{"id":276389,"date":"2022-10-31T16:00:05","date_gmt":"2022-10-31T10:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=276389"},"modified":"2022-10-31T16:00:05","modified_gmt":"2022-10-31T10:30:05","slug":"uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/","title":{"rendered":"Uttaranchal High Court| Appointee cannot claim right to continue to the next phase of project when appointment was purely on temporary and co-terminus basis"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Uttaranchal High Court<\/b>: A Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition wherein the petitioner had argued that National Geotechnical Facility (hereinafter &#8220;NGF&#8221;) issued the advertisement for the permanent post of Scientist &#8216;B&#8217; for Project-NFG Phase-I and hence, he had the right to continue in the Phase-II project as Scientist &#8216;B&#8217;. The Court held that as the petitioner was appointed purely on temporary and co-terminus basis for Phase-I project, his termination from the said post cannot be held to be illegal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The commencement of NGF in Survey of India, Dehradun was for five years from January 2010 to December 2015. On 19-12-2011, the Project Director of NGF issued advertisement for recruitment to various posts. On 12-09-2012, the petitioner was issued an appointment letter by the Project Director for the post of Scientist &#8216;B&#8217; and accordingly, the petitioner assumed charge of the said post.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 22-06-2017, the Department of Science and Technology issued an order for Project-NFG Phase-II from April 2017 to March 2020. It was clear from the order that the staff and scientists were to appointed afresh through Search-Cum-Committee and their services would be on contractual basis and co-terminus with the NGF Phase-II project. Thus, on 20-07-2017, the Department of Science and Technology communicated that the staff working in the erstwhile project would be informed about fresh recruitment and salary structure of NGF Phase-II project, and services of the erstwhile staff will stand terminated on 31-10-2017. Therefore, the petitioner was given the advance notice on 17-08-2017 about termination of her services w.e.f. 31-10-2017.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 31-08-2017, the Project Director, NGF, Dehradun, issued an advertisement for recruitment of temporary posts for NGF Phase-II project. The petitioner was aggrieved by the above-mentioned orders, hence, filed an application before Central Administrative Tribunal to quash the same, but the said application was dismissed. Hence, this petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that it was clear from the appointment letter dated 12-09-2012 that the petitioner was appointed purely on temporary and co-terminus basis with the Phase-I project and as per the advertisement dated 19-12-2011, it is also clear that the said project was sanctioned only for five years. Moreover, the petitioner did not challenge her appointment letter dated 12-09-2012. Therefore, the Court held that there is no illegality in the termination order as well as in the advertisement. The petitioner cannot be said to have any right to continue in the Phase-II project as Scientist &#8216;B&#8217;. Lastly, the Central Administrative Tribunal has rightly dismissed her claim on merits and there is no illegality in the said action.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Dr. Ruchika Tandon v. Union of India, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001285261\">2022 SCC OnLine Utt 1274<\/a>, decided on 20-10-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Petitioner-in-Person, for the Petitioner(s);<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Ms Monka Pant, for the Respondent(s).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#160; &#160; Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition wherein the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":275480,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[52630,52631,35263],"class_list":["post-276389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-national-geotechnical-facility","tag-ngf","tag-uttaranchal-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Uttaranchal High Court| Appointee cannot claim right to continue to the next phase of project when appointment was purely on temporary and co-terminus basis | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition wherein the petitioner had argued that National\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court| Appointee cannot claim right to continue to the next phase of project when appointment was purely on temporary and co-terminus basis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition wherein the petitioner had argued that National\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-31T10:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/\",\"name\":\"Uttaranchal High Court| Appointee cannot claim right to continue to the next phase of project when appointment was purely on temporary and co-terminus basis | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-31T10:30:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"A Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition wherein the petitioner had argued that National\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Uttaranchal High Court| Appointee cannot claim right to continue to the next phase of project when appointment was purely on temporary and co-terminus basis\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Uttaranchal High Court| Appointee cannot claim right to continue to the next phase of project when appointment was purely on temporary and co-terminus basis | SCC Times","description":"A Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition wherein the petitioner had argued that National","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Uttaranchal High Court| Appointee cannot claim right to continue to the next phase of project when appointment was purely on temporary and co-terminus basis","og_description":"A Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition wherein the petitioner had argued that National","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-10-31T10:30:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/","name":"Uttaranchal High Court| Appointee cannot claim right to continue to the next phase of project when appointment was purely on temporary and co-terminus basis | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-10-31T10:30:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"A Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. dismissed a petition wherein the petitioner had argued that National","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-1.