{"id":276868,"date":"2022-11-05T18:00:42","date_gmt":"2022-11-05T12:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=276868"},"modified":"2022-11-05T18:00:42","modified_gmt":"2022-11-05T12:30:42","slug":"prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Gujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

Gujarat High Court<\/b>: While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation (‘A&C’) Act, 2016 cannot be rejected on the ground that it is vague or bereft of the material particulars as Section 21 of the A&C Act does not remotely suggests that the nature of dispute has to be enumerated or explained in the notice invoking the arbitration clause.<\/p>\n

Facts:<\/b><\/p>\n

On 10-12-2018, the petitioner and the respondents entered into a Partnership Agreement (‘Deed’). On 2-02-2021, a notice was issued by the respondent, on account of some disputes between the parties, to settle the disputes within 15 days. When the disputes were not settled, on 23-03-2021, the petitioner got issued a notice invoking the arbitration clause of the Deed by nominating one as the sole arbitrator.<\/p>\n

Arguments:<\/b><\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondent contended that the arbitration notice issued by the petitioner lacked material particulars. Therefore, the petition should be dismissed.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner cited Umesh Goel<\/i> v. H.P. Coop. Group Housing Society Ltd.<\/i>, (2016) 11 SCC 313<\/a> contending that the bar contained under Section 69(3)<\/a> of the Partnership Act, 1932<\/a> will not be applicable to the proceedings under the A&C Act.<\/p>\n

Observation and Analysis:<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court noted that in view of Section 69(3)<\/a> of the Partnership Act<\/a>, no suit can be instituted in any Court by any partner, to enforce a right arising from a contract or under the Partnership Act, unless the firm is registered.<\/p>\n

The Court, while referring to Umesh Goel supra, said that according to the ruling, the arbitral proceedings does not come under the ambit of the expression “other proceedings”, as provided under the Partnership Act. Therefore, the Court reiterated that the bar imposed under Section 69 will have no application to the arbitral proceedings and award.<\/p>\n

The Court held that a notice issued under Section 21 of the A&C Act cannot be rejected on the grounds that it is vague or bereft of the material particulars.<\/p>\n

The Court further held that Section 21 of the A&C Act does not remotely suggest that the nature of dispute must be enumerated in the notice invoking the arbitration clause.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Court allowed the petition, appointing a Sole Arbitrator, as the notice issued by the petitioner fell within the ambit of Section 21 of the A&C Act.<\/p>\n

[Hemlata Jain v. Padmavati Analkumar Mishra, 2022 SCC OnLine Guj 1787<\/a>, decided on 7-10-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

*Kriti Kumar, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Gujarat High Court: While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":268439,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[52770,2633,3226,52772,31135],"class_list":["post-276868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appointmen-to-farbitrator","tag-arbitral_award","tag-arbitration","tag-gujarat-hc","tag-sole-arbitrator"],"yoast_head":"\nGujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6)\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-05T12:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/\",\"name\":\"Gujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-05T12:30:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6)\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Gujarat High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars | SCC Times","description":"While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6)","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars","og_description":"While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6)","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-11-05T12:30:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/","name":"Gujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg","datePublished":"2022-11-05T12:30:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6)","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Gujarat High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/prayer-for-appointment-arbitrator-cannot-rejected-ground-vague-bereft-of-material-particulars-gujarathighcourt-legal-update-research-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gujarat High Court | Notice for appointment of arbitrator cannot be rejected on ground of vague material particulars"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-259.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":242236,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/14\/whether-the-arbitral-process-could-be-interfered-under-article-226-227-of-the-constitution-and-under-what-circumstance-supreme-court-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":276868,"position":0},"title":"Whether the arbitral process could be interfered under Article 226\/227 of the Constitution, and under what circumstance? Supreme Court explains","author":"Editor","date":"January 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the Courts are allowed to interfere with the arbitral process beyond the ambit of the enactment, then the efficiency of the process will be diminished.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272655,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/30\/calcutta-high-court-illegal-procedure-for-appointment-of-arbitrator-does-not-render-arbitration-agreement-illegal-in-toto-guiding-principles-for-appointment-of-arbitrator-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":276868,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Illegal procedure for appointment of Arbitrator does not render Arbitration agreement illegal in toto; Guiding Principles for Appointment of Arbitrator reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"August 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Calcutta High Court: In a petition challenging the appointment of sole Arbitrator by the respondent, Shekhar B. Saraf, J., held that merely because an arbitration clause provides for an illegal method of appointment of arbitrator, it does not come to an end and after removing the illegal portion\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/12\/arbitration-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":276868,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Whether disability of an appointing authority to appoint an arbitrator frustrate the arbitration agreement. HC unravels in light of Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J., while addressing the matter in respect to the invocation of an arbitration clause expressed that: \u201c\u2026the legislative policy is to encourage arbitration, thus, any interpretation that would nullify an arbitration clause must be avoided.\u201d What led to the filing of the present petition? Petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":314889,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/no-claim-certificate-does-not-render-dispute-non-arbitrable-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":276868,"position":3},"title":"\u2018No claim certificate\u2019 by a party does not automatically render dispute non-arbitrable: Gujarat HC","author":"Editor","date":"February 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the Court reaches a clear conclusion that there is not even a vestige of doubt that the claim is non-arbitrable, it may refuse to refer the dispute to arbitration, otherwise, the rule is to refer the dispute to arbitration\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/17\/bombay-high-court-denied-appointment-arbitrator-dispute-against-msme\/","url_meta":{"origin":276868,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court denies appointment of arbitrator for dispute against MSME","author":"Ridhi","date":"October 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court held the instant applications under Section 11 of Arbitration Act as non-maintainable and dismissed the said applications.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286933,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/unilateral-appointment-of-arbitrator-whether-absolute-prohibition-contrary-to-the-scheme-of-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":276868,"position":5},"title":"Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator \u2014 Whether Absolute Prohibition Contrary to the Scheme of the Act?","author":"Editor","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Prashant Tripathi\u2020 and Sanjeev Singh\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276868"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276868\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268439"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}