{"id":271413,"date":"2022-08-09T12:00:07","date_gmt":"2022-08-09T06:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=271413"},"modified":"2022-08-12T09:49:18","modified_gmt":"2022-08-12T04:19:18","slug":"punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/","title":{"rendered":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n

Punjab and Haryana High Court<\/span>: Alka Sarin, J., dismissed the revision petition filed under Article 227<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> to set aside the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge vide which the application for appointment was dismissed on the ground that the order refusing appointment does not decide any issue nor does it adjudicate rights of the parties.<\/p>\n

Facts:<\/p>\n

The plaintiff filed a suit for a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering in his peaceful possession and cultivation of the suit’s land. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9<\/a> of the Civil Code, 1908<\/a> for the appointment of a Local Commissioner for bringing on record the existing position of the suit’s property.<\/p>\n

The defendant- respondent contested that the application was filed just to delay the proceedings. It was also argued that there was no locus standi and cause of action to file the application.<\/p>\n

Hereafter, the application was dismissed and the plaintiff- petitioner sought revision of the said order.<\/p>\n

Issue:<\/p>\n

Is Revision maintainable against an order dismissing an application for the appointment of a Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code, 1908?<\/p>\n

Observation and Analysis:<\/p>\n

The Court relied on the judgment of Pritam Singh<\/i> v. Sunder Lal<\/i> [1990(2) PLR 191] where it was held that refusing to appoint a Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code, 1908, has nothing to do with the rights of the parties. It is the discretion of the Court to appoint a Commission, then no right of any party can be said to be prejudiced as such.<\/p>\n

The Court held that there is no illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge.<\/p>\n

The Court further held that no revision will be maintainable against an order dismissing an application for the appointment of a Local Commissioner as it does not decide any issue nor does it adjudicate any rights of the parties for the purpose of the suit.<\/p>\n

[Harchand v. Karambir Singh, 2022 SCC OnLine P&H 1777,<\/a> decided on 18-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Balraj Gujjar, Advocate, for the Petitioner.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Alka Sarin, J., dismissed the revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution to set aside <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":269629,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8331,46089,35055,2809,45626],"class_list":["post-271413","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-local-commissioner","tag-order-26-rule-9-cpc","tag-revision","tag-rights-of-parties"],"yoast_head":"\nPunjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"the plaintiff filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Civil Code, 1908 for the appointment of a Local Commissioner\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"the plaintiff filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Civil Code, 1908 for the appointment of a Local Commissioner\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-08-09T06:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-12T04:19:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/\",\"name\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-08-09T06:30:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-12T04:19:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"the plaintiff filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Civil Code, 1908 for the appointment of a Local Commissioner\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available | SCC Times","description":"the plaintiff filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Civil Code, 1908 for the appointment of a Local Commissioner","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available","og_description":"the plaintiff filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Civil Code, 1908 for the appointment of a Local Commissioner","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-08-09T06:30:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-08-12T04:19:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/","name":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-08-09T06:30:07+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-12T04:19:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"the plaintiff filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Civil Code, 1908 for the appointment of a Local Commissioner","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Punjab and Haryana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":167814,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/09\/revision-petition-order-dismissing-application-appointment-local-commissioner-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":271413,"position":0},"title":"Revision petition against the order dismissing application for appointment of Local Commissioner is not maintainable","author":"Saba","date":"November 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Recently before the High Court, a revision petition was filed against the order passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Meham, District Rohtak, dismissing the application for appointment of the Local Commissioner. The lower court had appointed the Local Commissioner to demarcate the suit property\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":309602,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":271413,"position":1},"title":"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: Himachal Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen it is a matter of record that the petitioner had sought amendment in the suit on the ground that during the pendency of the suit, certain part of the suit land stood encroached by the respondent, this pre-supposes that the petitioner was aware of his boundaries.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/hp-hc-provision-to-issue-a-commission-to-make-local-investigation-is-not-a-tool-to-create-evidence-in-favor-of-parties-order-made-under-or-26-r-9-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":271413,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Provision to \u2018issue a Commission to make local investigation\u2019 is not a tool to create evidence in favor of parties; order made under Or. 26 R. 9 set aside","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel, J. entertained a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, where the petitioner had challenged the order passed by the Civil Judge, where the application for appointment of a Revenue Officer as a Local Commissioner under Order 26 Rule\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237734,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/p-court-allows-revision-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":271413,"position":3},"title":"P&H HC | Pending application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC ought to have been decided prior to the decision in the application under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC; Court allows revision petition","author":"Editor","date":"October 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In a revision petition challenging an order passed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC; Raj Mohan Singh, J., allowed the petition while setting the order aside. The present petition arises from the order dated 07-03-2020 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sirsa, vide\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":311102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/10\/cal-hc-allows-revision-application-for-addition-of-parties-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":271413,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court allows revision application for addition of parties; remits for reconsideration pending special officer\u2019s report","author":"Ritu","date":"January 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that court has discretion under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the CPC to add necessary or proper parties for effective adjudication.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/10\/mad-hc-non-service-of-copies-of-plaint-is-not-a-ground-for-converting-a-summary-suit-filed-under-or-37-cpc-into-a-regular-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":271413,"position":5},"title":"Mad HC | Non-service of copies of plaint is not a ground for converting a summary suit filed under Or. 37 CPC into a regular suit","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0V. Bharathidasan, J., dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby the application filed by the petitioner-defendant to convert the original summary suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff under Order 37 CPC into a regular suit was dismissed. The respondent had filed a suit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271413","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271413"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271413\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/269629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271413"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271413"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271413"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}