{"id":275024,"date":"2022-10-04T17:00:27","date_gmt":"2022-10-04T11:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=275024"},"modified":"2022-10-04T17:00:27","modified_gmt":"2022-10-04T11:30:27","slug":"delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court |Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act, 2007 not to come in way of legal representation before the Maintenance Tribunal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Delhi High Court<\/b>: In a case filed by the petitioners challenging the vires of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001568636\">17<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002841661\">Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007<\/a> alleging to be in violation of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\">Advocates Act, 1961<\/a>, a Division Bench of Vibhu Bakhru and Amit Mahajan JJ., held that Section 17 of the Senior Citizens Act would not come in way of legal representation on behalf of the parties before the Maintenance Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">As per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001568636\">17<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002841661\">Maintenance of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007<\/a>, no party to a proceeding before a Tribunal or Appellate Tribunal shall be represented by a legal practitioner so that easy, affordable and less time-consuming justice may be made accessible to the senior citizens. Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\">Advocates Act, 1961<\/a>, on the other hand, gives an absolute right to an Advocate to practice before all Courts and Tribunals.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner 2 has engaged Petitioner 1 as her Counsel in relation to a complaint filed under the Maintenance Act before the Maintenance Tribunal wherein Petitioner 1 was denied entry by the Maintenance Tribunal citing Section 17 of the Maintenance Act. Reliance was placed on <i>Paramjit Kumar Saroya<\/i> v. <i>The Union of India<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0000788094\">2014 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 10864<\/a>, wherein the Division Bench of the Hon&#8217;ble Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court interpreted the import of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\">Advocates Act, 1961<\/a> in relation to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002841661\">Maintenance Act, 2007<\/a> and held that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\">Advocates Act, 1961<\/a> came into force on 15.06.2011 i.e., much after coming into force of the Maintenance Act in the year 2007.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was observed <i>that the decision vide section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\">Advocates Act<\/a> has become law on a posterior date to Section 17 of the said Act which is sufficient for us to come to the conclusion that there cannot be an absolute bar to the assistance by legal practitioners to a Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal despite the &#8220;notwithstanding&#8221; clause<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>&#8220;&hellip;if a Tribunal is legally authorized to take evidence, there is the right to practise before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has the right to take evidence. That being the status of the Tribunal, there has been intrinsic right in the advocate to practise before such a Tribunal in view of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\">Advocates Act<\/a> which cannot be taken away.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>We thus conclude on the provisions of the Acts as under: &#8211; (i) We would request the Central Government to have a re-look into the provisions of the said Act in view of our observations aforesaid, more so in the context of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\">Advocates Act<\/a>. (ii) The right to appeal is conferred on a party aggrieved under Section 16 of the said Act. (iii) Section 17 would not come in the way of legal representation on behalf of parties post 15.06.2011 in view of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\">Advocates Act<\/a> having come into force.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that that as of yet neither has any decision been taken in that respect nor has any appeal been filed against the judgment passed by Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held in agreement with the decision taken by the Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court, that Section 17 would not come in way of legal representation on behalf of the parties before the Maintenance Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Pawan Reley v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/DdPk1RAg\">2022 SCC OnLine Del 3221<\/a>, decided on 27-09-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Petitioner-in-person<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Ms Bharathi Raju, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI\/R-1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Madhav Bajaj, Advocate for UOI.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#160; &#160; Delhi High Court: In a case filed by the petitioners challenging the vires of Section 17 of the Maintenance and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":268833,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2656,12481,51197,8731,2543,26564,52180,52181,52182,52183,29722,52184],"class_list":["post-275024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-advocate","tag-advocates-act","tag-advocates-act-1961","tag-constitutional-validity","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-legal-representation","tag-maintenance-of-parents-and-senior-citizen-act-2007","tag-right-to-practise","tag-section-17","tag-section-30","tag-senior-citizens","tag-senior-citizens-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi High Court |Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act, 2007 not to come in way of legal representation before the Maintenance Tribunal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case filed by the petitioners challenging the vires of Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court |Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act, 2007 not to come in way of legal representation before the Maintenance Tribunal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case filed by the petitioners challenging the vires of Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-04T11:30:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court |Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act, 2007 not to come in way of legal representation before the Maintenance