{"id":274188,"date":"2022-09-22T16:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-09-22T10:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=274188"},"modified":"2022-09-22T16:00:00","modified_gmt":"2022-09-22T10:30:00","slug":"delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court denies grant of exclusive right to use the name \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019 for being a common name in India"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

Delhi High Court<\/b>: In a suit filed by Vasundhara Jewelers Private Limited (‘plaintiff’), praying for an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, exporting, advertising, marketing and\/or in any manner using, in relation to any jewelry any other allied and cognate goods including but not limited to textiles, textile goods and fabrics, under the impugned marks or deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s trademarks i.e., ‘VASUNDHRA’ family of marks, Navin Chawla J.<\/b> rejected prayer for injunction and held that merely because the plaintiff deals in jewelry items, which by themselves are more costly thereby resulting in a higher turnover for the plaintiff, will not give a better right to the plaintiff over an otherwise a common name in India.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff-company was established on 28-10-1999 and has its jewellery showroom at Pitampura, New Delhi. It is also engaged in the services of popular Indian celebrities like Ms. Prachi Desai and Ms. Shweta Tewari. The goods of the plaintiff are regularly showcased at various fashion events like Lakme Fashion Week’ where the actress Ms. Jahnvi Kapoor was the showstopper for the fashion designer Punit Balana, in which she wore the jewellery of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff asserts that it is only around April, 2022 that it came across the publication of the defendant 1’s impugned mark\/logo ‘VASUNDHRA FASHION’\/ in Class 25, for goods being ‘textile, textile goods and fabrics.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff asserts that the mark adopted by defendant 1 is deceptively similar to the ‘VASUNDHRA Marks’ of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n

The Division Bench of this Court in Bhole Baba Milk Food Industries Ltd.<\/i> v. Parul Food Specialities Pvt. Ltd.<\/i>, 2011 SCC OnLine Del 288<\/a>, reiterated that the distinctiveness to which the registered proprietor of a mark can lay a claim is to what it has gotten registered as a whole and such registration cannot possibly give an exclusive statutory right to such proprietor qua a particular word of common origin.<\/p>\n

Placing reliance on Cadila Health Care Ltd.<\/i> v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.<\/i>, 2001 PTC 300 (SC), the Court observed that the plaintiff does not have a registration in the word mark ‘VASUNDHRA’, while has obtained registration in the various marks of which ‘VASUNDHRA’ is an essential part, and it would have to be looked into for determining the balance of convenience and the effect thereof.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that the goods of the plaintiff and the defendant 1 are not identical, however, can be said to be remotely cognate to each other. But, when compared as a whole, though phonetically the two marks are identical, visually they are different as the plaintiff’s mark has a symbol ‘V’ along with the word ‘VASUNDHRA’, while the defendant 1 has a picture of a leaf along with the word ‘VASUNDHRA Fashion’.<\/p>\n

The Court enlisted reasons for the difference between the two marks<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Defendant 1 herein claims to have two manufacturing units, four warehouses, and seven offline stores. Its goods are available also online at Flipkart and Meesho, where the plaintiff is not present.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    The goods of the defendant 1 are aimed at persons belonging to the lower strata who are looking for cheaper garments while the goods of the plaintiff are claimed to be designer jewellery aimed at persons belonging to the higher strata of the society.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    The goods of defendant 1 are in Classes 24 and 25, in which the plaintiff does not have any registration.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    The area of operation of the plaintiff and the defendant 1 is also distinct; with the plaintiff being in Delhi, while the defendant 1 being predominantly in the State of Gujarat.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    He Court remarked that as the plaintiff is dealing in jewellery, its turnover may sound enormous, but that alone may not be sufficient to, at least at this stage, presume that the mark has obtained such reputation and goodwill so as to be associated only with the plaintiff and for even other goods.<\/p>\n

    On the contention raised by the plaintiff that defendant has used its popular store mark ‘VASUNDHARA’ in a particular style in one of its stores, counsel for defendant assured that the said mark will never be used in the future.<\/p>\n

    Thus, the Court held the plaintiff has not been able to make out a prima facie case for grant of prohibitory interim injunction against the defendant 1.<\/p>\n

    [Vasundhara Jewelers Pvt Ltd. v. Kirat Vinodbhai Jadvani, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 2996<\/a>, decided on 21-09-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

    For plaintiff: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Mr. Prateek Kumar, Ms. Shubhie Wahi, Ms. Sanya Kapoor, Mr. Parrek & Ms. Aarushi Jain, Advs.<\/p>\n

    For defendant: Mr. Raghavendra M. Bajaj, Mr. Anshuman Upadhyay, Mr. Naseem & Mr. Prashant, Advs. for D-1.<\/p>\n\n

