{"id":275409,"date":"2022-10-11T17:00:06","date_gmt":"2022-10-11T11:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=275409"},"modified":"2022-10-11T17:00:06","modified_gmt":"2022-10-11T11:30:06","slug":"delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced \u2018GANDHA\u2019 with \u2018PAAN\u2019 with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

Delhi High Court<\/b>: In a suit filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietors, principal officers, servants, agents and distributors and all others acting on its behalf, from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in any manner with products including but not limited to tobacco products, pan masala products, confectionary and\/or any other goods and\/or services using the mark RAJNI PAAN, RAJNIPAAN, infringing plaintiffs’ trademarks RAJNI, RAJNIGANDHA including trade dress and any other mark deceptively similar, Jyoti Singh, J.<\/b>, held that defendants are guilty of infringement by dishonestly adopting nearly identical trademark and identical packaging, trade-dress, etc., and have chosen to deliberately stay away from the proceedings, despite service, for which repeated efforts had been made by the Plaintiffs.<\/p>\n

It is the case of the Plaintiffs that they are a part of the Dharampal Satyapal Group (DS Group), which is a multi-diversified conglomerate, founded in the year 1929 and have a strong presence in high growth sectors such as Food & Beverages, Confectionary, Hospitality, Mouth Fresheners, Pan Masala, Tobacco, Agro Forestry, Rubber Thread and Infrastructure.<\/p>\n

The Conflicting marks are as follows:<\/b><\/p>\n

Plaintiffs label<\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Defendants label<\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Counsel for plaintiff submitted that the RAJNIGANDHA products being Plaintiffs’ flagship product and the world’s largest selling premium flavoured pan masala are sold in a unique packaging having a distinct layout, getup and colour scheme.<\/p>\n

An ex-parte ad interim injunction has been granted by this Court in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendants vide order dated 29-11-2018. Order sheets indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of Defendants 3 and 4, despite service through several modes, including dasti.<\/p>\n

In Dharampal Satyapal Limited<\/i> v. Suneel Kumar Rajput<\/i>, 2014 SCC OnLine Del 687<\/a>, the Court declared the mark “Rajnigandha” as a well-known trademark, under Section 2(1)(zb)<\/a> r\/w Section 2(1)(zg)<\/a> of the TradeMarks Act, 1999<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the Plaintiffs are registered proprietors of the trademark RAJNIGANDHA and have filed the Certificate of Registration in this regard which is valid and subsisting. No evidence to the contrary has been produced by the Defendants who chose to abstain from the proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Court further noted that having analyzed the competing marks and the impugned label\/packaging, it is clear that there is deceptive similarity between them as the packaging of the impugned product, has been designed in an identical colour scheme, font and labels, to give an overall look and feel of the Plaintiffs’ products under the RAJNIGANDHA marks, which has been done intentionally to trade off the significant goodwill and reputation of the Plaintiffs in their RAJNIGANDHA marks.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court held that Defendants have mischievously and deliberately adopted a deceptively similar mark and have only replaced ‘GANDHA’ with ‘PAAN’ with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation established by the Plaintiffs as the goods are allied and cognate and the triple identity test is satisfied as the trademark is nearly identical and the trade channels are identical with the same consumer base.<\/p>\n

[Dharampal Satyapal Limited v. Youssef Anis Mehio, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 3307<\/a>, decided on 27-09-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Vaishali Mittal and Mr. Shivang Sharma, Advocates for plaintiff<\/p>\n

