{"id":276290,"date":"2022-10-29T09:00:40","date_gmt":"2022-10-29T03:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=276290"},"modified":"2022-10-29T09:00:40","modified_gmt":"2022-10-29T03:30:40","slug":"bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Bombay High Court<\/b>: In an application filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\">482<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">Criminal Procedure Code<\/a> (CrPC) for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\">504<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\">506<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC), a Division Bench of Vibha Kankanwadi and Rajesh S Patil, J., quashed and set aside the FIR and the proceedings thereto, on the ground that the allegations made, and the evidence collected is not prima facie sufficient, to attract the ingredients of offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\">498-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a>. As far as Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\">504<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\">506<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> is concerned, unless the other offences are proven to amount to &#8220;cruelty&#8221;, offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\">498-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> cannot be made out and, therefore, it would be a futile exercise to ask the applicants to face the trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The informant (Respondent No. 2) lodged a report with the police that she has been harassed mentally and physically by her husband and in laws. There are categorical allegations pertaining to demand of dowry, money for buying a car and forcing to reproduce a son and like.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the allegations levelled by the informant that she was treated like a maid servant, the Court noted that if a married lady is asked to do household work definitely for the purpose of the family, it cannot be said that it is like a servant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further remarked that if she had no wish to do her household activities, then she ought to have told it either prior to the marriage so that the bride-groom can rethink about the marriage itself or if it is after marriage, then such problem ought to have been sorted out earlier.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the contention put forth by the applicants that the FIR appears to be a concocted version as it was the second marriage of wife wherein charges of similar nature were filed which eventually culminated in divorce, the Court noted that the previous complaints\/applications against the first husband and his family members, does not mean that she is in a habit of levelling such allegations and extracting money until and unless proven by cogent and reliable evidence by the applicants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the contention by the applicants that there was demand of Rs. 4,00,000\/- for purchasing four-wheeler and she was subjected to mental and physical harassment, the Court noted that there are details which are missing and lacking as mere use of the word harassment &#8220;mentally and physically&#8221; are not sufficient to attract ingredients of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\">498-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a>. Unless those acts are described it cannot be concluded whether those acts amounted to harassment or subjecting a person to cruelty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the further contention regarding that she got medically checked through doctor, at the instance of her in-laws, for demand of birth of a son, the Court observed that on perusal of medical documents placed before the Court, it is clear that she was rather referred for her gynecological problem relating to cyst in the ovaries, implying that she was not pregnant at all, and the allegations are baseless.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that the allegations made and evidence placed is not sufficient, at this prima facie stage, to attract the ingredients of offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\">498-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a>. Further as regards offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\">504<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\">506<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\">34<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> is concerned, it is in fact already conferred under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\">498-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> and unless those other offences are shown which would amount to &#8220;cruelty&#8221;, offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\">498-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> cannot be made out and, therefore, it would be a futile exercise to ask the applicants to face the trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sarang Diwakar Amle v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Application No. 40 of 2021, decided on 21-10-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Sagar Bhingare, Advocate for the Applicants;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. S.J. Salgare, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 &#8211; State.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. S.S. Khoche, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. S.B. Solanke, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. (Appointed)<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#160; &#160; Bombay High Court: In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) for quashing the FIR for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":261881,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2518,2570,2846,2521,3000,50894,52588,6061,52589,52590],"class_list":["post-276290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-Cruelty","tag-divorce","tag-Evidence","tag-harassment","tag-household-work","tag-maid-servant","tag-medical-treatment","tag-mental-harasment","tag-physical-harasment"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A,\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-29T03:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-29T03:30:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A,\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times","description":"In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A,","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC","og_description":"In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-10-29T03:30:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/","name":"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-10-29T03:30:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A,","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bom-hc-holds-taunts-not-grave-enough-to-prove-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":276290,"position":0},"title":"&#8216;Taunts for dark complexion not grave enough to prove cruelty or abetment to suicide under IPC&#8217;; Bombay HC acquits husband","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEvery dispute, quarrel or altercation arising from the matrimonial life are not criminal offence. It will take colour of Criminal law only when there are no alternatives for the wife but to put an end to her life, because of the harassment.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"wife suicide over dark complexion","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/bom03.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/bom03.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/bom03.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/bom03.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/27\/bombay-hc-quashes-s-498-a-proceedings-against-paramour-of-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":276290,"position":1},"title":"Read why Bombay HC quashed S. 498-A IPC proceedings initiated against husband\u2019s paramour by wife","author":"Editor","date":"August 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFor the attraction of Section 498-A, cruelty shall be inflicted upon the wife either by the husband or a relative of the husband; a paramour in extra-marital affair is not a relative of the husband.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352170,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/bomhc-on-misuse-of-s-498-a-ipc-highlights-improper-police-investigation\/","url_meta":{"origin":276290,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Classic case of misuse of S.498-A IPC\u2019; Bombay HC quashes dowry harassment case, highlights improper police investigation","author":"Editor","date":"July 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court observed that the police does not take proper precautions and appropriate investigation when it came to offences under Section 498-A\u00a0IPC and called their attitude of proceeding with investigation with presumptions\/prejudicial mind, \u2018dangerous\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"misuse of S.498-A IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/misuse-of-S.498-A-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/misuse-of-S.498-A-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/misuse-of-S.498-A-IPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/misuse-of-S.498-A-IPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225470,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/11\/bom-hc-allegations-of-cruelty-and-harassment-in-absence-of-specific-details-would-not-attract-to-ingredients-of-ss-304b-and-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":276290,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Allegations of Cruelty and Harassment, in absence of specific details, would not attract ingredients of Ss. 304B and 498-A IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and V.G. Bisht, JJ., dismissed the criminal appeal on finding the trial court\u2019s decision which was challenged to be in consonance with evidence on record. A criminal appeal was filed by the deceased\u2019s father (Informant) against the judgment and order that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355619,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/bom-hc-friend-not-relative-under-section-498a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":276290,"position":4},"title":"Husband\u2019s friend not a \u2018relative\u2019 under Section 498-A IPC: Bombay High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The husband\u2019s friend tried to convince him that if his demands are not fulfilled then he shall not cohabit with his wife and shall send her to her paternal home.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-7-7.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-7-7.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-7-7.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/blog-7-7.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/bom-hc-high-court-upheld-the-decision-of-trial-court-in-light-of-no-evidence-to-hold-the-charge-of-cruelty-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":276290,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | High Court upheld the decision of trial court in light of no evidence to hold the charge of &#8220;cruelty&#8221; under S. 498-A IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Sandeep K. Shinde, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the State against the order of acquittal by the trial court in respect to the matter pertaining to Sections 498-A and 306 of Penal Code, 1860. State preferred the present appeal under Section 378(1) of CrPC, 1973 against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276290\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}