{"id":275156,"date":"2022-10-06T16:00:11","date_gmt":"2022-10-06T10:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=275156"},"modified":"2022-10-06T16:00:11","modified_gmt":"2022-10-06T10:30:11","slug":"bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court | Right to reside in shared household of husband is lost after grant of divorce; Cannot be claimed based on an earlier order"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Bombay High Court<\/b>: In a petition filed by Umakant Bondre\/ applicant 1 (former father-in-law of respondent 1) challenging the order dated 12-02-2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir whereby respondent 1-divorced wife was permitted to occupy the shared household standing in the name of present applicant 1, Sandipkumar C More, J. held that respondent 1 being a divorced wife, is not entitled to claim residence order or implementation of earlier residence order in the light of changed circumstances i.e. after her subsequent divorce for occupying the shared household after leaving the same long back and prior to her divorce.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The applicants in the proceedings are the parents of respondent 2 Suraj Umakant Bondre (husband) and in-laws of respondent 1 . Initially, a case was filed by Respondent 1-wife under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\">Domestic Violence Act, 2005<\/a>, wherein the Magistrate directed respondent 2-husband to provide interim maintenance of Rs. 2,000\/- per month and also monthly amount of Rs. 1500\/- as a rent for wife to make arrangement for her residence independently, which was later modified to include giving her accommodation in the shared household. The modified order stands impugned by the present application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The main ground for challenging the impugned order is that Respondent 1-wife cannot enforce these orders since the marriage between both of them has been dissolved long back and more particularly on 10-07-2018 when the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Udgir passed an order of dissolution of marriage between Sakshi and her husband.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Placing reliance on <i>Ramachandra Warrior<\/i> v. <i>Jayasree<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000772902\">2021 SCC OnLine Ker 1444<\/a>, the Court held that Respondent 1 cannot take resort to the earlier residence order when her marriage with respondent 2 Suraj has been dissolved by a divorce decree passed by the Court having proper jurisdiction and especially when she had already left her shared household four years back. Under the circumstances, wife is not even entitled for the relief of restraining dispossession since she is not in possession of the shared household.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that the Magistrate has definitely erred in directing the applicants to provide one room to respondent 1-wife in the shared household along with the facility of WC, bathroom and electricity as respondent 1 being a divorced wife, is not entitled to claim residence order or implementation of earlier residence order in the light of changed circumstances i.e., after her subsequent divorce for occupying the shared household after leaving the same long back and prior to her divorce.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Umakant Havgirao Bondre v. Sakshi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Nr8Z0l3A\">2022 SCC OnLine Bom 3168<\/a>, decided on 30-09-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate, for the Applicants;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Ajinkya Reddy, Advocate, for the Respondent 1;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Ameya Sabnis, Advocate, for the Respondent 2.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#160; &#160; Bombay High Court: In a petition filed by Umakant Bondre\/ applicant 1 (former father-in-law of respondent 1) challenging the order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":261881,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2518,20061,2846,2698,2549,4021,38755,43798,49617],"class_list":["post-275156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-dissolution-of-marriage","tag-divorce","tag-Domestic_Violence","tag-maintenance","tag-marriage","tag-residence","tag-right-to-residence","tag-right-to-shared-household"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay High Court | Right to reside in shared household of husband is lost after grant of divorce; Cannot be claimed based on an earlier order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a petition filed by Umakant Bondre\/ applicant 1 (former father-in-law of respondent 1) challenging the order dated 12-02-2018 passed\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court | Right to reside in shared household of husband is lost after grant of divorce; Cannot be claimed based on an earlier order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a petition filed by Umakant Bondre\/ applicant 1 (former father-in-law of respondent 1) challenging the order dated 12-02-2018 passed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-06T10:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay High Court | Right to reside in shared household of husband is lost after grant of divorce; Cannot be claimed based on an earlier order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-06T10:30:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a petition filed by Umakant Bondre\/ applicant 1 (former father-in-law of respondent 1) challenging the order dated 12-02-2018 passed\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court | Right to reside in shared household of husband is lost after grant of divorce; Cannot be claimed based on an earlier order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay High Court | Right to reside in shared household of husband is lost after grant of divorce; Cannot be claimed based on an earlier order | SCC Times","description":"In a petition filed by Umakant Bondre\/ applicant 1 (former father-in-law of respondent 1) challenging the order dated 12-02-2018 passed","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court | Right to reside in shared household of husband is lost after grant of divorce; Cannot