Defendants 1 and 2 ex-parte vide order dated 19-09-2022.<\/p>\n

Defendants 3 and 4 ex-parte vide order dated 15-07-2019.<\/p>\n

Suit decreed qua Defendants 5 and 6 vide order dated 06-02-2019<\/p>\n\n

*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The trademark RAJNIGANDHA has been declared as a well-known mark by this Court and is entitled to a high degree of protection. The impugned mark is visually and structurally deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs’ trademark.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":275415,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36595,2543,2943,8341,5881,52326,52327,52328,3221,18071],"class_list":["post-275409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-deceptive-similarity","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-injunction","tag-intellectual-property-rights","tag-ipr","tag-quantum-of-damages","tag-rajnigandha","tag-rajnipaan","tag-Trademark","tag-trademark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced \u2018GANDHA\u2019 with \u2018PAAN\u2019 with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a suit filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietors, principal officers,\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced \u2018GANDHA\u2019 with \u2018PAAN\u2019 with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a suit filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietors, principal officers,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-11T11:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced \u2018GANDHA\u2019 with \u2018PAAN\u2019 with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-11T11:30:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a suit filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietors, principal officers,\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128-1.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced \u2018GANDHA\u2019 with \u2018PAAN\u2019 with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced \u2018GANDHA\u2019 with \u2018PAAN\u2019 with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA | SCC Times","description":"In a suit filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietors, principal officers,","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced \u2018GANDHA\u2019 with \u2018PAAN\u2019 with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA","og_description":"In a suit filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietors, principal officers,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-10-11T11:30:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/","name":"Delhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced \u2018GANDHA\u2019 with \u2018PAAN\u2019 with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-10-11T11:30:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a suit filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietors, principal officers,","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128-1.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/delhi-high-court-held-rajnipaan-guilty-for-infringement-for-adopting-deceptively-similar-mark-and-replaced-gandha-with-paan-with-an-intention-to-ride-upon-goodwill-and-repu\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court held RAJNIPAAN guilty for infringement for adopting deceptively similar mark and replaced \u2018GANDHA\u2019 with \u2018PAAN\u2019 with an intention to ride upon goodwill and reputation of RAJNIGANDHA"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270758,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/28\/gems-bond-or-james-bond-delhi-high-court-directs-compensation-to-cadbury-against-trademark-infringement-by-neeraj-food-products\/","url_meta":{"origin":275409,"position":0},"title":"Gems or James Bond; Delhi High Court directs compensation to Cadbury against trademark infringement by Neeraj Food Products","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prathiba Singh, J. permanently injuncts Neeraj Food Products (\u2018defendants') for trading JAMES BOND a chocolate product in pillow packs which is deceptively similar with Mondelez India Foods Private Limited (formerly Cadbury India Ltd.) (\u2018plaintiff') GEMS, the name of which has derived inspiration from a copyrighted artistic character\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":275409,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/nova-v-novya-trademark-dispute-delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-in-favour-of-sterling-agro-industries\/","url_meta":{"origin":275409,"position":2},"title":"[NOVA v NOVYA Trademark Dispute] Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction in favour of Sterling Agro Industries","author":"Arunima","date":"February 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Sterling Agro Industries emerges victorious in the trademark clash between NOVA and NOVYA, as Delhi High Court decrees in their favor, enforcing a permanent injunction against the defendants and awarding litigation costs.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201647,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/trademark-paras-has-acquired-distinctiveness-for-milk-products-use-of-same-for-cognate-products-held-infringement-thereof\/","url_meta":{"origin":275409,"position":3},"title":"Trademark PARAS has acquired distinctiveness for milk products; use of same for cognate products held infringement thereof","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 11, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Pratibha M. Singh, J. decreed a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for permanent injunction from using its registered trademark PARAS. The plaintiff was the registered proprietor of trademark PARAS. The trademark was adopted in 1987 in respect of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":274911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/03\/delhi-high-court-no-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-colgate-as-custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":275409,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court | No need for injunction in favour of Colgate as Custom authorities denied import of infringing goods in India","author":"Editor","date":"October 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Colgate Palmolive Company (\u2018plaintiff\u2019) seeking permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademark COLGATE, copyright, trade dress etc. against unknown Defendants who are responsible for importing a container in India having products bearing marks which are deceptively\/ confusingly similar to the Plaintiffs\u2019\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Colgate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/interim-injunction-in-favour-of-dps-society-against-infringement-of-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":275409,"position":5},"title":"Del HC grants interim injunction in favour of DPS Society against Infringement of trademark and crest logo by Delhi Public International School","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J. while addressing the matter of trademark infringement, opined that, \u201cBesides, considering that parties are in the field of education, deliberate adoption by the Defendants of impugned trade marks and logo that are deceptively similar and\/or identical to the Plaintiff\u2019s registered trade marks\/names and logos\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Screenshot-2021-08-20-at-6.04.50-PM.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=275409"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275409\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/275415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=275409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=275409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=275409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}