{"id":278839,"date":"2022-11-30T16:00:04","date_gmt":"2022-11-30T10:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=278839"},"modified":"2022-12-02T12:13:48","modified_gmt":"2022-12-02T06:43:48","slug":"delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court awards cost of Rs. 9 lakhs to a US based company to protect its well-known mark &#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217; and &#8216;TORQ-GARD&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Delhi High Court<\/b>: In a case filed by a US based company for protection of its mark <i>&#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217;<\/i> and <i>&#8216;TORQ-GARD&#8217;<\/i>, the Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. held that the defendants are refrained from using the mark <i>&#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217;<\/i>, <i>&#8216;leaping deer&#8217;<\/i> logo, mark <i>&#8216;TORQ-GARD&#8217;<\/i> and awarded actual costs of Rs. 9,28,978 in favour of the US based company.<\/p>\n<p><b>Background<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Plaintiffs were involved in the business of manufacturing and selling of Agricultural Equipment, Commercial and Consumer Equipment, Turf Construction and Forestry and Finance and dealt in various other products of consumers such as Engines and Drive Train Components, Electronic Solutions, Government and Military Sales, Rental Sales, Parts, and Services (Coolants, Lubricants, Engine Oil, Transmission Oil and Greases), Lubrication Equipment Accessories, Engine Parts, and Support Services.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The present suit was filed to protect the mark <i>&#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217;<\/i> which was adopted in 1837 along with the <i>&#8216;leaping deer&#8217;<\/i> logo. Plaintiffs operated through domain names <a href=\"http:\/\/www.deere.com\">www.deere.com<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.johndeereclassic.com\">www.johndeereclassic.com<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.deere.co.in\">www.deere.co.in<\/a>. The mark <i>&#8216;TORQ-GARD&#8217;<\/i> was used by plaintiffs for engine oil internationally since 1969 and in India since 2012. Plaintiffs claimed to have taken various actions to protect their rights in these marks including in, <i>Deere and Co.<\/i> v. <i>S. Harcharan Singh<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001010892\">2015 SCC OnLine Del 14637<\/a>, where the mark <i>&#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217;<\/i>, including its colour and the logo had been held to be well-known marks under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563661\">2(1)(zg)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> (Act).<\/p>\n<p><b>Submissions on behalf of the Plaintiffs<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Plaintiffs were aggrieved by the sale of products using the plaintiffs&#8217; marks by the defendants, both through physical sales and through e-commerce, on platforms like <i>&#8216;India Mart&#8217;<\/i>. Further, plaintiffs submitted that the investigations revealed that the defendants were using the marks <i>&#8216;TORQ-GARD&#8217;<\/i> and <i>&#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217;<\/i> with the <i>&#8216;leaping deer&#8217;<\/i> logo and the products procured from the defendants had identical mark, logo, colour combination as that of the plaintiffs. During the investigation, samples of the defendant&#8217;s products were tested and as per the test report, the quality of the defendant&#8217;s products was found to be inferior to the plaintiffs&#8217; products.<\/p>\n<p><b>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 8-10-2021, this Court passed an order in <i>Deere and Co.<\/i> v. <i>Jitender Kumar Gaur<\/i>, CS (COMM) 498 of 2021, wherein the plaintiff was granted <i>ex-parte interim<\/i> injunction against the defendants. The Court opined that from the report placed on record, it was clear that the products found with the defendants were not manufactured by them and clearly appeared to be counterfeited products. Further, the Court opined that the nature of engine oil was such that the safety and security of the customers who used this product, was a matter of concern for this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the defendants were not permitted to sell the counterfeited products using the mark <i>&#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217;<\/i>, <i>&#8216;leaping deer&#8217;<\/i> logo, mark <i>&#8216;TORQ-GARD&#8217;<\/i> and\/or plaintiffs&#8217; trade dress, either physically or through online mode. Further, the Court awarded actual costs of Rs. 9,28,978 in favour of the plaintiffs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Deere and Company v. Jitender Kumar Gaur, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/05iuBzl5\">2022 SCC OnLine Del 4073<\/a>, decided 23-11-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For the Plaintiff(s): Advocate Pravin Anand;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Karan Kamra;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate Vaishali Mittal;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For the Defendant(s): Advocate Vijay Kasana.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#160; &#160; Delhi High Court: In a case filed by a US based company for protection of its mark &#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217; and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":278068,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[53280,53282,2543,42598,35782,46160,2583,53278,44998,44951,29244,30609,53279,46073,52951,53281],"class_list":["post-278839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-actual-costs","tag-counterfeited-products","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-domain-names","tag-ex-parte-interim-injunction","tag-identical-mark","tag-Investigation","tag-john-deere","tag-logo","tag-marks","tag-protection","tag-refrain","tag-torq-gard","tag-trade-dress","tag-trade-marks-act-1999","tag-well-known-mark"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi High Court awards cost of Rs. 9 lakhs to a US based company to protect its well-known mark &#039;JOHN DEERE&#039; and &#039;TORQ-GARD&#039; | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case filed by a US based company for protection of its mark \u2018JOHN DEERE\u2019 and \u2018TORQ-GARD\u2019, Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court awards cost of Rs. 9 lakhs to a US based company to protect its well-known mark &#039;JOHN DEERE&#039; and &#039;TORQ-GARD&#039;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case filed by a US based company for protection of its mark \u2018JOHN DEERE\u2019 and \u2018TORQ-GARD\u2019, Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-30T10:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-02T06:43:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court awards cost of Rs. 9 lakhs to a US based company to