{"id":272479,"date":"2022-08-27T16:20:30","date_gmt":"2022-08-27T10:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=272479"},"modified":"2022-08-27T16:20:30","modified_gmt":"2022-08-27T10:50:30","slug":"delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court upholds CCI’s direction to investigate alleged anti-competitive WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, 2021; Prima facie case established to investigate; FB a proper party"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n

Delhi High Court<\/span>: The appeals were filed by WhatsApp (\u2018Appellant’) and its parent company Facebook (\u2018Appellant’) challenging the jurisdiction of Competition Commission of India (\u2018respondent’) to direct investigation into the 2021 Terms of Service and Privacy Policy of the Appellant on the ground that it violates the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002<\/a>, when the matters arising from the same issue is pending before Supreme Court. A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma CJ., and Subramonium Prasad J.<\/span>, upheld the impugned judgment as well the direction of respondent as prima facie case was established and as there is no irreconcilable repugnancy between the jurisdiction of either of the authorities.<\/p>\n

Brief Background<\/p>\n

WhatsApp was originally governed by its own Terms and Privacy Policy of 2012, however after Facebook acquired WhatsApp in 2014, the policy got updated in 2016 (\u20182016 Policy’). The 2016 policy informed WhatsApp users about the acquisition and how Facebook would use WhatsApp’s information for its advertisement and products giving a one-time opportunity to WhatsApp users to opt out of Facebook using their information that was shared over WhatsApp. However, users who joined WhatsApp after the 2016 Policy, were not offered this option. <\/span>The policy was challenged, and the adjudication stands pending before the Supreme Court as we report it.<\/p>\n

The policy got updated again in the year 2021 which was again challenged before Delhi high court and Supreme Court pending adjudication, as we report. CCI, thus taking Suo motu<\/i> cognizance under Section 26(1) of Competition Commission Act, 2002, directed the Director-General, (\u2018CCI (DG)’) to conduct an investigation to examine the potential abuse of dominance exercised by both the Appellants under Section 4 of Competition Commission Act, 2002. Assailing this, a petition was filed which was rejected by the Single Judge and thus present appeals were filed primarily on the issue as to whether the CCI ought to wait till final adjudication of the issues which are pending before the Supreme Court.<\/span><\/p>\n

Issue 1: Whether CCI should abstain from exercising its jurisdiction to maintain comity between decisions of different authorities on the same issues?<\/span><\/p>\n

The issue is regarding overlapping jurisdictions of CCI and Constitutional Courts. <\/span>Placing reliance on Competition Commission of India<\/i> v. Bharti Airtel<\/i> (2019) 2 SCC 521<\/a>, the Court noted that while the Supreme Court is looking into whether the 2021 Policy is violative of the right to privacy under Article 21 or not, the investigation by CCI is confined to whether the 2021 Policy is in furtherance of the dominant position occupied by WhatsApp and institutes anti-competitive practices. The spheres of operation of both are vastly different. Neither this Court nor the Supreme Court are analyzing the 2021 Policy through the prism of competition law.<\/span><\/p>\n

Scope and Ambit of Section 26 (1)<\/a> Competition Act, 2002<\/a><\/p>\n

Placing reliance on Competition Commission of India<\/i> v. Steel Authority of India<\/i>, (2010) 10 SCC 744<\/a>, the Court noted that the jurisdiction of the CCI under Section 26(1) does not contemplate an adjudicatory function, but merely an administrative one. Thus, the function performed by the CCI under Section 26(1)<\/a> Competition Act, 2002<\/a> would not be affected by the adjudication by the Supreme Court or the present Court while analyzing the potential violation of fundamental rights instigated by the 2021 Policy.<\/p>\n

Will the principle of res-judicata apply?<\/p>\n

The Court further noted that the 2021 Policy is a substantially modified version of the 2016 Policy inasmuch as the 2016 Policy had an \u201copt-out\u201d<\/span> option, which is absent from the 2021 Policy that places its users in a \u201ctake-it-or-leave-it\u201d<\/span> situation. It is the \u201copt-out\u201d option that primarily led to CCI rendering its conclusion that the 2016 Policy did not violate the Competition Act, 2002<\/a>. However, in the face of changed circumstances, considering the dominant position occupied by WhatsApp, the investigation proposed to be conducted by CCI does not warrant interference, and res judicata would, thus, not be applicable in the instant case.<\/p>\n

Issue 2: Has CCI failed to discern a prima facie case that would entail a direction to the DG to investigate the alleged anti-competitive practices?<\/span><\/p>\n

Placing reliance on Management of the Bangalore Woollen Cotton and Silk Mills Co. Ltd.<\/i> v. B. Dasappa<\/i>, AIR 1960 SC 1352<\/a>, the Court observed that a prima facie case need not be a case proved to the hilt, but a case which can be said to be established if the evidence which is led in support of the same were to be believed.<\/span><\/p>\n

