{"id":277762,"date":"2022-11-19T15:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-11-19T09:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=277762"},"modified":"2022-11-19T15:00:00","modified_gmt":"2022-11-19T09:30:00","slug":"clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/","title":{"rendered":"Clarifying the scope of Rina Devi Case, Delhi High Court rules \u2018Railway not liable where initial burden of bona fide passenger is not proved by claimant\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Delhi High Court<\/b>: In a case, wherein an appeal was filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567643\">23<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829239\">Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987<\/a> (Act) against the Order passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), the Single Judge Bench of Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. held that the appellants failed to prove that the ticket was purchased by the deceased and therefore, it cannot be said that the deceased was a <i>bona fide<\/i> passenger.<\/p>\n<p><b>Background<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the deceased purchased the journey ticket from Allahabad Railway Station to travel to New Delhi and boarded the train. When the train was about to arrive at the New Delhi Railway Station, the deceased standing near the compartment gate fell from the train due to sudden and heavy jerk. The deceased was moved to the hospital where he died. The appellants (parents of the deceased) filed a claim petition for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, where it was held that the deceased was not a <i>bona fide<\/i> passenger as he did not have the ticket on him and hence, the petition was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p><b>Submissions on behalf of the Appellants<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the appellants submitted that while passing the impugned order though the Tribunal had held that the incident was an untoward incident, however, it erred in arriving at a conclusion that the deceased was not a <i>bona fide<\/i> passenger as no ticket was found from his body. While relying on <i>Union of India<\/i> v. <i>Rina Devi<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000062742\">(2019) 3 SCC 572<\/a> <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">(Rina Devi case)<\/span>, it was submitted that the appellants were able to discharge their initial burden by filing an affidavit along with the claim application wherein it was stated that the deceased had undertaken the journey after purchasing the ticket.<\/p>\n<p><b>Submissions on behalf of the Respondent<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the respondent also placed reliance on <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Rina Devi case<\/span> and submitted that the Tribunal rightly concluded that the deceased was not a <i>bona fide<\/i> passenger as there was no witness to the deceased buying the ticket and no ticket was found on him on search.<\/p>\n<p><b>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that during the search, no ticket was found with the deceased person and in support of claim, only Appellant 1 (father of the deceased) was examined. The father of the deceased stated that he had not accompanied the deceased to the railway station therefore, ticket was not purchased in his presence. During cross-examination, it was stated by the mother of the deceased that she had accompanied the deceased to the railway station and gave him money for purchasing the ticket.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Rina Devi<\/span>, where it was held that <i>\u201cmere presence of a body on the railway premises would not be conclusive to hold that injured or deceased was a bona fide passenger for which claim for compensation could be maintained. However, mere absence of ticket with such injured or deceased would not negate the claim that he was a bona fide passenger. The initial burden would be on the claimant, which could be discharged by filing an affidavit of the relevant facts and burden would then shift on the Railways and the issue could be decided on the facts shown or the attending circumstances. This would have to be dealt with from case to case based on facts found.\u201d.<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in case the journey ticket was lost, the initial burden could be discharged by placing evidence by way of an affidavit thereby stating the circumstances under which the ticket was purchased, and the train journey was undertaken. But in the present case, neither in the claim application nor in an affidavit these facts were stated by the appellants. Thus, the Court opined that the appellants have failed to discharge the burden that was upon them. Therefore, the Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order that was passed by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Raj Kumar v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/V1123c8Y\">2022 SCC OnLine Del 3825<\/a>, decided on 15-11-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For the Appellant(s): Advocate D.S. Sabharwal;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For the Respondent(s): Senior Panel Counsel Anushkaa Arora along with Advocate Aditya Sharan.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: In a case, wherein an appeal was filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (Act) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":269599,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30272,2728,9121,30336,34368,2733,53052],"class_list":["post-277762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bona-fide","tag-compensation","tag-cross-examination","tag-deceased","tag-passenger","tag-Railway","tag-railway-claims-tribunal-act-1987"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Clarifying the scope of Rina Devi Case, Delhi High Court rules \u2018Railway not liable where initial burden of bona fide passenger is not proved by claimant\u2019 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case, wherein an appeal was filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (Act) against the Order passed\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Clarifying the scope of Rina Devi Case, Delhi High Court rules \u2018Railway not liable where initial burden of bona fide passenger is not proved by claimant\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case, wherein an appeal was filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (Act) against the Order passed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-19T09:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/\",\"name\":\"Clarifying the scope of Rina Devi Case, Delhi High Court rules \u2018Railway not liable where initial burden of bona fide passenger is not proved by claimant\u2019 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-19T09:30:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case, wherein an appeal was filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (Act) against the Order passed\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Clarifying the scope of Rina Devi Case, Delhi High Court rules \u2018Railway not liable where initial burden of