{"id":273645,"date":"2022-09-13T17:00:14","date_gmt":"2022-09-13T11:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=273645"},"modified":"2022-09-13T17:00:14","modified_gmt":"2022-09-13T11:30:14","slug":"madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madras High Court<\/span>: In an appeal filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519660\">374(2)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (CrPC) r\/w Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570317\">36-B<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\">Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act, 1985<\/a> (\u2018NDPS Act&#8217;) to set aside the conviction and sentence rendered by the Trial Court, G. Jayachandran, J. has set aside the conviction of the appellant\/accused, and has observed that by preponderance of probability, he has established the absence of knowledge, further the evidence relied by the complainant does not prove that the appellant was conscious of the presence of heroin in the parcel given to him by another accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">In this case, the appellant was alleged to be found possessing 1\u00bd kg of Heroin with intention to transport it illegally to Kuwait, thereby committed offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570401\">8(c)<\/a> r\/w <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570293\">21(c)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570294\">22(b)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570295\">23(c)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570304\">29<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\">NDPS Act<\/a>. The issue in this case was, whether the Trial Court was correct in holding the accused guilty of possession of heroin relying upon Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570314\">35<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570342\">54<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\">NDPS Act<\/a>, which provides for presumption of culpable mental state and the animus to possess.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the Trial Court, for reasons not properly explained, had failed to follow the dictum laid down in <i>Mohan Lal<\/i> v. <i>State of Rajasthan<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/V0WTH5Fo\">(2015) 6 SCC 222<\/a> and in <i>Noor Aga v. State of Punjab<\/i> (2008) 6 SCC 417 and has wrongly applied the dictum laid in <i>Madan Lal<\/i> v. <i>State of Himachal Pradesh<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/JUF8IUr3\">2003 (7) SCC 465<\/a> and <i>Megh Singh<\/i> v. <i>State of Punjab<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/m0v48Ink\">(2004) SCC (Cri) 58<\/a> which are factually different from the case in hand.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the appellant claimed that he was not aware of the contents of the parcel given by the absconding accused, as he came and gave the parcel to the appellant saying it contained tamarind and wheat flour. Further, the appellant without any hesitation identified his bag and allowed the officials to examine his bag, as he was not aware of the character of the powder he was carrying, till the officials disclosed to him that it was heroin. Thus, the appellant was not conscious that he was in possession of heroin. Moreover, by preponderance of probability, the appellant has rebutted the presumption of culpable mental state. Further, to establish that the possession was conscious, the prosecution relied on the Call Details Records, however, no proof was produced by the complainant that cell number belongs to the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also viewed that the previous statement recorded by Police Constable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519397\">161(3)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">CrPC<\/a> has to be treated on a par with the statement recorded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570358\">67<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\">NDPS Act<\/a> by the Officer of Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) and the Trial Court erred in referring this inadmissible document to presume culpable mental state of the appellant. It further viewed that the complainant has failed to probe the case properly and there has been a perfunctory investigation at all stages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u201cthough not in all cases, the carrier can plead absence of culpability, in the peculiar circumstances and facts of this case, the knowledge of contraband in the airbag cannot be attributed to the appellant\u201d<\/span>. Thus, the appellant is set at liberty in this case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Anandam Gundluru v. Inspector of Police, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/e8GWUL0H\">2022 SCC OnLine Mad 4486<\/a>, decided on 01.09.2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">T.S.Sasikumar, Advocate, for the Appellant;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Special Public Prosecutor N.P.Kumar, Advocate, for the Respondent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: In an appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) r\/w Section 36-B of Narcotic <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":261884,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[51651,18591,31308,32360,25364,2567,51407,36495,51652,51653,51654],"class_list":["post-273645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-animus","tag-code-of-criminal-procedure","tag-culpable-mental-state","tag-heroin","tag-liberty","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985","tag-narcotics-control-bureau","tag-preponderance-of-probability","tag-tamarind","tag-wheat-flour"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In an appeal filed under S. 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 r\/w S. 36-B of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In an appeal filed under S. 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 r\/w S. 36-B of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-09-13T11:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-13T11:30:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":585,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/Madras-HC.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"animus\",\"Code of Criminal Procedure\",\"culpable mental state\",\"Heroin\",\"liberty\",\"Madras High Court\",\"Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985\",\"Narcotics Control Bureau\",\"Preponderance of probability\",\"tamarind\",\"wheat flour\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/Madras-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-13T11:30:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In an appeal filed under S. 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 r\\\/w S. 36-B of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/Madras-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/Madras-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Madras High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/09\\\/13\\\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused | SCC Times","description":"In an appeal filed under S. 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 r\/w S. 36-B of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused","og_description":"In an appeal filed under S. 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 r\/w S. 36-B of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-09-13T11:30:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused","datePublished":"2022-09-13T11:30:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/"},"wordCount":585,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","keywords":["animus","Code of Criminal Procedure","culpable mental state","Heroin","liberty","Madras High Court","Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985","Narcotics Control Bureau","Preponderance of probability","tamarind","wheat flour"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/","name":"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-09-13T11:30:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In an appeal filed under S. 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 r\/w S. 36-B of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Madras High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/madras-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-preponderance-of-probability-heroin-animus-culpabl-mental-state-wheat-flour-tamarind-narcotics-contr\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras High Court set aside conviction of the accused for possessing Heroin believing it to be tamarind and wheat flour; observes in some peculiar circumstances the knowledge of contraband cannot be attributed to the accused"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=273645"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273645\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=273645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=273645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=273645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}