{"id":27651,"date":"2015-11-30T10:04:37","date_gmt":"2015-11-30T04:34:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=27651"},"modified":"2015-12-22T12:17:29","modified_gmt":"2015-12-22T06:47:29","slug":"compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/","title":{"rendered":"Compact Disc is \u201cdocument\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: In the case where the Court was deciding the question regarding the exhibition of Compact Discs filed in defence by the accused and to get the same proved from Forensic Science Laboratory, the bench of Dipak Misra and P.C. Pantt, JJ held that the courts below erred in law in rejecting the application to play the compact disc in question to enable the public prosecutor to admit or deny.<\/p>\n

In the case where a female child aged nine years was alleged to be sexually abused by his uncle, considering the fact that the compact disc in question had the conversation between the father of the victim and son and wife of the appellant regarding alleged property dispute, the Court referred to various judgments of this court where it was held that tape recorded conversation is admissible provided first the conversation is relevant to the matters in issue; secondly, there is identification of the voice; and, thirdly, the accuracy of the tape recorded conversation is proved by eliminating the possibility of erasing the tape record. The Court, hence, held that Compact Discs were \u201cdocuments\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872.<\/p>\n

Regarding Section 294 CrPC, the Court held that the object of Section 294 CrPC is to accelerate pace of trial by avoiding the time being wasted by the parties in recording the unnecessary evidence. Where genuineness of any document is admitted, or its formal proof is dispensed with, the same may be read in evidence. Hence, it was said that the endorsement of admission or denial by the public prosecutor will be sufficient and defence will have to prove the document if not admitted by the prosecution. [Shamsher Singh Verma<\/em> v. State of Haryana<\/em>, 2015 SCC OnLine SC 1242<\/a><\/b>\u00a0decided on 24.11.2015]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: In the case where the Court was deciding the question regarding the exhibition of Compact Discs filed in defence by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":27341,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt"],"yoast_head":"\nCompact Disc is \u201cdocument\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Compact Disc is \u201cdocument\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In the case where the Court was deciding the question regarding the exhibition of Compact Discs filed in defence by\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-30T04:34:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-22T06:47:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/\",\"name\":\"Compact Disc is \u201cdocument\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-30T04:34:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-22T06:47:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Compact Disc is \u201cdocument\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Compact Disc is \u201cdocument\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Compact Disc is \u201cdocument\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872","og_description":"Supreme Court: In the case where the Court was deciding the question regarding the exhibition of Compact Discs filed in defence by","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-11-30T04:34:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-22T06:47:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/","name":"Compact Disc is \u201cdocument\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","datePublished":"2015-11-30T04:34:37+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-22T06:47:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","width":1920,"height":1280},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/30\/compact-disc-is-document-under-section-3-of-the-evidence-act-1872\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Compact Disc is \u201cdocument\u201d under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":260151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/15\/ph-hc-are-recordings-of-private-conversation-between-husband-and-wife-permissible-as-evidence-under-s-13-of-hma-1955-hc-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":27651,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC |\u00a0Are Recordings of Private Conversation between Husband and Wife permissible as evidence under S. 13 of HMA, 1955? HC decides","author":"Editor","date":"January 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Lisa Gill, J., held that to permit a spouse to record conversations with an unsuspecting partner and to produce the same in a court of law, to be made the basis of deciding a petition under Section 13 of the Act cannot be permitted. Order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":231612,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/01\/del-hc-if-right-to-adduce-evidence-collected-by-surreptitious-means-in-a-marital-or-family-relationship-is-available-without-any-consequences-it-could-potentially-create-havoc-in-peoples-p\/","url_meta":{"origin":27651,"position":1},"title":"[S. 14 of Family Courts Act] Del HC | In a contest between right to privacy and right to fair trial, both of which arise under expansive Art. 21, right to privacy may have to yield to right to fair trial","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J., while addressing a matrimonial dispute, observed that, \"the only criterion or test under Section 14 of Family Courts Act for a Family Court to admit, evidence is it's subjective satisfaction that the evidence would assist it to deal effectually with the dispute.\" Divorce petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":115311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/21\/the-relief-being-sought-is-the-litmus-test-for-determining-the-nature-of-a-writ-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":27651,"position":2},"title":"The relief being sought is the litmus test for determining the nature of a writ petition","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 21, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the \u2018money for change of land use\u2019 scam involving Ram Kishan Fauji where it was alleged that no appeal lies against the order passed by the Single Judge of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in exercise of criminal jurisdiction, the 3-Judge Bench of Dipak Misra, A.M.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347991,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/16\/bomhc-orders-wife-to-give-voice-sample-to-verify-husbands-claim-of-extra-marital-affair\/","url_meta":{"origin":27651,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Article 20(3) of Constitution not attracted\u2019; Bombay HC orders wife to give voice sample to verify husband\u2019s claim of extra marital affair","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Magistrate in the matters of domestic violence has the power to adopt the procedure as per Section 28(2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and exercise of such power depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236317,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/26\/jk-hc-mere-use-of-derogatory-or-objectionable-words-may-not-be-a-sufficient-ground-for-invoking-provisions-contained-in-ss-124a-or-153a-of-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":27651,"position":4},"title":"J&K HC | Mere use of derogatory or objectionable words may not be a sufficient ground for invoking provisions contained in Ss. 124A or 153A of IPC","author":"Editor","date":"September 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar, J. accepted the petition of the political leader and accordingly granted him bail. According to the case of the prosecution in the present case in June 2020, the Police received information from reliable sources that an audio clip containing objectionable conversation pertaining to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/prosecution-case-held-to-fail-as-vital-factors-necessary-to-complete-the-chain-remain-unproved-sri-lankan-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":27651,"position":5},"title":"SL SC | Prosecution case held to fail as vital factors necessary to complete the chain remain unproved","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: A Bench comprising of Eva Wanasundera PC,\u00a0Buwaneka Aluwihare, PC, and Prasanna Jayawardena PC, JJ. cancelled a conviction due to the absence of any incriminating evidence against the appellant. The appellant was accused of committing gang rape, robbery and murder of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27651\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}