{"id":278074,"date":"2022-11-26T14:00:20","date_gmt":"2022-11-26T08:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=278074"},"modified":"2022-12-01T17:14:04","modified_gmt":"2022-12-01T11:44:04","slug":"delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

Delhi High Court<\/b>: In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1<\/a> and 2<\/a> of CPC<\/a> for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim<\/i> injunction, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. passed an interim order restraining Vistara Media Private Limited from using Tata Sia Airlines Limited’s registered and well-known trade mark ‘Vistara’<\/i>.<\/p>\n

Background<\/b><\/p>\n

Plaintiff filed the present suit to seek permanent injunction restraining infringement of its registered and well-known trademark ‘Vistara’<\/i>. The mark ‘Vistara’<\/i> has been declared a well-known trademark under Section 2(1)(zg)<\/a> of the Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> by this Court in TATA SIA Airlines Limited<\/i> v. Pilot18 Aviation Book Store<\/i>, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9535<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In 2022, plaintiff came to know that defendant company was incorporated in 2021 and was engaged in the business of news broadcasting services and had been using plaintiff’s registered and well-known trade mark ‘Vistara’<\/i> in various forms and manners. Plaintiff placed a news article on record, by which it appeared that defendant’s website mentioned about plaintiff and its airline business, destinations, and operations, using the trade mark ‘Vistara’<\/i>.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the plaintiff submitted that being a registered proprietor of the trademark ‘Vistara’<\/i>, plaintiff had an exclusive right to use the trade mark and to protect the same from infringement by third parties. Further, it was submitted that defendant had dishonestly copied the trade mark ‘Vistara’<\/i> in its entirety and it was manifestly clear that the intention was to confuse the customers into believing that the services and packages offered by the defendant originate from the plaintiff and was a clear case of infringement under Section 29 of the Act. It was also submitted that over the years, plaintiff had built a reputation and misrepresentation by the defendant to the public was leading to an incalculable harm and injury to plaintiff’s goodwill and business.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court held that plaintiff made out a prima facie<\/i> case for grant of ex parte ad-interim<\/i> injunction and balance of convenience also lied in favour of the plaintiff. Therefore, the Court held that the defendant and all others acting for and on its behalf were restrained from using plaintiff’s registered and well-known trade mark ‘Vistara’<\/i>, in any form or manner whatsoever, including but not limited to its variations in vernacular languages such as Kannada, amounting to infringement and were also restrained from passing off its services or goods as that of the plaintiff. Further, defendants were directed to take down their website with domain name www.vistaranews.com<\/i>.<\/p>\n

[Tata Sia Airlines Limited v. Vistara Media Private Limited, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4076<\/a>, decided on 22-11-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Plaintiff(s): Advocate Pravin Anand;<\/p>\n

Advocate Achuthan Sreekumar;<\/p>\n

Advocate Rohil Bansal.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Delhi High Court: In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":278068,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[53061,53198,31976,14752,3215,2943,26444,31483,53199,2616,52951,51445,53200],"class_list":["post-278074","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ad-interim","tag-broadcasting-services","tag-ex-parte","tag-goodwill","tag-infringement","tag-injunction","tag-interim-order","tag-misrepresentation","tag-registered","tag-Trade_Mark","tag-trade-marks-act-1999","tag-vistara","tag-well-known"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-26T08:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-01T11:44:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"311\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-26T08:30:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-01T11:44:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"width\":391,\"height\":311,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019 | SCC Times","description":"In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019","og_description":"In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-11-26T08:30:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-01T11:44:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":391,"height":311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","name":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-11-26T08:30:20+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-01T11:44:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","width":391,"height":311,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":272963,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/03\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-in-favour-of-vistara-against-using-similar-keychains-tags-similar-marks-damages-compensation-20lakhs-intellectual-property-rights-airlines-trademark-infringementlega\/","url_meta":{"origin":278074,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains company selling keychains and baggage tags having VISTARA marks online; Raises security concerns and directs damages of Rs 20 lakh","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Tata Sia Airlines (\u2018plaintiff') seeking decree of permanent injunction against company selling keychains and baggage tags bearing the \u2018VISTARA Marks' in the aubergine and gold colour-combination, on a Chinese e-commerce platform, namely AliExpress, by the seller (\u2018defendant'), Navin Chawla J.,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"VISTARA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/the-term-fly-high-used-by-vistara-is-common-to-aviation-delhi-high-court-vacates-interim-injunction-granted-in-favour-of-frankfinn\/","url_meta":{"origin":278074,"position":1},"title":"The term \u2018FLY HIGH\u2019 used by Vistara is common to aviation; Delhi High Court vacates interim injunction granted in favour of Frankfinn","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Frankfinn Aviation Services Private Limited (\u2018plaintiff\u2019) seeking permanent and mandatory injunction restraining the Defendant inter alia from infringement of trademark \u2018FLY HIGH\u2019, passing off, unfair competition, dilution and for rendition of accounts, Jyoti Singh, J., vacates an interim injunction order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":278074,"position":2},"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com. While recognising that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":278074,"position":3},"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com. While recognising that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Intellectual Property"","block_context":{"text":"Intellectual Property","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/intellectual_property\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-a-website-using-tata-mark-targeting-indian-public\/","url_meta":{"origin":278074,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against a website using TATA mark “targeting” Indian public","author":"Editor","date":"September 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The considerations, while deciding an application for grant of ad-interim injunction could be less stringent than the one for final relief in a suit. Interim decisions are required to be made based on probable rather than a definitive view.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279621,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-sukam-systems-p-ltd-for-its-trade-mark-su-kam-against-lithium-power-energy-p-ltd-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":278074,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte ad interim injunction to Sukam Systems (P) Ltd. for its trade mark \u2018Su-Kam\u2019 against Lithium Power Energy (P) Ltd in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, Sukam Systems (P) Ltd. alleged infringement and passing of by Lithium Power Energy (P) Ltd. of its registered trade marks \u2018Su-Kam\u2019, \u2018BIG conqueror Tubular Battery\u2019 and \u2018BIG Warrior Tubular Battery\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278074","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278074"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278074\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278074"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278074"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278074"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}