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/uttaranchal-high-court-appointee-cannot-claim-right-to-continue-to-the-next-phase-of-project-when-appointment-was-purely-on-temporary-and-co-terminus-basis\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Uttaranchal High Court| Appointee cannot claim right to continue to the next phase of project when appointment was purely on temporary and co-terminus basis"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":295859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/","url_meta":{"origin":276389,"position":0},"title":"Temporary Appointees cannot claim regularization based on past performance or long service: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that \u201cin the terms and conditions of the appointment it is clearly mentioned that the employee would not be having any right to claim regularization\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199557,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/03\/rule-turning-down-maternity-leave-for-third-child-held-unconstitutional-uttaranchal-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":276389,"position":1},"title":"Rule turning down \u2018Maternity leave\u2019 for third child held unconstitutional: Uttaranchal HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sharma J., decided that the proviso second of the Fundamental Rule 153 of the U.P. Fundamental Rules be struck down as it declines to grant maternity leave to a woman for her third child. In accordance to the facts of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":197618,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/uttaranchal-hc-bans-water-sports-in-the-state-till-state-government-comes-up-with-suitable-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":276389,"position":2},"title":"Uttaranchal HC bans water sports in the State till State Government comes up with suitable policy","author":"Saba","date":"June 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Uttaranchal High Court has banned all water sports, paragliding, and white river rafting in the State until a policy is framed to regulate these activities. The Court directed the State Government to \u201cprepare a transparent policy in this regard within a period of two weeks\u201d. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":354454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/uttaranchal-hc-vaccinologist-conviction-stayed-citing-public-health-national-interest\/","url_meta":{"origin":276389,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Vaccine development is issue of public health and national interest\u2019: Uttaranchal HC stays Vaccinologist&#8217;s conviction under Section 306 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"July 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cUnless the attention of the court is drawn to the specific consequences that would follow on account of the conviction, the person convicted cannot obtain an order of stay of conviction.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Vaccinologist conviction stayed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Vaccinologist-conviction-stayed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Vaccinologist-conviction-stayed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Vaccinologist-conviction-stayed.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Vaccinologist-conviction-stayed.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353989,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/21\/uttaranchal-hc-stays-disqualification-pradhan-candidate-malfeasance-returning-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":276389,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Clear case of malfeasance by the Returning Officer\u2019: Uttaranchal HC stays disqualification of Pradhan candidate over toilet location","author":"Editor","date":"July 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight to contest the elections is a statutorily guaranteed right, and the same cannot be denied in a completely arbitrary manner and which prima facie appears to be illegal.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Disqualification of Pradhan candidate over toilet location","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280209,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/22\/participation-in-the-elections-of-college-union-is-an-integral-part-of-the-education-uttaranchal-high-court-grants-age-relaxation-of-two-years-to-the-student-for-participating-in-thecollege-election\/","url_meta":{"origin":276389,"position":5},"title":"Participation in the elections of college union is an integral part of the education; Uttaranchal High Court grants age relaxation of two years to the student for participating in the college election","author":"Editor","date":"December 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Uttaranchal High Court held that participation in the elections of college union was an integral part of the education, and it was an opportunity that was given to the students for developing their leadership qualities, therefore, two years age relaxation was granted to the student for participating in his\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image27.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276389"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276389\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/275480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}