{"id":273748,"date":"2022-09-15T13:00:44","date_gmt":"2022-09-15T07:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=273748"},"modified":"2022-09-15T13:00:44","modified_gmt":"2022-09-15T07:30:44","slug":"there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Non-compliance of Section 94 JJ Act&#8217;; Bombay High Court set aside order sending a juvenile to regular court due to wrong assessment of age"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court<\/span>: In a case filed by a father (\u2018petitioner&#8217;) seeking for setting aside the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board (\u2018JJB&#8217;) directing for medical examination of the accused child which ascertained his age to be 21 years, a division bench of Revati Mohite Dere and Madhav J Jamdar JJ., set aside the impugned order as the age was ascertained flouting the provisions stated under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001520249\">94<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806282\">Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015<\/a> (\u2018JJ Act&#8217;). The age of the boy was found to be of 16 years (on the date of incident) as per the Aadhar card produced before the police, which was maliciously hidden as the father refused to pay a bribe to the police official concerned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was taken into custody for the alleged offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\">302<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561614\">307<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561731\">397<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561635\">326<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561403\">143<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561405\">145<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561407\">147<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561408\">148<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\">149<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\">504<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\">506(II)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> r\/w Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567320\">4<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567304\">25<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002775593\">Arms Act, 1959<\/a> and Section 37(1)(A) r\/w 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent 3- Samadhan Wagh, a police official, malafidely did not produce the documents, before the Juvenile Justice Board and Metropolitan Magistrate. The same was handed over by the petitioner&#8217;s father to show that his son was a Juvenile at the relevant time to the police official but Rs. 50000 was demanged by Wagh which was he refused to pay .<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was further submitted that as per Section 94 of JJ Act, only in the absence of any document to show the juvenility of a person, that the age is to be determined by conducting an ossification test or any other latest medical age determination test conducted on the orders of the Committee or the Board. However, in the present case, the Juvenile Justice Board ordered for medical examination without any document verification, which was further upheld by Metropolitan Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the documents relied upon, in particular, the Aadhar Card was prepared in 2011 and as such, the petitioner or his father could not have anticipated any impending case against the petitioner. The Juvenile Justice Board also should have sought documents from respondent 3 before resorting to clause (3) of Section 94 of the JJ Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that from the documents which are annexed to the petition, the date of birth of the petitioner appears to be 04-06-2005, which, prima-facie shows that at the relevant time, petitioner was a juvenile.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court thus sets aside the impugned orders dated 26-08-2021 and 8-11- 2021. finding non-compliance with the provisions of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001520249\">94<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806282\">Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further directed the investigation in the matter to be handed from respondent 3 to the senior inspector of police and placed relevant documents before JJB so that appropriate orders could be passed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also directed Superintendent, Thane Central Prison to shift the petitioner to the Child Observation Home, Dongri. The directions were given to Additional Commissioner of Police, North Region, Mumbai to conduct an inquiry with respect to the allegations made against respondent 3 which will be heard by ACP only.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Vikas Ramji Yadav v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/xOkBV96N\">2022 SCC OnLine Bom 2299<\/a>, decided on 07-09-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Vashishtha Arora i\/b Mr. Vipul M. Yadav for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Ms. S. D. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent\u2014State<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Sr. P.I Mr. Jeevan Kharat, from Dindoshi Police Station was present<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">P.I Mr. Samadhan Wagh from Dindoshi Police Station was present<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: In a case filed by a father (\u2018petitioner&#8217;) seeking for setting aside the order passed by the Juvenile Justice <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":261881,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3116,2518,35044,51702,28294,2967,3464],"class_list":["post-273748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Aadhar_card","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-bride","tag-child-observation-home","tag-inquiry","tag-Juvenile","tag-police"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>&#039;Non-compliance of Section 94 JJ Act&#039;; Bombay High Court set aside order sending a juvenile to regular court due to wrong assessment of age | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case filed by a father seeking for setting aside the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board directing for medical examination\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"&#039;Non-compliance of Section 94 JJ Act&#039;; Bombay High Court set aside order sending a juvenile to regular court due to wrong assessment of age\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case filed by a father seeking for setting aside the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board directing for