    *Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Vasundhara Jewelers Private Limited (‘plaintiff’), praying for an ad-interim injunction restraining the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":268833,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[51913,36595,2543,3215,2943,51914,51915,3221,18071,51916],"class_list":["post-274188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-common-name","tag-deceptive-similarity","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-infringement","tag-injunction","tag-jewelery","tag-textiles","tag-Trademark","tag-trademark-infringement","tag-vasundhara"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi High Court denies grant of exclusive right to use the name \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019 for being a common name in India | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a suit filed by Vasundhara Jewelers Private Limited, praying for an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing,\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies grant of exclusive right to use the name \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019 for being a common name in India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a suit filed by Vasundhara Jewelers Private Limited, praying for an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-09-22T10:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court denies grant of exclusive right to use the name \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019 for being a common name in India | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-22T10:30:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a suit filed by Vasundhara Jewelers Private Limited, praying for an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing,\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court denies grant of exclusive right to use the name \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019 for being a common name in India\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court denies grant of exclusive right to use the name \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019 for being a common name in India | SCC Times","description":"In a suit filed by Vasundhara Jewelers Private Limited, praying for an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing,","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court denies grant of exclusive right to use the name \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019 for being a common name in India","og_description":"In a suit filed by Vasundhara Jewelers Private Limited, praying for an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-09-22T10:30:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/","name":"Delhi High Court denies grant of exclusive right to use the name \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019 for being a common name in India | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-09-22T10:30:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a suit filed by Vasundhara Jewelers Private Limited, praying for an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing,","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/22\/delhi-high-court-denies-grant-of-exclusive-right-to-use-the-name-vasundhra-for-being-a-common-name-in-india\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court denies grant of exclusive right to use the name \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019 for being a common name in India"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":297335,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/20\/exclusive-monopoly-cannot-be-claimed-on-generic-word-vasundhra-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":274188,"position":0},"title":"\u201cCan\u2019t claim exclusive monopoly on generic word \u2018VASUNDHRA\u2019\u201d; Delhi High Court refuses to grant interim injunction to Vasundhra Jewellers","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA party that has made an assertion that its mark is dissimilar to a cited mark and obtains a registration based on that assertion, is not to be entitled to obtain an interim injunction against the proprietor of the cited mark, on the ground that the mark is deceptively similar.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/delhi-high-court-vasundhara-own-name-defence-trademark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":274188,"position":1},"title":"Own Name Defence in Trade Marks| Delhi High Court protects jewellery firm\u2019s right to use founder\u2019s name \u2018Vasundhara\u2019; No injunction granted","author":"Arunima","date":"August 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The appellant, Vasundhra Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., incorporated in 1999, claims continuous use and registration of the mark VASUNDHRA for jewellery, while the respondent, Vasundhara Fashion Jewellery LLP, incorporated in 2016, traces its mark VASUNDHARA to its founder Vasundhara Mantri, who has used the name in business since 2001.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Own Name Defence in Trade Marks","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Own-Name-Defence-in-Trade-Marks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Own-Name-Defence-in-Trade-Marks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Own-Name-Defence-in-Trade-Marks.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Own-Name-Defence-in-Trade-Marks.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":274188,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/the-term-fly-high-used-by-vistara-is-common-to-aviation-delhi-high-court-vacates-interim-injunction-granted-in-favour-of-frankfinn\/","url_meta":{"origin":274188,"position":3},"title":"The term \u2018FLY HIGH\u2019 used by Vistara is common to aviation; Delhi High Court vacates interim injunction granted in favour of Frankfinn","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Frankfinn Aviation Services Private Limited (\u2018plaintiff\u2019) seeking permanent and mandatory injunction restraining the Defendant inter alia from infringement of trademark \u2018FLY HIGH\u2019, passing off, unfair competition, dilution and for rendition of accounts, Jyoti Singh, J., vacates an interim injunction order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/28\/delhi-high-court-restrains-voltas-care-from-using-voltas-trademark-logo-ex-parte-injunction-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":274188,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Voltas Care from using VOLTAS trademark\/Logo; Ex-parte injunction granted","author":"Editor","date":"June 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Dinesh Kumar Sharma J. granted an ex parte injunction to Voltas Limited restraining a website from using their registered trademark and logo VOLTAS and block and suspend the website. The present application was filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/20\/permanent-injunction-granted-for-infringement-of-trademark-on-satisfaction-of-triple-identity-test\/","url_meta":{"origin":274188,"position":5},"title":"Permanent injunction granted for infringement of trademark on satisfaction of \u2018triple identity test\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manmohan, J. decreed a suit for grant of a permanent injunction against the defendant for infringement of plaintiff \u2019s trademarks. It was an admitted fact that the plaintiff was a registered owner of the trademarks SUMEET and SUMEET TRADITIONAL for their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=274188"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274188\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268833"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=274188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=274188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=274188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}