{"id":278056,"date":"2022-11-25T15:00:55","date_gmt":"2022-11-25T09:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=278056"},"modified":"2022-11-25T15:00:55","modified_gmt":"2022-11-25T09:30:55","slug":"bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"[Explained] What made Bombay High Court grant bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Dr. Anand Teltumbde?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Bombay High Court<\/b>: While granting bail to the Bhima Koregaon accused, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, the Division Bench comprising Milind N. Jadhav, A.S. Gadkari, JJ., held that NIA could not establish reasonable grounds for the Court to believe that the allegations and accusations against the accused are <i>prima facie<\/i> true. The Court observed,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>&#8220;There is no material save and except calling upon us to presume that the word &#8216;brother Anand&#8217; is a reference to the appellant and as such he is directly involved with the activities of CPI(M).&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant, Dr. Anand Teltumbde was arraigned as accused No.10 in an FIR registered by National Investigation Agency (NIA) under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\">120-B<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561367\">115<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561376\">121<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561377\">121-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561381\">124-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561414\">153<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\">201<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\">505(1)(b)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) and under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554025\">13<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554028\">16<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554030\">17<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554031\">18<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554033\">18-B<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554036\">20<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554060\">38<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554061\">39<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808781\">Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967<\/a> (UAPA) regarding Bhima Koregaon incident.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Pertinently, the appellant is a renowned scholar, writer, and civil rights activist who has authored 26 books published nationally and internationally and pioneered a theoretical critique on Neoliberal Globalization vis-a-vis Dalits and other oppressed masses. At the time of his arrest, he was working at the Goa Institute of Management, as a Senior Professor.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #538135;\">What Happened in Bhima Koregaon?<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 31-12-2017, Bhima Koregaon Shaurya Din Prerana Abhiyan organised an event called &#8216;Elgaar Parishad&#8217; in Shaniwarwada, Pune to celebrate 200th anniversary of the historic battle of Bhima Koregaon on 01-01-2018. More than 200- 250 Social organisations joined the program. During the event, mobs bearing saffron flags attacked persons travelling to and returning from Shaniwarwada Pune which resulted in large-scale violence including arson, stone pelting and it even caused death of an innocent person near Bhima Koregaon, Pune.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #538135;\">Allegations against the Accused<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">NIA alleged that the appellant is the think tank of the banned activities of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), hereinafter CPI(M), and is intellectually and ideologically connected with CPI(M). A gist of specific charges against the appellant are as follows:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">a. In 2012, the appellant had attended a meet organised by Revolutionary Democratic Front (RDF), a banned organisation, and vehemently espoused the cause of reinvention of Dalit Militancy as well revolutionary resurgence under the flag of CPI(M);<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">b. The appellant was the General Secretary of the Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights (CPDR) and a member of Anuradha Ghandy Memorial Committee, both front organisations of CPI(M);<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">c. He was one of the convenors of Elgar Parishad Program and was present at the venue;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">d. He attended International Conferences under the guise of academic visits to Canada, Pakistan, USA, France etc. That he used to exchange literature on ideology, training, and work strategy of CPI(M) with International Communist Organisations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">e. That he is the real elder brother of wanted accused Milind Teltumbde, CCM and Secretary of Maharashtra &#8211; Madhya Pradesh &#8211; Chhattisgarh (MMC) Zone of CPI(M). That he met his brother during his urban area visits and shared literature of Maoist ideology collected by him during International Conferences;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">f. He took efforts to release one Murugan, a CPI(M) cadre from jail as well as for release of G.N. Saibaba, another convicted accused in a CPI(M) related case.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #538135;\">Analysis of Evidence<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">NIA had provided five documents and three witnesses to buttress the charges levelled against the appellant. The Court has examined each document meticulously to reach the following findings:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>1st document:<\/b> This letter states that the Central Committee (CC) is pleased with the progress that (Comrade Anand) has made on the Dalit campaign and it has agreed to allocate him additional funds (10L yearly) to organise International Seminars and lectures on Dalit issues. That CC has sent funds for (Comrade Anand&#8217;s) upcoming Human Rights convention in Paris while calling upon coordination with friends in America and France and reiterates to keep the fire ablaze. NIA contended that the term &#8216;dear Comrade Anand&#8217; has been used for the appellant which establishes that he is an active member of CPI(M). NIA further pressed that so far as Appellant&#8217;s visit to Paris and Budapest on 09-04-2018 is concerned, he was on leave, and expenses were not incurred by the Institute and hence it is to be deduced that the expenses were borne by CPI(M).