{"id":274848,"date":"2022-10-01T15:00:07","date_gmt":"2022-10-01T09:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=274848"},"modified":"2022-10-01T15:00:07","modified_gmt":"2022-10-01T09:30:07","slug":"top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/","title":{"rendered":"Top 16 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Suspension of Covaxin procurement, Negligence committed by Doctors and more| September 2022 Round Up"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

This roundup contains rulings on Claim of refund on service tax, Shareholders of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank, WHO's suspension of Covaxin procurement, RTI on pay scales, gross pay, PF deduction and TDS, Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Classification of agricultural hand operated drum, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Classification of Bus Air conditioning system ,Negligence committed by doctors, What constitutes government authority, Unfair trade practice, Arbitrary deduction of earnest money and on Rejection of Resolution Plan.<\/p>\n

Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)<\/h4>\n

Whether refund can be claimed on the service tax deposited on ‘construction' of individual\/ independent ‘residential' houses? CESTAT answers<\/p>\n

The coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and Subba Rao (Technical Member) allowed an appeal holding that appellant is entitled to claim refund of the service tax deposited by the appellant on construction of individual\/independent residential houses. The appeal was filed assailing the order by the Commissioner (Appeals) where he had upheld the order of adjudicating authority rejecting the refund claim of Rs. 21,33,490\/-. <\/p>\n

[Quality Builders & Contractor v. Commr. of CG&ST<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

Armed Forces Tribunal, Lucknow Bench<\/h4>\n

Whether dismissal order served without show cause notice justified when there's suspicion of involvement in espionage & anti-national activities? Armed Forces Tribunal decides<\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava, Member (J) and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) upheld the antedated dismissal of the applicant which was served without any show cause notice on the ground of his involvement in espionage and anti-national activities.<\/p>\n

[Arjun Singh v. Union of India]<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai<\/h4>\n

Shareholders of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank restrained by SEBI to participate in IPO; SAT quashes appeals as the aggrieved parties were not part of Offer for Sale<\/p>\n

While quashing the appeal preferred by the appellants against the order dated 12-05-2022 passed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), the coram of Tarun Agarwala, J. (Presiding Officer), M.T. Joshi, J. (Judicial Member), Meera Swarup (Technical Member) held that the appellants not being an “aggrieved person” as they were not part of the Offer for Sale (‘OFS') and therefore, cannot file appeals questioning the legality and veracity of SEBI's order granting exemption to the Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited (‘Bank') under Regulation 300 of the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 (‘ICDR Regulations'). <\/p>\n

[Robert & Ardis James Company Ltd. v. SEBI, 2022 SCC OnLine SAT 210<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

Central Information Commission<\/h4>\n

RTI on WHO's suspension of Covaxin procurement| ‘CPIO's reply incorrect, vague and mindlessly prepared'; CIC issues show cause notice<\/p>\n

In a complaint for an action against the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) for willfully misleading and furnishing false information to the appellant, the Information Commissioner Heeralal Samariya, observed that the initial reply provided by the CPIO was incorrect, vague and mindlessly prepared and directed him to send his written submissions to justify as to why action should not be initiated against him under Section 20<\/a> of the Right to Information Act, 2005<\/a> (RTI) for the gross violation of its provisions. <\/p>\n

[Saurav Das v. PIO, 2022 SCC OnLine CIC 402<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

RTI on pay scales, gross pay, PF deduction and TDS| Unhappy with CPIO's response, Central Information Commission allows inspection of records<\/p>\n

In a second appeal filed under Section 19<\/a> of the Right to Information Act, 2005<\/a> on the ground of unsatisfactory reply furnished by the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), the Information Commissioner Amita Pandove, has directed the CPIO and Assistant Director (E-Governance cell), to provide an opportunity to the appellant to inspect the relevant records as the information provided to the appellant was erroneous, and also, reprimanded the public authority for providing such mindless and incongruous replies.<\/p>\n

[Akshay Kumar Shakya v. CPIO, 2022 SCC OnLine CIC 396<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

National Green Tribunal, New Delhi (NGT)<\/h4>\n

NGT directs Maharashtra Government to pay compensation of ₹12,000 crore due to improper waste management<\/p>\n

The coram of Adarsh Kumar Goel J (Chairperson), Sudhir Agarwal (Judicial Member), JJ. and Prof. A. Senthil Vel (Expert Member) took up the issue of monitoring of solid waste management as per orders of the Supreme Court in Almitra H. Patel v. Union of India<\/i>, 2014 SCC OnLine SC 1844<\/a>, order dated 02.09.2014 as well as liquid waste management in Paryavaran Suraksha<\/i> v. Union of India<\/i>, (2017) 5 SCC 326<\/a> and awarded compensation of Rs. 12000 crore under S. 15<\/a> of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010<\/a> to remedy the continuing damage to the environment. <\/p>\n

