{"id":271885,"date":"2022-08-19T09:00:01","date_gmt":"2022-08-19T03:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=271885"},"modified":"2022-08-18T16:40:29","modified_gmt":"2022-08-18T11:10:29","slug":"2022-scc-vol-7-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

\n

Army Act, 1950<\/a> — Ss. 125<\/a>, 126<\/a>, 69<\/a>, 3(ii)<\/a> and 70<\/a> — Criminal trial — Concurrent jurisdiction of court martial under Army Act and criminal courts under CrPC<\/b>: When Designated Officer\/Commanding Officer impliedly declined to exercise discretion to conduct trial in court martial. Trial by criminal court under CrPC, held, mandatory. In a case of concurrent jurisdiction, when court martial has impliedly declined to conduct trial, criminal court cannot direct the court martial to do the same. [State of Sikkim<\/i> v. Jasbir Singh<\/i>, (2022) 7 SCC 287<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> — Or. 41<\/a> R. 27<\/a> — Admissibility of additional evidence in appellate court not adduced in the court of original jurisdiction<\/b>: Admissibility of additional evidence under Or. 41<\/a> R. 27<\/a> CPC<\/a> does not depend upon the relevancy of the issue on hand, or whether the applicant had an opportunity for adducing such evidence at an earlier stage or not, but it depends upon whether or not appellate court requires the evidence sought to be adduced to enable it to pronounce judgment or for any other substantial cause. That is, whether such additional evidence has a direct bearing on pronouncement of the judgment. [Sanjay Kumar Singh<\/i> v. State of Jharkhand<\/i>, (2022) 7 SCC 247<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Constitution of India<\/a> — Arts. 21<\/a>, 32<\/a> and 226<\/a> — Constitutional\/Public Law Torts\/Public Safety — Violation of life and personal liberty<\/b>: Where life and personal liberty have been violated, absence of any applicable statutory provision(s) for compensation is of no consequence. Right to life guaranteed under Art. 21 is the most sacred right preserved and protected under the Constitution, violation of which is always actionable and there is no necessity of any statutory provision as such for preserving that right. Thus, a writ petition seeking compensation is maintainable. Furthermore, Art. 21 has to be read into all public safety statutes, since prime object of public safety legislation is to protect individual and to compensate him for loss suffered. Duty of care expected from State or its officials functioning under public safety legislation is very high. [Sanjay Gupta<\/i> v. State of U.P<\/i>., (2022) 7 SCC 203<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Constitution of India<\/a> — Arts. 300-A<\/a> and 226<\/a> — Right to property<\/b>: Deprivation of property can only be permitted when and to the extent it is strictly in compliance with applicable law. Land reserved for public purpose under Town Planning law. Lapse of acquisition due to inaction of executive to acquire land within prescribed statutory time period cannot be interfered with by Court contrary to scheme of the applicable statute. [Laxmikant<\/i> v. State of Maharashtra<\/i>, (2022) 7 SCC 252<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Education Law — Professional Colleges\/Education — Medical and Dental Colleges — Reservation of seats\/Quota\/Exemption\/Priority in Medical\/Dental Institutions<\/b>: In this case, directions were issued to implement roster point-based reservation for preferential candidates as followed by JIPMER in all AIIMS institutes. However, roster points need not be similar to that of JIPMER. This order directed to be applicable for admission from year 2022. Students Assn. [AIIMS<\/i> v. AIIMS<\/i>, (2022) 7 SCC 201<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> — Ss. 8<\/a>, 9<\/a>, 5(20)<\/a>, 5(21)<\/a>, 3(6)<\/a> and 3(12)<\/a> — Procurer\/purchaser of services\/goods from corporate debtor by rendering advance payments to it — Consideration of, as operational creditor<\/b>: Debt arising from a contract in relation to supply of goods\/services by corporate debtor amounts to “operational debt”. [Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd.<\/i> v. Hitro Energy Solutions (P) Ltd<\/i>., (2022) 7 SCC 164<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Land Acquisition Act, 1894<\/a> — S. 23<\/a> — Compensation awarded in another proceeding<\/b>: Extent to which compensation awarded in another proceeding may be relied on, all relevant factors and necessity of consideration of it, explained. [LAO<\/i> v. N. Savitha<\/i>, (2022) 7 SCC 256<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002<\/a> — S. 35<\/a> r\/w Ss. 13(2)<\/a>, 13(4)<\/a> and 2(1)(zc) to (zf)<\/a> — Dues of secured creditor, priority of, over dues of Central Excise Department<\/b>: Dues of secured creditor over the properties of assessee have priority over dues of Central Excise Department. Prior to insertion of S. 11-E<\/a> of the Central Excise Act, 1944<\/a> there was no provision in the 1944 Act inter alia providing for first charge on the property of the assessee or any person under the 1944 Act. Further, S. 35 of the SARFAESI Act inter alia provides that the provisions of the SARFAESI Act shall have overriding effect on all other laws. Also, even the provisions contained in S. 11-E<\/a> of the Central Excise Act<\/a> are subject to the provisions contained in the SARFAESI Act. [Punjab National Bank<\/i> v. Union of India<\/i>, (2022) 7 SCC 260<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Army Act, 1950 — Ss. 125, 126, 69, 3(ii) and 70 — Criminal trial — Concurrent jurisdiction of court martial <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":267145,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[13631,48678,8331,39496,3260,7601,48567,30361,22064,31387,14531,35513],"class_list":["post-271885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-army-act","tag-army-act-1950","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-civil-procedure-code-1908","tag-Constitution","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-education-law","tag-ibc","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016","tag-land-acquisition-act","tag-land-acquisition-act-1894"],"yoast_head":"\n2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"When Designated Officer\/Commanding Officer impliedly declined to exercise discretion to conduct trial in court martial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When Designated Officer\/Commanding Officer impliedly declined to exercise discretion to conduct trial in court martial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-08-19T03:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-08-19T03:30:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"When Designated Officer\/Commanding Officer impliedly