{"id":274630,"date":"2022-09-28T17:00:23","date_gmt":"2022-09-28T11:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=274630"},"modified":"2022-09-28T17:00:23","modified_gmt":"2022-09-28T11:30:23","slug":"court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/","title":{"rendered":"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore<\/b> | In a case arising out of a vehemently contested arbitration where the Tribunal after carefully going through the viewpoints of both the parties considered it essential to revert the matter back to the Judge who ordered remission for the resolution of dispute, a bench comprising of Sundaresh Menon, CJ, Judith Prakash, JCA and Jonathan Hugh Mance<\/b>*, IJ., dismissed the appeal with costs upholding the judgment given by the Tribunal while reiterating that the Tribunal’s jurisdiction is only revived “to the extent of” the remission ordered.<\/b><\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/span><\/p>\n

An appeal was filed under Or. 21 R. 20 of the Singapore International Commercial Court Rules, 2021 against an order of the International Judge.<\/p>\n

CKH claimed that they raised numerous issues relating to the principal debt and interest which CKG had disputed as they fell outside the scope of the remission ordered. The Tribunal, after carefully going through the viewpoints of both the parties recorded in the judgment, that it considered it imperative for the parties to revert to the Judge who had ordered remission for the resolution of the dispute.<\/p>\n

Appellant’s contention<\/span><\/p>\n

The appellant contended that the Judge “erred in holding that the Tribunal’s determination of the amount of the Principal Debt had to be subject to appellant’s concessions”<\/b> as to the amount of the principal debt outstanding in April, 2011. The appellant also contended that the imposition of an interest rate of 2% compounded monthly was never canvassed before the Tribunal in relation to the principal debt and hence, the rate of interest so imposed is not justified.<\/p>\n

The appellant also submitted that they are entitled to challenge and require proof of what sums owe by way of the principal debt. The contention was raised that the parameters fixed by the recitals are not open to being revisited before the Tribunal on the basis of which the remission was ordered.<\/p>\n

The appellant submitted that, even though the parties agreed that the outstanding Principal Debt would carry interest at the rate of 2% compounded monthly, they must be allowed to argue that the penalty so imposed was unreasonable and should be considered unenforceable. They also contended that during the period from 20-12- 2011 to 3-11- 2014, CKG was not claiming the Principal Debt and hence the penalty at the rate of 2% shall not be imposed for that period.<\/p>\n

Opinion and Analysis<\/span><\/p>\n

Placing the reliance on Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd.<\/i> v. Fairmount Development Pte Ltd<\/i>, [2007] 3 SLR(R) 86 at [27], L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd.<\/i> v. Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd.<\/i>, [2014] 1 SLR 1221 at [41]-[42] and AKN<\/i> v. ALC<\/i>, [2016] 1 SLR 966 at [47], the Court held that the order challenged was carefully defined and had precisely specified what a tribunal should do and apart from the remission ordered, “there was no ground on which the appellant or the Tribunal itself can seek to re-open or expand the subject matter of the award or arbitration.”<\/i> It was also opined by the Court that it was highly unlikely that the BANI award could lead to double recovery.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed that the remission was ordered on the parameters fixed by the Recitals and is not open to be revisited before the Tribunal on the remission.<\/p>\n

The Court also concluded that all the arguments regarding the rate interest of 2% compounded monthly fell outside the scope of the limited remission ordered.<\/p>\n

[CKH v. CKG, [2022] SGCA(I) 6, decided on 30-08-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Hee Theng Fong, Toh Wei Yi, Poon Pui Yee and Leong Shan Wei Jaclyn (Harry Elias Partnership LLP), Counsel for the Appellant;<\/p>\n

Tan Beng Hwee Paul and Victor Yao Lida (Cavenagh Law LLP), Counsel for the Respondent.<\/p>\n\n