[Compliance of Municipal Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 & Other Environmental Issues, In re, 2020 SCC OnLine NGT 590<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

National Green Tribunal | Noise Pollution — violation of right to peaceful, comfortable and pollution-free life guaranteed by Article 21<\/p>\n

Passing a revolutionary direction to the State for controlling Noise Pollution, a bench comprising of Sheo Kumar Singh (Judicial Member), J. and Dr. Arun Kumar Verma (Expert Member) come down heavily on the State government on their insouciant and careless feet dragging over controlling noise pollution from vehicular horns and modified exhausts in the State and directed the State to compulsorily abide and implement the existing legislative framework on the subject matter.<\/p>\n

[Consumer Unity & Trust Society, Jaipur v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling<\/h4>\n

Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld the decision of AAR; classified agricultural hand operated drum under HSN 8436, liable to GST at 12% rate<\/p>\n

In an appeal for determining the Harmonised System of Nomenclature code (HSN) and applicable tax on the appellant's product, the two-member bench of Milind Torawane and Vivek Ranjan upheld the decision of the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling that the appellant's product is classified at HSN 8436 tariff item and liable to GST at 12% rate, and observed that as the appellant's product is in its use, as well as its function is described under the said HSN Code, thus it is covered within the description provided under the said code. <\/p>\n

[Adarsh Plant Protect Ltd., In re, 2020 SCC OnLine Guj AAR-GST 2<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

Authority of Advanced Ruling<\/h4>\n

Authority of Advanced Ruling | Myntra ineligible to avail input tax credit on vouchers and subscription packages procured from third party<\/p>\n

In an application filed to sought advance ruling on the question that, whether the applicant would be eligible to avail the input tax credit, in terms of Section 16 of the Central Goods and Services (‘CGST') Act , 2017, on vouchers and subscription packages procured by the applicant from third party vendors, the two-member bench of M.P. Ravi Prasad and T. Kiran Reddy has ruled that the applicant is not eligible to avail the input tax credit, as it is not available in terms of Section 17(5)(h) of the CGST Act, 2017 <\/p>\n

[Myntra Designs Pvt. Ltd., In re<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

Whether non-alcoholic malt drink “Kingfisher Radler” covered as ‘carbonated beverages of fruit drink or with fruit juice'; Karnataka Authority of Advanced Ruling answers<\/p>\n

In an application filed to sought advance ruling on the question that, whether the non-alcoholic malt drink “Kingfisher Radler” is covered as ‘carbonated beverages of fruit drink or with fruit juice' under Entry 12-B of Central tax rate notification no.1\/2017, the two-member bench of M.P. Ravi Prasad and T. Kiran Reddy has ruled that ‘Kingfisher Radler' merit classification as carbonated beverages of fruit drink. <\/p>\n

[United Breweries Ltd., In re, 2018 SCC OnLine Kar AAR-GST 6<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

Authority for Advance Ruling| GST applicable on Bus Air conditioning system, comprising rooftop unit, compressor and installation kit<\/p>\n

In an application filed to sought advance ruling regarding the classification of the applicant's product, the two-member bench of M.P Ravi Prasad and T. Kiran Reddy has ruled that the bus air-conditioning system inclusive of rooftop unit, compressor and installation kit for one consolidated price to a single customer merits classification under heading 84152010; and when sold to single customer for a single fitting at customer end, but price negotiated and agreed separately for each unit then under heading 84152010; and when rooftop unit, compressor and installation kit sold individually or in combination then under heading 8415.90.00<\/p>\n

[Eberspaecher Suetrak Bus Climate Control System India Pvt. Ltd., In re<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

What constitutes a ‘government authority' or ‘government entity'; Karnataka Authority of Advanced Ruling answers<\/p>\n

The two-member bench of M.P Ravi Prasad and T. Kiran Reddy has ruled that works contract services executed to Public Works Department, for construction of Airport Terminal Building and for development of Greenfield airport is liable to tax at 9 percent GST. Further, the works contract services executed to Karnataka State Police Housing and Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. for construction of High Security prison; Kudala Sangama Development Board (KSDB) for construction of Basava International Center and Museum; Karnataka Residential Educational Institutions Society (KREIS) for Constructions of Residential School Complex are all liable to 9 percent tax.<\/p>\n