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Opinion of the Court:<\/b> After reading of aforesaid letter along with the letter dated 10-08-2020 issued by the Goa Institute of Management, the Court opined that <i>prima facie<\/i>, the appellant had travelled extensively from 11-07-2016 to 05-03-2020 while on leave and being out of office on his own expenses on at least 64 occasions. Submission of NIA that contents of 1st document prima facie invoke provisions of Section 15 of the UAP Act is not acceptable and palatable when the letter is read as it is unless there is any other material to corroborate and support such a theory. The Court noted that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>&#8220;It is seen that appellant is a man of intellectual prominence in the field of Dalit ideology\/movement and merely because he is the elder brother of wanted accused Milind Teltumbde who had gone underground 30 years ago to espouse the cause of CPI(M) cannot be a sole ground to indict the Appellant and link him to the activities of CPI(M).&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>2nd document<\/b>: The second letter is addressed by Comrade M to Comrade Surendra, which refers to &#8216;Comrade Anand&#8217;. The letter which is typed on the letterhead of CPI(M), Central Committee, states that &#8216;Comrade Anand&#8217; has made a few good suggestions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Opinion of the Court:<\/b> There is nothing more in the letter to suggest complicity of the appellant, provided taken at the highest that the word &#8216;Comrade Anand&#8217; refers to him, which is vehemently denied by the appellant. Hence, the Court held on reading the letter <i>prima facie<\/i> it cannot be presumed that the appellant is actively involved in the work of the CIP(M).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>3rd document:<\/b> The letter relating to fact-finding team to gauge the truth about fake encounters in Gadchiroli which is addressed by one &#8216;R&#8217; to &#8216;Comrade Prakash&#8217;, states that &#8220;Anand has agreed to co-ordinate the whole thing&#8221;. According to NIA &#8220;Anand&#8221; denotes the involvement of the appellant which squarely falls within the provisions of Section 15 of the UPA Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Opinion of the Court:<\/b> Prima facie reading of the letter does not establish any case against the appellant unless there is other material to show his nexus to the alleged activity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>4th document<\/b>: The name &#8216;Anand&#8217; appears in the letter addressed by &#8216;Comrade M&#8217; to &#8216;Comrade Rona&#8217; also. The relevant portion reads thus: <i>&#8220;.&#8230;&#8230;. please speak with brother Anand, inform him to send reports through Comrade Manoj&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;<\/i> NIA emphasized that &#8216;brother Anand&#8217; appearing in this letter addressed by &#8216;Comrade M&#8217; (Milind Teltumbde, the wanted accused and younger brother of Appellant) clearly drives home the point that it is none other than Appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Opinion of the Court:<\/b> The Court opined that prima facie, reading of the letter, does not indicate any role of the appellant, especially when the letter has not been recovered and seized from him. The Court observed that even assuming at the highest that reference in this letter i.e., &#8216;brother Anand&#8217; is to the appellant himself, the prosecution still has to show the nexus and link of the appellant with the present crime or any specific overt act. The Court expressed,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8220;<b>This letter refers to names of 17 persons in all, including &#8220;brother Anand&#8221;. Some names are also with their phone numbers. Not all of these 17 persons have been indicted in the present crime. If NIA&#8217;s argument is to be accepted, then the statement\/sentence referring to some of the said names appears to be more serious.&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>5th document<\/b>: The last document referred to and relied upon by NIA is an &#8220;account statement&#8221; which bears the heading&#8212;&#8221;Accounts2k17 PARTY FUND RECEIVED IN LAST YEAR FROM C.C.&#8221; NIA has particularly emphasised on &#8220;Anand T. === R === 90 T from Surendra (Though Milind)&#8221; part of the document. According to NIA the name Anand T. is a reference to the appellant having received Rs.90,000 from Surendra (Surendra Gadling, Accused No.3) through Milind (wanted accused and younger brother of Appellant).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Opinion of the Court:<\/b> Noting the fallacy in the argument of NIA, the Court expressed that if Anand T. is the appellant himself and he received Rs.90,000, even in that case it cannot be linked to the statement in the earlier letter dated 02-01-2018 since the account statement pertains to the year 2016 and or 2017. Further, the document is unsigned and has been recovered from the laptop of one of the co-accused. Hence, at this prima facie stage, the Court cannot presume that the appellant received Rs.90,000.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Additionally, the Court observed that one such seized document which contained the list of Central Committee Members of CPI(M) group along with their details and photographs for the year 2017, suggests that the appellant is not a member of this C.C. However, at Serial No.4 one Katkam Sudarshan @ Anand @ Mahesh @ Bhaskar appears as Central Committee and Polit Bureau Member of CPI(M). Hence, the Court opined that the reference to the name &#8216;Anand&#8217; can also be to this member as argued by Appellant; and <i>prima facie<\/i>, such a probability cannot be ruled out, unless there is material shown to the contrary.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #538135;\">Findings and Conclusion<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">After appreciating the material on record as well as the statements of three key witness against the appellant, the Court held that <i>prima facie,<\/i> the prosecution was unable to establish that provisions of Sections 16 and 18 can be invoked at this stage against the appellant. Hence, the Court held that on reading the chargesheet and other material on record, <i>prima facie<\/i>, it could not be inferred that the appellant has involved himself in a &#8216;terrorist act&#8217;. Additionally, the Court remarked,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;In the present case the offence and crime related to the Bhima Koregaon incident resulted in the death of one person. On reading the draft charges and the chargesheet qua the Appellant, we prima facie find that NIA has not investigated or made any investigation in respect of this aspect. However, it is their case that the banned terrorist organization CPI(M) used the Elgar Parishad.