{"id":279118,"date":"2022-12-05T16:00:41","date_gmt":"2022-12-05T10:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=279118"},"modified":"2022-12-15T15:14:04","modified_gmt":"2022-12-15T09:44:04","slug":"nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal<\/b> | While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay Singh, J. and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)<\/b>, held that the promoters cannot withhold information and necessary documents from the Liquidator as the lookback period is not applicable qua the liquidator.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/span><\/p>\n

In the instant matter, an appeal was preferred by the appellant, Amardeep Singh Bhatia challenging the impugned order dated 29-05-2020 passed by the Adjudicating Authority, NCLT where the Liquidator was permitted to investigate the transactions executed by the Corporate Debtor beyond 2 years from the insolvency commencement date, while exercising the inherent powers under R. 11 of the NCLT Rules. The Adjudicating Authority went on to cite S. 19<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC) while stating that the promoters and other associated persons shall provide all assistance to the interim resolution professionals and directed the members of suspended management to handover all the relevant documents and information and cooperate with the Liquidator. The order stated that:<\/p>\n

“…exercising the inherent powers under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, the Liquidator is hereby permitted to scrutinize \/investigate the transactions executed\/entered by the Corporate Debtor beyond 2 years from the insolvency commencement date i.e. from 01.04.2008 as required by the Forensic Auditor M\/s. KPMG. The relevant information\/documents\/records are required to be sought by the Liquidator from the Directors\/Suspended Board and other Personnel of the Corporate Debtor in relation to those transactions which have been entered into \/executed by the Corporate Debtor from 01.04.2008.”<\/i><\/p>\n

Appellant’s Contention<\/span><\/p>\n

The appellant contended that as per S. 43<\/a> IBC<\/a>, a ‘Related Party’ shall be given preference during the period of two years and parties other than that for one year preceding the Insolvency Commencement Date (‘ICD’).<\/p>\n

The appellant relied upon Anuj Jain<\/i> v. Axis Bank Ltd.<\/i>, (2020) 8 SCC 401<\/a> for the argument. As per the contention of the appellant, the Corporate Debtor under S. 19<\/a> IBC<\/a> cannot be expected to cooperate and provide documents since the Liquidator cannot investigate a ‘Corporate Debtor’ beyond two years from the ICD. It was also argued that as per S. 35(1)(1)<\/a> IBC<\/a>, “the Liquidator can investigate the Financial Affairs of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ to determine ‘Undervalued’ or ‘Preferential Transactions’ which having a lookback period of two years prior to the ICD.”<\/i><\/p>\n

Respondent’s Contention<\/span><\/p>\n

The respondent\/Liquidator contended that if the Liquidator on an examination of the transactions of the corporate debtor as per S. 43(2)<\/a> IBC<\/a> determines that certain undervalued transactions were made during the relevant period under S. 46, he shall make an application to the Adjudicating Authority to declare such transactions as void and reverse the effect of such transaction and for such examination the Liquidator is expected to have all the relevant documents.<\/p>\n

The respondent further contended that that there is no look back period of two years for S. 66<\/a> IBC<\/a> and if the Liquidator is to file an application under S. 66(2) regarding the fraud committed by the ‘Corporate Debtor’ before the Adjudicating Authority it is presupposed that all the relevant documents are possessed at that time. The Respondent also referred to Regulation 9<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016<\/a>, which has no look-back period, and it states that the personnel shall extend cooperation to the Liquidator.<\/p>\n

Tribunal’s Observation<\/span><\/p>\n

The Tribunal observed that unless the Liquidator is in the possession of all the material documents, “he cannot determine whether they are ‘Undervalued Transactions’ or ‘Preferential Transactions’, during the relevant period of time, and therefore, the ‘Corporate Debtor’ cannot deny these documents at the threshold itself.”<\/b><\/p>\n

The Tribunal observed that there is look-back period specified in S. 66<\/a> IBC<\/a>. The Tribunal outrightly noted that the appellant cannot invoke Regulation 9 solely on grounds of denying the documents.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal further observed the reliance on Anuj Jain<\/i> v. Axis Bank Ltd.<\/i>, (2020) 8 SCC 401<\/a> is misplaced as the Adjudicating Authority in that case had already passed an Order that certain transactions were ‘Preferential’\/‘Undervalued’<\/i>.<\/p>\n

Tribunal’s Decision<\/span><\/p>\n

Upholding the order of the Adjudicating Authority having exercised its inherent powers under R.11 of NCLT Rules, 2016, the Tribunal held that it is imperative that the Liquidator is in possession of the relevant documents to determine whether the transaction also falls under Ss. 43<\/a> or 46<\/a> IBC<\/a> or a fraud has been committed under S. 66<\/a> IBC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[Amardeep Singh Bhatia v. Abhishek Nagori, 2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 1579<\/a>, decided on 28-11-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Ms. Henna George and Ms. Shivani Sharma, Counsel for the Appellant;<\/p>\n