[KMV Projects Ltd., In re, 2022 SCC OnLine Kar AAR-GST 16<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

National Consumer Disputes Resolution Commission (NCDRC)<\/h4>\n

NCDRC | In a tripartite contract between the seller, service provider and consumer, the seller and service provider are liable for any defect, deficiency and unfair trade practice on any product sold by them<\/p>\n

While deciding upon the instant complaint concerning alleged unfair trade practice followed by Flipkart of tampering with a product's MRP, the Bench of Mamidi Christopher (President), S. Sandhya Rani and K. Venkateshwarlu (Members) observed that there is tripartite contract between the seller, service provider (herein ‘Flipkart') and the consumer. The seller and service provider are liable for any defect, deficiency of service and unfair trade practice on the services provided or good\/product sold by them.<\/i> It was held that Flipkart had tampered with the original MRP of the product (herein ‘oil sachet') and charged an amount more than the MRP from the consumer, thereby illegally extorting the consumer and causing economic loss and mental agony. Flipkart's conduct thereby falls within the ambit of deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. <\/p>\n

[Shaik Umar Farooq v. Flipkart Internet (P) Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine NCDRC 519<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

“Hospitals are vicariously liable for the acts of negligence committed by their doctors”; NCDRC grants compensation of Rs 1 crore to the parents who lost their only child in corrective surgery for squint eye<\/p>\n

While deciding the instant complaint wherein the issue was that whether the treating doctors at Sankara Nethralaya committed the breach in their duty of care while performing a corrective surgery for squint eye, which was the proximate cause of death of the child; the Bench of R.K. Agarwal, J., (President), Dr. S.M. Kanitkar and Binoy Kumar (Members) observed that it is well established that a hospital is vicariously liable for the acts of negligence committed by the doctors engaged or empaneled to provide medical care and it is common experience that when a patient goes to a hospital, he\/she goes there on account of the reputation of the hospital, with the hope that proper care will be taken by the hospital authorities. If the hospital fails to discharge their duties through their doctors, it is the hospital which has to justify the acts of commission or omission on behalf of their doctors.<\/p>\n

[Dr. Reba Modak v. Sankara Nethralaya<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

Offer of possession of apartments without the amenities promised and arbitrary deduction of earnest money; Read to know whether NCDRC found Mahindra Homes liable for deficient service?<\/p>\n

The Bench of S.M. Kanitkar (Presiding Member) and Binoy Kumar (Member) while deliberating upon the instant complaints seeking refund of amount paid against the total consideration of the flat booked along with interest; observed and held that Mahindra Homes and Ireo Pvt. Ltd., have committed deficiency in service vis-a-vis providing the complainants their apartment along with the amenities promised, and since the builder had deducted 10% of total sale consideration, hence the amount of earnest money deducted was not correct, especially when the complainants were not at fault.<\/p>\n

[Hemant Narang v. Mahindra Homes Pvt. Ltd<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal<\/h4>\n

NCLAT | Rejection of Resolution Plan by the NCLT due to Non-Serious, Casual and Non-Diligent Conduct of Resolution Appellant is Good in Law<\/p>\n

In an appeal filed by the appellant against the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for cancellation of non-bailable warrants, a bench comprising of Ashok Bhushan*<\/span>, M Satyanarayana Murthy, JJ., and Barun Mitra (Technical Member) held that the NCLT was right in refusing to approve the Resolution Plan due to non-serious, casual and non-diligent conduct of the Resolution Applicant.<\/i> <\/p>\n

