{"id":278896,"date":"2022-12-01T15:00:10","date_gmt":"2022-12-01T09:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=278896"},"modified":"2022-12-02T17:04:37","modified_gmt":"2022-12-02T11:34:37","slug":"section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 11B Central Excise Act&#8217;s limitation period applicable to claims for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: SC\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court:<\/strong> The bench of <strong>MR Shah<\/strong>* and MM Sundresh, JJ has held that while making claim for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 shall have to be applied and applicable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was argued before the Court that as in Rule 18 of the 2002 Rules and notification dated 6.9.2004, there is no mention to the applicability of Section 11B of the Act and that the claim for rebate of duty under Rule 18 is different and distinct than that of the claim for refund of duty under Section 11B of the Act, the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Act shall not be applicable, while considering the claim for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the 2002 Rules.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Supreme Court rejected the said contention to hold that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cMerely because in Rule 18 of the 2002 Rules, which is an enabling provision for grant of rebate of duty, there is no reference to Section 11B of the Act and\/or in the notification dated 6.9.2004 issued in exercise of powers conferred by Rule 18, there is no reference to the applicability of Section 11B of the Act, it cannot be said that the provision contained in the parent statute, namely, Section 11B of the Act shall not be applicable, which otherwise shall be applicable in respect of the claim of rebate of duty.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After going through the scheme of Section 11B of the Act, the Court observed that the same is applicable with respect to claim for rebate of duty also. The Court noticed that,<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>As per Explanation (A) to Section 11B, \u201crefund\u201d includes \u201crebate of duty\u201d of excise.<\/li>\n<li>As per Section 11B(1) of the Act, any person claiming refund of any duty of excise (including the rebate of duty as defined in Explanation (A) to Section 11B of the Act) has to make an application for refund of such duty to the appropriate authority before the expiry of one year from the relevant date and only in the form and manner as may be prescribed.<\/li>\n<li>The \u201crelevant date\u201d is defined under Explanation (B) to Section 11B of the Act, which means in the case of goods exported out of India where a refund of excise duty paid is available in respect of the goods themselves or, as the case may be, the excisable materials used in the manufacture of goods. Thus, the \u201crelevant date\u201d is relatable to the goods exported.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was, hence, observed that the application for rebate of duty shall be governed by Section 11B of the Act and therefore shall have to be made before the expiry of one year from the \u201crelevant date\u201d and in such form and manner as may be prescribed. The form and manner are prescribed in the notification dated 6.9.2004.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court also highlighted the aspect that <em><u>Section 11B of the Act is a substantive provision in the parent statute and Rule 18 of the 2002 Rules and notification dated 6.9.2004 can be said to be a subordinate legislation and that a<\/u><\/em> <em><u>subordinate legislation cannot override the parent statute. Subordinate legislation can always be in aid of the parent statute<\/u><\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Stating that subordinate legislation cannot be interpreted in such a manner that parent statute may become otiose or nugatory, the Court observed,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cIf the submission on behalf of the appellant that as there is no mention\/reference to Section 11B of the Act either in Rule 18 or in the notification dated 6.9.2004 and therefore the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Act shall not be applicable with respect to claim for rebate of duty is accepted, in that case, the substantive provision \u2013 Section 11B of the Act would become otiose, redundant and\/or nugatory.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that accepting appellant\u2019s submission would mean that there shall not be any period of limitation for making an application for rebate of duty. On the submission that in such a case the claim has to be made within a reasonable time, the Court said that the same also cannot be accepted as <em><u>when the statute specifically prescribes the period of limitation, it has to be adhered to<\/u><\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Sansera Engineering Limited v. Deputy Commissioner, Large Tax Payer Unit, Bengaluru, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wNl9IA3F\">2022 SCC OnLine SC 1635<\/a>, decided on 29.11.2022]<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">*Judgment by: Justice MR Shah<\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For appellant: Sr. Adv Arvind P. Datar<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Revenue: Adv Siddhant Kohli<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court observed that if it is accepted that the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Act shall not be applicable with respect to claim for rebate of duty as there is no mention of Section 11B of the Act either in Rule 18 or in the notification dated 6.9.2004, then there will not be any period of limitation for making an application for rebate of duty.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":278916,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[53314,53315,33091,32057,5961,53316,53318,53317],"class_list":["post-278896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-central-excise-act-1944","tag-central-excise-rules-2002","tag-interpretation-of-statute","tag-limitation-period","tag-rebate","tag-rebate-of-duty","tag-rule-18-of-central-excise-rules","tag-section-11b-of-central-excise-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Section 11B Central Excise Act&#039;s limitation period applicable to claims for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: SC\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 11B Central Excise Act&#039;s limitation period applicable to claims for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: SC\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court observed that if it is accepted that the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Act shall not be applicable with respect to claim for rebate of duty as there is no mention of Section 11B of the Act either in Rule 18 or in the notification dated 6.9.2004, then there will not be any period of limitation for making an application for rebate of duty.