{"id":272900,"date":"2022-09-02T15:30:45","date_gmt":"2022-09-02T10:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=272900"},"modified":"2022-09-02T15:30:45","modified_gmt":"2022-09-02T10:00:45","slug":"delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/","title":{"rendered":"Repeated blocking of channels proving to be insufficient; Delhi High Court directs Telegram to disclose details of infringing defaulters"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court<\/span>: In a case filed by Neetu Singh (&#8216;plaintiff 1&#39;) being aggrieved as her work which is circulated by Telegram (&#8216;defendant 1&#39;), is continuously being infringed due to mushrooming of channels on the platform under challenge and seeking disclosure of details of the defaulters, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Prathiba Singh J.<\/span> remarked that &#8216;take down&#39; or blocking orders are merely token relief for the interregnum and without monetary relief of damages, coupled with mushrooming of infringing platforms, the copyright owner&#39;s spirit to create and write may be considerably negated. The Court further directed Telegram to disclose the details of the channels\/devices used in disseminating the infringing content along with their mobile numbers, IP addresses, email addresses, etc.,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Background<\/span>: Plaintiff 1 is a renowned author of books which are designed to train students aspiring to take various competitive examinations including the examinations of Staff Selection Commission (SSC), Bank Probationary Officer (PO), CDS, NDA, etc. The allegation in the suit is that the Plaintiffs&#39; copyrighted works including course material, online lectures and other works are being disseminated unauthorizedly through various Telegram channels. Even after repeated notices being sent to Telegram, some channels were taken down, but some infringing channels continue to exist and new channels come up almost on a daily basis, with different names. The present suit was filed vide an application seeking discovery of the details of the people who are operating these channels.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Issue<\/span>: Whether Telegram can be directed to disclose the identity of the creators of the infringing channels which unauthorizedly and illegally disseminate the Plaintiffs&#39; copyrighted works?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Submissions<\/span>: Telegram has opposed the grant of relief stating that it cannot share the data relating to the creators or users of the channels, as the said data is stored in Telegram&#39;s data servers in Singapore and the law of Singapore prohibits such disclosure. Moreover, as per Telegram, it being an intermediary under the IT Act, none of the pre-conditions which permit the intermediary to disclose the identity of the users, as per the IT Guidelines, are satisfied.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Observations<\/span>: The Court noted that the Telegram stores its data on a cloud server. It is claimed that the same is in an encrypted form. The personal data is claimed to be protected under Telegram&#39;s Privacy Policy and its Terms of Service.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Whether the act amounts to copyright infringement?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The activity of circulating copyrighted materials on Telegram channels would be &#8220;communication to the public&#8221; as provided for in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532709\">2(ff)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>. The copies of the Plaintiffs&#39; works, which are circulated on the Telegram channels, would constitute &#8220;infringing copy&#8221; of the Plaintiffs&#39; works as defined under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532709\">2(m)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>. Thus, any reproduction of such literary work would constitute an infringing copy, even if the same is in electronic form.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the remedies available for a copyright owner under the Copyright Act are both civil and criminal in nature. Thus, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">the significance of the protection and enforcement of such rights cannot be diminished, merely due to the growth of technology, which has made infringers easy to hide and conceal their illegal activities. The propensity of infringers to conceal and hide is the very reason due to which the provisions of law are widely worded. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the grant of injunction per se in the absence of commensurate damages or monetary deterrents, would be a toothless relief. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Unless and until the identity of the operators of these channels who are ex facie infringers of the Plaintiffs&#39; copyright are disclosed, the Plaintiffs are rendered without remedy for recovering damages.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">The Court explained elaborate factors regarding Indian courts to be the natural forum of jurisdiction in this dispute. For the sake of brevity, a few are listed below<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-left: 0.0mm;\">The copyrighted material is related to Indian examination materials, and thus, in all likelihood the source of the infringing channels being in India, the accounts of such infringing channels would have been created from India and the data of such accounts would have been uploaded from India;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-left: 0.0mm;\">Considering that the Plaintiffs&#39; work relates to competitive examinations in India, it is highly possible that the devices circulating the infringing content and the persons running the infringing platforms and channels are located in India.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-left: 0.0mm;\">Cloud computing being the norm these days, even if the data is stored in a physical structure outside India, the same is accessible to the company in other jurisdictions including from India.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-left: 0.0mm;\">Therefore, the data is accessible across different jurisdictions, including India and the conventional concepts of territoriality no longer exist.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The High Courts are vested with inherent powers to enable themselves to maintain their dignity, and secure obedience to their process and rules, i.e., and to give effective relief.