[Cimco Projects Ltd. v. Anup Kumar, 2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 61<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    This roundup contains rulings on Claim of refund on service tax, Shareholders of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank, WHO's suspension of Covaxin <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":274849,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45673,46957],"tags":[46392,52116,50657,20611],"class_list":["post-274848","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns-for-roundup","category-tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup","tag-commissions","tag-regulatory","tag-round-up","tag-tribunals"],"yoast_head":"\nTop 16 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Suspension of Covaxin procurement, Negligence committed by Doctors and more| September 2022 Round Up | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Top 16 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Suspension of Covaxin procurement, Negligence committed by Doctors and more| September 2022 Round Up\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"    This roundup contains rulings on Claim of refund on service tax, Shareholders of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank, WHO's suspension of Covaxin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-01T09:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/\",\"name\":\"Top 16 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Suspension of Covaxin procurement, Negligence committed by Doctors and more| September 2022 Round Up | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-01T09:30:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98-1.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Top 16 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Suspension of Covaxin procurement, Negligence committed by Doctors and more| September 2022 Round Up\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Top 16 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Suspension of Covaxin procurement, Negligence committed by Doctors and more| September 2022 Round Up | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Top 16 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Suspension of Covaxin procurement, Negligence committed by Doctors and more| September 2022 Round Up","og_description":"    This roundup contains rulings on Claim of refund on service tax, Shareholders of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank, WHO's suspension of Covaxin","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-10-01T09:30:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/","name":"Top 16 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Suspension of Covaxin procurement, Negligence committed by Doctors and more| September 2022 Round Up | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-10-01T09:30:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98-1.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/01\/top-16-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-authorities-improper-waste-management-noise-pollution-myntra-vouchers-kingfisher-radler-suspension-of-covaxin-procurement-negligence-commit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Top 16 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Improper waste management, Noise Pollution, Myntra vouchers, Kingfisher Radler, Suspension of Covaxin procurement, Negligence committed by Doctors and more| September 2022 Round Up"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":274153,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/authority-of-advanced-ruling-central-goods-and-services-act-kingfisher-radler-carbonated-beverages-of-fruit-drink-non-alcoholic-beer-beverage-variants-tariff-heading-food-safety-and-standards-au\/","url_meta":{"origin":274848,"position":0},"title":"Whether non-alcoholic malt drink “Kingfisher Radler” covered as \u2018carbonated beverages of fruit drink or with fruit juice\u2019; Karnataka Authority of Advanced Ruling answers","author":"Editor","date":"September 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Authority of Advanced Ruling (Karnataka): In an application filed to sought advance ruling on the question that, whether the non-alcoholic malt drink \"Kingfisher Radler\" is covered as \u2018carbonated beverages of fruit drink or with fruit juice\u2019 under Entry 12-B of Central tax rate notification no.1\/2017, the two-member bench of M.P.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Advance Rulings"","block_context":{"text":"Advance Rulings","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/aar\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AAR","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285762,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/01\/scconline-legalroundup-14-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-bodies-february-roundup-2023-shiv-sena-party-symbol-dispute-medical-negligence-compensation-nclat-itat-election-commission-natio\/","url_meta":{"origin":274848,"position":1},"title":"Top 14 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Shiv Sena Party Symbol Dispute, Income Tax Act, Medical Negligence and more| February 2023 Roundup","author":"Arunima","date":"March 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This roundup contains many interesting rulings including the Shiv Sena Party Name and Symbol Dispute, Negligence committed by doctors and Compensation therein, Amendment to Section 178(6) of the Income Tax Act, Initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and more.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-574.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-574.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-574.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-574.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273735,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/central-information-commission-central-public-information-officer-section-20-of-the-right-to-information-act-2005-world-health-organisation-section-18-rti-act-covaxin-united-nations-bharat-bi\/","url_meta":{"origin":274848,"position":2},"title":"RTI on WHO’s suspension of Covaxin procurement| ‘CPIO’s reply incorrect, vague and mindlessly prepared’; CIC issues show cause notice","author":"Editor","date":"September 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission: In a complaint for an action against the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) for willfully misleading and furnishing false information to the appellant, the Information Commissioner Heeralal Samariya, observed that the initial reply provided by the CPIO was incorrect, vague and mindlessly prepared and directed him to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Central Information Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/31\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-july-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":274848,"position":3},"title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | July 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Here\u2019s a run-through of all the significant decisions covered in the month of July, 2021 under the Section of Tribunals\/Commission\/Regulatory Bodies. Appellate Tribunal for Electricity \u00a0 Solar Project Whether there was bona fide delay in commissioning the solar power project? \u201c\u2026allowed an appeal which was filed against the Order of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262952,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/03\/tribunals-and-commissions-roundup-of-february-2022\/","url_meta":{"origin":274848,"position":4},"title":"17 Reports to Read: Medical Negligence, Zee Insider Trading, Membership Subscription charges for CENVAT Credit and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of February 2022","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) State commission disallows benefit of increase in the tariff based on the change in law provision; Tribunal directs reconsideration A Coram of R.K. Gauba (Officiating Chairperson) and Sandesh Kumar Sharma (Technical Member) decided on an appeal which was filed by Solar Power Project Developer (\u201cSPD\u201d)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/05\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-june-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":274848,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal Roundup June 2023 | Top Stories on Justice Verma\u2019s death; Mula-Mutha Riverfront Project; Tragic mix-up of a sperm sample and more","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies, Commissions this month","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunal monthly june 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-june-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-june-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-june-2023.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-june-2023.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274848","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=274848"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274848\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/274849"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=274848"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=274848"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=274848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}