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Further, considering that the appellant has no criminal antecedents, and he has been behind bars for more than two years and half, the Court opined that a case for grant of bail has been made out. Hence, the impugned order of the Special Judge, Greater Bombay dismissing the bail application of the appellant has been set aside and the appellant was directed to be released on bail on the following conditions:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">a. The appellant to execute a PR bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one or more solvent local sureties in the like amount.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">b. He shall not tamper with the evidence of prosecution nor influence the prosecution witnesses;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">c. He shall furnish his contact numbers, both mobile and landline, and permanent residential address, before his actual release from jail, to the Investigating Officer and the Special Court before which his case is pending;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">d. He shall attend the concerned police station where he resides, initially for a period of one year, once in a fortnight i.e., on every 1st and 16th of each English Calendar month and thereafter on every first Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon the till the conclusion of trial;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">e. He shall not leave the jurisdiction of the State of Maharashtra and if he desires to travel within India, he shall seek prior leave and permission of the Trial Court;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">f. He shall deposit his passport held by him before his actual release from jail, with the designated Special Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Pertinently, on the request of the prosecution to stay the operation and implementation of this order to enable NIA to challenge it before the Supreme Court, the Court had directed that the order granting bail to the appellant will remain stayed for a period of one week.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Anand Teltumbde v. National Investigation Agency, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/e3TueFDK\">2022 SCC OnLine Bom 5174<\/a>, decided on 18-11-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate i\/by Ms. Devyani Kulkarni for Appellant;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Sandesh Patil a\/w. Mr. Chintan Shah, Mr. Shrikant Sonakawade and Mr. Prithviraj Gole;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate for Respondent No.1 &#8211; NIA;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Ms. J.S. Lohakare, APP for Respondent No.2 &#8211; State;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Pradip Bhale, Dy. S.P. NIA present;<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#160; &#160; Bombay High Court: While granting bail to the Bhima Koregaon accused, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, the Division Bench comprising Milind N. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":278061,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,33781,2518,53191,53192,48030,29821,42834,46059,3476,21324,27064,19141,33657,30397],"class_list":["post-278056","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-bhima-koregaon","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-communist-party","tag-dalit-reform","tag-elgar-parishad","tag-freedom","tag-legal-news","tag-legal-update","tag-Maoist","tag-nia","tag-personal-liberty","tag-special-court","tag-terrorist-organisation","tag-uapa"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[Explained] What made Bombay High Court grant bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Dr. Anand Teltumbde? | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While granting bail to the Bhima Koregaon accused, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, the Division Bench comprising Milind N. Jadhav, A.S. Gadkari, JJ.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Explained] What made Bombay High Court grant bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Dr. Anand Teltumbde?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While granting bail to the Bhima Koregaon accused, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, the Division Bench comprising Milind N. Jadhav, A.S. Gadkari, JJ.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-25T09:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"390\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"310\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/\",\"name\":\"[Explained] What made Bombay High Court grant bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Dr. Anand Teltumbde? | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-25T09:30:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"While granting bail to the Bhima Koregaon accused, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, the Division Bench comprising Milind N. Jadhav, A.S. Gadkari, JJ.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png\",\"width\":390,\"height\":310},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Explained] What made Bombay High Court grant bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Dr. Anand Teltumbde?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Explained] What made Bombay High Court grant bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Dr. Anand Teltumbde? | SCC Times","description":"While granting bail to the Bhima Koregaon accused, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, the Division Bench comprising Milind N. Jadhav, A.S. Gadkari, JJ.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Explained] What made Bombay High Court grant bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Dr. Anand Teltumbde?","og_description":"While granting bail to the Bhima Koregaon accused, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, the Division Bench comprising Milind N. Jadhav, A.S. Gadkari, JJ.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-11-25T09:30:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":390,"height":310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/","name":"[Explained] What made Bombay High Court grant bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Dr. Anand Teltumbde? | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png","datePublished":"2022-11-25T09:30:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"While granting bail to the Bhima Koregaon accused, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, the Division Bench comprising Milind N. Jadhav, A.S. Gadkari, JJ.