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-01T09:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-02T11:34:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/\",\"name\":\"Section 11B Central Excise Act's limitation period applicable to claims for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: SC\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-12-01T09:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-02T11:34:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310,\"caption\":\"supreme court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 11B Central Excise Act&#8217;s limitation period applicable to claims for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: SC\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 11B Central Excise Act's limitation period applicable to claims for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: SC\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 11B Central Excise Act's limitation period applicable to claims for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: SC\u00a0","og_description":"Supreme Court observed that if it is accepted that the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Act shall not be applicable with respect to claim for rebate of duty as there is no mention of Section 11B of the Act either in Rule 18 or in the notification dated 6.9.2004, then there will not be any period of limitation for making an application for rebate of duty.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-12-01T09:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-02T11:34:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/","name":"Section 11B Central Excise Act's limitation period applicable to claims for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: SC\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg","datePublished":"2022-12-01T09:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-02T11:34:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg","width":390,"height":310,"caption":"supreme court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/section-11b-central-excise-act-limitation-period-applicable-to-claim-for-rebate-on-duty-under-rule-18-central-excise-rules-supreme-court-taxation-interpretation-explained-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 11B Central Excise Act&#8217;s limitation period applicable to claims for rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: SC\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":241888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/06\/cestat-it-is-incumbent-on-the-original-authority-not-to-adjudicate-the-protective-notices-and-wait-till-the-decision-of-the-revisionary-authority-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":278896,"position":0},"title":"CESTAT | It is incumbent on the original authority not to adjudicate the protective notices and wait till the decision of the Revisionary Authority; Tribunal allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"January 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): S.S. Garg (Judicial Member) allowed appeals which were filed against the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) whereby Commissioner had rejected the appeal for not depositing the mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F. Appellant had filed four rebate claims\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264906,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/02\/whether-confiscation-by-custom-excise-authority-forfeits-the-claim-of-secured-creditor-over-such-property-whether-the-dues-of-excise-department-create-a-first-charge-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":278896,"position":1},"title":"Whether confiscation by Custom &#038; Excise Authority forfeits the claim of Secured Creditor over such property? Whether the dues of Excise department create a First Charge? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"April 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of L. Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran*, JJ., quashed the confiscation order of Customs and Central Excise Commission confiscating land, building, plant and machinery of Rathi Ispat Ltd. for lacking statutory backing. The Bench observed that the existing law only permit confiscation of goods and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281212,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/07\/corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-corporate-debtor-liquidation-refund-allowed-appeal-partly-allowed-no-inconsistency-s-11b-of-the-central-excise-act-1944-s-335-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":278896,"position":2},"title":"No inconsistency between Section 33 IBC and Section 11-B of the Central Excise Act, 1944; NCLAT partly allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"January 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, a Liquidator filed an application before for release\/refund of unlawful payment by the applicant. The Tribunal, partly allowing the appeal, upheld the refund of the amount of Rs.25,46,588\/- and of the amount of Rs.1,08,797\/- as no application for refund was filed for the said amount.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":379600,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/28\/finance-ministry-notifies-central-excise-amendment-rules-2026\/","url_meta":{"origin":278896,"position":3},"title":"Petrol and Diesel Export Tax Benefits Revised: What Remains and What Has Been Withdrawn","author":"Shubhi","date":"March 28, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Finance Ministry has notified the Central Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2026, revising export tax benefits for petrol, diesel and ATF, while preserving strategic exports by PSU oil companies to select neighbouring countries.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Central Excise (Amendment) Rules","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Central-Excise-Amendment-Rules.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Central-Excise-Amendment-Rules.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Central-Excise-Amendment-Rules.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Central-Excise-Amendment-Rules.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233580,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/08\/jhar-hc-mandatory-pre-deposit-not-to-be-waived-off-by-court-under-amended-s-35-f-central-excise-act-until-exceptional-grounds-of-undue-financial-hardships-is-proved-beyond-doubt\/","url_meta":{"origin":278896,"position":4},"title":"Jhar HC | Mandatory pre-deposit not to be waived off by Court under amended S. 35-F, Central Excise Act until exceptional grounds of undue financial hardships is proved beyond doubt","author":"Editor","date":"August 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214504,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/09\/sc-explains-law-on-payment-of-interest-on-differential-excise-duty-under-section-11ab-of-central-excise-act-1944\/","url_meta":{"origin":278896,"position":5},"title":"SC explains law on payment of interest on \u2018Differential excise duty\u2019 under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding the question whether interest is payable on the differential excise duty with retrospective effect that become payable on the basis of escalation clause under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and UU Lalit and KM Joseph, JJ held,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278896\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278916"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}