In order to reach a conclusion for this issue, it is important to discuss first whether or not the Appellants occupy a dominant position in the relevant geographical market and the relevant product market. Placing reliance on Harshita Chawla<\/i> v. WhatsApp Inc., 2020<\/i> SCC OnLine CCI 32,<\/a> the Court concluded that given its popularity and wide usage, WhatsApp seems to be dominant. Paragraph 33 of the impugned decision states details which are in stark violation of Section 4(2)(c) and (e)<\/a> of the Competition Act, 2002<\/a>. Thus, a prima facie case of violation of provisions of the Competition Act, 2002<\/a>, has been made out against the Appellants herein that would require an investigation to be initiated by the DG.<\/span><\/p>\n

Is Facebook a proper party?<\/p>\n

The Court found merit in the submission of CCI that one of the key issues with the 2021 Policy is its propensity to share the data of its users with Facebook Inc., the parent company of WhatsApp. Solely for the reason that the policies itself do not emanate out of Facebook Inc., the Appellant cannot hide behind the fact that it is the direct and immediate beneficiary of the data sharing mechanism envisaged by the policies. Thus, Facebook is the entity from which the policy under challenge emanates thus making it proper to be a party to the proceedings.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court did not find it appropriate to scuttle the investigation at a nascent stage. However, it granted liberty to the applicant to take all such steps as required by it, in accordance with law, to impugn the CCI Order.<\/p>\n

[WhatsApp LLC v. Competition Commission of India, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 2582<\/a>, decided on 25-08-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For LPA 163\/2021 & CM APPLs. 15908\/2021, 16893\/2021, 18800\/2021, 18910\/2021, 46058\/2021, 46059\/2021, 46655\/2021<\/span><\/p>\n

Counsel for WHATSAPP LLC: Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tejas Karia, Mr. Shashank Mishra, Ms Supritha Prodaturi and Mr. Shashank Mishra, Advocates<\/p>\n

For CCI: Mr. N. Venkataraman, ASG with Mr.V. Chandrashekara Bharathi, Ms.Amritha Chandramouli, Mr. S. Ram Narayan, Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr.Madhav Gupta, Mr. Vedant Kapur, Advocates for R-1. Ms Binsy Susan, Ms. Anjali Kumar, Mr. Shyamal Anand and Mr. Vishesh Sharma, Advocates for Meta Platforms Inc. Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Yaman Verma, Mr. Swati Aggarwal and Ms. Mishika Bajpai, Advocates for Facebook India in CM APPL. 40334\/2021.<\/p>\n

For LPA 164\/2021 & CM APPLs. 15931\/2021, 18798\/2021, 18912\/2021, 40334\/2021, 40335\/2021, 46656\/2021<\/b><\/p>\n

Counsel for FACEBOOK INC: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sweta Shroff Chopra, Mr. Gauhar Mirza and Ms. Nitika Dwivedi, Advocates.<\/p>\n

For CCI: Mr. Balbir Singh, ASG with Ms. Monica Benjamin, Ms. Anu Sura, Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr. Madhav Gupta, Mr. Vedant Kapur, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Varun Pathak, Mr. Mitali Daryani, Mr. Yash Karunakaran and Ms. Vani Kaushik, Advocates for R-2 Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Yaman Verma and Ms. Mishika Bajpai, Advocates for Facebook India in CM APPL. 40334\/2021.<\/p>\n