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png","width":390,"height":310},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/bhima-koregaon-elgar-parishad-bail-to-anand-teltumbde-personal-liberty-legal-news-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Explained] What made Bombay High Court grant bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Dr. Anand Teltumbde?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":322081,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/14\/supreme-court-grants-bail-activist-gautam-navlakha-elgar-parishad-maoist-links-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":278056,"position":0},"title":"[Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case] Supreme Court lifts stay on Bombay HC order granting bail to activist Gautam Navlakha","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Gautam Navlakha is a human rights activist and the former Secretary of the People's Union for Democratic Rights and was arrested in August 2018.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gautam Navlakha","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/elgaar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/elgaar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/elgaar.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/elgaar.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271696,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/16\/bhima-koregaon-heres-why-supreme-court-granted-permanent-bail-to-dr-varavara-rao-on-medical-grounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":278056,"position":1},"title":"Bhima Koregaon| Here&#8217;s why Supreme Court granted permanent bail to Dr. Varavara Rao on medical grounds","author":"Editor","date":"August 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Adopting a humanitarian approach, the 3-judges Bench comprising Uday Umesh Lalit, Aniruddha Bose, and Sudhanshu Dhulia, JJ., had granted permanent bail to Bhima Koregaon accused, Dr. P. Varavara Rao solely on medical grounds. The appellant, Dr. P. Varavara Rao, presently 82 years of age, was kept in house\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"medical grounds","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/13_MicrosoftTeams-image.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/13_MicrosoftTeams-image.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/13_MicrosoftTeams-image.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/13_MicrosoftTeams-image.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/13_MicrosoftTeams-image.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309709,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/bombay-high-court-bail-granted-gautam-navlakha-bhima-koregaon-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":278056,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court grants bail to Gautam Navlakha in Bhima Koregaon Case","author":"Ridhi","date":"December 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court stayed operation of the instant order for a period of 3 weeks so that NIA could file an appeal before the Supreme Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gautam Navlakha","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gautam-Navlakha.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gautam-Navlakha.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gautam-Navlakha.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gautam-Navlakha.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298048,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/29\/sc-grants-bail-to-vernon-gonsalves-and-arun-ferreira-in-bhima-koregaon-violence\/","url_meta":{"origin":278056,"position":3},"title":"Explained| Why SC granted bail to Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira in Bhima Koregaon Violence case","author":"Editor","date":"July 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira were charged with several offences under IPC and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and they were alleged to have played an active role in recruitment of and training for cadres of the Communist Party of India (Maoist).","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bhima koregaon violence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/bhima-koregaon-violence-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/bhima-koregaon-violence-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/bhima-koregaon-violence-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/bhima-koregaon-violence-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369023,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/06\/bombay-hc-grants-bail-to-bhima-koregaon-accused-hany-babu-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":278056,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court grants bail to Bhima Koregaon accused Hany Babu after prolonged incarceration of 5 years","author":"Ritu","date":"December 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cProlonged incarceration without trial amounts to infringement of right of an accused enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bhima Koregaon","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bhima-Koregaon.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bhima-Koregaon.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bhima-Koregaon.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bhima-Koregaon.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297925,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/sc-grants-bail-to-vernon-gonsalves-and-arun-ferreira-in-bhima-koregaon-violence-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":278056,"position":5},"title":"Bhima Koregaon Violence | SC grants bail to Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Earlier, the Bombay High Court had denied the plea of Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bhima koregaon violence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/bhima-koregaon-violence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/bhima-koregaon-violence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/bhima-koregaon-violence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/bhima-koregaon-violence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278056"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278056\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278061"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278056"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278056"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}