be claimed based on an earlier order","og_description":"In a petition filed by Umakant Bondre\/ applicant 1 (former father-in-law of respondent 1) challenging the order dated 12-02-2018 passed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-10-06T10:30:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/","name":"Bombay High Court | Right to reside in shared household of husband is lost after grant of divorce; Cannot be claimed based on an earlier order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-10-06T10:30:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a petition filed by Umakant Bondre\/ applicant 1 (former father-in-law of respondent 1) challenging the order dated 12-02-2018 passed","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/bombay-high-court-right-to-reside-in-shared-household-of-husband-is-lost-after-grant-of-divorce-cannot-be-claimed-based-on-an-earlier-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court | Right to reside in shared household of husband is lost after grant of divorce; Cannot be claimed based on an earlier order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":361318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/23\/refusal-brother-widow-reside-shared-household-constitutes-domestic-violence-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":275156,"position":0},"title":"Refusal to allow brother\u2019s widow to reside in shared household constitutes Domestic violence: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"September 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The wording itself \u201chas lived together at any point of time\u201d, covers even the past cohabitation or past togetherness between the aggrieved person and the respondent.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Denying brother's widow residence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Denying-brothers-widow-residence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Denying-brothers-widow-residence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Denying-brothers-widow-residence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Denying-brothers-widow-residence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221839,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/bom-hc-divorced-wife-who-continue-to-cohabit-with-the-husband-is-entitled-to-filed-proceedings-under-s-12-of-dv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":275156,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Divorced wife, who continues to cohabit with the husband, is entitled to filed proceedings under S. 12 of DV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Mangesh S. Patil, J., dismissed a criminal revision application filed against the order of the trial court whereby the application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, filed by the divorced wife of the applicant-husband was allowed and he was directed to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252914,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/19\/second-marriage-a-ground-for-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":275156,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | Husband marrying second time after grant of divorce. Is it &#8216;domestic violence&#8217; within DV Act? Decrypted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Manish Pitale, J., expressed while addressing the present application that, \u201cSecond marriage cannot come within the definition of domestic violence.\u201d By the instant application, applicants sought quashing of criminal proceedings filed by sole respondent under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213792,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/20\/bom-hc-divorced-wife-cannot-file-application-under-domestic-violence-act-application-filed-under-ss-12-and-18-rejected-in-absence-of-domestic-relationship\/","url_meta":{"origin":275156,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Divorced wife cannot file application under Domestic Violence Act; application filed under Ss. 12 and 18 rejected in absence of &#8220;domestic relationship&#8221;","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0M.G. Giratkar, J. refused to interfere with an order of the Judicial Magistrate as confirmed by the Sessions Judge, whereby the application filed by the applicant under Section 12 and 18 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was dismissed. The applicant married to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/01\/bom-hc-does-family-court-has-jurisdiction-to-entertain-an-application-for-relief-under-ss-18-to-22-of-the-d-v-act-read-what-court-held\/","url_meta":{"origin":275156,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | Does Family Court has jurisdiction to entertain an application for relief under Ss. 18 to 22 of the D.V. Act? Read what Court held","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: C.V. Bhadang, J., addressed an application regarding the transfer of Criminal Miscellaneous Application regarding the dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. Facts pertinent to the matter are that the marriage of husband and wife ran into rough weather and led to the applicant\/husband to file\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312481,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/30\/delhi-high-court-dismiss-wife-appeal-failure-establish-shared-household-domestic-violence-claim-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":275156,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses appeal by wife on failure to establish shared household in Domestic Violence claim","author":"Arunima","date":"January 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On perusal of the definition of \"shared household\" and the provisions of Sections 17 and 19 of Domestic Violence Act states that to show \u201cshared household\u201d the parties must show the place where they have lived together in the past.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=275156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275156\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=275156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=275156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=275156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}