\n

*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this report together.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Parallel inquiries by two different authorities in their respective spheres of adjudication are not uncommon and a slight overlap between the inquiries does not mean that one must lead to the ouster of the other.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":268833,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[51258,2505,2543,3871,2583,2554,51259,30617,51260,51261,32307,51262,16151],"class_list":["post-272479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-anti-competetive-practises","tag-Competition_Commission_of_India","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-facebook","tag-Investigation","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-meta-platforms","tag-prima-facie","tag-privacy-policy","tag-resjudicata","tag-terms-of-service","tag-terms-of-service-and-privacy","tag-whatsapp"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi High Court upholds CCI's direction to investigate alleged anti-competitive WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, 2021; Prima facie case established to investigate; FB a proper party | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The appeals were filed by WhatsApp (\u2018Appellant') and its parent company Facebook (\u2018Appellant') challenging the jurisdiction of Competition\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court upholds CCI's direction to investigate alleged anti-competitive WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, 2021; Prima facie case established to investigate; FB a proper party\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The appeals were filed by WhatsApp (\u2018Appellant') and its parent company Facebook (\u2018Appellant') challenging the jurisdiction of Competition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-08-27T10:50:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court upholds CCI's direction to investigate alleged anti-competitive WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, 2021; Prima facie case established to investigate; FB a proper party | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-08-27T10:50:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The appeals were filed by WhatsApp (\u2018Appellant') and its parent company Facebook (\u2018Appellant') challenging the jurisdiction of Competition\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court upholds CCI’s direction to investigate alleged anti-competitive WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, 2021; Prima facie case established to investigate; FB a proper party\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court upholds CCI's direction to investigate alleged anti-competitive WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, 2021; Prima facie case established to investigate; FB a proper party | SCC Times","description":"The appeals were filed by WhatsApp (\u2018Appellant') and its parent company Facebook (\u2018Appellant') challenging the jurisdiction of Competition","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court upholds CCI's direction to investigate alleged anti-competitive WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, 2021; Prima facie case established to investigate; FB a proper party","og_description":"The appeals were filed by WhatsApp (\u2018Appellant') and its parent company Facebook (\u2018Appellant') challenging the jurisdiction of Competition","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-08-27T10:50:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/","name":"Delhi High Court upholds CCI's direction to investigate alleged anti-competitive WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, 2021; Prima facie case established to investigate; FB a proper party | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-08-27T10:50:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The appeals were filed by WhatsApp (\u2018Appellant') and its parent company Facebook (\u2018Appellant') challenging the jurisdiction of Competition","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/delhi-high-court-upholds-competition-commission-india-direction-investigation-anticompetitive-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-policy-terms-of-service-competition-law-overlapping-jurisdiction-legalnews-legal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court upholds CCI’s direction to investigate alleged anti-competitive WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, 2021; Prima facie case established to investigate; FB a proper party"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":246200,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/whatsapp-policy-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":272479,"position":0},"title":"CCI | No \u2018opt-out’ option for WhatsApp users in the 2021 Update. Why? Data Sharing with Facebook, Unilateral terms and more. Read CCI’s take on WhatsApp\u2019s conduct in the garb of the policy update","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): The coram comprising of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi (Members) while addressing a very interesting matter with respect to WhatsApp\u2019s updated policy, expressed that: \u201c\u2026in a data driven ecosystem, the competition law needs to examine whether the excessive data\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224190,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/13\/clipping-the-dgs-and-ccis-investigative-power-recent-trends\/","url_meta":{"origin":272479,"position":1},"title":"Clipping The DG\u2019s and CCI\u2019s Investigative Power: Recent Trends","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Dhruv Rajain, Principle Associate,\u00a0 Siddhant Khetawat, Associate and Shreya Joshi, Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas\u00a0 Cite as: (2020) PL (Comp. L) January 75","rel":"","context":"In "Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas"","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":89461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/02\/privacy-matters-the-case-of-whatsapps-new-privacy-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":272479,"position":2},"title":"Privacy Matters!! The Case of WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy","author":"Saba","date":"December 2, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By Sourav Dan*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/fb-post.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/fb-post.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/fb-post.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/fb-post.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/fb-post.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":41071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":272479,"position":3},"title":"CCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While upholding the jurisdiction of Competition Commission of India (CCI) to entertain complaints regarding abuse of dominance of Patent Rights, the Court dismissed a challenge by Ericsson to two orders passed by CCI to look into allegations of abuse of market dominance. In order to confirm regularity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":345649,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/11\/7th-tnnlu-national-antitrust-moot-court-competition-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":272479,"position":4},"title":"7th TNNLU National Antitrust Moot Court Competition, 2025","author":"Student Reporter","date":"April 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Welcome to the Land of Cholas, Tiruchirappalli! The Tamil Nadu National Law University (TNNLU), through its Moot Court Committee in collaboration with the Centre for Competition Law (CCL), and Eastern Book Company is proud to present the 7th edition of the TNNLU National Antitrust Moot Court Competition at its Tiruchirappalli\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Law School News"","block_context":{"text":"Law School News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/lawschoolnews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-11-at-21.44.15_1acfa53e.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-11-at-21.44.15_1acfa53e.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-11-at-21.44.15_1acfa53e.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-11-at-21.44.15_1acfa53e.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-11-at-21.44.15_1acfa53e.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":359805,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/11\/supreme-court-upholds-direction-to-investigate-offences-by-former-cbi-officers\/","url_meta":{"origin":272479,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Matter hasn’t been allowed to be investigated\u2019; Supreme Court upholds direction to investigate alleged offences by former CBI officers in 2000","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is cardinal in law that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done. It is high time that sometimes those who investigate must also be investigated to keep alive the faith of the public at large in the system\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"investigate offences by former CBI officers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/investigate-offences-by-former-CBI-officers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/investigate-offences-by-former-CBI-officers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/investigate-offences-by-former-CBI-officers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/investigate-offences-by-former-CBI-officers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=272479"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272479\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268833"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=272479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=272479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=272479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}