{"id":276877,"date":"2022-11-07T10:00:29","date_gmt":"2022-11-07T04:30:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=276877"},"modified":"2022-11-07T10:00:29","modified_gmt":"2022-11-07T04:30:29","slug":"sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/","title":{"rendered":"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Orissa High Court<\/b>: In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality and judicial propriety of the impugned order of cognizance, on the ground that it is not tenable in law and hence, liable to be quashed in the interest of justice, R.K. Pattanaik, J. has held that the petitioner seized the vehicle at the behest of another person who was not pulling well with the opposite party, and which could amount to the commission of offences connected to the official duty or having nexus with the investigation and hence, sanction should have been insisted upon before proceeding with the complaint by the Lower Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, one of the opposite parties was ill-treated by the petitioner and other police staff when they seized his bike, claiming it to be stolen and abused him, and did not return his bike even after showing proof of its ownership. Further, false allegations and complaints were made against him, and the Lower Court recorded the initial statement after the complaint was received , conducted an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code and passed the impugned order a without adequately verifying the documents and demanding sanction in terms of Section 197 of the Code, passed the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The issue in the present case is whether the Lower Court was to insist upon a sanction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\">197<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">CrPC<\/a>. before taking cognizance of the offences against the petitioner?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court interpreted Section 197 of the Code which stipulates that when a public servant is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction of the Government, however, thisdoes not mean that a public servant who is not removable from his office without the sanction of the Government cannot be criminally prosecuted unless a sanction under Section 197 of the Code is obtained, provided that the mischief alleged against him was committed while he was acting or purporting to act in the discharge of official duty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred <i>D. Devaraja<\/i> v. <i>Owais Sabeer Hussain<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000693204\">(2020) 7 SCC 695<\/a>, wherein it was held that <b>\u201cthe object of Section 197 of the Code is to prevent public servants from being subjected to vexatious proceedings for the acts which are done in the discharge of their official duty or committed in excess of such duty or authority, further, to decide whether sanction is necessary, the test is whether the act is totally unconnected with the official duty or if there is reasonable nexus with the official duty<\/b>\u201d, and reiterated that if the seizure of the vehicle had been carried out in the due discharge of official duty, the Lower Court should have demanded sanction under Section 197 of the Code, and had it been carried out in mischief and committed excess in the color of discharging duty, no sanction would be required.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court quashed the impugned order and directed the Lower Court to demand sanction under Section 197 of the Code against the petitioner before proceeding with the complaint and taking cognizance of offences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Ajaya Kumar Barik v. State of Odisha, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/53lyPKT2\">2022 SCC OnLine Ori 3738<\/a>, decided on 01-11-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For Petitioner: Senior Advocate Jagbandhu Sahoo;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">For Respondent: Additional Government Advocate P.K. Muduli;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Advocate P.S. Das.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Orissa High Court: In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":268945,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3726,23344,52771,52773,2694,52774,31012],"class_list":["post-276877","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cognizance","tag-criminal-procedure","tag-discharge-of-duty","tag-reasonable-nexus","tag-Sanction","tag-section-197","tag-seizure"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-07T04:30:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/\",\"name\":\"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-07T04:30:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Orissa High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty | SCC Times","description":"In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty","og_description":"In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-11-07T04:30:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/","name":"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-11-07T04:30:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Orissa High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":212024,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ori-hc-the-court-should-not-take-cognizance-if-the-act-complained-of-appears-to-have-inseparable-nexus-with-the-discharge-of-the-official-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":276877,"position":0},"title":"Ori HC | Court should not take cognizance if the act complained of appears to have inseparable nexus with discharge of official duty","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A. K. Mishra, J., allowed a petition filed to quash the order passed taking cognizance of the offences under Sections 448, 427, 380, 506 and 149 IPC. The facts of the case were that a complaint was filed against the petitioner stating that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":371361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/","url_meta":{"origin":276877,"position":1},"title":"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSanction under section 197 CrPC is only for the acts reasonably connected to official duty, not personal illegal acts even if done by the public servants.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 197 not corruption shield","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/25\/orissa-hc-quashes-criminal-proceedings-against-nesco-orissa-officials-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":276877,"position":2},"title":"Orissa HC quashes Criminal proceedings against NESCO Orissa Officials on grounds of absence of Sanction under Section 197 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"April 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The officers on duty cannot be subjected to undue harassment in the hands of unscrupulous litigants, to prevent malicious prosecution provisions such as Section 168 of the Electricity Act, 2003, are put in place.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":53721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":276877,"position":3},"title":"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The 3-judge bench of I. A. Ansari ACJ, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Navaniti Prasad Singh, JJ upheld the validity of Invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section (3) of Section 197 , the Notification dated 16.05.1980 issued by Bihar Government, invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":329997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/sanction-to-prosecute-public-servants-change-in-regime-a-balancing-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":276877,"position":4},"title":"Sanction to Prosecute Public Servants: Change in Regime &mdash; A Balancing Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Mrinal Shankar\u2020 and Dharma Tej Koneru\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Prosecute Public Servants","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/03-141.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/03-141.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/03-141.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/03-141.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":342312,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":276877,"position":5},"title":"S. 197 CrPC | Excess use of power by Customs officers to \u2018extract truth\u2019 is an act done in discharge of official duty: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSanction of the Government, to prosecute a public officer, for any act related to the discharge of official duty, is imperative to protect the public officer from facing harassive, retaliatory, revengeful, and frivolous proceedings.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276877","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276877"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276877\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268945"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276877"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276877"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}