{"id":276150,"date":"2022-10-26T11:00:57","date_gmt":"2022-10-26T05:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=276150"},"modified":"2022-10-26T11:00:57","modified_gmt":"2022-10-26T05:30:57","slug":"jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: justify;\"><b>Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court<\/b>: While deliberating over the instant writ petition concerning reservation provided to Pahari Speaking People, the Sanjay Dhar, J., had to look into the question as to who can invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Art. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\">Constitution<\/a> seeking a writ of certiorari or a writ of mandamus. The Court dismissed the instant petition and observed that under ordinary circumstances, a third person, having no concern with the case, cannot claim to have any locus standi to raise any grievance whatsoever. However, if the actual persons aggrieved, because of ignorance, illiteracy etc., are unable to approach the Court and a person, who has no personal agenda, approaches the Court, then the Court may examine the issue. Even in cases filed in public interest, the Court can exercise the writ jurisdiction at the instance of a third party only when it is shown that legal injury is threatened and the affected class of persons is unable to approach the Court on account of their poverty etc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: justify;\">The petitioners were aggrieved due to Statutory Order No. 127 dated 20-04-2020, by virtue of which, amendments were made in the Jammu and Kashmir Reservations Rules, 2005 and 4% reservation was provided to Pahari Speaking People in respect of each service, class, category, grade in the services and post under the State\/UT.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: justify;\">The respondents raised preliminary objections concerning maintainability of the instant petition. It was contended that the petitioners are not the \u201caggrieved persons\u201d as the same is clear from the contents of their petition and prayer, therefore the writ petition is not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: justify;\"><i>Per contra<\/i>, the petitioners argued that the petition raises important constitutional questions as it involves questions of general public importance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: justify;\">Perusing the submissions of the parties, prayers raised in the petition, the Court noted that while challenging the impugned Statutory Order, the petitioners have sought a writ of mandamus, but, in fact, they have sought the Order\u2019s quashment, meaning thereby that they are seeking a writ of certiorari as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: justify;\">The Court relying on Supreme Court case laws, observed that a writ petition under Art. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\">Constitution<\/a> can be maintained only by an aggrieved person, whose legal or constitutional rights have been infringed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: justify;\">It was pointed out by the Court that in the instant case the petitioners have not disclosed as to how they are aggrieved of the impugned Statutory Order and they have not stated as to which of their legal rights have been affected by the impugned action of the respondents. It was further noted that the petitioners have not even disclosed their credentials. It is not discernible as to which class of persons the petitioners are representing. They have not even averred in the petition that they are filing the petition in public interest. Hence, the instant petition cannot even be treated as a public interest petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: justify;\">Since the petitioners have neither shown that how they are aggrieved of the impugned Order, nor they have shown as to which of their legal or constitutional right has been infringed by issuance of the impugned Statutory Order. Therefore, the petitioners do not qualify as \u201caggrieved persons\u201d who can maintain a writ of certiorari or a writ of mandamus against the respondents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: justify;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Mohammad Anwar Chowdhary v. UT of Jammu and Kashmir, <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/54u4BqyN\">2022 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 773<\/a><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">, decided on 30-09-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; text-align: justify;\">S.M. Chowdhary Advocate, for the Petitioners;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; text-align: justify;\">Suraj Singh G.A and Vishal Sharma DSGI, Advocates, for the Respondents.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Sucheta Sarkar, Editorial Assistant has prepared this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deliberating over the instant writ petition concerning reservation provided to Pahari Speaking People, the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":268669,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12141,30699,7601,51785,3043,2672,5941,32664],"class_list":["post-276150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226","tag-certiorari","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-jk-hc","tag-Mandamus","tag-reservation","tag-service-law","tag-writ"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>J&amp;K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&amp;K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deliberating over the instant writ petition concerning reservation provided to Pahari Speaking People, the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-26T05:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"headline\":\"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\\\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-26T05:30:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":622,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/JK-HC.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Article 226\",\"certiorari\",\"Constitution of India\",\"J&amp;K HC\",\"Mandamus\",\"reservation\",\"Service Law\",\"Writ\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/\",\"name\":\"J&K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\\\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/JK-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-26T05:30:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/JK-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/JK-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/10\\\/26\\\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\\\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_3\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deliberating over the instant writ petition concerning reservation provided to Pahari Speaking People, the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-10-26T05:30:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/"},"author":{"name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"headline":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226","datePublished":"2022-10-26T05:30:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/"},"wordCount":622,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg","keywords":["Article 226","certiorari","Constitution of India","J&amp;K HC","Mandamus","reservation","Service Law","Writ"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/","name":"J&K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-10-26T05:30:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217026,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":276150,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against official respondents for restraining private persons from encroaching of the suit property of the petitioner. The petitioner herein had filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219336,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/10\/mp-hc-writ-of-mandamus-under-art-226-cannot-be-issued-for-compelling-police-to-perform-a-statutory-duty-under-s-154-crpc-without-availing-all-the-other-alternative-remedies-as-prescribed-in-crimin\/","url_meta":{"origin":276150,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | Writ of mandamus cannot be issued for compelling police to perform a statutory duty under S. 154 CrPC without availing all other alternative remedies prescribed in CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J., dismissed a petition filed under Article 226 Constitution of India to direct the respondents to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint made by her. The main question before the High Court to decide was \u2018whether a writ petition under Article\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258148,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/06\/can-executing-courts-order-for-enforcement-of-arbitral-award-be-challenged-under-art-226\/","url_meta":{"origin":276150,"position":2},"title":"All HC | Can Executing Court&#8217;s order for enforcement of arbitral award be challenged under Art. 226? HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J., held that, Section 36 of the 1996 Act makes the arbitral award capable of being enforced in a like manner as a decree without any further judicial intervention. Instant petition was filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India principally seeking\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/ori-hc-no-ambit-of-writ-of-certiorari-under-article-226-when-there-is-neither-procedural-irregularity-in-conducting-inquiry-nor-violation-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":276150,"position":3},"title":"Ori HC | No ambit of writ of certiorari under Article 226 when there is neither procedural irregularity in conducting inquiry nor violation of natural justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and Dr A.K. Mishra, JJ., dismissed the writ petition against the judgment declining interference in the disciplinary proceeding and order imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement. The facts of the case were that appellant-petitioner was appointed as an officer of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264045,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/21\/extraordinary-writ-jurisdiction-is-to-be-exercised-only-in-rare-cases-or-certain-contingencies-in-the-interest-of-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":276150,"position":4},"title":"Extraordinary writ jurisdiction is to be exercised only in rare cases or certain contingencies in the interest of justice, including exceptional cases: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Chandra Dhari Singh, J., expressed that it is settled law that the power to issue writ has its own well-defined limitations imposed by the High Courts, one of which was the availability of alternative efficacious remedy. A petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226469,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/03\/utt-hc-no-coercive-action-during-investigation-against-rape-accused-where-prima-facie-consent-of-complainant-found\/","url_meta":{"origin":276150,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | No coercive action during investigation against rape-accused where\u00a0prima facie consent of complainant found","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Alok Kumar Verma, J., allowed a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned First Information Report dated 28-12-2019, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned FIR; and a writ of mandamus, commanding and directing the Respondents 1 & 2\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276150"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276150\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268669"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}