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the courts in India would be perfectly justified in directing Telegram, which runs its massive operations in India to adhere to Indian law and adhere to orders passed by Indian Courts for disclosure of relevant information relating to infringers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">In so far as the law in Singapore is concerned, the provisions of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Section 17 and First Schedule, Part III under Legitimate Interests in Personal Data Protection Act, 2012 (Singapore)<\/span>, specifically recognize violations of law, as being an exception to privacy, when details of the originators of the infringing data can be revealed. Moreover, copyrighted works are entitled to automatic protection in all WTO countries under the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1886 read with the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), 1995.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, in view of this position of the law regarding copyright along with compliance with local law, i.e., PDPA, Telegram cannot excuse itself from non-furnishing of information relating to the channels through which dissemination of infringing content takes place.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Coming to Indian laws, even according to the broad principles of Order XI Civil Procedure Code, the Court can direct disclosure of documents and information relating to <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8216;any matter in question in a suit<\/span>&#39;. Placing reliance on <i>K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nnXl4mu5\">(2018) 1 SCC 809<\/a>, the Court clarified that if there is a law in existence to justify the disclosure of information and there is a need for the disclosure considering the nature of encroachment of the right, then, privacy cannot be a ground to justify non-disclosure, so long as the same is not disproportionate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court concluded that Indian Courts are competent to decide issues relating to infringement of copyright and the mere fact that Telegram is operating a messaging service in India which chooses not to locate its servers in India cannot divest the Indian Courts from dealing with copyright disputes or divest copyright owners from availing their remedies in Indian Courts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court remarked<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> &#8220;In the present age of cloud computing and diminishing national boundaries in data storage, conventional concepts of territoriality cannot be strictly applied. The dynamic evolution of law is essential to ensure appropriate remedies in case of violation of copyright and other IP laws.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court thus directed Telegram to disclose the details of the channels\/devices used in disseminating the infringing content, mobile numbers, IP addresses, email addresses, etc., used to upload the infringing material and communicate the same, as per the list of channels filed along with the present application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Neetu Singh v. Telegram FZ LLC, CS (Comm) 282 of 2020, decided on 30-08-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Ms. Rajeshwari H. &amp; Ms. Swapnil Advocates, for the Plaintiff;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anushka Sharda, Mr. Madhav Khosla, Ms. Smriti Nair, Mr. Vinay Tripathi, Mr. Madhav Chitale, Mr. Aishwary Vikram and Mr. Saksham Dhingra, Advocates, for the Telegram.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Infringers cannot be permitted to seek shelter under Telegram&#8217;s policies merely on the ground that its physical server is in Singapore. If the protection of copyright is not evolved as per the changing times, it would have a chilling effect on the progressive initiatives taken by educators in sharing their materials and ensuring accessibility.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":272918,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[51413,31679,51414,9271,11391,16161,2543,3215,30630,51415,51416,48863,41661,37386],"class_list":["post-272900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-berne-convention","tag-cloud-computing","tag-cloud-storage","tag-copyright","tag-copyright-infringement","tag-data-protection","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-infringement","tag-it-act","tag-pdpa","tag-personal-data-protection-act","tag-singapore","tag-telegram","tag-trips"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Repeated blocking of channels proving to be insufficient; Delhi High Court directs Telegram to disclose details of infringing defaulters | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case filed by Neetu Singh (\u2018plaintiff 1&#039;) being aggrieved as her work which is circulated by Telegram (\u2018defendant 1&#039;), is continuously\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Repeated blocking of channels proving to be insufficient; Delhi High Court directs Telegram to disclose details of infringing defaulters\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case filed by Neetu Singh (\u2018plaintiff 1&#039;) being aggrieved as her work which is circulated by Telegram (\u2018defendant 1&#039;), is continuously\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-09-02T10:00:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1337\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/\",\"name\":\"Repeated blocking of channels proving to be insufficient; Delhi High Court directs Telegram to disclose details of infringing defaulters | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-02T10:00:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case filed by Neetu Singh (\u2018plaintiff 1') being aggrieved as her work which is circulated by Telegram (\u2018defendant 1'), is continuously\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg\",\"width\":1337,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Repeated blocking of channels proving to be insufficient; Delhi High Court directs Telegram to disclose details of infringing defaulters\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Repeated blocking of channels proving to be insufficient; Delhi High Court directs Telegram to disclose details of infringing defaulters | SCC Times","description":"In a case filed by Neetu Singh (\u2018plaintiff 1') being aggrieved as her work which is circulated by Telegram (\u2018defendant 1'), is continuously","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Repeated blocking of channels proving to be insufficient; Delhi High Court directs Telegram to disclose