{"id":279845,"date":"2022-12-17T16:00:22","date_gmt":"2022-12-17T10:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=279845"},"modified":"2022-12-20T14:38:44","modified_gmt":"2022-12-20T09:08:44","slug":"delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court stays CCI\u2019s order for recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore from MakeMyTrip Private Limited"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Delhi High Court<\/b>: A Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. stayed the order passed by the Competition Commission of India and directed that no recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore shall be affected in respect of MakeMyTrip for the remaining 90% of the penalty amount.<\/p>\n<p><b>Background<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The present petition has been filed by MakeMyTrip (P) Ltd. against the order passed by the NCLAT in <i>Make My Trip (India) (P) Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Competition Commission of India<\/i> and the appeal to NCLAT arisen out of order passed by Competition Commission of India (CCI) in <i>Federation of Hotel &amp; Restaurant Associations of India (FHRAI)<\/i> v. <i>MakeMyTrip (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001298359\">2022 SCC OnLine CCI 58<\/a>. The NCLAT directed a deposit of 10% of the penalty amount, which was imposed by the CCI as a condition for admission of the appeal.<\/p>\n<p><b>Submissions on behalf of the Petitioner<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order passed by the NCLAT was completely ambiguous as to the reasons for which the direction for deposit of 10% of the penalty amount imposed by the CCI had been issued. Further, it was submitted that the Court should clarify that if the deposit as directed was made, the recovery of the remaining 90% penalty amount ought to be stayed. It was also submitted that an appeal against the order of the CCI would lie before the NCLAT, under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001531283\">53B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002783336\">Competition Act, 2002<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b>Submissions on behalf of the Respondents<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the respondents submitted that it was clear that subject to deposit of 10% of the penalty amount imposed by the CCI, the recovery of the remaining 90% of the penalty amount would remain stayed. Further, it was submitted that the appeal against the order passed by the NCLAT would lie to the Supreme Court under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001531301\">53T<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002783336\">Competition Act, 2002<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the total amount which had been fixed as penalty was Rs. 223.48 crores. The Court noted that the appeal filed before the NCLAT was admitted without giving any reasons for directing the deposit of 10% of the penalty amount. Further, no interim protection had been explicitly granted in the impugned order, in respect of the recovery of the remaining 90% of the penalty amount. The Court opined that <i>&#8220;the appeal before the NCLAT is a first appeal challenging the order passed by the CCI. Thus, in the opinion of this Court, a pre-deposit of 10% of the penalty amount could not have been made for mere admission of the appeal. It was obvious that the intention, which might not be explicitly made clear in the entire order, was against the recovery of the remaining 90% of the penalty amount&#8221;<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court directed that subject to the deposit of 10% of the total penalty amount of Rs. 223.48 crores, in accordance with the order of the CCI, as directed by the NCLAT, no recovery shall be affected in respect of the remaining 90% of the penalty amount.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">MakeMyTrip (P) Ltd. v. Competition Commission of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/s34424Uu\">2022 SCC OnLine Del 4440<\/a>, decided on 14-12-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocate who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner(s): Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Senior Advocate Ramji Srinivasan<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Shashank Gautam<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Rajat Moudgil<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Aashna Manocha<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Akshat Hansari<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Anisha Bohra<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Swapnil Singh<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Sreemoyee Deb<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Anand Sree<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For the Respondent(s): ASG N. Venkataraman<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Rajeev Saxena,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Samar Bansal,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Chandra Shekhara Bharatho,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Amritha Chandramouli,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate S. Ram Narayana,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Rahul Vijay Kumar,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Madhav Gupta<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Vedant Kapur<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Rajeev Saxena<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Siddharth Luthra<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Saurav Bansal<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Vaibhav Gaggar<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Vaibhav Chouker<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Ela Bali<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Kokila Kumari<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Faiz Siddiqui<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Somdev Tiwari<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Mrityunjay Mahendra<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Abir Roy<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate T. Sundar Ramanathan<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Vivek Pandey<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Aman Shankar<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Soham Goswami<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Rohan Arora<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Rukhmini Bobde<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Sonal Gupta<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Ishan Nagar<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Abhishek Thakral<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Amlaan Kumar<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>The Delhi High Court stayed the recovery of a Rs. 223.48 crore penalty imposed by Competition Commission of India (CCI) on MakeMyTrip (P) Ltd. for abuse of its dominant position.