medical examination\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-09-15T07:30:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/\",\"name\":\"'Non-compliance of Section 94 JJ Act'; Bombay High Court set aside order sending a juvenile to regular court due to wrong assessment of age | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-15T07:30:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case filed by a father seeking for setting aside the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board directing for medical examination\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"&#8216;Non-compliance of Section 94 JJ Act&#8217;; Bombay High Court set aside order sending a juvenile to regular court due to wrong assessment of age\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"'Non-compliance of Section 94 JJ Act'; Bombay High Court set aside order sending a juvenile to regular court due to wrong assessment of age | SCC Times","description":"In a case filed by a father seeking for setting aside the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board directing for medical examination","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"'Non-compliance of Section 94 JJ Act'; Bombay High Court set aside order sending a juvenile to regular court due to wrong assessment of age","og_description":"In a case filed by a father seeking for setting aside the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board directing for medical examination","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-09-15T07:30:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/","name":"'Non-compliance of Section 94 JJ Act'; Bombay High Court set aside order sending a juvenile to regular court due to wrong assessment of age | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-09-15T07:30:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case filed by a father seeking for setting aside the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board directing for medical examination","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/there-is-non-compliance-of-section-94-jj-act-bombay-high-court-sets-aside-order-sending-a-juvenile-to-regular-court-due-to-wrong-assessment-of-age\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"&#8216;Non-compliance of Section 94 JJ Act&#8217;; Bombay High Court set aside order sending a juvenile to regular court due to wrong assessment of age"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":290967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/30\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-revision-age-proof-juvenile-justice-act-rules-aadhar-card-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":273748,"position":0},"title":"[Juvenile Justice] Aadhaar not a valid document for proof of age of Prosecutrix under Juvenile Justice Rules: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"JJ Act, 2015 and JJ Rules, 2012 are mandatory and have overreaching effect over any other provision.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272075,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/23\/can-the-trial-court-determine-the-age-of-the-juvenile-involved-in-a-crime-madhya-pradesh-high-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":273748,"position":1},"title":"Can the Trial Court determine the age of the juvenile involved in a crime? Madhya Pradesh High Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"August 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. in a recent case affirmed that Trial Court does not have power to determine the age of the applicant and this power is vested only with the JJ Board. This petition was filed against the order passed by Additional Special Judge whereby\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295835,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/inquiry-under-section-15-jj-act-2015-conducted-transparent-matter-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":273748,"position":2},"title":"[Section 15 of JJ Act] Inquiry for trying a juvenile as an adult must be conducted in a transparent and fair manner: Bombay High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court explained that trying a child below 18 years before Juvenile Justice Board is a rule and trying a child above 16 years as an adult before Regular Court is an exception.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233387,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/05\/ori-hc-in-case-of-various-conflicting-evidence-beneficial-approach-to-be-taken-in-a-claim-of-juvenility-as-per-guiding-objective-under-s-94-of-jj-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":273748,"position":3},"title":"Ori HC | In case of various conflicting evidence, beneficial approach to be taken in a claim of juvenility as per guiding objective under S. 94 of JJ Act","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":322453,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/18\/chhattisgarh-hc-sets-aside-order-directing-juvenile-to-be-tried-as-an-adult-for-murder-of-his-parents-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":273748,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Failed to comply with Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015\u2019: Chhattisgarh HC sets aside the order directing juvenile to be tried as an adult for murder of his parents","author":"Arushi","date":"May 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that there was no detailed report of the assessment made, no document was enclosed along with the report of conducting assessment, procedure adopted, factors assessed, mode of assessment, evaluation of child based on the stages of assessment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350011,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/06\/juvenile-conviction-under-arms-act-set-aside-patna-hc-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":273748,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Punishment of juvenile in conflict with law is not the purpose of juvenile justice\u2019; Patna HC sets aside order of conviction against juvenile under Arms Act","author":"Editor","date":"June 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe J.J. Act, 2000 is based on our belief that children are the future of the society and in case they go into conflict with law under some circumstances, they should be reformed and rehabilitated and not punished. No society can afford to punish its children\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=273748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273748\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=273748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=273748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=273748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}