{"id":278971,"date":"2022-12-02T12:00:46","date_gmt":"2022-12-02T06:30:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=278971"},"modified":"2022-12-06T15:57:21","modified_gmt":"2022-12-06T10:27:21","slug":"pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/","title":{"rendered":"POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Delhi High Court:<\/b> In a case for grant of bail under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (POCSO Act), the Single Judge Bench of Jasmeet Singh, J. denied bail to a 23-year-old married man stating that he was involved in a serious offence of changing the date of birth of the complainant to show that when the physical relationship was established between them, the complainant was not a minor.<\/p>\n<p><b>Background<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the father of the minor girl registered an FIR stating that her daughter was missing. Later, a status report was filed wherein it was stated that the missing girl was traced and rescued in Uttar Pradesh and was brought back. The minor girl was found in the company of the applicant (petitioner).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The prosecutrix&#8217;s statements were recorded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\">164<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">CrPC<\/a>. wherein she stated that the applicant was her boyfriend and she stayed with him for about one and a half months. Further, the prosecutrix stated that she established a physical relationship with the applicant with her consent and wanted to stay with him.<\/p>\n<p><b>Submission on behalf of the Petitioner<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the statements made under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\">164<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">Cr.P.C.<\/a>, the applicant should be granted bail and moreover, the applicant had been in custody since 2019 and the charge sheet had already been filed.<\/p>\n<p><b>Submission on behalf of the Respondent<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the complainant stated that the complainant had informed that it was the applicant who took her to the SDM office and got her date of birth changed in Aadhar Card from 2002 to 2000 only for the purpose of showing that on the date of establishing physical relationship, the complainant was not a minor.<\/p>\n<p><b>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the prosecutrix was merely 16 years old and the applicant was 23 years old and was married and the conduct of the applicant of getting the date of birth changed in the Aadhar Card of the complainant was a serious offence as the applicant wanted to take advantage by getting the date of birth changed on Aadhar Card, so that when the applicant established physical relationship with the complainant, she would not have been a minor. Further, the consent of a minor specially when the applicant was 23 years old and was already married also disentitled the applicant for the grant of bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Javed v. State (NCT of Delhi), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0I5DCWS9\">2022 SCC OnLine Del 4182<\/a>, decided on 23-11-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner: Advocate Sharan Mehta;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For the Respondent: Additional Public Prosecutor Y.S. Chauhan;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Gunjan Sinha Jain.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court denied bail to a married person as he wanted to take advantage of the complainant by getting the complainant&#8217;s Date of Birth on the Aadhar Card changed so that when the applicant established physical relationship with the complainant, she would not have been a minor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":278068,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[47065,3612,32256,3239,3227,3067,34511,3229,39378,24384,32658,2599,53344],"class_list":["post-278971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-aadhar-cards","tag-charge_sheet","tag-complainant","tag-consent","tag-custody","tag-FIR","tag-grant-of-bail","tag-minor","tag-physical-relationship","tag-prosecutrix","tag-serious-offence","tag-statement","tag-traced-and-rescued"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case for grant of bail under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act), the Single Judge Bench\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case for grant of bail under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act), the Single Judge Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-02T06:30:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-06T10:27:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/\",\"name\":\"POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-02T06:30:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-06T10:27:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case for grant of bail under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act), the Single Judge Bench\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man | SCC Times","description":"In a case for grant of bail under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act), the Single Judge Bench","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man","og_description":"In a case for grant of bail under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act), the Single Judge Bench","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-02T06:30:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-06T10:27:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/","name":"POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-12-02T06:30:46+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-06T10:27:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case for grant of bail under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act), the Single Judge Bench","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","width":391,"height":311,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234766,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/25\/megh-hc-anticipatory-bail-sought-under-s-3-of-pocso-act-denied\/","url_meta":{"origin":278971,"position":0},"title":"Megh HC | Anticipatory bail sought under S. 3 of POCSO Act denied","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: W. Diengdoh, J., rejected an anticipatory bail application which was filed when an FIR under Section 3(a)\/4 of POCSO Act was lodged by the Complainant as the mother of the victim alleging that the petitioner had sexually assaulted and raped her minor daughter, after which she was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":270640,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":278971,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected","author":"Editor","date":"July 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Sexual abuse resulting in tying of knot between the victim and the accused in violation of provisions of law or birth of a child, does not mitigate the act of the petitioner in any manner, since the consent of a minor is immaterial and inconsequential in law","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208946,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/29\/megh-hc-accused-under-pocso-act-denied-bail-for-harassing-the-victim-minor-girl-opining-that-there-was-reasonable-apprehension-of-witness-tampering\/","url_meta":{"origin":278971,"position":2},"title":"Megh HC | Accused under POCSO Act denied bail for harassing victim minor girl opining that there was reasonable apprehension of witness tampering","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: The Bench of H.S. Thangkhiew, J. hearing a bail application filed by an accused under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, denied grant of bail opining that the accused was a threat to the victim. First Information Report was lodged against the accused for committing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":272658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/30\/delhi-high-court-grants-bail-rape-accused-pocso-aadharcard-pancard-verification-not-required-before-sex-sufficient-estblish-indulging-physicalrelationship-minor-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":278971,"position":3},"title":"Judicial scrutiny of date of birth for establishing consensual sexual relation not necessary; Delhi High Court grants bail in light of accused being honey trapped","author":"Editor","date":"August 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a case filed by a woman alleging rape charges under Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (\u2018POCSO'), Jasmeet Singh, J. granted bail to the applicant accused as the case, in the opinion of the Court and based on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258116,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/04\/kidnapped-or-eloped-minor-alleged-to-have-been-kidnapped-tracked-after-almost-4-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":278971,"position":4},"title":"Kidnapped or Eloped? Minor alleged to have been kidnapped tracked after almost 4 years: Del HC demystifies whether she ran away on her own or was kidnapped","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., granted bail to a person accused of kidnapping a minor, which eventually in view of the minor\u2019s statement was a case of her running away on her own accord and living a happy married life with him. The instant petition was filed to seek\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/anticipatory-bail-person-alleged-with-serious-allegations-cannot-be-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":278971,"position":5},"title":"Anticipatory Bail: Person alleged with serious allegations cannot be granted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Petitioner had prayed for anticipatory bail in FIR registered under Sections 420, 465, 467, 471 and 120-B of the Penal Code before a Single Judge Bench of Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. Facts of the case are that petitioner had executed a sale deed and sold\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278971"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278971\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}