{"id":276595,"date":"2022-11-03T18:00:47","date_gmt":"2022-11-03T12:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=276595"},"modified":"2022-11-03T18:00:47","modified_gmt":"2022-11-03T12:30:47","slug":"act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/","title":{"rendered":"Act of mutual affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend cannot equate with \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019 under POCSO Act; Meghalaya High quashes FIR"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

Meghalaya High Court<\/b> | While quashing the FIR and the resultant criminal proceedings under POCSO Act, 2012<\/a>, W. Diengdoh, J., held that ‘Sexual Assault’ under POCSO Act, 2012<\/a> cannot be attributed to an act where there is mutual love and affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the mother of a minor girl filled a FIR on 18-12-2020, complaining that her minor daughter was sexually assaulted by the accused. The mother alleged that her minor daughter, who was found absent from her room by the teacher at the school where she was studying and who had accordingly reported the matter to her, narrated that she was sexually assaulted by the accused on two occasions i.e. on 11-12-2020 and 16-12-2020. The accused was arrested by the police under S. 5(1)\/6<\/a> of the POCSO Act<\/a> and he got bail after he was in custody for about 10 months.<\/p>\n

It is evident from the materials on record that the minor daughter of the mother was having an affair with the accused. The instant petition was filed by the accused (petitioner 1) and the minor girl’s mother (petitioner 2) on mutual understanding for quashment of FIR.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the petitioners contended that the minor girl in her statement under S. 161<\/a> CrPC<\/a> as well as S. 164<\/a> CrPC<\/a> admitted that the accused was her boyfriend and her relationship with him was consensual and out of her own free will. The counsel for the petitioners also contended that the fact that both the accused and mother of minor girl has jointly and on mutual understanding filed the instant petition before the Court reflected the bonafide of the petitioners.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the petitioners further contended that “this is a case where two teenagers are involved in a romantic relationship and being unaware of the legal restrictions, had indulged in a physical relationship out of their own free will and consent”<\/span> and therefore this no case of sexual assault can be made under the provisions of the POCSO Act.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the petitioners also submitted that the instant matter does not involve extreme depravity, perversity or cruelty<\/span> and since there was no ill-motive or mens rea on his part, he may not be penalized for the same.<\/p>\n

Discussing the effect of rape or sexual assault on victim and the need for stringent provisions under POCSO Act, the Court observed that “in a case where there is mutual love and affection between a child and a person which might even lead to a physical relationship, though the consent of the child under the law is immaterial as far as prosecution for an alleged offence of sexual assault is concerned”<\/span>.<\/p>\n

The Court also observed that “…in a case of a boyfriend and girlfriend particularly, if both of them are still very young, the term ‘sexual assault’ as could be understood under the POCSO Act cannot be attributed to an act where, there is, as pointed above, mutual love and affection between them.”<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

The Court noted the observation<\/span> in Ranjit Rajbanshi<\/i> v. State of W.B.<\/i>, 2021 SCC OnLine Cal 2470<\/a> and Vijayalakshmi<\/i> v. State<\/i>, Crl. O.P. No. 232 of 2021, order dated 27.01.2021, where it was held that<\/p>\n

“There can be no second thought as to the seriousness of offences under the POCSO Act and the object it seeks to achieve. However, it is also imperative for this Court to draw the thin line that demarcates the nature of acts that should not be made to fall within the scope of the Act, for such is the severity of the sentences provided under the Act. Justifiably so, that if acted upon hastily or irresponsibly, it could lead to irreparable damage to the reputation and livelihood of youth whose actions would have been only innocuous. What came to be a law to protect and render justice to victims and survivors of child abuse, can, become a tool in the hands of certain sections of the society to abuse the process of law.<\/b>”<\/p>\n

In the light of facts of the case, argument advanced, authorities cited and in the interest of Justice, the Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under POCSO Act and absolve the accused from any liability in the aforementioned criminal case.<\/p>\n

[Silvestar Khonglah v. State of Meghalaya, 2022 SCC OnLine Megh 575<\/a>, decided on 27.10.2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Mr K. Ch. Gautam, Counsel for the Petitioners;<\/p>\n

Mr S. Sengupta and Mr. H. Kharmih (Addl. PP), Counsel for the Respondent.<\/p>\n\n