*Ritu Singh, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Apart from the remission ordered, there is no basis on which a party in CKH’s position or the Tribunal itself can seek to re-open or expand the subject matter of the award or arbitration.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":274639,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[35672,3226,2773,52037,2554,52038,2760,48863],"class_list":["post-274630","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-arbitral-tribunal","tag-arbitration","tag-Award","tag-court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-recourse-against-award","tag-remission","tag-singapore"],"yoast_head":"\nCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case arising out of a vehemently contested arbitration where the Tribunal after carefully going through the viewpoints of both parties\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case arising out of a vehemently contested arbitration where the Tribunal after carefully going through the viewpoints of both parties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-09-28T11:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-28T11:30:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":643,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Arbitral Tribunal\",\"Arbitration\",\"Award\",\"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore\",\"Jurisdiction\",\"Recourse against award\",\"remission\",\"Singapore\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Foreign Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/\",\"name\":\"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-28T11:30:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case arising out of a vehemently contested arbitration where the Tribunal after carefully going through the viewpoints of both parties\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/28\\\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered | SCC Times","description":"In a case arising out of a vehemently contested arbitration where the Tribunal after carefully going through the viewpoints of both parties","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered","og_description":"In a case arising out of a vehemently contested arbitration where the Tribunal after carefully going through the viewpoints of both parties","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-09-28T11:30:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered","datePublished":"2022-09-28T11:30:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/"},"wordCount":643,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg","keywords":["Arbitral Tribunal","Arbitration","Award","Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore","Jurisdiction","Recourse against award","remission","Singapore"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Foreign Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/","name":"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-09-28T11:30:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case arising out of a vehemently contested arbitration where the Tribunal after carefully going through the viewpoints of both parties","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/court-of-appeal-of-the-republic-of-singapore-jurisdiction-of-arbitral-tribunal-is-only-revived-to-the-extent-of-the-remission-ordered\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal is only revived to the extent of the remission ordered"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-94-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":265016,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/international-commercial-arbitral-award\/","url_meta":{"origin":274630,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC deals whether an international commercial arbitral award rendered outside India between the parties who have no connection to India can be enforced in India","author":"Editor","date":"April 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division bench of Ritu Raj Awasthi, CJ., and Suraj Govindaraj, J. issued notice to the respondent and listed for 22-02-2022. The noteworthy facts in the instant case is that the petitioner and respondent are body corporate which are incorporated outside India, the petitioner having its registered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280459,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/arbitration-dossier-2021-22a-snapshot-of-major-developments-in-lex-arbitri\/","url_meta":{"origin":274630,"position":1},"title":"Arbitration Dossier (2021-22)| A Snapshot of Major Developments in Lex Arbitri","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Chakrapani Misra, Sameer Bindra and Varshini Sunder Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 88","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arbitration Dossier","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image122.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":260715,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/does-arbitral-tribunal-have-exclusive-jurisdiction-to-settle-disputes-relating-to-works-contract-in-state-of-madhya-pradesh-under-the-scheme-of-m-p-madhyastham-adhikaran-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":274630,"position":2},"title":"Does Arbitral Tribunal have exclusive jurisdiction to settle disputes relating to \u201cworks contract\u201d in State of Madhya Pradesh under the scheme of M.P Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983? MP HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sheel Nagu and Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, JJ., while holding that M.P Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 mandates exclusive jurisdiction to Tribunal for settling \u201cworks contract\u201d added that Section 34(2)(b)(i) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, provides that an arbitral award would be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":252436,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/amazon-in-dispute-with-future-retail\/","url_meta":{"origin":274630,"position":3},"title":"Emergency arbitrator’s award is referable to S. 17(1) of Indian Arbitration Act; enforceable under S. 17(2): Scopious analysis of landmark SC ruling in favour of Amazon in dispute with Future Retail","author":"Editor","date":"August 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0Supreme Court: Holding that an award passed by Emergency Arbitrator is enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a Division Bench of R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai, JJ. has ruled in favour of Amazon in the infamous Future-Amazon dispute. It has been held that the interim award in favour\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/31\/arbitration-arbitral-award-can-execution-be-by-writ-of-mandamus-alternate-remedy-section-34-legal-news-legal-updates-supreme-court-legal-research-high-court-jurisdiction-scope\/","url_meta":{"origin":274630,"position":4},"title":"If a High Court converts itself into Executing Court it will be flooded with writ petitions to execute arbitral awards: SC","author":"Editor","date":"August 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While adjudicating an appeal relating to arbitration, the Division Bench of M. R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., held that by entertaining the petition under Article 226 for executing an arbitral award, the High Court had virtually converted itself into Executing Court. Modifying the impugned judgment and order,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/14\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":274630,"position":5},"title":"Stage of consideration of objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Editor","date":"March 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shaurya Sahay\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274630","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=274630"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274630\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/274639"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=274630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=274630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=274630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}