protect its well-known mark 'JOHN DEERE' and 'TORQ-GARD' | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-30T10:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-02T06:43:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case filed by a US based company for protection of its mark \u2018JOHN DEERE\u2019 and \u2018TORQ-GARD\u2019, Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court awards cost of Rs. 9 lakhs to a US based company to protect its well-known mark &#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217; and &#8216;TORQ-GARD&#8217;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court awards cost of Rs. 9 lakhs to a US based company to protect its well-known mark 'JOHN DEERE' and 'TORQ-GARD' | SCC Times","description":"In a case filed by a US based company for protection of its mark \u2018JOHN DEERE\u2019 and \u2018TORQ-GARD\u2019, Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court awards cost of Rs. 9 lakhs to a US based company to protect its well-known mark 'JOHN DEERE' and 'TORQ-GARD'","og_description":"In a case filed by a US based company for protection of its mark \u2018JOHN DEERE\u2019 and \u2018TORQ-GARD\u2019, Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-11-30T10:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-02T06:43:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/","name":"Delhi High Court awards cost of Rs. 9 lakhs to a US based company to protect its well-known mark 'JOHN DEERE' and 'TORQ-GARD' | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-11-30T10:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-02T06:43:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case filed by a US based company for protection of its mark \u2018JOHN DEERE\u2019 and \u2018TORQ-GARD\u2019, Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","width":391,"height":311,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-awards-actual-cost-of-rs-928978-to-a-us-based-company-to-protect-its-well-known-mark-john-deere-and-torq-gard\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court awards cost of Rs. 9 lakhs to a US based company to protect its well-known mark &#8216;JOHN DEERE&#8217; and &#8216;TORQ-GARD&#8217;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":278963,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/high-court-monthly-roundup-november-2022-60-legal-stories-including-default-bail-babri-masjid-demolition-kashmiriyat-muzaffarnagar-riots-and-more\/","url_meta":{"origin":278839,"position":0},"title":"High Court Monthly Roundup| November 2022| 60+ Legal Stories including Default Bail, Babri Masjid Demolition, Kashmiriyat, Muzaffarnagar Riots and more","author":"Editor","date":"December 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court Allahabad High Court dismisses appeal against acquittal order in Babri Masjid Demolition Case In an appeal against the judgment passed by the Special Judge acquitting the accused persons in Babri Masjid demolition case, the division bench of Ramesh Sinha and Saroj Yadav, JJ. has held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Court Round Up&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image48.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/29\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-rpg-enterprises-ltd-for-its-mark-rpg-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-awards-rs-3-lakhs-as-damages\/","url_meta":{"origin":278839,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019 in a trade mark infringement suit; awards Rs. 3 lakhs as damages","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019. Further, RPG Developers (P) Ltd. were restrained from offering\/rendering any services using the impugned trade mark \u2018RPG\u2019 and\/or \u2018RPG DEVELOPERS\u2019 and\/or artistic work which was a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's artistic work or any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":290105,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/blatantly-infringed-louis-vuitton-marks-delhi-high-court-imposes-rs9-59-lakh-costs-on-the-manufacturers-for-selling-counterfeit-goods-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":278839,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Blatantly infringed Louis Vuitton marks\u2019; Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction and imposes Rs. 9.59 lakh costs on the manufacturers for selling counterfeit goods","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court opined that the defendants took unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Louis Vuitton (LV) marks and deceived the unwary consumers of their association with the LV marks.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305446,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/23\/dhc-permanently-injuncts-website-sastajoota-com-from-selling-counterfeit-products-under-mark-puma-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":278839,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court permanently injuncts website \u2018sastajoota.com\u2019 from selling counterfeit products under the mark \u201cPUMA\u201d","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDefendant 1 is a counterfeiter and has dragged plaintiff in the Court for an entirely unnecessary litigation, thus, plaintiff will be entitled to actual costs quantified at Rs. 4,59,520.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-whitehat-education-for-its-marks-and-logos-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":278839,"position":4},"title":"[WhiteHat Jr v. Whitehat Sr] Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Whitehat Education Technology for its marks \u2018WhiteHat Jr\u2019, \u2018W\u2019; awards Rs. 9 lakhs costs","author":"Editor","date":"August 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDue to the fact that the defendant has not contested the matter, but compelled the plaintiff to file the present suit, by not agreeing to give up the infringing mark, despite being put to notice, the plaintiff is entitled to receive actual costs.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277715,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/18\/delhi-high-court-awards-rs-20-lakhs-costs-to-louis-vuitton-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-case-against-club-factory\/","url_meta":{"origin":278839,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court awards Rs. 20 lakhs costs to Louis Vuitton in a trade mark infringement case against Club Factory","author":"Editor","date":"November 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where Club Factory was involved in the sale of various unauthorized\/ counterfeited products, bearing the registered marks of Louis Vuitton, the Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. awarded costs of Rs. 20 lakhs in favour of Louis Vuitton, though the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278839"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278839\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}