*Ritu Singh, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“In a case of rape or sexual assault, the act not only affects the physical well-being of the victim but would also leave a very deep emotional scar which would require prolonged counselling for the experience and the image to be erased from the mind of the victim. Such an act would have a more profound effect on a child.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":268311,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[52727,2550,3229,23524,6191],"class_list":["post-276595","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-consent-of-minor","tag-Meghalaya_High_Court","tag-minor","tag-pocso-act","tag-sexual-assault"],"yoast_head":"\nAct of mutual affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend cannot equate with \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019 under POCSO Act; Meghalaya High quashes FIR | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While quashing the FIR and the resultant criminal proceedings under POCSO Act, 2012, W. Diengdoh, J., held that \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019under POCSO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Act of mutual affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend cannot equate with \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019 under POCSO Act; Meghalaya High quashes FIR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While quashing the FIR and the resultant criminal proceedings under POCSO Act, 2012, W. Diengdoh, J., held that \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019under POCSO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-03T12:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/\",\"name\":\"Act of mutual affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend cannot equate with \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019 under POCSO Act; Meghalaya High quashes FIR | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-03T12:30:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"While quashing the FIR and the resultant criminal proceedings under POCSO Act, 2012, W. Diengdoh, J., held that \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019under POCSO\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Meghalaya High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Act of mutual affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend cannot equate with \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019 under POCSO Act; Meghalaya High quashes FIR\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Act of mutual affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend cannot equate with \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019 under POCSO Act; Meghalaya High quashes FIR | SCC Times","description":"While quashing the FIR and the resultant criminal proceedings under POCSO Act, 2012, W. Diengdoh, J., held that \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019under POCSO","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Act of mutual affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend cannot equate with \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019 under POCSO Act; Meghalaya High quashes FIR","og_description":"While quashing the FIR and the resultant criminal proceedings under POCSO Act, 2012, W. Diengdoh, J., held that \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019under POCSO","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-11-03T12:30:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/","name":"Act of mutual affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend cannot equate with \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019 under POCSO Act; Meghalaya High quashes FIR | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-11-03T12:30:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"While quashing the FIR and the resultant criminal proceedings under POCSO Act, 2012, W. Diengdoh, J., held that \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019under POCSO","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Meghalaya High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/act-of-mutual-affection-between-young-boyfriend-and-girlfriend-cannot-equate-with-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act-meghalaya-high-quashes-fir\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Act of mutual affection between young boyfriend and girlfriend cannot equate with \u2018Sexual Assault\u2019 under POCSO Act; Meghalaya High quashes FIR"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Meghalaya-High-Court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326677,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/16\/touching-private-part-with-penis-amounts-to-aggravated-penetrative-sexual-assault-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":276595,"position":0},"title":"Touching private part with penis amounts to aggravated penetrative sexual assault under POCSO Act; Meghalaya HC upholds man\u2019s conviction for raping 4-yr-old girl","author":"Editor","date":"July 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the testimony of the victim child inspires the confidence of the Court and is found to be reliable, there is no necessity to look for other corroborations.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327140,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/23\/meghalaya-hc-upholds-20-yrs-conviction-sexually-assaulting-minor-girlfriend\/","url_meta":{"origin":276595,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Love is blind but minor girl was made blind by intoxication to fulfil sexual desire\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds 20 yrs conviction for sexually assaulting minor girlfriend","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the guise of loving the minor girl, the boy had poured some intoxicating substance in the tea which made the girl unconscious and had aggravated sexual intercourse with her.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295290,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/23\/meghalaya-hc-quashes-pocso-proceedings-against-minor-girls-boyfriend-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":276595,"position":2},"title":"\u201816-year-old girl capable of making conscious decision for her well-being\u2019; Meghalaya HC quashes POCSO proceedings against boyfriend","author":"Editor","date":"June 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court also said that prima facie, it appeared that there was no mens rea involved.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1077.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321481,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/meghalaya-high-court-modifies-sentence-pocso-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":276595,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Male member made scapegoat for mistake of both\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds conviction under POCSO, mitigates life sentence to 10 yrs imprisonment","author":"Editor","date":"May 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA case involving love affair and unfortunately, the male member was made as a scapegoat to undergo imprisonment for the mistakes committed by the two. It is no doubt true that the offence under POCSO Act, 2012 has been made out to impose punishment on the accused, while the so-called\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/09\/del-hc-making-minor-touch-private-parts-aggravated-sexual-assault-pocso\/","url_meta":{"origin":276595,"position":4},"title":"Making minor touch private parts with sexual intent constitutes Aggravated Sexual Assault under POCSO Act: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Minor inconsistencies arising from age, vocabulary or manner of narration do not erode the credibility of the prosecution, particularly where the allegation relates to commission of sexual assault with sexual intent.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Making minor touch private parts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373163,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/19\/del-hc-rubbing-penis-against-childs-private-part-not-penetrative-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":276595,"position":5},"title":"Rubbing penis against child’s private part not ‘Penetrative Sexual Assault’ under POCSO Act; Delhi HC modifies sentence","author":"Ritu","date":"January 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe accused in this case was a doctor to whom the child was sent for medicine. The accused was in a position of authority and trust, and it was such a position that had been misused by him\u2026 In such circumstances, no leniency is called for.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Penetrative-Sexual-Assault-under-POCSO-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Penetrative-Sexual-Assault-under-POCSO-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Penetrative-Sexual-Assault-under-POCSO-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Penetrative-Sexual-Assault-under-POCSO-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276595","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276595"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276595\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}