ali<\/i> v. V. Jaya<\/i>, (2022) 10 SCC 477<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> — S. 100<\/a> — Second appeal:<\/b> Remand of matter to High Court, when warranted, explained. [Farooqi Begum<\/i> v. State of U.P.<\/i>, (2022) 10 SCC 399<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Consumer Protection — Services — Housing and Real Estate — Maintenance charges:<\/b> Person\/body to whom maintenance charges of a flat to be paid, ascertained. [Utpal Trehan<\/i> v. DLF Home Developers Ltd.<\/i>, (2022) 10 SCC 409<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (18 of 1966)<\/a> — S. 28(4)<\/doclink> — Acquisition proceedings — “Interested person” — Who is:<\/b> Allottee of land by KIAD Board, after acquisition of lands under S. 28<\/a> of the KIAD Act, 1966<\/a>, which was for benefit of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB), cannot be said to be a “person interested” under provisions of the KIAD Act, 1966<\/a>. [Gregory Patrao<\/i> v. Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd.<\/i>, (2022) 10 SCC 461<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — Ss. 302<\/a>, 376<\/a> & 201<\/a> — Brutal rape and murder of minor — Death sentence:<\/b> Abhorrent nature of crime alone cannot be the decisive factor for awarding death sentence. Death sentence commuted to imprisonment for life without remission till 30 yrs RI, for rape and murder of minor. [Pappu<\/i> v. State of U.P.<\/i>, (2022) 10 SCC 321<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — Ss. 409<\/a>, 420<\/a>, 467<\/a>, 471<\/a>, 474<\/a>, 477-A<\/a> r\/w Ss. 109<\/a> and 120-B<\/a>:<\/b> In this case, scandal alleged as to sale of used tickets\/fake tickets\/tickets bearing the nomination of higher value in certain buses of Punjab Roadways. There was absence of valid proof as to recovery of tickets and inquiry report submitted by the Enquiry Committee. Resultantly, considering said infirmities, appellant conductors, acquitted. [Jarnail Singh<\/i> v. State of Punjab<\/i>, (2022) 10 SCC 451<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 22 Rr. 3 and 4 — Abatement of appeal: Appeal as a whole cannot <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279923,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[8331,33051,14261,34703,14251],"class_list":["post-279911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-legal-representatives","tag-penal-code","tag-pendency-of-appeal","tag-person-interested"],"yoast_head":"\n2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 22 Rr. 3 and 4 \u2014 Abatement of appeal: Appeal as a whole cannot be dismissed as abated for not bringing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 22 Rr. 3 and 4 \u2014 Abatement of appeal: Appeal as a whole cannot be dismissed as abated for not bringing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-20T03:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/\",\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-20T03:30:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 22 Rr. 3 and 4 \u2014 Abatement of appeal: Appeal as a whole cannot be dismissed as abated for not bringing\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3 | SCC Times","description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 22 Rr. 3 and 4 \u2014 Abatement of appeal: Appeal as a whole cannot be dismissed as abated for not bringing","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3","og_description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 22 Rr. 3 and 4 \u2014 Abatement of appeal: Appeal as a whole cannot be dismissed as abated for not bringing","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-20T03:30:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/","name":"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg","datePublished":"2022-12-20T03:30:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 22 Rr. 3 and 4 \u2014 Abatement of appeal: Appeal as a whole cannot be dismissed as abated for not bringing","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg","width":390,"height":310},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":99321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/court-clarifies-order-xiii-a-of-code-of-civil-procedure-1908\/","url_meta":{"origin":279911,"position":0},"title":"Court clarifies Order XIII-A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908","author":"Saba","date":"February 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Divisional Bench of Badar Durez and Ashutosh Kumar, JJ. while disposing of an appeal gave relief to party whose suit was dismissed at the admission stage \u00a0by invoking the provisions of Order XIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It was held by the Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/06\/utt-hc-ex-parte-decree-set-aside-considering-sufficient-cause-under-or-9-r-13-of-the-code-of-civil-procedure-1908-court-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":279911,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | Ex-parte decree set aside considering \u201csufficient cause\u201d under Or. 9 R. 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Court allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Alok Kumar Verma, JJ., allowed an appeal which was filed challenging an order passed by Judge, Family Court whereby, the application filed by the appellant, under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for setting aside\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6158,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/09\/civil-procedure-code-1908-order-of-dismissal-of-counterclaim-when-constitutes-decree\/","url_meta":{"origin":279911,"position":2},"title":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Order of dismissal of counterclaim when constitutes decree","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 9, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"2015 SCC VOL. 2 FEBRUARY 28, 2015 PART 4Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 8 R. 6-A, Or. 2 R. 2 and S. 2(2) \u2014 Order of dismissal of counterclaim when constitutes decree: Counterclaim when conclusively adjudicated on merits and dismissed by order of court, finality is attached in respect\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "SCC Weekly"","block_context":{"text":"SCC Weekly","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/supremecourtcases\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215226,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/ph-hc-court-fee-should-be-refunded-although-the-dispute-settled-without-recourse-to-s-89-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":279911,"position":3},"title":"P&H HC | Court fee should be refunded although the dispute settled without recourse to S. 89 CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Lisa Gill, J. allowed the application for the refund of the fees on the ground that the matter was resolved between the parties. An appeal was filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Faridabad where the suit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":363794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/ieee-mumbai-section-welfare-assn-v-global-ieee-institute-for-engineers-an-immediate-re-look-necessary-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":279911,"position":4},"title":"IEEE Mumbai Section Welfare Assn. v. Global IEEE Institute for Engineers: An Immediate Re-Look Necessary by the Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Basanti Lal Pavecha* and Avish Mittal**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Rejection-of-plaint-under-Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270011,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/","url_meta":{"origin":279911,"position":5},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing","author":"Editor","date":"July 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Fateh Deep Singh, J., dismissed a review application on the ground that no mistake or error was found on the records which would be self-evident, and any interpretation put forth by the applicant cannot be considered at this juncture according to Order 47 Rule 1\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=279911"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279911\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279923"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=279911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=279911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=279911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}