declined to exercise discretion to conduct trial in court martial\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"SCC Part\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2 | SCC Times","description":"When Designated Officer\/Commanding Officer impliedly declined to exercise discretion to conduct trial in court martial","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2","og_description":"When Designated Officer\/Commanding Officer impliedly declined to exercise discretion to conduct trial in court martial","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-08-19T03:30:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","name":"2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-08-19T03:30:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"When Designated Officer\/Commanding Officer impliedly declined to exercise discretion to conduct trial in court martial","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"SCC Part"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":262179,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/22\/explained-does-army-act-provide-lesser-punishment-even-for-serious-offences-is-a-person-not-tried-by-court-martial-but-by-a-criminal-court-at-a-disadvantageous-position\/","url_meta":{"origin":271885,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Does Army Act provide lesser punishment even for serious offences? Is a person not tried by Court Martial but by a Criminal Court at a disadvantageous position?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where it was argued before the bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud* and Surya Kant, JJ that in case the trial is conducted by the ordinary criminal court and not a court-martial under the Army Act, the accused would not be able to avail the benefit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Does-Army-Act-provide-lesser-punishment-even-for-serious-offences-Is-a-person-not-tried-by-Court-Martial-but-by-a-Criminal-Court-at-a-disadvantageous-position.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Does-Army-Act-provide-lesser-punishment-even-for-serious-offences-Is-a-person-not-tried-by-Court-Martial-but-by-a-Criminal-Court-at-a-disadvantageous-position.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Does-Army-Act-provide-lesser-punishment-even-for-serious-offences-Is-a-person-not-tried-by-Court-Martial-but-by-a-Criminal-Court-at-a-disadvantageous-position.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Does-Army-Act-provide-lesser-punishment-even-for-serious-offences-Is-a-person-not-tried-by-Court-Martial-but-by-a-Criminal-Court-at-a-disadvantageous-position.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Does-Army-Act-provide-lesser-punishment-even-for-serious-offences-Is-a-person-not-tried-by-Court-Martial-but-by-a-Criminal-Court-at-a-disadvantageous-position.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280316,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/26\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":271885,"position":1},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 4","author":"Editor","date":"December 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 12 R. 6 \u2014 Grant of relief on the basis of admission \u2014 When permissible: Grant of such relief is discretionary in nature. Requirements for exercise of such power, namely: specific, clear and categorical admission of facts and documents on record are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":270530,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/22\/2022-scc-vol-6-part-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":271885,"position":2},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 6 Part 4","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Administrative Law \u2014 Administrative Appeal, Review or Revision \u2014 Appeal to State Authorities \u2014 Right to appeal \u2014 Choice of forum: Party having right of appeal does not have corresponding right to insist upon consideration of appeal by forum no longer in existence, when such appeal can be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SCC Part","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278049,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/25\/madras-high-court-petition-under-section-482-crpc-challenging-a-proceeding-under-section-12-of-the-dv-act-is-not-maintainable-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":271885,"position":3},"title":"Madras High Court| Petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging a proceeding under Section 12 of the D.V. Act is not maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"November 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In 32 cases regarding domestic violence filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), the full bench of P.N. Prakash ,Teekaa Raman and A.D Jagadish Chandira, JJ. held a petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging a proceeding under Section 12 of the D.V. Act is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":349176,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/30\/position-of-delinquents-facing-proceedings-under-part-iii-of-the-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-in-cheque-bouncing-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":271885,"position":4},"title":"Position of Delinquents Facing Proceedings under Part III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in Cheque Bouncing Cases","author":"Editor","date":"May 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Pallav Saxena*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Insolvency Cheque bouncing","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-30T150705.144.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-30T150705.144.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-30T150705.144.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-30T150705.144.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281220,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/09\/2023-scc-vol-1-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":271885,"position":5},"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 1 Part 1","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 33 \u2014 Power of modification of award under \u2014 Scope of: Award can be modified only to the extent of correcting arithmetical and\/or clerical error without any material changes. [Gyan Prakash Arya v. Titan Industries Ltd., (2023) 1 SCC 153] Criminal Procedure Code,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-530.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271885"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271885\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/267145"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}