bona fide passenger is not proved by claimant\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Clarifying the scope of Rina Devi Case, Delhi High Court rules \u2018Railway not liable where initial burden of bona fide passenger is not proved by claimant\u2019 | SCC Times","description":"In a case, wherein an appeal was filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (Act) against the Order passed","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Clarifying the scope of Rina Devi Case, Delhi High Court rules \u2018Railway not liable where initial burden of bona fide passenger is not proved by claimant\u2019","og_description":"In a case, wherein an appeal was filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (Act) against the Order passed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-11-19T09:30:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/","name":"Clarifying the scope of Rina Devi Case, Delhi High Court rules \u2018Railway not liable where initial burden of bona fide passenger is not proved by claimant\u2019 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-11-19T09:30:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case, wherein an appeal was filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (Act) against the Order passed","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/clarifying-the-scope-of-rina-devi-case-delhi-high-court-rules-railway-not-liable-where-initial-burden-of-bona-fide-passenger-is-not-proved-by-claimant\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Clarifying the scope of Rina Devi Case, Delhi High Court rules \u2018Railway not liable where initial burden of bona fide passenger is not proved by claimant\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":221363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/22\/ph-hc-merely-not-finding-a-ticket-from-the-body-of-a-person-who-died-in-railway-accident-does-not-prove-that-deceased-was-a-ticket-less-passenger\/","url_meta":{"origin":277762,"position":0},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Merely not finding a ticket from the body of a person who died in railway accident does not prove that deceased was a ticket less passenger","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Dr Ravi Ranjan, J. allowed the appeal filed by legal heirs of a person who died in a \u2018railway untoward accident\u2019, under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The claimants herein were the sons of the deceased person who died in an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":325204,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/27\/bombay-hc-set-aside-railway-tribunal-judgment-deceased-death-held-to-be-untoward-incident\/","url_meta":{"origin":277762,"position":1},"title":"[Train Accidents] | \u201cInjury sustained while deboarding from the wrong train cannot be termed as self-inflicted injury\u201d: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"June 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Setting aside the decision of the Railway Claims Tribunal and awarding compensation to legal representatives of the deceased the Court stated that a rash and negligent act cannot be equated with a criminal act resulting in self-inflicted injury and held that the injury sustained by the deceased was an \u2018untoward\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/02\/railways-act-circumstantial-evidence-sufficient-to-prove-untoward-incident-bom-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":277762,"position":2},"title":"Circumstantial evidence sufficient to prove &#8216;untoward incident&#8217; under Railways Act: Bombay HC grants compensation to deceased&#8217;s parents","author":"Editor","date":"December 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Railways Act is a beneficial legislation, and even in criminal matters, circumstantial evidence is taken into consideration for deciding whether the offence was committed or not.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Railways Act circumstantial evidence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Railways-Act-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Railways-Act-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Railways-Act-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Railways-Act-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/24\/bom-hc-railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger\/","url_meta":{"origin":277762,"position":3},"title":"Railway employee travelling on Privilege Pass held bona fide passenger; Bombay HC grants Rs 3 lakh compensation despite missing journey entries","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 24, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely because an employee holding a valid pass fails to mention details himself, it cannot be held that he was travelling without a valid pass.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Railway employee travelling on pass held bona fide passenger","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Railway-employee-travelling-on-pass-held-bona-fide-passenger.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352757,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/bom-hc-on-compensation-to-deceased-lr-after-fall-from-train\/","url_meta":{"origin":277762,"position":4},"title":"Bombay HC grants Rs 8 lakh compensation to deceased\u2019s legal representative after accidental fall from local train","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe primary facts to enforce the strict liability of the railway administration are established and the fact that the Tribunal unjustifiably rejected the claim, did not defeat such vested right in the event the dependent\/claimant died after preferring an appeal.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"compensation deceased LR fall train","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/blog-2-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/blog-2-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/blog-2-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/blog-2-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332600,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/07\/jhc-grants-rs8-lakh-compensation-to-wife-whose-husband-died-after-accidentally-falling-from-running-train\/","url_meta":{"origin":277762,"position":5},"title":"\u2018No evidence to show that deceased was not bona fide passenger\u2019; Jharkhand HC grants Rs. 8 lakh compensation to wife whose husband died after accidentally falling from running train","author":"Arushi","date":"October 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Even if the ticket was not recovered from his person while preparing the inquest report of the deceased, mere filing of the affidavit on behalf of the appellant was sufficient to raise the presumption that the deceased was bona fide passenger.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=277762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277762\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/269599"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=277762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=277762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=277762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}