details of infringing defaulters","og_description":"In a case filed by Neetu Singh (\u2018plaintiff 1') being aggrieved as her work which is circulated by Telegram (\u2018defendant 1'), is continuously","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-09-02T10:00:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1337,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/","name":"Repeated blocking of channels proving to be insufficient; Delhi High Court directs Telegram to disclose details of infringing defaulters | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-09-02T10:00:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case filed by Neetu Singh (\u2018plaintiff 1') being aggrieved as her work which is circulated by Telegram (\u2018defendant 1'), is continuously","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg","width":1337,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/02\/delhi-high-court-directs-disclosure-of-details-of-infringing-defaulters-singapore-itact-copyright-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-neetu-singh-legalresearch\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Repeated blocking of channels proving to be insufficient; Delhi High Court directs Telegram to disclose details of infringing defaulters"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/delhi-high-court-directs-telegram-and-mega-to-immediately-take-down-any-illegal-content-uploaded-on-their-platform-relating-to-doctutorials\/","url_meta":{"origin":272900,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Telegram and Mega to immediately take down any illegal content uploaded on their platform relating to DocTutorials","author":"Editor","date":"July 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Pratibha M Singh, J. directed Telegram and Mega that whenever unauthorized and illegal content, relating to the copyrighted data or any content using the DocTutorial (\u2018Plaintiff') mark, is noticed in any of the channels\/websites\/URLs hosted by Telegram or Mega (\u2018Defendants'), the Plaintiff would be free to issue\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/02\/delhi-hc-orders-blocking-of-telegram-channels-for-illegally-sharing-apna-college-study-material-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":272900,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court orders suspension of domain names and blocking of Telegram channels for illegally sharing Apna College study material","author":"Editor","date":"October 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the defendants are not blocked from disseminating the copyrighted material of the plaintiff, the plaintiff would suffer enormous monetary loss apart from loss of subscribers and of goodwill.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372415,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/del-hc-grants-dynamic-injunction-in-warner-bros-copyright-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":272900,"position":2},"title":"Inside Delhi HC Order: Piracy webites illegally streaming &#8216;Friends&#8217;, &#8216;Stranger Things&#8217;, &#8216;Batman&#8217; taken down; Warner Bros wins Dynamic+ Injunction","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"January 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe need for immediate relief is particularly pressing in this case as the infringing websites are making available the plaintiffs\u2019 copyrighted works, which could lead to significant financial losses for the plaintiffs.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Warner bros. copyright case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Warner-bros.-copyright-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Warner-bros.-copyright-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Warner-bros.-copyright-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Warner-bros.-copyright-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281569,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/13\/issued-summons-in-suit-and-notice-application-under-order-xxxix-rules-1-and-2-c-p-c-to-american-video-sharing-app-triller-in-copyright-infringement-case-filed-by-yash-raj-films-legal-news-legal-rease\/","url_meta":{"origin":272900,"position":3},"title":"[YashRaj Copyrights case] Delhi High Court issues summons and notice to the American video sharing application \u2018Triller&#8217;","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The plaintiff contended that the impugned platforms contained various features, such as the audio extraction feature, which are beyond the limited role of an intermediary specified under Section 79 (2)(a) of the IT Act, thereby disentitling the defendant from the 'safe-harbour' protection guaranteed to intermediaries under the IT Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":365789,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/05\/legal-roundup-ipr-october-2025-copyright-trademark-personality-rights-patent-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":272900,"position":4},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights October 2025: A monthly digest of key IPR developments","author":"Editor","date":"November 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Bringing together the most important IPR decisions from High Courts across India, this roundup offers an overview of October\u2019s major developments in copyright, trade mark, and personality rights, along with notable updates from related legal domains.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights October 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279819,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-microsoft-corporation-and-awards-damages-of-rs-2-lakhs-in-a-12-year-old-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":272900,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Microsoft Corporation and awards damages of Rs. 20 lakhs in a 12-year-old copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Microsoft filed the present suit for permanent injunction against the defendants restraining them from directly or indirectly reproducing\/storing\/installing and\/or using pirated\/unlicensed software programmes, thereby infringing the copyright in the plaintiffs\u2019 computer programmes\/software titles.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=272900"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272900\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/272918"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=272900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=272900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=272900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}