Mr. Ratnanko Banerjee (Sr. Advocate), Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Mr. Aditya Krishnamurthy and Mr. Ashutosh Tiwari, Counsel for the Respondents\/Intervenor.<\/p>\n\n

*Ritu Singh, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":278002,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[33289,30596,16901,22064,34534,30182,53397,32186,39343],"class_list":["post-279118","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-adjudicating-authority","tag-corporate-debtor","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-board-of-india","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code","tag-liquidator","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclt-rules","tag-promoters","tag-related-party"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay Singh, J. and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay Singh, J. and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-05T10:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-15T09:44:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-279-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-279-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-05T10:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-15T09:44:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay Singh, J. and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-279-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-279-1.png\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"NCLAT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date | SCC Times","description":"While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay Singh, J. and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date","og_description":"While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay Singh, J. and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-05T10:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-15T09:44:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-279-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/","name":"NCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-279-1.png","datePublished":"2022-12-05T10:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-15T09:44:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay Singh, J. and Shreesha Merla* (Technical Member)","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-279-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-279-1.png","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"NCLAT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/nclat-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-does-not-contemplate-lookback-period-information-and-relevant-documents-not-to-be-withhold-from-liquidator-to-investigate-transactions-done-even-beyond-two-year\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does not contemplate lookback period; Information and relevant documents not to be withhold from Liquidator to investigate transactions done even beyond two years from Insolvency Commencement Date"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-279-1.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":233025,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/nclat-upholds-nclt-judgment-allowing-liquidator-to-sell-companys-assets-attached-by-ed\/","url_meta":{"origin":279118,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT upholds NCLT Judgment allowing liquidator to sell company\u2019s assets attached by ED","author":"Editor","date":"July 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson) and Justice B.L. Bhat (Judicial member) rejected an appeal challenging an NCLT judgement where it allowed a liquidator to sell the assets of a company which had been attached by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) during\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":230370,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/02\/removal-of-a-liquidator-under-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":279118,"position":1},"title":"Removal of a Liquidator under IBC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kondapalli Sai Sumed Yasaswi*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":280454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/nclat-no-liquidator-has-any-personal-rights-to-continue-in-liquidation-process-adjudicating-authority-can-order-for-replacement-of-liquidator\/","url_meta":{"origin":279118,"position":2},"title":"NCLAT | No Liquidator has any \u2018personal rights\u2019, to continue in Liquidation Process; Adjudicating Authority can order for replacement of Liquidator","author":"Editor","date":"December 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | The bench comprising of M. Venugopal, J. and Naresh Salecha* (Technical Member) held that the Adjudicating Authority which had the powers to appoint the Liquidator also have the power to remove the \u2018Liquidator for any fit, just, valid and proper reasons. \u201c\u2026no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":270018,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/nclt-when-can-a-liquidator-in-a-liquidation-process-be-replaced-elucidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":279118,"position":3},"title":"NCLT| When can a liquidator in a liquidation process be replaced?","author":"Editor","date":"July 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai: The Bench of S. Ramathilagam, J., Judicial Member, and Anil Kumar B, Technical Member held that the tribunal has the power to replace the liquidator of a Corporate Debtor in a liquidating process if the tribunal finds necessary grounds for such replacement. Factual Background and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Financial Creditor","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/11\/nclt-auction-purchaser-responsible-for-claims-liabilities-obligations-of-corporate-debtor\/","url_meta":{"origin":279118,"position":4},"title":"NCLT| Auction purchaser responsible for claims\/ liabilities\/ obligations of Corporate Debtor","author":"Editor","date":"July 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai: The coram of H.V. Subba Rao, Judicial Member and Chandra Bhan Singh, Technical Member, declared that the auction purchaser of the Corporate Debtor company, as a going concern is responsible for any claims\/ liabilities\/ obligations of the Corporate Debtor. An interlocutory application was filed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Financial Creditor","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274550,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/27\/nclat-rejection-of-resolution-plan-by-the-nclt-due-to-non-serious-casual-and-non-diligent-conduct-of-resolution-appellant-is-good-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":279118,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | Rejection of Resolution Plan by the NCLT due to Non-Serious, Casual and Non-Diligent Conduct of Resolution Appellant is Good in Law","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The CIRP is a time bound process where timeline has been prescribed for each step. The CIRP cannot be allowed to continue for indefinite period.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279118","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=279118"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279118\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278002"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=279118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=279118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=279118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}