{"id":279858,"date":"2022-12-17T15:30:47","date_gmt":"2022-12-17T10:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=279858"},"modified":"2022-12-29T12:24:13","modified_gmt":"2022-12-29T06:54:13","slug":"nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal<\/b> | Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7<\/a> IBC<\/a>, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. (Judicial Member)<\/b> and Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) held that an application filed under S. 7<\/a> IBC<\/a> could be maintained in respect of the component of interest which became due and payable, without asking for the principal amount which has not yet become due and payable.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/b><\/p>\n

An application under S. 7<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC) was filed by the appellant in respect of interest of three quarters which accrued and became payable as debt. The application was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority on the ground that only the interest amount would not fall within the definition of financial debt until and unless principal amount has also become due and payable.<\/p>\n

The appellant preferred an appeal before this Tribunal challenging the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/b><\/p>\n

Whether an application under S. 7<\/a> IBC<\/a> can be filed and maintained in respect of the component of interest which became due and payable without asking for the principal amount which has not yet become due and payable?<\/p>\n

Contention of the Parties<\/b><\/p>\n

The appellant contended that an application under S. 7<\/a> IBC<\/a> is maintainable even if it only relates to interest if the interest crosses the threshold limit of the financial debt. The appellant further submitted that the financial debt is a debt with interest if any, disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money and includes debentures.<\/i><\/p>\n

Relying on Orator Marketing (P) Ltd.<\/i> v. Samtex Desinz (P) Ltd.<\/i>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 513<\/a>, where an application under S. 7<\/a> was held maintainable and interest free loan was regarded as a financial debt, the appellant contended that on the same analogy the interest which became due and payable would attract the provisions of Section 7<\/a> of the Code<\/a><\/i>.<\/p>\n

The respondent contended that the Adjudicating Authority had made no error while passing the impugned order. Negating the application of Orator Marketing (P) Ltd.<\/i> (Supra) in the present case, the respondent submitted that debt and interest together constitute financial debt and the interest independently does not constitute financial debt.<\/p>\n

Tribunal\u2019s Observation and Decision<\/b><\/p>\n

After carefully examining S. 7<\/a> IBC<\/a>, the Tribunal observed that application under S. 7<\/a> IBC<\/a> is maintainable if the financial creditor shows the default as a condition precedent and according to S. 3(12) default means non-payment of debt when whole or any part or instalment of the amount of debt has become due and payable and is not paid<\/i>. The Tribunal also observed that there is no dispute that the amount of interest became due and payable by the Corporate Debtor to the Appellant.<\/p>\n

Relying on Innovative Industries Ltd.<\/i> v. ICICI Bank<\/i>, (2018) 1 SCC 407<\/a> and Orator Marketing (P) Ltd.<\/i> (Supra), the Tribunal held that an application filed under S. 7<\/a> IBC<\/a> could be maintained in respect of the component of interest which became due and payable, without asking for the principal amount which has not yet become due and payable.<\/p>\n

[Base Realtors (P) Ltd. v. Grand Realcon (P) Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 1603<\/a>, decided on 15-11-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

PCA Abhishek Nahta, Raveena Paniker and Rishabh Sachdeva, Counsel for the Appellant;<\/p>\n

Jeewesh Prakash and Ujjwal Mendiratta, Counsel for the Respondents.<\/p>\n

\n

*Ritu Singh, Editorial Assistant has put this report together<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7 IBC, a bench comprising of Rakesh <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[16621,30361,22064,30182,22014],"class_list":["post-279858","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-16621","tag-ibc","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7 IBC, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. (Judicial Member)\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7 IBC, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. (Judicial Member)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-17T10:00:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-29T06:54:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-17T10:00:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-29T06:54:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7 IBC, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. (Judicial Member)\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"NCLAT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable | SCC Times","description":"Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7 IBC, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. (Judicial Member)","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable","og_description":"Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7 IBC, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. (Judicial Member)","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-17T10:00:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-29T06:54:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/","name":"NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","datePublished":"2022-12-17T10:00:47+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-29T06:54:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7 IBC, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. (Judicial Member)","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"NCLAT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":292549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":279858,"position":0},"title":"Threshold limit includes both principal amount and interest under IBC; NCLAT set aside NCLT’s order","author":"Ritu","date":"May 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting the S. 7 application for not fulfilling \u2018threshold\u2019 when Deed of Guarantee mentions about the interest on default.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296173,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/nclat-application-section-9-ibc-not-maintainable-absence-strict-proof-debt-default\/","url_meta":{"origin":279858,"position":1},"title":"Application under Section 9 of the IBC is not maintainable in absence of strict proof of Debt and Default: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Proceedings under the IBC, 2016, are summary in character and a trial is not conducted, like that of \u2018Civil\u2019 matter, before the \u2018Competent Civil Court\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284573,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/20\/operational-creditor-corporate-debtor-agreement-services-live-tv-production-default-section-8-notice-no-reply-application-nclt-pre-existing-dispute-dismissed-appeal-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":279858,"position":2},"title":"Whether Corporate Debtor can raise pre-existing dispute in reply to the petition filed under Section 9 IBC in case demand notice issued under Section 8 of IBC is not replied? NCLAT answers","author":"Editor","date":"February 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter, the petitioner preferred an appeal challenging the order of Adjudicating Authority dismissing application in view of the \u201cpre-existing dispute\u201d. NCLAT held that when the reply to Demand Notice was not filed within 10 days, the Corporate Debtor is not precluded from raising the question of dispute\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291227,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/04\/nclat-discusses-settlement-after-constitution-of-committee-of-creditors-under-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":279858,"position":3},"title":"What is the rule for settlement after constitution of ‘Committee of Creditors’? NCLAT Answers","author":"Ritu","date":"May 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny settlement after passing of the impugned order and after constitution of the CoC is only permissible when the same is approved with 90% vote share of CoC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304367,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":279858,"position":4},"title":"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application","author":"Ritu","date":"October 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLT\u2019s order did not contain specific findings regarding whether the entire loan amount had been paid and whether nothing remained due.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/financial-creditor-corporate-debtor-collaboration-agreement-default-in-payment-nclt-section-7-ibc-application-dismissed-appeal-nclat-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":279858,"position":5},"title":"Debt and default are sine qua non and only condition for admitting S. 7 IBC application: NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"February 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While hearing an appeal challenging an impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority dismissing a S. 7 IBC application on the ground that the appellant was not able to establish debt and default, the Tribunal held that it is clear from the facts and circumstances the definition of debt and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279858","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=279858"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279858\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=279858"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=279858"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=279858"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}