Tribunal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-04T11:30:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case filed by the petitioners challenging the vires of Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court |Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act, 2007 not to come in way of legal representation before the Maintenance Tribunal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court |Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act, 2007 not to come in way of legal representation before the Maintenance Tribunal | SCC Times","description":"In a case filed by the petitioners challenging the vires of Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court |Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act, 2007 not to come in way of legal representation before the Maintenance Tribunal","og_description":"In a case filed by the petitioners challenging the vires of Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-10-04T11:30:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/","name":"Delhi High Court |Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act, 2007 not to come in way of legal representation before the Maintenance Tribunal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-10-04T11:30:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case filed by the petitioners challenging the vires of Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-section-17-of-senior-citizens-act-2007-not-to-come-in-way-of-legal-representation-before-the-maintenance-tribunal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court |Section 17 of Senior Citizens Act, 2007 not to come in way of legal representation before the Maintenance Tribunal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":286094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/04\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-filed-for-seeking-stay-of-proceedings-under-senior-citizens-act-due-to-pending-partition-proceedings-legal-news-research-awareness-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":275024,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court| Pendency of a partition suit by the son against his parents is no deterrent to the proceedings under Senior Citizens Act, 2007","author":"Arunima","date":"March 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Senior Citizens have every right to protect themselves and in case of ill-treatment and abuse by their children\/ legal heirs, can approach the Maintenance Tribunal for their eviction from their property of any kind, which includes both Ancestral as well as Self Acquired Property.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354564,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-senior-citizens-act-maintenance-tribunal-cannot-decide-property-disputes-civil-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":275024,"position":1},"title":"Senior Citizens Act, 2007 | Maintenance Tribunals can\u2019t resolve property disputes; Civil Courts hold jurisdiction: Allahabad HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe present being a case where the grievance sought to be raised by the petitioner is regarding alleged obstruction by his neighbour in the construction of a gate on the petitioner's property, the same in our view would not come within the purview of provisions of the Senior Citizens Act\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Maintenance Tribunals cannot resolve property disputes","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maintenance-Tribunals-cannot-resolve-property-disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maintenance-Tribunals-cannot-resolve-property-disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maintenance-Tribunals-cannot-resolve-property-disputes.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Maintenance-Tribunals-cannot-resolve-property-disputes.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/delhi-maintenance-and-welfare-of-parents-and-senior-citizens-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":275024,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Which is the proper forum for filing appeals from the eviction order passed by DM under Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act? Court answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J., held that: The senior citizen can approach the Deputy Commissioner\/DM for eviction from any property over which he\/she enjoys rights and such order will be appealable to the Divisional Commissioner. Petitioner who is the wife of respondent 4 and daughter-in-law of respondent 3\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":292406,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":275024,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a 97-year-old challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act","author":"Arunima","date":"May 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that the present case is not a case of casus omissus and the Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot make the provision what the Legislature did not intend it to be.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198669,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/18\/parents-can-evict-children-under-the-provisions-of-mwpsc-act-2007-upon-being-harassed-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":275024,"position":4},"title":"Parents can evict children under the provisions of MWPSC Act, 2007 upon being harassed: Bombay HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.D. Dhanuka, J., addressed a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in regard to an order passed by the Tribunal for Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":194767,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/02\/senior-citizens-entitled-to-institute-application-seeking-eviction-of-son-daughter-or-other-legal-heir-on-grounds-of-ill-treatment-or-non-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":275024,"position":5},"title":"Senior citizens entitled to institute application seeking eviction of son\/ daughter or other legal heir on grounds of ill-treatment or non-maintenance","author":"Saba","date":"April 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of Siddharth Mridul and Deepa Sharma, JJ., dismissed a Letters Patents Appeal before it. The matter before the Court was related to the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Hereinafter \u2018act\u2019) and the issue\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=275024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275024\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268833"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=275024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=275024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=275024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}