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279267,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,31537,2505,39770,22014,2627,53621,3009],"class_list":["post-279845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-competition-act-2002","tag-Competition_Commission_of_India","tag-makemytrip","tag-nclat","tag-Penalty","tag-penalty-amount","tag-recovery"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi High Court stays CCI\u2019s order for recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore from MakeMyTrip Private Limited | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. stayed the order passed by the Competition Commission of India and directed that no recovery\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court stays CCI\u2019s order for recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore from MakeMyTrip Private Limited\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. stayed the order passed by the Competition Commission of India and directed that no recovery\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-17T10:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-20T09:08:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court stays CCI\u2019s order for recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore from MakeMyTrip Private Limited | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-17T10:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-20T09:08:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"A Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. stayed the order passed by the Competition Commission of India and directed that no recovery\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court stays CCI\u2019s order for recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore from MakeMyTrip Private Limited\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court stays CCI\u2019s order for recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore from MakeMyTrip Private Limited | SCC Times","description":"A Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. stayed the order passed by the Competition Commission of India and directed that no recovery","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court stays CCI\u2019s order for recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore from MakeMyTrip Private Limited","og_description":"A Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. stayed the order passed by the Competition Commission of India and directed that no recovery","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-17T10:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-20T09:08:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/","name":"Delhi High Court stays CCI\u2019s order for recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore from MakeMyTrip Private Limited | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","datePublished":"2022-12-17T10:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-20T09:08:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"A Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. stayed the order passed by the Competition Commission of India and directed that no recovery","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","width":391,"height":311,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-stays-ccis-order-for-recovery-of-rs-223-48-crore-from-makemytrip-private-limited\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court stays CCI\u2019s order for recovery of Rs. 223.48 crore from MakeMyTrip Private Limited"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":276040,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/21\/cci-makemytrip-oyo-goibibo-anti-competitive-practice-abuse-of-dominant-position-monetary-penalty-imposed-competition-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":279845,"position":0},"title":"\u201cFair market opportunity is the hallmark of competition\u201d; CCI imposes hefty monetary penalty on MakeMyTrip, Goibibo and OYO for their anti-competitive practices and abuse of dominant position","author":"Editor","date":"October 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Competition Commission of India: In a significant development, the Commission while deliberating upon the alleged contravention of Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act by MakeMyTrip, Goibibo and OYO, was of the view that the commercial arrangement between OYO and MakeMyTrip and Goibibo which led to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/competition-commission-of-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/competition-commission-of-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/competition-commission-of-india.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/competition-commission-of-india.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/competition-commission-of-india.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276407,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/top-15-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-not-eligible-for-gst-combined-wire-rope-and-one-stop-crisis-centre-makemytrip-goibibo-oyo-and-google\/","url_meta":{"origin":279845,"position":1},"title":"[Top 15 Rulings from Tribunals and Commissions] GST; MakeMyTrip, Goibibo, OYO and Google penalized by CCI; Violation of Code of Ethics &#038; Broadcasting Standards by News18; Bombay Dyeing and Wadia Group penalized by SEBI etc.","author":"Editor","date":"October 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling| \u2018Combined Wire Rope' not a part of the fishing vessel, thus, not eligible for GST at 5 percent In an application sought for advance ruling on the question that whether Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate of 5 percent under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283093,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/11\/leniency-applicants-beware-nclat-rules-in-the-beer-cartelisation-case-pawan-jagetia-v-cci-a-case-comment\/","url_meta":{"origin":279845,"position":2},"title":"Leniency Applicants Beware: NCLAT Rules in the Beer Cartelisation Case Pawan Jagetia v. CCI: A case comment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Priyam Indurkhya\u2020 and Rituraj Singh Parmar\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-368.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":282480,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/26\/repudiated-appeal-of-google-llc-deposit-10-penalty-quantified-order-of-cci-for-abuse-of-dominance-in-relation-to-android-eco-system-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":279845,"position":3},"title":"&#8216;Findings not contrary to the weight of record\u2019; Supreme Court affirms NCLAT&#8217;s order refusing to stay CCI\u2019s Rs 1,338 crore penalty on Google LLC for anti-competitive practices","author":"Editor","date":"January 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court had reservation to express its opinion on the merits of the case which would otherwise affect the proceedings pending before NCLAT and stated that the findings of the CCI at the interlocutory stage was neither without jurisdiction nor suffered from any error which would necessitate interference in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-202.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":290137,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/cci-imposed-penalty-anti-competitive-behaviour-appal-nclat-reduce-penalty-mitigating-factors-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":279845,"position":4},"title":"Mitigating factors should be considered while imposing penalty for anti-competitive behavior: NCLAT imposes 1% penalty of the turnover on Geep Industries","author":"Ritu","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026penalty @1% of the turnover for each year of continuance of the cartel would be appropriate penalty in keeping with the extent and seriousness proportionality of the anti-competitive behavior of Geep Industries.\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281470,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/cci-abuse-dominant-position-play-store-policies-penalty-google-appeal-nclat-interim-relief-refused\/","url_meta":{"origin":279845,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT refuses to grant interim relief to Google; directs to deposit 10% of &#8377; 936 crore penalty","author":"Editor","date":"January 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: While deciding an appeal filed against the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order imposing a penalty of \u20b9 936.44 crore on the appellant, Google for abusing its dominant position through its Play Store policies, a bench consisting of Rakesh Kumar, J., and Dr.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=279845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279845\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=279845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=279845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=279845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}