{"id":276197,"date":"2022-10-27T11:00:12","date_gmt":"2022-10-27T05:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=276197"},"modified":"2022-10-27T11:00:12","modified_gmt":"2022-10-27T05:30:12","slug":"illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Providing illegible copies attacks detenu&#8217;s fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: In a case where a detenu was provided with the illegible copy of documents relating to his detention, the bench of <strong>Ajay S. Rastogi*<\/strong> and CT Ravikumar, JJ has held that Thus, the right to make representation is a fundamental right of the detenu under Article 22(5) of the Constitution and supply of the illegible copy of documents which has been relied upon by the detaining authority indeed has deprived him in making an effective representation. Hence, the order of detention was held to be illegal and not in accordance with the procedure contemplated under law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the case at hand, the Manipur High Court had set aside the order of detention passed under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 on the premise that the detaining authority failed to supply the legible copies of documents which were relied upon by it while passing the order of detention.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The State had challenged the said order and had argued that the detenu had failed to question before the detaining authority that illegible or blurred copies were supplied to him which were relied upon while passing the order of detention.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Supreme Court, however, rejected the said contention and held that the right to make representation being a fundamental right under Article 22(5) of the Constitution in order to make effective representation, the detenu is always entitled to be supplied with the legible copies of the documents relied upon by the detaining authority and such information made in the grounds of detention enables him to make an effective representation. Hence, <strong>there is no substance in the submissions that merely because the detenu has failed to raise this question before the detaining authority which go into root of the matter to take away the right vested in the detenu in assailing the order of detention while availing the remedy available to him under Article 226 of the Constitution of India<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cThe right of personal liberty and individual freedom which is probably the most cherished is not, in any manner, arbitrarily to be taken away from him even temporarily without following the procedure prescribed by law and once the detenu was able to satisfy while assailing the order of detention before the High Court in exercise of jurisdiction Article 226 of the Constitution holding that the grounds of detention did not satisfy the rigors of proof as a foundational effect which has enabled him in making effective representation in assailing the order of detention in view of the protection provided under Article 22(5) of the Constitution, the same renders the order of detention illegal.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, hence, upheld the order passed by Manipur High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[State of Manipur v. Buyamayum Abdul Hanan, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NUL2I8M4\">2022 SCC OnLine SC 1455<\/a>, decided on 19.10.2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">*Judgment by: Justice Ajay S. Rastogi<\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Amicus Curiae: Prerna Singh<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: In a case where a detenu was provided with the illegible copy of documents relating to his detention, the bench <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":276203,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[52540,3365,12931,3268,2886,52541,7841,52542,35292],"class_list":["post-276197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-article-225-of-the-constitution","tag-detention","tag-detention-order","tag-Fundamental_Rights","tag-Illegal_Detention","tag-legible-copies-of-documents","tag-ndps","tag-prevention-of-illicit-traffic-in-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act","tag-right-to-make-representation"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Providing illegible copies attacks detenu&#039;s fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Providing illegible copies attacks detenu&#039;s fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In a case where a detenu was provided with the illegible copy of documents relating to his detention, the bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-27T05:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/\",\"name\":\"Providing illegible copies attacks detenu's fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-27T05:30:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Providing illegible copies attacks detenu&#8217;s fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Providing illegible copies attacks detenu's fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Providing illegible copies attacks detenu's fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0","og_description":"Supreme Court: In a case where a detenu was provided with the illegible copy of documents relating to his detention, the bench","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-10-27T05:30:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","name":"Providing illegible copies attacks detenu's fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png","datePublished":"2022-10-27T05:30:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/27\/illegible-copies-documents-detention-violate-right-to-make-representation-detenu-fundamental-right-detention-order-held-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Providing illegible copies attacks detenu&#8217;s fundamental right to make representation; renders detention order illegal: Supreme Court\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Providing-illegible-copies-attacks-detenus-fundamental-right-to-make-representation-renders-detention-order-illegal-1.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":210574,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/kar-hc-detention-order-challenged-for-supplying-illegible-documents-test-is-to-determine-whether-detenue-rendered-incapable-of-making-representation\/","url_meta":{"origin":276197,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Detention order challenged for supplying illegible documents \u2013 test is to determine whether detenue rendered incapable of making representation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: The Division Bench of K.N. Phaneendra and K. Somashekhar, JJ. hearing a petition in the nature of habeas corpus, refused to interfere with the detention order passed against petitioner herein finding no reasons, therefore.\u00a0 The instant petition sought quashing of detention order passed against the detenue-petitioner on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":280682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/30\/set-aside-detention-order-conservation-foreign-exchange-prevention-smuggling-activities-act-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":276197,"position":1},"title":"Failure and non-supply of legible\/translated copies of documents despite a request renders the order of detention illegal and bad in law; Delhi High Court sets aside the COFEPOSA detention order","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Detaining Authority gravely erred in relying upon the illegible documents which is equivalent to non-placement of translated-RUDs in a language which the detenu understands, which consequently vitiates the \u2018subjective satisfaction\u2019 arrived at by the Detaining Authority.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":328928,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/17\/sc-disposes-of-challenge-against-delhi-hc-decision-quashing-detention-orders-cofeposa-for-being-infructuous\/","url_meta":{"origin":276197,"position":2},"title":"[Detention Under COFEPOSA] SC disposes of challenge against Delhi HC\u2019s decision quashing detention orders for being infructuous by efflux of time","author":"Editor","date":"August 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The question of law which revolved around right of making representation being seriously jeopardized as detenus were supplied with various documents as parts of relied upon documents (\u2018RUDs\u2019) which are illegible, incomplete and not readable violating Article 22 (5) of the Constitution of India read with Section 3 (3) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"detention orders under COFEPOSA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/detention-orders-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/detention-orders-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/detention-orders-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/detention-orders-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/13\/failure-furnishing-documents-delay-deciding-detenu-representation-violates-art-225\/","url_meta":{"origin":276197,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Failure in furnishing documents &amp; delay in deciding detenu\u2019s representation violates Art. 22(5)\u2019: SC quashes detention order under COFEPOSA","author":"Editor","date":"September 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the matters pertaining to personal liberty of the citizens, the Authorities are enjoined with a constitutional obligation to decide the representation with utmost expedition. Each day\u2019s delay matters in such a case.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"detention order under COFEPOSA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/detention-order-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/detention-order-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/detention-order-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/detention-order-under-COFEPOSA.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256613,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/01\/national-security-act-delay-in-considering-representation-and-non-communication-of-rejection-strikes-at-the-heart-of-fundamental-rights-of-detenu-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":276197,"position":4},"title":"National Security Act| Delay in considering representation; non-communication of rejection strike at the heart of fundamental rights of detenu: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPreventive detention in independent India is to be exercised with utmost regard to constitutional safeguards.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/jk-hc-failure-to-cite-in-detention-order-about-detenues-right-to-make-representation-amounts-to-infraction-of-right-guaranteed-under-art-225-and-s-13-of-jk-public-safety-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":276197,"position":5},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Failure to cite in detention order about detenue\u2019s right to make representation amounts to infraction of right guaranteed under Art. 22(5) and S. 13 of J&#038;K Public Safety Act","author":"Editor","date":"August 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. quashed the detention order and allowed the petition as the Detaining Authority had failed to mention in the detention order about the petitioner\u2019s right to make representation. In the present appeal, Wajid Haseeb, counsel for petitioner vehemently opposed the detention order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276197\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/276203"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}